Skip to content
Plinth

· Public charity

American Postal Workers Union Afl-Cio

Apwu is responsible for the negotiation and implementation of a collective bargaining contract with the usps on behalf of the members of the union and employees in the bargaining unit.

$153k
Granted FY2024still arriving
11
Grants FY2024still arriving
4
States reached
$15k
Largest
01What you fund
01

What you funded, over time

By grantee IRS cause code (NTEE).

A cause breakdown isn’t shown here: 53% of AMERICAN POSTAL WORKERS UNION AFL-CIO’s grantee dollars fall outside its nine largest cause areas, whether because the recipient carries no IRS cause code or because its cause sits in the long tail. A chart would be mostly one residual band and misrepresent the portfolio.

02FY2024 · 11 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

The 11 grants below total $113,725 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $153,330 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $39,605 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k3 grants · $20k
  • $10k–50k8 grants · $94k
$10,000
Median grant
4
States reached
$168M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
NCBCP$15,000
WORKING FAMILIES ORGANIZATION INC$15,000
A PHILIP RANDOLPH INST$12,600
CONGRESSIONAL BLACK CAUCUS$11,000
ECONOMIC POLICY INSTITUTE$10,000
YES FOR FREEDOM TO VOTE BY MAIL$10,000
NATIONAL ACTION NETWORK$10,000
NATIONAL VOTE AT HOME INSTITUTE$10,000
Individual grant recipient$8,950
CBTU$5,675
A PHILIP RANDOLPH MIAMI-DADE CHAPTER$5,500
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, your grants (FY21–24) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 13%. 78% of your dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 13%MAUI AREA LOCAL: $25k → 9%NATIONAL ACTION NETWORK: $10k → 17%WORKING FAMILIES ORGANIZATION INC: $15k → 20%ECONOMIC POLICY INSTITUTE: $10k → 14%A PHILIP RANDOLPH MIAMI-DADE CHAPTER: $6k → 15%UMWA STRIKE AID FUND: $26k → 7%KPWU DISASTER RELIEF FUND: $26k → 16%ECONOMIC POLICY INSTITUTE: $10k → 14%NATIONAL VOTE AT HOME INSTITUTE: $10k → 7%ECONOMIC POLICY INSTITUTE: $10k → 14%NATIONAL VOTE AT HOME INSTITUTE: $10k → 7%ECONOMIC POLICY INSTITUTE: $10k → 14%PROGRESSIVE CONGRESSIONAL CAUCUS CENTER: $10k → 14%AMERICANS FOR FINANCIAL REFORM: $20k → 14%NCBCP: $15k → 14%A PHILIP RANDOLPH INST: $13k → 14%NAACP (SEPARATE CHECKS): $12k → 14%UNION COMMUNITY: $10k → 14%CONGRESSIONAL BLACK CAUCUS: $11k → 14%UNION NETWORK INTERNATIONAL: $10k → 14%NCBCP: $10k → 14%A PHILIP RANDOLPH INST: $7k → 14%NCBCP: $10k → 14%DEBS-JONES-DOUGLASS INSTITUTE: $23k → 14%A PHILIP RANDOLPH INST: $7k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

57%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$213k · 6 repeat orgs$164k to everyone else

6 repeat relationships — 5 still active in FY2024, 1 since wound down; 6 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

6
6

Total granted

$213k
$103k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+23%
+26%

Still filing today

100%
50%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 47% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $60k went to new ones.

50%100%’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’21’22’23’24
Public BenefitCivil RightsSocial ScienceEducationOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • UM
    UNITED MINE WORKERS OF AMERICA
    3× · 2022–2024 · $46k · revenue +11%
  • NC
    National Coalition on Black Civic Partic
    3× · 2022–2024 · $35k · revenue +0%
  • CO
    COALITION OF BLACK TRADE UNIONISTS
    4× · 2021–2024 · $33k · revenue +210%

Funded once

  • KD
    KPWU DISASTER RELIEF FUND
    one grant, 2022 · $26k
  • AP
    AMERICAN POSTAL WORKERS UNION
    one grant, 2023 · $25k · 36% of their budget
  • DI
    DEBS-JONES-DOUGLASS INSTITUTE INCgraduated
    one grant, 2021 · $23k · revenue +88%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
American Postal Workers Union Afl-Cio

Apwu is responsible for the negotiation and implementation of a collective bargaining contract with the usps on behalf of the members of the union and employees in the bargaining unit.

2
Communications Workers of America Local 1038

Labor Union

3
California Black Power Network

To change the lived conditions of black Californians by dismantling systemic and anti-black racism. CBPN fulfills this mission by building and protecting Black Political Power through the development of robust policy campaigns and advocacy…

Civil Rights
4
Cincinnati Afl-Cio Labor Council

The mission of the afl-cio is to improve the lives of working families, to bring economic justice to the workplace and social justice to our nation.

5
Congressional Black Caucus Political Edu Cation and Leadership Institute

The congressional black caucus political education leadership institute's mission is to provide political education and training to the next generation of african american leadership.

Civil Rights
6
United Public Service Employees Union Local 424-J

To provide collective bargaining representation to members.

7
American Civil Liberties Union of New Jersey Inc

To promote an defend civil liberties principles.

Civil Rights
8
Contra Costa Labor Council Afl-Cio

The council is a federation of approximately 85 affiliated unions. the organizaton engages in a wide range of activities. the activities are designed to improve the lives of working families, to bring economic justice to the workplace, and…

9
American Workers for Progress

American workers for progress works to ensure that leaders at every level are focused on reducing barriers to job growth and addressing economic challenges to guarantee a better future for all americans.

10
International Union of Operati Engineers Local 101

Negotiating Organization

11
American Federation of Labor & Congress of Industrial Orgs

To organize all workers for the economic, moral and social advancement of their condition and status.

12
International Union of Operating Engineers Local 825ABCDRRH

The work of the union, as the representative of its members, is to provide for the continuous employment of labor, to bring about stable conditions in the industry, and to establish necessary procedures for resolutions of disputes between…

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Congressional Black Caucus Foundation Inc and the most unlike its peers is American Postal Workers Union. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

12 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 12 of the 18 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
12/12
Grantees still filing
7/12
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

UNITED MINE WORKERS OF AMERICA — $46,100 · OtherUNITED MINE WORKERS OF AMERICACOALITION OF BLACK TRADE UNIONISTS — $32,675 · OtherCOALITION OF BLACK TRADE UNIONISTSA PHILIP RANDOLPH INSTITUTE — $26,600 · OtherA PHILIP RANDOLPH INSTITUTEKPWU DISASTER RELIEF FUND — $25,500 · OtherKPWU DISASTER RELIEF FUNDAMERICAN POSTAL WORKERS UNION — $25,165 · OtherAMERICAN POSTAL WORKERS UNIONIndividual grant recipient — $10,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipient — $10,000 · OtherYES FOR FREEDOM TO VOTE BY MAIL — $10,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipient — $8,950 · Other+1 more — $5,500 · OtherNational Coalition on Black Civic Partic — $35,000 · Public BenefitNational Coalition on Blac…Americans for Financial Reform Education Fund — $32,295 · Public BenefitAmericans for Financial Re…NATIONAL ACTION NETWORK INC — $10,000 · Public BenefitNATIONAL ACTION NETWORK IN…CONGRESSIONAL PROGRESSIVE CAUCUS CENTER — $10,000 · Public BenefitCONGRESSIONAL PROGRESSIVE …ECONOMIC POLICY INSTITUTE — $40,000 · Social ScienceECONOMIC POL…WORKING FAMILIES ORGANIZATION INC — $15,000 · Civil RightsCONGRESSIONAL BLACK CAUCUS FOUNDATION INC — $11,000 · Civil RightsDEBS-JONES-DOUGLASS INSTITUTE INC — $22,500 · Education
Other$200,490Public Benefit$87,295Social Science$40,000Civil Rights$26,000Education$22,500

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetUNITED MINE WORKERS OF AMERICA — $46,100 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetECONOMIC POLICY INSTITUTE — $40,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetNational Coalition on Black Civic Partic — $35,000 over 3y, 0.3% of budgetCOALITION OF BLACK TRADE UNIONISTS — $32,675 over 4y, 1.6% of budgetAmericans for Financial Reform Education Fund — $32,295 over 2y, 0.6% of budgetA PHILIP RANDOLPH INSTITUTE — $26,600 over 3y, 1.9% of budgetAMERICAN POSTAL WORKERS UNION — $25,165 over 1y, 36% of budgetDEBS-JONES-DOUGLASS INSTITUTE INC — $22,500 over 1y, 5.2% of budgetWORKING FAMILIES ORGANIZATION INC — $15,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCONGRESSIONAL BLACK CAUCUS FOUNDATION INC — $11,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNATIONAL ACTION NETWORK INC — $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetCONGRESSIONAL PROGRESSIVE CAUCUS CENTER — $10,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Communications Workers of America Afl-Cio ClcDC19.9× affinity7 shared granteesties to 10 of 10Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Communications Workers of America Afl-Cio Clc · United Food and Commercial Workers International Union · United Steel Paper and Forestry Rubber Manufacturing Energy Allied · Tides Foundation · American Federation of Labor and Congress of Industrial Organizations · The Ford Foundation · International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers · Amalgamated Charitable Foundation Inc · New Venture Fund · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization American Postal Workers Union Afl-Cio funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
2021222324
no gov · 00%3%10%23%40%your share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY2024

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 18 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph