Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Zell and Myrna Hurwitz Foundation Inc

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$298k
Granted FY2025still arriving
32
Grants FY2025still arriving
6
States reached
$97k
Largest
01What you fund
0190% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20192025.

Philanthropy$1.4MReligion$181kArts & Culture$92kEducation$56kCommunity Improvement$56kInternational$53kEnvironment$32kPublic Benefit$30kOther$0
02FY2025 · 32 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k27 grants · $54k
  • $10k–50k3 grants · $60k
  • $50k–250k2 grants · $184k
$1,800
Median grant
6
States reached
$1.9M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
GREATER MIAMI JEWISH FEDERATION$96,500
THE ASSOCIATED JEWISH CHARITIES$87,500
NER TAMID GREENSPRING VALLEY$30,120
IMADI$18,000
FOUNDATION FOR DEFENSE OF DEMOCRACY$12,000
Individual grant recipient$7,982
BIRTHRIGHT ISRAEL FOUNDATION$7,500
ALGEMEINER INC$5,000
JEWISH NATIONAL FUND$3,600
HILLEL UNIVERSITY OF MD COLLEGE PAR$3,600
JEWISH CHILD CARE ASSOCIATION$3,600
FRIENDS OF ISRAEL DEFENSE FORCES$2,800
Individual grant recipient$2,050
GOUCHER COLLEGE HILLEL$1,800
BNAI ISRAEL CONGREGATION OF B'MORE$1,800
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY20–22, $4k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 55% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%AMERICAN FRIENDS OF UNIT 669: $1k → 11%AYFA FOUNDATION: $2k → 9%AMERICAN FRIENDS OF UNIT 669: $1k → 16%SHALOM TIKVAH INC: $136 → 11%BALTIMORE HUNGER PROJECT: $100 → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

MI
NY
MA
PA
NJ
RI
CA
CO
MO
MD
NC
DC
TX
FL

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

94%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$2.5M · 56 repeat orgs$157k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +36% since the first grant, against +26% for the ones you funded once.

56 repeat relationships — 16 still active in FY2025, 40 since wound down; 15 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

56
63

Total granted

$2.5M
$111k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+36%
+26%

Still filing today

32%
37%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 77% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $46k went to new ones.

50%100%’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
EducationArts & CultureInternationalReligionHealthHuman ServicesOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • LC
    LEHRMAN COMMUNITY DAY SCHOOL INC
    3× · 2019–2023 · $40k · revenue +150%
  • BI
    BIRTHRIGHT ISRAEL FOUNDATION
    5× · 2020–2025 · $16k · revenue +19%
  • MU
    MOMENTUM UNLIMITED INC
    2× · 2021–2022 · $13k · revenue +36%

Funded once

  • FF
    FOUNDATION FOR DEFENSE OF DEMOCRACI
    one grant, 2022 · $18k
  • CL
    CHAI LIFELINE MID-ATLANTIC
    one grant, 2021 · $15k
  • CL
    CHAI LIFELINE INCgraduated
    one grant, 2019 · $13k · revenue +38%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Bar Ilan University in Israel Inc

Biu produces students who excel in the sciences, humanities, law, engineering, business & the arts.

2
Rabbi Isaac Elchanan Theological Seminary

To prepare students for the rabbinate and to issue the traditional certificate of ordination in connection therewith. the seminary is authorized to confer the degree of master of hebrew literature (m.h.l.), doctor of hebrew literature…

Education
3
Hebrew College

Promotes excellence in jewish learning & leadership within a pluralistic environment. see sch ohebrew college promotes excellence in jewish learning and leadership within a pluralistic environment of open inquiry, intellectual rigor,…

Education
4
University of Southern California Hillel Foundation

To create an informed, celebratory and satisfying jewish community for students at the university of southern california, to deepen jewish identity through social, intellectual and spiritual participation, to offer diversified…

5
University of Judaism Foundation
6
Hillel At the George Washington University Inc

The mission of gw hillel is to provide an open, warm, and pluralistic environment in which students can shape their college experience by connecting socially, culturally, and spiritually to their judaism. hillel aims to foster students'…

7
Ben and Esther Rosenbloom Hillel Center for Jewish Life At University of Md

Enhance the lives of jewish students as that they may enrich the jewish people and the world. hillel actively seeks to engage jewish students on their own terms, to provide them with opportunities to participate in jewish life.

8
Greater Miami Hillel Foundation Inc

The mission of the organization is to enrich the lives of jewish undergraduate and graduate students so that they may enrich the jewish people and the world.

9
The Jewish Agency for Israel

The jewish agency binds jews across ideologies and civilizations together in a worldwide jewish family with israel at its center. it provides the global framework for aliyah, ensures global jewish safety, strengthens jewish identity and…

10
Bureau of Jewish Education of Greater Los Angeles Inc

Bje enhances the quality of, increases access to, and encourages participation in jewish education throughout the jewish communities of greater los angeles. bje is an advocate, planner, catalyst, and creative leader for strengthening and…

Religion
11
Hillel the Foundation for Jewish Campus Life At the Penn State University

To enrich the lives of jewish and undergraduate students so that they may enrich the jewish people and the world. penn state hillel's student leaders, professionals, and lay leaders are dedicated to creating a pluralistic, welcoming, and…

12
The Israel Institute Inc

The israel institute, inc. (the institute) enhances knowledge about modern israel by ensuring that more students have access to courses about israel during their time on campus.

International

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Repair the World and the most unlike its peers is The Maryland Food Bank Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

Your grantees are a median of 33 years old; the field is 14. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number22%2%<5yr16%10%5–10yr19%14%10–20yr16%29%20–35yr11%25%35–55yr16%20%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value22%9%<5yr16%14%5–10yr19%3%10–20yr16%17%20–35yr11%8%35–55yr16%50%55yr+

The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 2% of your grantees by number, and just 9% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close 0.0% lost their exemption, against 14% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
0.0%0/62
the rest of the field
14%
5,903/41,787

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

46 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 46 of the 136 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
9
Early backer (in before they grew)
45/46
Grantees still filing
30/46
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

THE ASSOCIATED JEWISH CHARITIES — $1,120,473 · OtherTHE ASSOCIATED JEWISH CHARITIESIndividual grant recipient — $940,336 · OtherIndividual grant recipient+107 more — $308,415 · Other+107 moreGREATER MIAMI JEWISH FEDERATION INC — $283,700 · PhilanthropyGREATER MIA…+2 more — $1,180 · PhilanthropyALGEMEINER INC — $84,500 · Arts & CultureThe United States Holocaust Memorial Museum — $5,300 · Arts & Culture+3 more — $4,550 · Arts & CultureFoundation for the Defense of Democracies Inc — $27,000 · InternationalBIRTHRIGHT ISRAEL FOUNDATION — $16,300 · InternationalFRIENDS OF THE ISRAEL DEFENSE FORCES — $12,525 · International+2 more — $2,800 · InternationalImadi Inc — $55,800 · Community Improvement+1 more — $540 · Community ImprovementLEHRMAN COMMUNITY DAY SCHOOL INC — $39,719 · EducationTHE JEMICY SCHOOL INC — $1,500 · Education+6 more — $3,716 · EducationCHAI LIFELINE INC — $13,000 · HealthSINAI HOSPITAL OF BALTIMORE INC — $5,600 · HealthCHILDREN'S CANCER AND BLOOD FOUNDATION INC — $2,000 · HealthLEVINDALE AUXILIARY INC — $851 · Health
Other$2,369,224Philanthropy$284,880Arts & Culture$94,350International$58,625Community Improvement$56,340Education$44,935Health$21,451

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetGREATER MIAMI JEWISH FEDERATION INC — $283,700 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetALGEMEINER INC — $84,500 over 6y, 1.6% of budgetImadi Inc — $55,800 over 3y, 1.8% of budgetLEHRMAN COMMUNITY DAY SCHOOL INC — $39,719 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetFoundation for the Defense of Democracies Inc — $27,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetBIRTHRIGHT ISRAEL FOUNDATION — $16,300 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetCHAI LIFELINE INC — $13,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetMOMENTUM UNLIMITED INC — $12,800 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetFRIENDS OF THE ISRAEL DEFENSE FORCES — $12,525 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetJEWISH COMMUNITY CENTER OF BALTIMORE INC — $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetSINAI HOSPITAL OF BALTIMORE INC — $5,600 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetThe United States Holocaust Memorial Museum — $5,300 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetSIMON WIESENTHAL CENTER INC — $2,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetChabad of Iceland Inc — $2,136 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetCHILDREN'S CANCER AND BLOOD FOUNDATION INC — $2,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetHILLEL THE FOUNDATION FOR JEWISH CAMPUS LIFE — $2,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN FRIENDS OF UNIT 669 INC — $2,000 over 2y, 0.9% of budgetTHE AFYA FOUNDATION OF AMERICA INC — $1,800 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCAMP HASC INC — $1,800 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN COMMITTEE FOR SHAARE ZEDEK HOSPITAL IN JERUSALEM INC — $1,800 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE JEMICY SCHOOL INC — $1,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPARDES INSTITUTE OF JEWISH STUDIES NORTH AMERICA INC — $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF BALTIMORE FOUNDATION INC — $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE MARYLAND FOOD BANK INC — $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE HARRY S TRUMAN LIBRARY INSTITUTE NATIONAL AND INTERNATIONAL AFFAIRS — $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSweet Dream Makers Inc — $1,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTORAH ACADEMY OF BERGEN COUNTY — $900 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetLEVINDALE AUXILIARY INC — $851 over 3y, 1.1% of budgetYOUTH RENEWAL FUND — $750 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetJEWISH RESOURCE CENTER — $720 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetREPAIR THE WORLD — $540 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetJEWISH CAMP AND CONFERENCE SERVICE INC — $540 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCENTER FOR JEWISH EDUCATION INC — $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMANHATTAN SEPHARDIC CONGREGATION — $500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetItineris Inc — $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBuilding Science Technology and Education Partnerships Inc — $430 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetTRUSTEES OF THE UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA — $430 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetMICHIGAN B'NAI B'RITH HILLEL FOUNDATION INC — $360 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCHILDREN'S MUSEUM OF THE EAST END I — $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSwim Across America Inc — $180 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHILLEL OF BROWARD AND PALM BEACH INC — $136 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetShalom Tikvah Inc — $136 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetPLAY FOR PINK INC — $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBALTIMORE HUNGER PROJECT LLC — $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetJOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY — $36 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds GREATER MIAMI JEWISH FEDERATION INC
  • Who funds ALGEMEINER INC
  • Who funds Imadi Inc
  • Who funds LEHRMAN COMMUNITY DAY SCHOOL INC
  • Who funds Foundation for the Defense of Democracies Inc
  • Who funds BIRTHRIGHT ISRAEL FOUNDATION
  • Who funds CHAI LIFELINE INC
  • Who funds MOMENTUM UNLIMITED INC
  • Who funds FRIENDS OF THE ISRAEL DEFENSE FORCES
  • Who funds JEWISH COMMUNITY CENTER OF BALTIMORE INC
  • Who funds SINAI HOSPITAL OF BALTIMORE INC
  • Who funds The United States Holocaust Memorial Museum
  • Who funds SIMON WIESENTHAL CENTER INC
  • Who funds Chabad of Iceland Inc

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Associated Jewish Charities of BaltimoreMD40.3× affinity18 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Associated Jewish Charities of Baltimore · Jewish Communal Fund · Center for Jewish Education Inc · Crane Family Foundation Inc · Greater Miami Jewish Federation Inc · The Harry and Jeanette Weinberg Foundation Inc · T Rowe Price Program for Charitable Giving Inc · The Associated Jewish Community Federation of Baltimore Inc · Herbert Bearman Foundation · France-Merrick Foundation Inc · Baltimore Community Foundation Inc · The Kathy L Shapiro Foundation Inc Inc

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Zell and Myrna Hurwitz Foundation Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 110%0%1%3%5%your share of their income ↑0%5%10%15%20%share of the org’s income from governmentmedian 2%
  • Johns Hopkins University12% of income from government
  • The Maryland Food Bank Inc11% of income from government
  • Jewish Community Center of Baltimore Inc2% of income from government
  • Sinai Hospital of Baltimore Inc0% of income from government
  • Torah Academy of Bergen County0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
11get no government money at all
9report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–20%
typical government reliance, FY2025

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Zell and Myrna Hurwitz Foundation Inc?

Find your warmest path to Zell and Myrna Hurwitz Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 136 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph