Skip to content

California · Public charity

Sacramento Zoological Society

The sacramento zoo inspires appreciation, respect and a connection with wildlife and nature through education, recreation and conservation.

$163k
Granted FY2024(still arriving)
12
Itemized grants FY2024
5
Organizations funded FY2023
20%
First-time grantees FY2023
Read the full brief
Itemized, FY2024
$138k
The rest is grants the schedule does not break out
Median grant, FY2024
$7,750
Largest grant, FY2024
$26,750
Organizations funded a year
2 to 8
FY2017 to FY2023
States reached, FY2024
9
Total assets, FY2024
$27M

How open it is to new grantees

In FY2023, 20% of the organizations Sacramento Zoological Society funded were first-time grantees, receiving 29% of its grant dollars.

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2023, 71% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $20k went to new ones.

50%100%’18’19’20’21’22’23
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’18’19’20’21’22’23
AnimalsOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
The numbers by year
Fiscal yearOrganizations fundedTo those organizationsFirst-time grantees
FY2024still arriving12$138k33%
FY20235$70k20%
FY20225$44k20%
FY20216$50k50%
FY20202$14k0%
FY20198$109k38%
FY20187$71k57%
FY20176$48kn/a
100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Animals$490kEnvironment$75k

Where its grants go

Grant dollars by states, across the years we hold.

Which US states its grants reach

MA
OR
CT
RI
CA
MO
VA
KS
NC
TX
FL

Top grantees

Largest recipients by total granted, FY2017 to FY2024, and the share of each one’s budget the grants supplied at peak.

Show all 22 grantees

Where it is load-bearing

Each grantee by its size and the share of its budget Sacramento Zoological Society supplied at peak.

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetWild Nature Institute: $104,275 over 7y, 11% of budgetWildlife Conservation Global Inc: $93,550 over 6y, 2.6% of budgetWildlife Conservation Network Inc: $59,350 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetThe International Rhino Foundation: $45,125 over 2y, 0.9% of budgetRed Panda Network: $44,122 over 6y, 2.0% of budgetCommunities Living Among Wildlife Sustainably Conservancy: $26,770 over 4y, 4.9% of budgetSedgwick County Zoological Society Inc: $26,275 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetMountain Lion Foundation: $17,868 over 2y, 2.0% of budgetThe Saint Louis Zoo Association: $12,750 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetSnow Leopard Conservancy: $12,250 over 2y, 0.7% of budgetNorth Carolina Zoological Society Inc: $9,310 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetThe University Foundation at Sacramento State: $8,250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMadagascar Fauna and Flora Group: $7,750 over 1y, 2.6% of budgetRhode Island Zoological Society: $7,250 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetHouston Zoo Inc: $6,400 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetZoological Society of San Diego: $6,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetGalapagos Conservancy Inc: $5,250 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetSedgwick County Zoological Foundation: $5,150 over 1y, 1.3% of budgetVirginia Zoological Society: $5,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budget

Tap a dot to name the grantee.

How this is measured
Share of budget is the funder’s grant in a year over the grantee’s total revenue that year, at its highest across the years we hold; revenue is from all sources. Only grantees confirmed against their own filings, whose grants do not exceed their revenue, are plotted: the largest 19.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Zoological Society of CincinnatiOH13.6× affinity4 shared granteesties to 9 of 9Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Zoological Society of Cincinnati · The Pfizer Foundation Inc · American Endowment Foundation · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · National Philanthropic Trust · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Compare Sacramento Zoological Society with peer funders

About Sacramento Zoological Society

How much does Sacramento Zoological Society give?
Sacramento Zoological Society reported 12 itemized grants totaling $138,000, out of $162,750 in total grant expense reported on the return in its FY2024 IRS filing. It funded between 2 and 8 organizations a year over FY2017 to FY2023.
What does Sacramento Zoological Society fund?
By grant dollars over FY2017 to FY2024, its largest causes are Animals (87%), Environment (13%).
Who are Sacramento Zoological Society's largest grantees?
By total granted over FY2017 to FY2024: Wild Nature Institute ($104k), Wildlife Conservation Global Inc ($94k), Wildlife Conservation Network Inc ($59k).
Does Sacramento Zoological Society fund new organizations?
In FY2023, 20% of the organizations it funded were first-time grantees.
Which funders back the same organizations as Sacramento Zoological Society?
Its strongest co-funders, measured against what their size predicts, include Zoological Society of Cincinnati, The Pfizer Foundation Inc, American Endowment Foundation.
Where is Sacramento Zoological Society based?
Sacramento Zoological Society is based in CA.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 23 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Sacramento Zoological Society’s filings →

More from the funding graph