· Public charity
Laborers' Mid-Atlantic Regional Organization Coalition
To plan, develop, and conduct organizing activities within the juriskiction of the signatary labor organizations.
What you funded, over time
By grantee IRS cause code (NTEE).
A cause breakdown isn’t shown here: 91% of LABORERS' MID-ATLANTIC REGIONAL ORGANIZING COALITION’s grantee dollars fall outside its nine largest cause areas, whether because the recipient carries no IRS cause code or because its cause sits in the long tail. A chart would be mostly one residual band and misrepresent the portfolio.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
The 3 grants below total $150,000 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $180,000 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $30,000 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.
By grant size · FY2024
- $10k–50k2 grants · $50k
- $50k–250k1 grant · $100k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| AMERICA WORKS USA | $100,000 |
| MARYLAND SENATE CAUCUS COMMITTEE | $25,000 |
| REAL RESULTS FOR PA | $25,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Dollar for dollar, your grants (FY17–24) land where the poverty rate runs at 16%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 88% of your dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Promoting public service among law school students who attned the university of maryland school of law.
Public awareness, education and research.
To educate
Maryland Workforce Alliance is a nonprofit coalition that unites unions, trade associations, nonprofits, and education institutions with the common goal to strengthen Maryland's workforce and help working people find good jobs that pay a…
We host educational events about the labor movement and working in unionized industries.
Promote civility in political discourse
Please see schedule o
Advocacy
) to lead and engage in campaigns that empower Black workers to advance our rights and improve job quality in key employment sectors
Advocate for progressive policies
Encourage the development of closer economic business and investment ties between the united states and the island of ireland.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Washington Ireland Program for Service & Leadership and the most unlike its peers is Samuel Staten Sr Charitable Trust. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
9 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 9 of the 14 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds AMERICA WORKS USA ↗
- Who funds REAL RESULTS FOR PENNSYLVANIA ↗
- Who funds WASHINGTON IRELAND PROGRAM FOR SERVICE & LEADERSHIP ↗
- Who funds TERENCE J O'SULLIVAN LIUNA CHARITABLE FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds MARYLAND TOGETHER INC ↗
- Who funds SAMUEL STATEN SR CHARITABLE TRUST ↗
- Who funds BUILDING A BETTER MARYLAND FUND ↗
- Who funds A PHILIP RANDOLPH INSTITUTE ↗
- Who funds DC FRIENDS OF IRELAND ↗
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Laborers' Mid-Atlantic Regional Organization Coalition funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.