Skip to content
Zumiez Foundation at a glanceAlso receives grants: funding profile →

· Private foundation

Zumiez Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$140k
Granted FY2025still arriving
110
Grants FY2025still arriving
45
States reached
$3k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
05Through PlinthRead
01What it funds
0197% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2025.

Human Services$1.6MHousing & Shelter$995kReligion$390kEducation$285kYouth Development$275kFood & Nutrition$153kCommunity Improvement$151kHealth$113kOther$0
02FY2025 · 110 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$1,299
Median grant
45
States reached
$51k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
CATHOLIC COMMUNITY SERVICES OF WESTERN WASHINGTON$2,969
GOOD WORKS MOVEMENT$2,544
CATHOLIC COMMUNITY SERVICES OF UTAH$2,078
CRADLES TO CRAYONS - BOSTON$1,725
SHARE INC$1,673
COMPASS HOUSING ALLIANCE$1,673
COCOON HOUSE$1,673
BROOKLYN CENTER COMMUNITY SCHOOLS$1,587
NEW BEGINNINGS$1,587
CATHOLIC CHARITIES OF THE DIOCESE OF ST CLOUD (PROGRAM CATHOLIC CHARITIES$1,587
NORTHLANDS RESCUE MISSION$1,582
YOUTHWORKS$1,582
COMMUNITY COUNCIL OF IDAHO INC-BLACKFOOT$1,582
THE NEXT DOOR$1,582
CHRIST THE KING PARISH AND SCHOOL$1,561
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY20–25, $1.1M) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 78% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%CRADLES TO CRAYONS - BOSTON: $8k → 8%COMMUNITY COUNCIL OF IDAHO: $21k → 11%THE VILLAGE FAMILY SERVICES: $10k → 14%THE CENTER FOR YOUTH: $8k → 14%SANCTUARY FOR FAMILIES: $9k → 17%COVENANT HOUSE TEXAS: $7k → 16%STEELBRIDGE MINISTRIES: $13k → 14%RISE HOUSE ARKANSAS: $10k → 15%WICHITA CHILDREN'S HOME: $7k → 16%COVENANT HOUSE MISSOURI: $10k → 21%COMMUNITY CLOTHES CLOSET: $13k → 6%VINA MOSES CENTER: $19k → 18%CHRISTIANS UNITED OUTREACH CENTER OF LEE COUNTY: $18k → 16%LIGHTHOUSE YOUTH SERVICES INC: $11k → 16%SHOES AND CLOTHES FOR KIDS: $27k → 17%COMMUNITY ACTION OF SKAGIT COUNTY: $17k → 11%CHILDREN'S HOME SOCIETY OF WEST VIRGINIA: $9k → 18%MISSISSIPPI COATS 4 KIDZ: $19k → 31%YOUTHWORKS: $10k → 10%LOVING ARMS INC: $8k → 11%NEW BEGINNINGS INC: $12k → 13%COMMUNITY COUNCIL OF IDAHO: $8k → 11%SISU YOUTH SERVICES: $7k → 16%VINA MOSES CENTER: $12k → 18%COMMUNITY ACTION OF SKAGIT COUNTY: $9k → 11%BLUE SKIES FOR CHILDREN: $12k → 12%CHILDREN'S HOME SOCIETY OF WEST VIRGINIA: $23k → 18%BILL WILSON CENTER: $13k → 8%CLARA WHITE MISSION: $10k → 14%COMMUNITY OUTREACH INC: $9k → 18%MISSISSIPPI COATS4KIDZ: $11k → 25%BLUE SKIES FOR CHILDREN: $7k → 12%CATHOLIC SOCIAL SERVICES: $20k → 10%PREBLE STREET: $7k → 7%PRISM: $28k → 11%THE DETROIT PHOENIX CENTER: $10k → 21%SBCS (FORMERLY SOUTH BAY COMMUNITY SERVICES): $16k → 11%PATCHOGUE MEDFORD YOUTH AND COMMUNITY SERVICES: $8k → 7%EL PROGRAMA HISPANO CATOLICO: $19k → 12%STREET TEENS: $18k → 13%PRISM: $7k → 11%SBCS (FORMERLY SOUTH BAY COMMUNITY SERVICES): $11k → 11%EL PROGRAMA HISPANO: $8k → 12%AMERICAN INDIAN COMMUNITY CWENTER: $15k → 12%THE ROAD HOME: $8k → 8%EVERETT GOSPEL MISSION: $8k → 9%THE ROAD HOME: $8k → 8%CATHOLIC COMMUNITY SERVICES OF WESTERN WASHINGTON - KING COUNTY: $14k → 9%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

AK
ME
VT
NH
WA
ID
MT
ND
MN
IL
WI
MI
NY
MA
OR
NV
WY
SD
IA
IN
OH
PA
NJ
CT
RI
CA
UT
CO
NE
MO
KY
WV
VA
MD
DE
AZ
NM
KS
AR
TN
NC
SC
DC
HI
OK
LA
MS
AL
GA
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

64%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$2.9M · 172 repeat orgs$1.6M to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +19% since the first grant, against +19% for those funded once.

172 repeat relationships: 103 still active in FY2025, 69 since wound down; 7 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

172
254

Total granted

$2.9M
$1.6M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+19%
+19%

Still filing today

69%
38%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 94% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $8k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesHousing & ShelterHealthCrime & LegalEducationCommunity ImprovementOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • NA
    Native American Heritage Association
    5× · 2020–2025 · $55k · revenue +53%
  • TN
    THE NEXT DOOR INC
    5× · 2020–2025 · $50k · revenue +99%
  • CC
    CATHOLIC CHARITIES OF FAIRFIELD COUNTY INC
    5× · 2020–2025 · $48k · revenue +46%

Funded once

  • LS
    LANSING SCHOOL DISTRICT
    one grant, 2022 · $28k
  • SA
    SHOES AND CLOTHES FOR KIDS
    one grant, 2022 · $27k · revenue -36%
  • SC
    SBCS CORPORATION
    one grant, 2022 · $27k · revenue -28%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Shelter House Community Shelter and Transition Services

Through shelter and housing, advocacy and supportive services, our mission is to prevent and end homelessness in our community.

—
2
Covenant House Washington Dc

Covenant house washington, dc ("chw") provides shelter, crisis care, community services, and outreach services to youth in the washington dc area.

Human Services
3
The San Francisco Particular Council of the Society of St Vincent De Paul

The mission of the st. vincent de paul society of san francisco (svdp-sf) is to offer hope and service on a direct person-to-person basis, working to break the cycles of homelessness and domestic violence.

Human Services
4
Family Housing Network of Fort Collins Inc

Faith Family Hospitality's mission is to support families experiencing homelessness to achieve sustainable self-sufficiency in a timely and dignified manner. This interfaith volunteer effort coordinates the work of 30 diverse Fort Collins…

Human Services
5
Covenant House California

Covenant house is dedicated to serving all of god's children with absolute respect and unconditional love to help youth experiencing homelessness and to protect and safeguard all youth in need.

Human Services
6
Community Human Services Corporation

Chs empowers individuals and families to live in stable housing, connect to community resources, build relationships and access quality food.

Human Services
7
Covenant House

In 34 cities across five countries, covenant house builds bridges to hope for young people facing homelessness and survivors of human trafficking. we meet their immediate needs for food, clothing, protection, and medical and mental health…

Human Services
8
Transition House Inc

Transition house is a human services agency dedicated to preventing and ending domestic violence. the agency provides a continuum of housing resources and holistic support for survivors of violence and their children, as well as prevention…

—
9
Samaritan House Inc

Samaritan House is committed to fostering personal safety, growth, and self-sufficiency in adults and their children through freedom from domestic violence, sexual assault, and human trafficking and removing their risks of homelessness.

Housing & Shelter
10
Rod's House

Rod's house builds authentic connections with young people, supports them in feeling respected and secure in who they are, empowers them to reach their full potential, and positively connects them to the community. rod's house envisions an…

Housing & Shelter
11
Youth Empowerment Shelter

To provide youth in crisis a place of physical and emotional safety while assisting them to build positive relationships and develop their individual potentials.

Youth Development
12
Reach Resource Services

Services to runaway youth

Human Services
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Peace At Home Family Shelter Inc; the most unlike its peers is Westside Interfaith Network. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

222 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 222 of the 433 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
45
Early backer (in before they grew)
217/222
Grantees still filing
167/222
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

+118 more: $2,014,364 · Other+118 moreVINA MOSES WELFARE CENTER INC: $40,202 · Human ServicesPEOPLE RESPONDING IN SOCIAL MINISTRY: $35,859 · Human ServicesCOMMUNITY COUNCIL OF IDAHO INC: $35,596 · Human ServicesCOMMUNITY ACTION OF SKAGIT COUNTY: $33,529 · Human ServicesMISSISSIPPI COATS 4 KIDZ: $33,112 · Human ServicesTHE CHILDREN'S HOME SOCIETY OF WEST VIRGINIA INC: $31,466 · Human Services+45 more: $691,783 · Human Services+45 moreNEVADA PARTNERSHIP FOR HOMELESS YOUTH: $34,215 · Housing & ShelterCOMPASS HOUSING ALLIANCE: $34,102 · Housing & ShelterCOCOON HOUSE: $33,380 · Housing & ShelterCHICAGO COALITION TO END HOMELESSNESS: $28,717 · Housing & ShelterALTERNATIVES FOR GIRLS: $24,111 · Housing & ShelterSamaritan House Inc: $22,700 · Housing & ShelterWESLEY HOUSE COMMUNITY CENTER CO: $16,437 · Housing & ShelterJACKSON STREET YOUTH SHELTER INC: $14,200 · Housing & ShelterRESTART INC: $13,285 · Housing & ShelterEDDIES HOUSE: $13,136 · Housing & ShelterDayspring Center Inc: $10,749 · Housing & ShelterTEDFORD HOUSING: $10,331 · Housing & ShelterCENTRAL ARIZONA SHELTER SERVICES INC: $9,978 · Housing & ShelterCOMMITTEE ON TEMPORARY SHELTER INC: $9,284 · Housing & ShelterNative American Heritage Association: $54,723 · Crime & LegalTHE NEXT DOOR INC: $50,230 · Crime & LegalHOME START INC: $25,135 · Crime & LegalThe Other Side Academy: $11,550 · Crime & LegalSAFE INC OF SCHENECTADY: $8,620 · Crime & LegalGALLATIN COUNTY LOVE INC: $37,717 · ReligionTEEN FEED: $26,475 · ReligionCIRCLE OF HOPE INC: $21,740 · ReligionTHE CONSERVATION ALLIANCE: $30,000 · PhilanthropyFIRST PLACE: $24,429 · PhilanthropySTAR HOUSE: $16,597 · PhilanthropyBELLEFAIRE JEWISH CHILDREN'S BUREAU: $15,707 · HealthLIFELONG HEALTH FOR ALL: $15,647 · HealthUNITED CHRISTIAN MINISTRIES OF ABBEVILLE COUNTY INC: $10,432 · HealthYOUTH PRIDE INC: $9,594 · HealthCOLUMBIA RIVER MENTAL HEALTH SERVICES: $9,159 · HealthNEW HORIZONS SHELTER AND OUTREACH CENTERS INC: $7,669 · Health
Other$2,014,364Human Services$901,547Housing & Shelter$274,625Crime & Legal$150,258Religion$85,932Philanthropy$71,026Health$68,208

Showing the 200 largest grantees by grant value.

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetNative American Heritage Association: $54,723 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetTHE NEXT DOOR INC: $50,230 over 5y, 0.4% of budgetCATHOLIC CHARITIES OF FAIRFIELD COUNTY INC: $48,061 over 5y, 0.2% of budgetTHE RESCUE MISSION OF UTICA INC: $43,551 over 5y, 0.3% of budgetVINA MOSES WELFARE CENTER INC: $40,202 over 5y, 1.2% of budgetPROTECT OUR WINTERS: $40,000 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetGALLATIN COUNTY LOVE INC: $37,717 over 3y, 1.5% of budgetPEOPLE RESPONDING IN SOCIAL MINISTRY: $35,859 over 2y, 0.5% of budgetCOMMUNITY COUNCIL OF IDAHO INC: $35,596 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetSHARE: $34,614 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetNEVADA PARTNERSHIP FOR HOMELESS YOUTH: $34,215 over 5y, 0.4% of budgetCOMPASS HOUSING ALLIANCE: $34,102 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetMANNA - THE DURANGO SOUP KITCHEN: $33,665 over 4y, 1.0% of budgetCOMMUNITY ACTION OF SKAGIT COUNTY: $33,529 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetCOCOON HOUSE: $33,380 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetMISSISSIPPI COATS 4 KIDZ: $33,112 over 4y, 6.9% of budgetTHE CHILDREN'S HOME SOCIETY OF WEST VIRGINIA INC: $31,466 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetButte Rescue Mission: $30,920 over 5y, 1.1% of budgetTHE CONSERVATION ALLIANCE: $30,000 over 2y, 0.5% of budgetSHERWOOD COMMUNITY SERVICES: $29,828 over 4y, 0.3% of budgetCHICAGO COALITION TO END HOMELESSNESS: $28,717 over 5y, 0.2% of budgetBLUE SKIES FOR CHILDREN: $27,674 over 5y, 2.9% of budgetSHOES AND CLOTHES FOR KIDS: $27,185 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetEL PROGRAMA HISPANO CATOLICO: $27,071 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetSBCS CORPORATION: $27,066 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHEALTHRIGHT 360: $26,523 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTEEN FEED: $26,475 over 5y, 1.8% of budgetWestside Interfaith Network: $25,891 over 4y, 2.9% of budgetHOME START INC: $25,135 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetGREATER BERGEN COMMUNITY ACTION INC: $24,790 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetFIRST PLACE: $24,429 over 5y, 0.9% of budgetALTERNATIVES FOR GIRLS: $24,111 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetCatholic Charities of Idaho: $23,670 over 2y, 0.8% of budgetNASHUA SOUP KITCHEN & SHELTER INC: $23,669 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetLOAVES AND FISHES SOUP KITCHEN INC: $23,403 over 2y, 0.5% of budgetCatholic Social Services: $23,399 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetAMERICAN INDIAN COMMUNITY CENTER ASSOCIATION: $23,136 over 4y, 0.6% of budgetSamaritan House Inc: $22,700 over 2y, 1.0% of budgetTHE ROAD HOME: $21,748 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetCIRCLE OF HOPE INC: $21,740 over 4y, 0.7% of budgetMOUNTAIN PLAINS YOUTH WORKS: $20,556 over 4y, 0.2% of budgetCLARA WHITE MISSION INC: $19,776 over 5y, 0.3% of budgetCOMMUNITY CLOTHES CLOSET: $19,694 over 2y, 0.9% of budgetCHURCHES UNITED IN MINISTRY: $19,534 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetEVERETT GOSPEL MISSION: $19,130 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetCATHOLIC COMMUNITY SERVICES OF WESTERN WASHINGTON: $18,443 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetSTREET TEENS: $18,356 over 1y, 14% of budgetCOMMUNITY OUTREACH INC: $18,263 over 4y, 0.4% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds Native American Heritage Association ↗
  • Who funds THE NEXT DOOR INC ↗
  • Who funds CATHOLIC CHARITIES OF FAIRFIELD COUNTY INC ↗
  • Who funds THE RESCUE MISSION OF UTICA INC ↗
  • Who funds VINA MOSES WELFARE CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds PROTECT OUR WINTERS ↗
  • Who funds GALLATIN COUNTY LOVE INC ↗
  • Who funds PEOPLE RESPONDING IN SOCIAL MINISTRY ↗
  • Who funds COMMUNITY COUNCIL OF IDAHO INC ↗
  • Who funds SHARE ↗
  • Who funds NEVADA PARTNERSHIP FOR HOMELESS YOUTH ↗
  • Who funds COMPASS HOUSING ALLIANCE ↗
  • Who funds MANNA - THE DURANGO SOUP KITCHEN ↗
  • Who funds COMMUNITY ACTION OF SKAGIT COUNTY ↗
  • Who funds COCOON HOUSE ↗
  • Who funds MISSISSIPPI COATS 4 KIDZ ↗
  • Who funds THE CHILDREN'S HOME SOCIETY OF WEST VIRGINIA INC ↗
  • Who funds Butte Rescue Mission ↗
  • Who funds THE CONSERVATION ALLIANCE ↗
  • Who funds SHERWOOD COMMUNITY SERVICES ↗
  • Who funds CHICAGO COALITION TO END HOMELESSNESS ↗
  • Who funds BLUE SKIES FOR CHILDREN ↗
  • Who funds SHOES AND CLOTHES FOR KIDS ↗
  • Who funds EL PROGRAMA HISPANO CATOLICO ↗
  • Who funds SBCS CORPORATION ↗
  • Who funds HEALTHRIGHT 360 ↗
  • Who funds TEEN FEED ↗
  • Who funds Westside Interfaith Network ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Gap FoundationDelivering Good IncWashington Federal Fo…For the Girls IncEmployees Community F…Windermere FoundationThe Kroger Co Foundat…Employees Community F…Northwest Harvest EmmPuget Sound Energy Fo…The Norcliffe Foundat…Moccasin Lake Foundat…
The Gap FoundationCA27.7× affinity23 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Gap Foundation · Delivering Good Inc · Washington Federal Foundation · For the Girls Inc · Employees Community Fund of the Boeing Company · Windermere Foundation · The Kroger Co Foundation · Employees Community Fund of Boeing-Puget Sound · Northwest Harvest Emm · Puget Sound Energy Foundation · The Norcliffe Foundation · Moccasin Lake Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Zumiez Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Zumiez Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 50%1%4%8%15%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 15%
  • Greater Bergen Community Action Inc: 62% of income from government
  • Jackson Street Youth Shelter Inc: 59% of income from government
  • Committee On Temporary Shelter Inc: 52% of income from government
  • Janus Youth Programs Inc: 46% of income from government
  • The Next Door Inc: 39% of income from government
  • Eva's Village Inc: 19% of income from government
  • Operation Hope of Fairfield Inc: 15% of income from government
  • El Programa Hispano Catolico: 13% of income from government
  • Youth Services of Tulsa Inc: 8% of income from government
  • Community Outreach Inc: 7% of income from government
  • Cradles to Crayons Inc: 2% of income from government
  • Covenant House Florida Inc: 1% of income from government
  • Clara White Mission Inc: 1% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
5get no government money at all
69report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
3rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Zumiez Foundation?

Find your warmest path to Zumiez Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 433 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Zumiez’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home