Skip to content

· Private foundation

Zafar and Mir Foundation Inc

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$374k
Granted FY2024still arriving
16
Grants FY2024still arriving
11
States reached
$95k
Largest
01What it funds
0193% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Health$374kInternational$112kReligion$110kEducation$59kHuman Services$32kPhilanthropy$24kArts & Culture$10kCivil Rights$5kOther$0
02FY2024 · 16 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k8 grants · $28k
  • $10k–50k5 grants · $136k
  • $50k–250k3 grants · $210k
$12,500
Median grant
11
States reached
$2.4M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
THE CITIZENS FOUNDATION$95,000
LIONS EYE INSTITUTE$59,469
CORNEAGEN INC$55,243
Individual grant recipient$36,700
THE CHILDLIFE FOUNDATION$35,000
LIONS GIFT OF SIGHT$30,094
ASSOCIATION OF AMERICAN MEDICAL COLLEGES$21,912
THE APPELLATE PROJECT$12,500
KEMCAANA$8,000
THE ALLIANCE ORGANIZATION$5,000
CENTRAL IOWA MEDICAL CENTER$4,075
VISION FIRST FOUNDATION$3,700
Individual grant recipient$3,200
APPNA$2,000
SEHAN VITAL FUSION$1,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

US giving: 86% of grant dollars ($663k). The need read here covers only this US portion; the 14% that went abroad ($109k) is mapped below.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY19–24, $102k) land where the poverty rate runs at 16%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 97% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%THE ALLIANCE ORGANIZATION: $3k → 9%THE CITIZENS FOUNDATION: $95k → 16%THE CITIZENS FOUNDATION USA: $1k → 16%THE CITIZENS FOUNDATION: $3k → 16%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

WA
MN
IL
WI
MI
NY
OR
IA
IN
OH
PA
MO
MD
DC
TX
FL

Beyond the US: 14% of all-years giving ($109k)

2 countries, by the recipient’s country on the filing.

grant dollars sentlessmore
Pakistan$104k · 5 grants
United Kingdom$5k · 1 grant
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving. International giving is mapped by the recipient’s country from the same 990 filings; comparable need data isn’t available at that grain.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

84%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$651k · 10 repeat orgs$121k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +95% since the first grant, against +1% for those funded once.

10 repeat relationships: 9 still active in FY2024, 1 since wound down; 7 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

10
12

Total granted

$651k
$55k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+95%
+1%

Still filing today

50%
75%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 82% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $66k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’19’20’21’22’23’24
InternationalEducationHealthHuman ServicesArts & CultureCommunity ImprovementOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • AO
    ASSOCIATION OF PHYSICIANS OFPAKISTANI-DESCENT OF NORTH AMERICA
    5× · 2017–2024 · $107k · revenue +90%
  • THE CITIZENS FOUNDATION USA
    3× · 2019–2024 · $99k · revenue +95%
  • CF
    CHILDLIFE FOUNDATION AMERICA I
    3× · 2022–2024 · $74k · revenue +11%

Funded once

  • NEW YORK FOUNDATION FOR THE ARTS INCgraduated
    one grant, 2019 · $10k · revenue +184%
  • I
    INTEALTHgraduated
    one grant, 2022 · $9k · revenue +42%
  • OH
    OBAT HELPERS INC
    one grant, 2021 · $7k · revenue -43%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
The Administrators in Medicine Foundation
Health
2
National Arab American Medical Association

Be an all inclusive association that acts as the voice of all arab american healthcare professionals and addresses their professional and cultural needs. through educational, philanthropic and service activities.

Health
3
American Association of Physicists in Medicine

Advancing medicine through excellence in the science, education and professional practice of medical physics. the mission is carried out through driving scientific and clinical innovation in medical physics to improve human health,…

Science & Tech
4
College of American Pathologists

The college of american pathologists (cap), the leading organization of board-certified pathologists, serves patients, pathologists & the public by fostering & advocating excellence in the practice of pathology & laboratory medicine…

—
5
Afghan Medica Professionals Assoication of America

The afghan medical professionals association of america (ampaa) supports afghan healthcare professionals and enhances healthcare access for afghan communities through education,advocacy and culturally responsive medical services both in…

Health
6
American College of Physicians Inc

The mission of the american college of physicians (acp), www. acponline.org, is to enhance the quality and effectiveness of health care by fostering excellence and professionalism in the practice of medicine. acp was founded in 1915 to…

Health
7
The American Board of Internal Medicine

See schedule o.the american board of internal medicine (abim) seeks to enhance the quality of health care by certifying internists and subspecialists who demonstrate the knowledge, skills and attitudes essential for excellent patient care.

Health
8
American College of Radiology

The american college of radiology (acr) is organized to advance radiology science, practice and access, improve quality and safety, provide continuing education for radiology and allied professionals, and achieve better outcomes through…

Health
9
Society of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging

The society is a multidisciplinary professional medical organization dedicated to improving human health by advancing nuclear medicine, molecular imaging and radionuclide therapy.

Health
10
American Association of Colleges of Osteopathic Medicine

Aacom leads and advocates for the osteopathic medical education community to improve the health of the public. aacom represents and advances the continuum of medical education by: supporting our member institutions as they educate the…

Education
11
America's Health Insurance Plans Inc

Ahip is the national trade association representing the health insurance industry. ahip's members provide health care coverage, services and solutions to more than 200 million americans. we are committed to market-based solutions and…

Membership Benefit
12
American Academy of Physician Associates Inc

To ensure the professional growth, personal excellence, and recognition of physician associates, and to support efforts to enable them to improve the quality, accessibility, and cost-effectiveness of patient-centered health care.

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The Citizens Foundation Usa; the most unlike its peers is Childlife Foundation America I. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

16 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 16 of the 29 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
16/16
Grantees still filing
11/16
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

KEMCAANA: $110,360 · OtherKEMCAANALIONS EYE INSTITUTE: $101,459 · OtherLIONS EYE INSTITUTECORNEAGEN INC: $69,488 · OtherCORNEAGEN INCIndividual grant recipient: $40,625 · OtherIndividual grant recipientLIONS GIFT OF SIGHT: $30,094 · OtherLIONS GIFT OF SIGHTVISION FIRST FOUNDATION: $20,850 · Other+12 more: $35,575 · Other+12 moreASSOCIATION OF PHYSICIANS OFPAKISTANI-DESCENT OF NORTH AMERICA: $106,845 · Community ImprovementASSOCIATION OF …THE CITIZENS FOUNDATION USA: $98,500 · Human ServicesTHE CITIZENS F…+1 more: $3,000 · Human ServicesCHILDLIFE FOUNDATION AMERICA I: $74,000 · PhilanthropyCHILDLIFE …Appellate Project Inc: $27,500 · EducationASSOCIATION OF AMERICAN MEDICAL COLLEGES: $21,912 · EducationINTEALTH: $9,405 · EducationUROLOGY CARE FOUNDATION INC: $5,000 · HealthBLOOD CANCER UNITED INC: $5,000 · HealthFEDERATION OF STATE MEDICAL BOARDS OF THE UNITED STATES INC: $1,790 · HealthNEW YORK FOUNDATION FOR THE ARTS INC: $10,000 · Arts & Culture
Other$408,451Community Improvement$106,845Human Services$101,500Philanthropy$74,000Education$58,817Health$11,790Arts & Culture$10,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetASSOCIATION OF PHYSICIANS OFPAKISTANI-DESCENT OF NORTH AMERICA: $106,845 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetTHE CITIZENS FOUNDATION USA: $98,500 over 3y, 0.4% of budgetCHILDLIFE FOUNDATION AMERICA I: $74,000 over 3y, 1.0% of budgetAppellate Project Inc: $27,500 over 4y, 1.9% of budgetASSOCIATION OF AMERICAN MEDICAL COLLEGES: $21,912 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNEW YORK FOUNDATION FOR THE ARTS INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetINTEALTH: $9,405 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetOBAT HELPERS INC: $7,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetUROLOGY CARE FOUNDATION INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetBLOOD CANCER UNITED INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetALLIANCE ORGANIZATION: $3,000 over 1y, 3.0% of budgetTHE HASSAN FOUNDATION: $1,800 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetFEDERATION OF STATE MEDICAL BOARDS OF THE UNITED STATES INC: $1,790 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNATIONAL HEALTH FORUM INC: $1,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetFOOD BANK OF IOWA: $200 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Zakia and Mian Family Charitable Foundation IncFL13.6× affinity4 shared granteesties to 5 of 5Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Zakia and Mian Family Charitable Foundation Inc · Network for Good · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Zafar and Mir Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Zafar and Mir Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 20%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%3%5%8%10%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    2get no government money at all
    2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–10%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 29 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Zafar and Mir’s filings →

    More from the funding graph