· Private foundation
Zafar and Mir Foundation Inc
Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k8 grants · $28k
- $10k–50k5 grants · $136k
- $50k–250k3 grants · $210k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| THE CITIZENS FOUNDATION | $95,000 |
| LIONS EYE INSTITUTE | $59,469 |
| CORNEAGEN INC | $55,243 |
| Individual grant recipient | $36,700 |
| THE CHILDLIFE FOUNDATION | $35,000 |
| LIONS GIFT OF SIGHT | $30,094 |
| ASSOCIATION OF AMERICAN MEDICAL COLLEGES | $21,912 |
| THE APPELLATE PROJECT | $12,500 |
| KEMCAANA | $8,000 |
| THE ALLIANCE ORGANIZATION | $5,000 |
| CENTRAL IOWA MEDICAL CENTER | $4,075 |
| VISION FIRST FOUNDATION | $3,700 |
| Individual grant recipient | $3,200 |
| APPNA | $2,000 |
| SEHAN VITAL FUSION | $1,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your US giving — 86% of grant dollars ($663k). The need read here covers only this US portion; the 14% that went abroad ($109k) is mapped below.
Your human-services grants (FY19–24, $102k) land where the poverty rate runs at 16%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 97% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
Beyond the US — 14% of all-years giving ($109k)
2 countries, by the recipient’s country on the filing.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving. International giving is mapped by the recipient’s country from the same 990 filings; comparable need data isn’t available at that grain.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +95% since the first grant, against +1% for the ones you funded once.
10 repeat relationships — 9 still active in FY2024, 1 since wound down; 7 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 82% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $66k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- AOASSOCIATION OF PHYSICIANS OFPAKISTANI-DESCENT OF NORTH AMERICA5× · 2017–2024 · $107k · revenue +90%
THE CITIZENS FOUNDATION USA3× · 2019–2024 · $99k · revenue +95%- CFCHILDLIFE FOUNDATION AMERICA I3× · 2022–2024 · $74k · revenue +11%
Funded once
NEW YORK FOUNDATION FOR THE ARTS INCgraduatedone grant, 2019 · $10k · revenue +184%- IINTEALTHgraduatedone grant, 2022 · $9k · revenue +42%
- OHOBAT HELPERS INCone grant, 2021 · $7k · revenue -43%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Be an all inclusive association that acts as the voice of all arab american healthcare professionals and addresses their professional and cultural needs. through educational, philanthropic and service activities.
Advancing medicine through excellence in the science, education and professional practice of medical physics. the mission is carried out through driving scientific and clinical innovation in medical physics to improve human health,…
The college of american pathologists (cap), the leading organization of board-certified pathologists, serves patients, pathologists & the public by fostering & advocating excellence in the practice of pathology & laboratory medicine…
The afghan medical professionals association of america (ampaa) supports afghan healthcare professionals and enhances healthcare access for afghan communities through education,advocacy and culturally responsive medical services both in…
The mission of the american college of physicians (acp), www. acponline.org, is to enhance the quality and effectiveness of health care by fostering excellence and professionalism in the practice of medicine. acp was founded in 1915 to…
See schedule o.the american board of internal medicine (abim) seeks to enhance the quality of health care by certifying internists and subspecialists who demonstrate the knowledge, skills and attitudes essential for excellent patient care.
The american college of radiology (acr) is organized to advance radiology science, practice and access, improve quality and safety, provide continuing education for radiology and allied professionals, and achieve better outcomes through…
The society is a multidisciplinary professional medical organization dedicated to improving human health by advancing nuclear medicine, molecular imaging and radionuclide therapy.
Aacom leads and advocates for the osteopathic medical education community to improve the health of the public. aacom represents and advances the continuum of medical education by: supporting our member institutions as they educate the…
Ahip is the national trade association representing the health insurance industry. ahip's members provide health care coverage, services and solutions to more than 200 million americans. we are committed to market-based solutions and…
To ensure the professional growth, personal excellence, and recognition of physician associates, and to support efforts to enable them to improve the quality, accessibility, and cost-effectiveness of patient-centered health care.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The Citizens Foundation Usa and the most unlike its peers is Childlife Foundation America I. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
15 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 15 of the 29 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds ASSOCIATION OF PHYSICIANS OFPAKISTANI-DESCENT OF NORTH AMERICA ↗
- Who funds THE CITIZENS FOUNDATION USA ↗
- Who funds CHILDLIFE FOUNDATION AMERICA I ↗
- Who funds Appellate Project Inc ↗
- Who funds ASSOCIATION OF AMERICAN MEDICAL COLLEGES ↗
- Who funds NEW YORK FOUNDATION FOR THE ARTS INC ↗
- Who funds INTEALTH ↗
- Who funds OBAT HELPERS INC ↗
- Who funds BLOOD CANCER UNITED INC ↗
- Who funds UROLOGY CARE FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds ALLIANCE ORGANIZATION ↗
- Who funds THE HASSAN FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds FEDERATION OF STATE MEDICAL BOARDS OF THE UNITED STATES INC ↗
- Who funds NATIONAL HEALTH FORUM INC ↗
- Who funds FOOD BANK OF IOWA ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Zakia and Mian Family Charitable Foundation Inc · Network for Good · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Zafar and Mir Foundation Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.