Skip to content
Plinth
Foundation DossiersMostly funded, not a grantmaker — see who funds it →
Plinth

· Public charity

Jacksonville Zoological Society Inc

The jacksonville zoo & gardens' mission is connecting our community with wildlife and wild places.

$471k
Granted FY2024still arriving
15
Grants FY2024still arriving
6
States reached
$67k
Largest
01What you fundRead
02The needRead
03Your edgeRead
04Your fieldRead
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2024.

Animals$2.0MEnvironment$93k
02FY2024 · 15 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

The 15 grants below total $344,077 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $471,348 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $127,271 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k4 grants · $28k
  • $10k–50k10 grants · $249k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $67k
$19,000
Median grant
6
States reached
$104M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
UF FOUNDATION$67,196
INTERNATIONAL RHINO FOUNDATION$48,000
FRIENDS OF BONOBOSLOLA YA BONOBO-USA$44,740
WILDLIFE CONSERVATION GLOBAL INC$40,000
SOUTH-EAST ZOO ALLIANCE FOR REPRODUCTION & CONSERVATION$22,250
UNIVERSITY OF NORTH FLORIDA - COLLEGE OF ARTS & SCIENCES$20,000
INTERNATIONAL IGUANA FOUNDATION$20,000
PAN AFRICAN SANCTUARIES ALLIANCE$19,000
SAVE THE MANATEE CLUB$15,000
TURTLE SURVIVAL ALLLIANCE$10,000
WILDLIFE CONSERVATION NETWORK INC$10,000
NAPLES ZOO$9,291
GIRAFFE CONSERVATION FOUNDATION USA$7,500
FRIENDS OF JACK PRIMATE SANCTUARY$6,000
RARE SPECIES CONSERVATION FOUNDATION$5,100
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, your grants (FY17–24) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 71% of your dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%WILDLIFE CONSERVATION NETWORK INC: $15k → 10%INTERNATIONAL RHINO FOUNDATION: $48k → 11%ZOO CONSERVATION OUTREACH GROUP: $19k → 14%SOUTH-EAST ZOO ALLIANCE FOR REPRODUCTION & CONSERVATION: $25k → 7%SEA TO SHORE ALLIANCE: $17k → 9%SAVE THE MANATEE CLUB: $15k → 13%PAN AFRICAN SANCTUARIES ALLIANCE: $29k → 12%THE JANE GOODALL INSTITUTE: $15k → 6%ZOO CONSERVATION OUTREACH GROUP: $89k → 8%GRACE CENTER INC: $15k → 7%INTERNATIONAL RHINO FOUNDATION: $48k → 11%ZOO CONSERVATION OUTREACH GROUP: $15k → 14%SOUTH-EAST ZOO ALLIANCE FOR REPRODUCTION & CONSERVATION: $22k → 7%SEA TO SHORE ALLIANCE: $15k → 9%SAVE THE MANATEE CLUB: $15k → 13%PAN AFRICAN SANCTUARIES ALLIANCE: $19k → 12%ASSOCIATION OF ZOOS & AQUARIUMS: $35k → 8%INTERNATIONAL RHINO FOUNDATION: $40k → 11%SOUTH-EAST ZOO ALLIANCE FOR REPRODUCTION & CONSERVATION: $20k → 7%SEA TO SHORE ALLIANCE: $15k → 9%ZOO CONSERVATION OUTREACH GROUP: $31k → 8%INTERNATIONAL RHINO FOUNDATION: $40k → 11%SOUTH-EAST ZOO ALLIANCE FOR REPRODUCTION & CONSERVATION: $20k → 7%SAVE THE MANATEE CLUB: $15k → 13%WILDLIFE CONSERVATION GLOBAL INC: $40k → 14%ASSOCIATION OF ZOOS & AQUARIUMS: $25k → 8%INTERNATIONAL RHINO FOUNDATION: $40k → 11%SOUTH-EAST ZOO ALLIANCE FOR REPRODUCTION & CONSERVATION: $20k → 7%WILDLIFE CONSERVATION GLOBAL INC: $25k → 14%ZOO CONSERVATION OUTREACH GROUP: $21k → 8%INTERNATIONAL RHINO FOUNDATION: $36k → 11%SOUTH-EAST ZOO ALLIANCE FOR REPRODUCTION & CONSERVATION: $20k → 7%SAVE THE MANATEE CLUB: $15k → 13%WILDLIFE CONSERVATION GLOBAL INC: $19k → 14%ASSOCIATION OF ZOOS & AQUARIUMS: $20k → 8%INTERNATIONAL RHINO FOUNDATION: $36k → 11%SOUTH-EAST ZOO ALLIANCE FOR REPRODUCTION & CONSERVATION: $20k → 7%WILDLIFE CONSERVATION GLOBAL INC: $15k → 14%ZOO CONSERVATION OUTREACH GROUP: $16k → 8%INTERNATIONAL IGUANA FOUNDATION: $20k → 11%UNIVERSITY OF NORTH FLORIDA - COLLEGE OF ARTS & SCIENCES: $71k → 14%UNIVERSITY OF NORTH FLORIDA - COLLEGE OF ARTS & SCIENCES: $60k → 14%UNIVERSITY OF NORTH FLORIDA - COLLEGE OF ARTS & SCIENCES: $41k → 14%UNIVERSITY OF NORTH FLORIDA - COLLEGE OF ARTS & SCIENCES: $40k → 14%UNIVERSITY OF NORTH FLORIDA - COLLEGE OF ARTS & SCIENCES: $22k → 14%UNIVERSITY OF NORTH FLORIDA - COLLEGE OF ARTS & SCIENCES: $20k → 14%UNIVERSITY OF NORTH FLORIDA - COLLEGE OF ARTS & SCIENCES: $20k → 14%UNIVERSITY OF NORTH FLORIDA - COLLEGE OF ARTS & SCIENCES: $20k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

ME
WI
OR
CA
MO
VA
MD
NC
SC
DC
GA
TX
FL

Grants abroad, by region — $97k on the FY2024 return

Schedule F, as filed: 5 regions. The IRS asks for region and purpose, not the recipient, so no country or grantee can be named here.

Sub-Saharan Africa$34k · 35% · 2 grants

Stated purpose: CONSERVATION SUPPPORT FOR AFRICAN ELEPHANT, BOTSWANA · CONSERVATION SUPPORT FOR CHICK BOLSTERING PROJECT

South America$32k · 32% · 3 grants

Stated purpose: CONSERVATION SUPPORT FOR GIANT ARMADILLO - COMMUNITY OFFICER POSITION, BRAZIL · CONSERVATION SUPPORT FOR COFFEE NURSERY PROJECT - COLUMBIA · CONSERVATION SUPPORT TO ASSIST WITH PURCHASE OF ROMAINE LETTUCE FOR MANATEE FOOD

Russia and Neighboring States$12k · 12% · 1 grant

Stated purpose: CONSERVATION SUPPORT FOR ARMENIAN VIPER CONSERVATION

East Asia and the Pacific$10k · 10% · 1 grant

Stated purpose: CONSERVATION SUPPORT FOR CASSOWARY SURVEY - PALUMA RANGE NP (SOUTH)

Central America and the Caribbean$10k · 10% · 1 grant

Stated purpose: CONSERVATION SUPPORT FOR BONGO SURVEILLANCE PROJECT - UNIFORMS/CAMERA TRAPS

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving. Grants abroad on Schedule F are filed by region, purpose and amount with no recipient name, so they are shown by region and cannot be placed on the country map or matched to a grantee.

04

Where the work is directed

The same grants, placed two ways — where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose earmarks the money.

About 15% of Jacksonville Zoological Society Inc’s grant dollars are earmarked, by their stated purpose, for a different county than the recipient’s own address — money that lands at a nonprofit in one place but is meant to do its work in another. Read by recipient address, 52% of the giving stays in FL; read by stated purpose it is 40% — less of the work is directed home than the recipients' locations suggest.

Jacksonville Zoological Society Inclessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address · 24% directed abroad (not shown)

Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the foundation’s own 990 grant descriptions.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

95%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$1.9M · 22 repeat orgs$110k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +43% since the first grant, against +22% for the ones you funded once.

22 repeat relationships — 13 still active in FY2024, 9 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

22
11

Total granted

$1.9M
$99k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+43%
+22%

Still filing today

82%
100%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 97% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $11k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
AnimalsInternationalEnvironmentPhilanthropyEducationOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • IE
    INTERNATIONAL ELEPHANT FOUNDATION
    8× · 2017–2024 · $298k · revenue +70%
  • SZ
    SOUTH-EAST ZOO ALLIANCE FOR REPRODUCTION AND CONSERVATION INC
    8× · 2017–2024 · $157k · revenue +74%
  • WC
    Wildlife Conservation Global Inc
    8× · 2017–2024 · $149k · revenue +43%

Funded once

  • GR
    GORILLA REHABILITATION CONSERVATION EDUCATION (GRACE) CENTER INCgraduated
    one grant, 2019 · $15k · revenue +60%
  • JG
    JANE GOODALL INSTITUTE FOR WILDLIFE RESEARCH EDUCATION AND CONSERVATIONgraduated
    one grant, 2017 · $15k · revenue +50%
  • AE
    ARCHBOLD EXPEDITIONS INC
    one grant, 2018 · $12k · revenue -51%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Rainforest Trust

Rainforest trust saves endangered wildlife and protects our planet by creating rainforest reserves through partnerships, community engagement, and donor support.

International
2
International Primate Protection League

Protecting the world's remaining primates by monitoring and exposing illegal trade, supporting a worldwide network of overseas sanctuaries and ngo's, publicising the plight of abused primates, and operating a sanctuary for resued gibbons.

Animals
3
Wildlife Protection Solutions

To protect endangered species.

Animals
4
Zoo Outreach Organisation

Wildlife conservation, research and education.

Environment
5
Wildlife Sos

Protecting india's precious wildlife from poaching, habitat loss, and human exploitation since 1995.

Animals
6
Int'l Union for Conservation of Nature & Natural Resources - Us

Iucn-us fund builds bridges between us donors and iucn by catalyzing, accelerating, funding and promoting iucn's work - conserving nature and natural resources in the united states and throughout the world.

Environment
7
Endangered Species International

Endangered Species International is strongly committed to reversing the trend of human-induced species extinction, saving endangered animals, and preserving wild places.

Animals
8
Global Conservation Force Inc

Global conservation force is dedicated to saving wildlife from extinction through education, anti-poaching and conservation efforts.

Animals
9
Wildlife Madagascar

Wildlife Madagascar is dedicated to the preservation and protection of Madagascars unique biodiversity through a multifaceted strategy and extensive collaborative efforts.

Animals
10
Zambia Carnivore Programme

To safeguard large carnivores, their prey, and habitat in zambia through applied research, conservation, and education.

Animals
11
Global Wildlife Foundation

Funding innovative veterinary research and supporting organizations dedicated to preserving and protecting wildlife for future generations.

Animals
12
Fauna & Flora International Usa Inc

Our mission is to act to conserve threatened species and ecosystems worldwide, choosing solutions that are sustainable, based on sound science and take into account human needs.

Philanthropy

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Wildlife Conservation Network Inc and the most unlike its peers is Rupununi Learners Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

Your grantees are a median of 24 years old; the field is 12. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number27%3%<5yr16%3%5–10yr20%24%10–20yr15%41%20–35yr9%24%35–55yr12%3%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value27%1%<5yr16%1%5–10yr20%21%10–20yr15%48%20–35yr9%28%35–55yr12%2%55yr+

The field is 27% startups (under 5 years old) — 3% of your grantees by number, and just 1% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close — 3% lost their exemption, against 17% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
3%1/35
the rest of the field
17%
17,088/103,009

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

05the grantee network

32 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 32 of the 35 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

2
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
10
Early backer (in before they grew)
31/32
Grantees still filing
21/32
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

INTERNATIONAL ELEPHANT FOUNDATION — $298,000 · AnimalsINTERNATIONAL ELEPHANT FOUNDATIONSOUTH-EAST ZOO ALLIANCE FOR REPRODUCTION AND CONSERVATION INC — $157,250 · AnimalsSOUTH-EAST ZOO ALLIANCE FOR REPRODUCTION AND CONSERVATION INCWildlife Conservation Global Inc — $149,000 · AnimalsWildlife Conservation Global IncFRIENDS OF BONOBOS — $100,290 · AnimalsFRIENDS OF BONOBOSAMERICAN ASSOCIATION OF ZOOLOGICAL PARKS AND AQUARIUMS INC — $85,150 · AnimalsAMERICAN ASSOCIATION OF ZOOLOGICAL PARKS AND AQUARIUMS INCWILDLIFE CONSERVATION NETWORK INC — $75,000 · AnimalsWILDLIFE CONSERVATION NETWORK INCSAVE THE MANATEE CLUB INC — $60,000 · AnimalsPAN AFRICAN SANCTUARY ALLIANCE INC — $54,745 · Animals+10 more — $168,313 · Animals+10 moreUNIVERSITY OF NORTH FLORIDA — $294,288 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF NORTH FLORIDAZOO CONSERVATION OUTREACH GROUP INC — $190,900 · OtherZOO CONSERVATION OUTREACH GROUP IN…Sea to Shore Alliance — $56,000 · OtherSea to Shore AllianceUNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA — $24,624 · Other+6 more — $62,288 · Other+6 moreTHE UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA FOUNDATION INC — $183,503 · EducationTHE UNIVER…GIRAFFE CONSERVATION FOUNDATION USA — $22,500 · InternationalUS FOR BELIZE FOUNDATION FOR RESEARCH & ENVIRONMENTAL EDUCATION INC — $7,500 · InternationalMARALLIANCE — $5,754 · InternationalAVIAN RESEARCH & CONSERVATION INSTITUTE INC — $20,000 · EnvironmentMADAGASCAR FAUNA AND FLORA GROUP — $7,477 · EnvironmentRUPUNUNI LEARNERS FOUNDATION — $27,142 · Philanthropy
Animals$1,147,748Other$628,100Education$183,503International$35,754Environment$27,477Philanthropy$27,142

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetINTERNATIONAL ELEPHANT FOUNDATION — $298,000 over 8y, 5.1% of budgetZOO CONSERVATION OUTREACH GROUP INC — $190,900 over 6y, 31% of budgetTHE UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA FOUNDATION INC — $183,503 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetSOUTH-EAST ZOO ALLIANCE FOR REPRODUCTION AND CONSERVATION INC — $157,250 over 8y, 6.3% of budgetWildlife Conservation Global Inc — $149,000 over 8y, 3.0% of budgetFRIENDS OF BONOBOS — $100,290 over 4y, 2.9% of budgetAMERICAN ASSOCIATION OF ZOOLOGICAL PARKS AND AQUARIUMS INC — $85,150 over 4y, 0.3% of budgetWILDLIFE CONSERVATION NETWORK INC — $75,000 over 7y, 0.1% of budgetSAVE THE MANATEE CLUB INC — $60,000 over 4y, 0.5% of budgetSea to Shore Alliance — $56,000 over 4y, 12% of budgetPAN AFRICAN SANCTUARY ALLIANCE INC — $54,745 over 3y, 2.6% of budgetREWILD — $32,500 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetTHE INTERNATIONAL IGUANA FOUNDATION — $30,000 over 2y, 11% of budgetRUPUNUNI LEARNERS FOUNDATION — $27,142 over 4y, 38% of budgetNAPLES ZOO INC — $23,738 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetGIRAFFE CONSERVATION FOUNDATION USA — $22,500 over 3y, 0.5% of budgetZOOLOGICAL SOCIETY OF MILWAUKEE CTY — $20,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetGORILLA REHABILITATION CONSERVATION EDUCATION (GRACE) CENTER INC — $15,420 over 1y, 1.7% of budgetTHE TURTLE SURVIVAL ALLIANCE FOUNDATION — $15,250 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetJANE GOODALL INSTITUTE FOR WILDLIFE RESEARCH EDUCATION AND CONSERVATION — $15,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetARCHBOLD EXPEDITIONS INC — $12,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetUS FOR BELIZE FOUNDATION FOR RESEARCH & ENVIRONMENTAL EDUCATION INC — $7,500 over 1y, 1.8% of budgetThe Inst for Regional Conservation — $7,500 over 1y, 1.4% of budgetMADAGASCAR FAUNA AND FLORA GROUP — $7,477 over 1y, 1.1% of budgetCOASTAL PLAINS INSTITUTE INC — $7,100 over 1y, 3.9% of budgetFRIENDS OF JACK PRIMATE SANCTUARY — $6,000 over 1y, 6.3% of budgetBOK TOWER GARDENS INC — $6,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetMARALLIANCE — $5,754 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetSAVE GIRAFFES NOW — $5,305 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetRare Species Conservatory Foundation — $5,100 over 1y, 0.8% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Columbus Zoological P…Friends of the Zoo In…Houston Zoo IncZoological Society of…Utah Zoological Socie…Dallas Zoo Management…Detroit Zoological So…Dallas Zoological Soc…Commonwealth Zoologic…East Coast Zoological…Nashville Zoo IncRiverbanks Society
Columbus Zoological Park AssociationOH24.2× affinity9 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Columbus Zoological Park Association · Friends of the Zoo Inc of Kansas City Missouri C/O Linda Falk · Houston Zoo Inc · Zoological Society of San Diego · Utah Zoological Society · Dallas Zoo Management Inc · Detroit Zoological Society · Dallas Zoological Society · Commonwealth Zoological Corporation D/B/A Zoo New England · East Coast Zoological Society of Florida Inc · Nashville Zoo Inc · Riverbanks Society

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Jacksonville Zoological Society Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 90%1%4%8%15%your share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 35%
  • Pan African Sanctuary Alliance Inc — 68% of income from government
  • Us for Belize Foundation for Research & Environmental Education Inc — 62% of income from government
  • Coastal Plains Institute Inc — 41% of income from government
  • The Inst for Regional Conservation — 35% of income from government
  • Archbold Expeditions Inc — 9% of income from government
  • Giraffe Conservation Foundation Usa — 2% of income from government
  • Bok Tower Gardens Inc — 1% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
9get no government money at all
3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
2rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 35 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home
State money flows
the interactive map of money crossing state lines