Skip to content

Washington, D.C. · Public charity

Partnership to Fight Chronic Disease

Disseminating information to educate members of the public about chronic disease and potential solutions for individuals and communities.

$145k
Granted FY2024(still arriving)
3
Itemized grants FY2024
2
Organizations funded FY2022
50%
First-time grantees FY2022
Read the full brief
Itemized, FY2024
$140k
The rest is grants the schedule does not break out
Median grant, FY2024
$40,000
Largest grant, FY2024
$75,000
Organizations funded a year
1 to 3
FY2017 to FY2022
States reached, FY2024
2
Total assets, FY2024
$1.7M

How open it is to new grantees

In FY2022, 50% of the organizations Partnership to Fight Chronic Disease funded were first-time grantees, receiving 97% of its grant dollars.

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2022, 3% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $1.2M went to new ones.

50%100%’18’19’20’21’22
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’18’19’20’21’22
Public BenefitCommunity ImprovementHealthOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
The numbers by year
Fiscal yearOrganizations fundedTo those organizationsFirst-time grantees
FY2024still arriving3$140k67%
FY20222$1.2M50%
FY20212$50k50%
FY20203$70k67%
FY20193$60k67%
FY20181$35k100%
FY20172$125kn/a
100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Health$1.4MPublic Benefit$255k

Top grantees

Largest recipients by total granted, FY2017 to FY2024, and the share of each one’s budget the grants supplied at peak.

GranteeTotal grantedYearsShare of their budget
Partnership to Fight Infectious Disease$1,168,5001n/a
Governors Cup Foundation Inc$235,000642%
One in Four Chronic Health$105,0001n/a
National Minority Quality Forum Inc$75,00011%
A Philip Randolph Institute$25,00014%
Clark County Medical Society Inc$25,00018%
Hispanics in Politics$20,0001n/a
Council for Affordable Health Coverage$15,00011%
Minority Health Institute$10,00017%
Nevada Public Health Association$5,0001n/a
Show all 11 grantees
All grantees of Partnership to Fight Chronic Disease by total granted
GranteeTotal grantedYearsShare of their budget
Partnership to Fight Infectious Disease$1,168,5001n/a
Governors Cup Foundation Inc$235,000642%
One in Four Chronic Health$105,0001n/a
National Minority Quality Forum Inc$75,00011%
A Philip Randolph Institute$25,00014%
Clark County Medical Society Inc$25,00018%
Hispanics in Politics$20,0001n/a
Council for Affordable Health Coverage$15,00011%
Minority Health Institute$10,00017%
Nevada Public Health Association$5,0001n/a
Institute for Global Health & Health Policy$5,000113%

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a set of overlaps that mostly run through this funder rather than between each other.

Pharmaceutical Research and Manufacturers of AmericaDC13.3× affinity4 shared granteesties to 0 of 0Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Pharmaceutical Research and Manufacturers of America

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Compare Partnership to Fight Chronic Disease with peer funders

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Partnership to Fight Chronic Disease?

Find your warmest path to Partnership to Fight Chronic Disease through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

About Partnership to Fight Chronic Disease

How much does Partnership to Fight Chronic Disease give?
Partnership to Fight Chronic Disease reported 3 itemized grants totaling $140,000, out of $145,000 in total grant expense reported on the return in its FY2024 IRS filing. It funded between 1 and 3 organizations a year over FY2017 to FY2022.
What does Partnership to Fight Chronic Disease fund?
By grant dollars over FY2017 to FY2024, its largest causes are Health (85%), Public Benefit (15%).
Who are Partnership to Fight Chronic Disease's largest grantees?
By total granted over FY2017 to FY2024: Partnership to Fight Infectious Disease ($1.2M), Governors Cup Foundation Inc ($235k), One in Four Chronic Health ($105k).
Does Partnership to Fight Chronic Disease fund new organizations?
In FY2022, 50% of the organizations it funded were first-time grantees.
Which funders back the same organizations as Partnership to Fight Chronic Disease?
Its strongest co-funders, measured against what their size predicts, include Pharmaceutical Research and Manufacturers of America.
Where is Partnership to Fight Chronic Disease based?
Partnership to Fight Chronic Disease is based in DC.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 11 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Partnership to Fight Chronic Disease’s filings →

More from the funding graph