· Public charity
Pharmaceutical Industry Labor-Management Management Association
The unions and companies of the pharmaceutical industry labor-management association recognize that a strong domestic pharmaceutical industry providing innovative, affordable medicines is vital to the american people and the nation.
What you funded, over time
By grantee IRS cause code (NTEE).
A cause breakdown isn’t shown here: 81% of Pharmaceutical Industry Labor-Management Management Association’s grantee dollars fall outside its nine largest cause areas, whether because the recipient carries no IRS cause code or because its cause sits in the long tail. A chart would be mostly one residual band and misrepresent the portfolio.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
The 5 grants below total $77,500 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $108,650 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $31,150 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| A PHILIP RANDOLPH INSTITUTE | $25,000 |
| The Larc Norcross School | $15,000 |
| CMRAVE | $15,000 |
| Diabetes Research Institute | $12,500 |
| NABTU Conference | $10,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Dollar for dollar, your grants (FY17–24) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 99% of your dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +32% since the first grant, against +26% for the ones you funded once.
8 repeat relationships — 4 still active in FY2024, 4 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 81% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $15k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- APA PHILIP RANDOLPH INSTITUTE8× · 2017–2024 · $110k · revenue +365%
- DRDIABETES RESEARCH INSTITUTE FOUNDATION INC8× · 2017–2024 · $81k · revenue +32%
- CFCENTER FOR MILITARY RECRUITMENT ASSESSMENT AND VETERANS EMPLOYMENT8× · 2017–2024 · $61k · revenue +65%
Funded once
- VAVOTEVETS ACTION FUND INCgraduatedone grant, 2023 · $500k · revenue +234%
- LCLABOR COUNCIL FOR LATIN AMERICAN ADVANCEMENTone grant, 2017 · $15k · revenue -2%
- NYNEW YORKERS AGAINST CORRUPTIONone grant, 2017 · $10k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
The national maintenance agreements policy committee negotiates and administers the national maintenance agreements, a series of collective bargaining agreements utilized by more than 1,700 industrial contractors who employ members of…
To promote unity of action in dealing with employers and to coordinate and consolidate the activities of its various affiliated local unions so they can work in a harmonious and united way.
The metropolitan washington council's mission is to organize in the community in an effort to promote social justice for all working people through the uniting of the labor movement and mobilizing the local community.
To ensure a cooperative effort directed to fully develop and demonstrate the possibilities of workers in building trades, railroad, production, bus and mass transit and shipyard industries of the united states and canada and to protect…
Labor union maintaining and improving the benefit and working conditions of members engaged in the carpentry trade.
To create a better working environment for the construction industry and its members.
Local 563 represents approximately 7,500 construction workers employed in minneapolis, mn, st paul, mn and surrounding areas. its purpose is to organize all workers for the economic, moral and social advancement of their condition and…
All activities conducted by the association are to enable it to:a. establish a better understanding between the members and companies in the construction and related industries.b. foster reasonable and just regulations by governments c.…
The objective of the baltimore-dc metro building and construction trades council are to enlist the voluntary cooperation and support of every eligible local union to the end that wage scales and desirable working conditions may be…
To organize all workers for the economic, moral and social advancement of their condition and status.
The work of the union, as the representative of its members, is to provide for the continuous employment of labor, to bring about stable conditions in the industry, and to establish necessary procedures for resolutions of disputes between…
To organize workers for the moral, economic and social advancement of their condition and status.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is National Coordinating Committee for Multiemployer Plans and the most unlike its peers is National Democratic Club. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
11 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 11 of the 15 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds VOTEVETS ACTION FUND INC ↗
- Who funds A PHILIP RANDOLPH INSTITUTE ↗
- Who funds DIABETES RESEARCH INSTITUTE FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds CENTER FOR MILITARY RECRUITMENT ASSESSMENT AND VETERANS EMPLOYMENT ↗
- Who funds BUILDING AND CONSTRUCTION TRADES DEPARTMENT AFL-CIO ↗
- Who funds National Democratic Club ↗
- Who funds NATIONAL COORDINATING COMMITTEE FOR MULTIEMPLOYER PLANS ↗
- Who funds LARC SCHOOL INC D/B/A THE LARC NORCROSS SCHOOL ↗
- Who funds LABOR COUNCIL FOR LATIN AMERICAN ADVANCEMENT ↗
- Who funds MARYLAND STATE AND DC AFL-CIO ↗
- Who funds SHEET METAL WORKERS' INTERNATIONAL SCHOLARSHIP FUND ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: International Union of Bricklayers & Allied Craftworkers · International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Pharmaceutical Industry Labor-Management Management Association funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Larc School Inc D/B/a the Larc Norcross School — 1% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.