Skip to content

· Private foundation

Zusman Family Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$74k
Granted FY2025still arriving
42
Grants FY2025still arriving
7
States reached
$28k
Largest
01What it funds
0176% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2018 to 2025.

Philanthropy$760kReligion$36kEducation$21kRecreation & Sports$2kArts & Culture$2kHuman Services$1kHealth$959Environment$800Other$0
02FY2025 · 42 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k39 grants · $7k
  • $10k–50k3 grants · $66k
$100
Median grant
7
States reached
$1.9M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Individual grant recipient$28,036
COLUMBUS TORAH ACADEMY$20,000
JDC$18,000
BEACHWOOD KEHILLA$1,156
GREEN ROAD SYNAGOGUE$800
Individual grant recipient$700
COLUMBUS TORAH ACADEMY$540
JACOB BERMAN COMMUNITY CENTER$482
Individual grant recipient$369
Individual grant recipient$360
THE CLUB OF BOCA POINTE$360
THE CLUB OF BOCA POINTE$360
AF OF ALYN HOSPITAL$360
CHABAD$360
Individual grant recipient$180
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY18–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 15%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%AMIT PURIM: $180 → 17%CHABAD: $360 → 20%BOCA JEWISH CENTER: $8k → 11%JDC: $45k → 12%COLUMBUS JEWISH FOUNDATION: $280k → 15%CONGREGATION NETIVOT SHALOM: $616 → 7%UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND HILLEL: $5k → 11%BOCA JEWISH CENTER: $2k → 11%SERIOUS FUN: $120 → 9%JDC: $18k → 12%COLUMBUS JEWISH FOUNDATION: $275k → 15%UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND HILLEL: $180 → 11%THE CLUB OF BOCA POINTE: $990 → 11%JDC: $10k → 12%COLUMBUS JEWISH FOUNDATION: $200k → 15%CLEVELAND JEWISH FEDERATION: $28k → 17%UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND HILLEL: $118 → 11%THE CLUB OF BOCA POINTE: $360 → 11%TORAH EMES: $800 → 15%BEACHWOOD KEHILLA: $10k → 17%THE CLUB OF BOCA POINTE: $360 → 11%TORAT EMET SYNAGOGUE: $700 → 15%JEWISH FEDERATION CLEVELAND: $4k → 17%BOCA JEWISH CENTER: $300 → 11%CONGREGATION TORAT EMET: $212 → 15%PLAYHOUSE SQUARE FOUNDATION: $1k → 17%BOCA JEWISH CENTER: $200 → 11%TORAT EMET SYNAGOGUE: $125 → 15%BEACHWOOD KEHILLA: $1k → 17%BOCA RATON SYNAGOGUE: $130 → 11%TORAH EMES: $125 → 15%BEACHWOOD KEHILLA: $1k → 17%AF OF ALYN HOSPITAL: $360 → 17%JEWISH FEDERATION CLEVELAND: $1k → 17%AF OF ALYN HOSPITAL: $360 → 17%MANDEL JCC: $910 → 17%GREEN ROAD SYNANGOGUE: $800 → 17%GREEN ROAD SYNAGOGUE: $800 → 17%GREEN ROAD SYNAGOGE: $750 → 17%BEACHWOOD KEHILLA: $459 → 17%CLEVELAND JEWISH FEDERATION: $360 → 17%GREEN ROAD SYNAGOGUE: $185 → 17%COLUMBUS TORAH ACADEMY: $20k → 15%COLUMBUS TORAH ACADEMY: $540 → 15%COLOMBUS TOR ACADEMY: $360 → 15%COLUMBUS TORAH ACADAMEY: $360 → 15%BOCA RATON SYNAGOGUE: $2k → 11%YOUNG ISRAEL OF GREATER CLEVELAND: $267 → 17%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

NY
MA
OH
NJ
CT
CA
MD
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

78%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$130k · 12 repeat orgs$38k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +44% since the first grant, against +13% for those funded once.

12 repeat relationships: 11 still active in FY2025, 1 since wound down; 13 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

12
25

Total granted

$130k
$7k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+44%
+13%

Still filing today

8%
16%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 58% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $31k went to new ones.

50%100%’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
InternationalHuman ServicesEducationReligionHealthArts & CultureOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • J
    JDC
    2× · 2024–2025 · $73k
  • CT
    COLUMBUS TORAH ACADEMY
    2× · 2022–2025 · $21k · revenue +44%
  • BK
    BEACHWOOD KEHILLA
    4× · 2021–2025 · $13k

Funded once

  • PS
    Playhouse Square Foundation
    one grant, 2023 · $1k · revenue -8%
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2024 · $961
  • MJ
    MANDEL JCC
    one grant, 2022 · $910
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
The Jewish Foundation of Cincinnati
Philanthropy
2
Jewish Life Foundation
—
3
University of Judaism Foundation
—
4
Chevras Shabbos Kodesh Podcast Fellowship
Religion
5
Eastern European Jewish Heritage Foundation
Philanthropy
6
Sherit Isroel
—
7
Foundation for Cincinnati Jewish Seniors formerly Jewish Home of Cincinnati Inc
Health
8
The Jerusalem Connection
—
9
JewishColumbus

Make Jewish life vibrant, accessible and secure in Columbus, Israel and around the world.

Religion
10
Delegation of Jewish American Students (Dojas)
—
11
Yeshiva Ohr Yisroel
Philanthropy
12
Partners in Torah of Cleveland Inc

To offer all Jews, regardless of affiliation, the opportunity to discover the Torah at their pace and schedule.

Human Services
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Hebrew Academy of Cleveland; the most unlike its peers is Playhouse Square Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

10 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 10 of the 53 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
10/10
Grantees still filing
6/10
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Columbus Jewish Foundation: $755,000 · PhilanthropyColumbus Jewish Foundation+1 more: $4,600 · PhilanthropyJDC: $72,500 · OtherJDCIndividual grant recipient: $28,496 · OtherIndividual grant …BEACHWOOD KEHILLA: $12,829 · OtherBEACHWOOD KEHILLABOCA JEWISH CENTER: $9,951 · OtherBOCA JEWISH CENTE…UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND HILLEL: $5,698 · Other+39 more: $16,071 · Other+39 moreCOLUMBUS TORAH ACADEMY: $20,900 · EducationPlayhouse Square Foundation: $1,200 · Arts & CultureJEWISH NATIONAL FUND-USA INC: $100 · InternationalNE EMAN FOUNDATION USA: $19 · InternationalPARTNERS IN TORAH: $100 · ReligionCHAI LIFELINE INC: $36 · HealthBIKUR CHOLIM OF CLEVELAND: $36 · Human Services
Philanthropy$759,600Other$145,545Education$20,900Arts & Culture$1,200International$119Religion$100Health$36Human Services$36

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetColumbus Jewish Foundation: $755,000 over 3y, 2.2% of budgetCOLUMBUS TORAH ACADEMY: $20,900 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetJEWISH FEDERATION OF CLEVELAND: $4,600 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPlayhouse Square Foundation: $1,200 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPARTNERS IN TORAH: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetJEWISH NATIONAL FUND-USA INC: $100 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetCHAI LIFELINE INC: $36 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBIKUR CHOLIM OF CLEVELAND: $36 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHEBREW ACADEMY OF CLEVELAND: $18 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds Columbus Jewish Foundation ↗
  • Who funds COLUMBUS TORAH ACADEMY ↗
  • Who funds JEWISH FEDERATION OF CLEVELAND ↗
  • Who funds Playhouse Square Foundation ↗
  • Who funds PARTNERS IN TORAH ↗
  • Who funds JEWISH NATIONAL FUND-USA INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Irving I Stone FoundationOH15.7× affinity5 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Irving I Stone Foundation · Marla & Joseph Shafran Foundation · Jewish Federation of Cleveland · The Ojc Fund · The Teri and Dan German Family Foundation Inc · Jay and Jean Schottenstein Foundation · Jewish Communal Fund · Raymond James Charitable Endowment Fund · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · National Philanthropic Trust · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Zusman Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Zusman Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 20%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    2get no government money at all
    4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Zusman Family Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to Zusman Family Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 53 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Zusman Family’s filings →

    More from the funding graph