Skip to content

· Public charity

Young Life

YOUNG LIFE is a ministry to help adolescents around the world become exposed to the person of jesus christ.

$20M
Granted FY2025still arriving
10
Grants FY2025still arriving
6
States reached
$12M
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Youth Development$136MReligion$983kHousing & Shelter$200kHuman Services$180kInternational$52kHealth$31kRecreation & Sports$28kPhilanthropy$25kOther$0
02FY2025 · 10 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 10 grants below total $12,619,010, the rows itemized in this filing. The $20,380,337 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $7,761,327 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k3 grants · $27k
  • $10k–50k5 grants · $123k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $100k
  • $250k+1 grant · $12M
$25,000
Median grant
6
States reached
$440M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
YOUNG LIFE FOUNDATION$12,368,599
MISSION INDIA$100,000
INFAITH$45,526
HIGHLANDER PRIDE$27,553
CAMPUS MINISTRY AT GRAND RAPID$25,000
SHILOH MINISTRIES INC$15,000
TRUELA CHURCH$10,000
YOUTH WITH A MISSION$9,373
BAPTIST CHAPEL$9,000
THE GOOD CHURCH$8,959
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–23, $124k) land where the poverty rate runs at 15%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 69% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%Trinity Grace Church: $46k → 20%Helping Hands Ministries: $9k → 13%Trinity Grace Church: $12k → 20%Helping Hand Ministries: $9k → 13%YMCA of the Suncoast: $10k → 12%Divine Alternative Dad Service: $20k → 9%Divine Alternative Dad Service: $18k → 9%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

WA
MT
ND
MI
NY
NV
IN
PA
CA
CO
MO
NC
GA
TX
FL

Grants abroad, by region: $7.7M on the FY2025 return

Schedule F, as filed: 8 regions, $6.8M to organizations and $900k to individuals. The IRS asks for region and purpose, not the recipient, so no country or grantee can be named here.

Europe (including Iceland and Greenland)$2.8M · 37% · 14 grants · 32 people

Stated purpose: YOUTH MINISTRY · TUITION, ROOM & BOARD

Sub-Saharan Africa$1.4M · 18% · 7 grants · 317 people

Stated purpose: YOUTH MINISTRY · TUITION, ROOM & BOARD

East Asia and the Pacific$1.4M · 18% · 10 grants

Stated purpose: YOUTH MINISTRY

Russia and Neighboring States$1.3M · 17% · 3 grants · 49 people

Stated purpose: YOUTH MINISTRY · TUITION, ROOM & BOARD

Middle East and North Africa$237k · 3% · 4 grants · 10 people

Stated purpose: YOUTH MINISTRY · TUITION, ROOM & BOARD

Central America and the Caribbean$235k · 3% · 3 grants · 19 people

Stated purpose: YOUTH MINISTRY · TUITION, ROOM & BOARD

South America$189k · 2% · 4 grants

Stated purpose: YOUTH MINISTRY

South Asia$91k · 1% · 1 grant

Stated purpose: YOUTH MINISTRY

How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving. Grants abroad on Schedule F are filed by region, purpose and amount with no recipient name, so they are shown by region and cannot be placed on the country map or matched to a grantee.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

100%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$138M · 17 repeat orgs$419k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +21% since the first grant, against +2% for those funded once.

17 repeat relationships: 5 still active in FY2025, 12 since wound down; 5 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

17
10

Total granted

$138M
$258k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+21%
+2%

Still filing today

47%
60%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 99% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $162k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
ReligionHuman ServicesYouth DevelopmentInternationalHealthOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • MC
    MILITARY COMMUNITY YOUTH MINISTRIES
    4× · 2019–2022 · $212k · revenue +77%
  • I
    INFAITH
    4× · 2017–2020 · $156k · revenue +21%
  • YM
    YOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF THE SUNCOAST INC
    3× · 2021–2023 · $68k · revenue +10%

Funded once

  • SM
    Stillwater Ministries
    one grant, 2024 · $73k · revenue -82% · 36% of their budget
  • CS
    CHILD SPONSORSHIP PROGRAM INC
    one grant, 2019 · $52k · revenue -30%
  • BC
    BEACON CHRISTIAN COMMUNITY HEALTH CENTER
    one grant, 2023 · $31k · revenue +2%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Christian Mission for the United Nations Community

Christian Mission for the United Nations Community is a ministry aimed at leading the head of every nation and other top leaders to faith in Jesus Christ and helping them to walk in dependence upon God as they discharge the…

—
2
Youth Conference Ministries Inc

To develop youth servant leaders who will share the message of jesus christ with their peers.

Youth Development
3
GlobalServant Ministries Inc

Offers counsel, formal & informal teaching served in a pastoral role, mentored groups,filled numerous speaking invitations, conducted discipling groups & provided spiritual, emotional and

Religion
4
Cole Young Ministries

Ministry

Religion
5
Discover Your Mission Inc

Supporing missionaries worldwide

Religion
6
Reformed Youth Movement Inc dba Reformed Youth Ministries

Providing Christian conferences, summer camps, internship programs,and ministry mentorship for youth across the United States.

Youth Development
7
Grateful Shepherd Ministries

Training pastors and leaders in christian faith

Religion
8
Young Disciple Ministries

To conduct a religious ministry for young people by providing youth camps and distributing a religious magazine

Religion
9
Dynamic Church Planting International

Equipping leaders to plant dynamic churches worldwide.

Human Services
10
Fruitful Vine Ministry

Pastoral care

Religion
11
Young Men's Christian Association of Albany Inc

To put christian principles into practice through programs that build healthy spirit, mind, and body for all.

Human Services
12
Global City Missions Initiative Incorporated

Global City Mission Initiative is dedicated to cross-cultural evanglism, disciplemaking, church planting among diverse diaspora populations in strategic cities reaching out evangelistically to start multiply churches, training believers to…

Religion
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Infaith; the most unlike its peers is Child Sponsorship Program Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

16 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 16 of the 33 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
15/16
Grantees still filing
11/16
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

YOUNG LIFE FOUNDATION: $136,128,523 · OtherYOUNG LIFE FOUNDATION+18 more: $1,135,099 · OtherINFAITH: $155,950 · ReligionCAMPUS MINISTRY AT GRAND RAPIDS INC: $75,000 · ReligionYOUTH WITH A MISSION DENVER INC: $72,600 · ReligionStillwater Ministries: $72,500 · ReligionREFUGE FOUNDATION: $25,500 · Religion+1 more: $12,960 · ReligionYOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF THE SUNCOAST INC: $67,985 · Human ServicesDADS DIVINE ALTERNATIVES FOR DADS SERVICES: $37,950 · Human ServicesHELPING HANDS MINISTRIES INC: $18,044 · Human ServicesCHILD SPONSORSHIP PROGRAM INC: $52,000 · InternationalPARTNERS IN DEVELOPMENT WORLDWIDE: $24,203 · InternationalYOUTH MENTORING WORLDWIDE INC: $37,000 · Youth DevelopmentELEVATE TAMPA BAY INC: $5,348 · Youth DevelopmentBEACON CHRISTIAN COMMUNITY HEALTH CENTER: $30,523 · Health
Other$137,263,622Religion$414,510Human Services$123,979International$76,203Youth Development$42,348Health$30,523

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetMILITARY COMMUNITY YOUTH MINISTRIES: $212,472 over 4y, 8.4% of budgetINFAITH: $155,950 over 4y, 0.6% of budgetCAMPUS MINISTRY AT GRAND RAPIDS INC: $75,000 over 2y, 4.3% of budgetStillwater Ministries: $72,500 over 1y, 36% of budgetYOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF THE SUNCOAST INC: $67,985 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetCENTRAL DETROIT CHRISTIAN COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION: $57,250 over 3y, 0.5% of budgetCHILD SPONSORSHIP PROGRAM INC: $52,000 over 1y, 9.5% of budgetDADS DIVINE ALTERNATIVES FOR DADS SERVICES: $37,950 over 2y, 4.3% of budgetYOUTH MENTORING WORLDWIDE INC: $37,000 over 2y, 3.2% of budgetBEACON CHRISTIAN COMMUNITY HEALTH CENTER: $30,523 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetREFUGE FOUNDATION: $25,500 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetHELPING HANDS MINISTRIES INC: $18,044 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetHELPING HANDS SUPPORT INC: $12,960 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetELEVATE TAMPA BAY INC: $5,348 over 1y, 0.9% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds MILITARY COMMUNITY YOUTH MINISTRIES ↗
  • Who funds INFAITH ↗
  • Who funds CAMPUS MINISTRY AT GRAND RAPIDS INC ↗
  • Who funds YOUTH WITH A MISSION DENVER INC ↗
  • Who funds Stillwater Ministries ↗
  • Who funds YOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF THE SUNCOAST INC ↗
  • Who funds CENTRAL DETROIT CHRISTIAN COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION ↗
  • Who funds CHILD SPONSORSHIP PROGRAM INC ↗
  • Who funds DADS DIVINE ALTERNATIVES FOR DADS SERVICES ↗
  • Who funds YOUTH MENTORING WORLDWIDE INC ↗
  • Who funds BEACON CHRISTIAN COMMUNITY HEALTH CENTER ↗
  • Who funds REFUGE FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds PARTNERS IN DEVELOPMENT WORLDWIDE ↗
  • Who funds HELPING HANDS MINISTRIES INC ↗
  • Who funds HELPING HANDS SUPPORT INC ↗
  • Who funds ELEVATE TAMPA BAY INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Servant FoundationKS13.7× affinity6 shared granteesties to 10 of 10Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Servant Foundation · Christian Community Foundation Inc · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · Renaissance Charitable Foundation Inc · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · American Endowment Foundation · National Philanthropic Trust · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Young Life funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Young Life. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 30%3%10%23%40%funder's share of their income ↑0%15%30%45%60%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    3get no government money at all
    4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–60%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 33 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Young Life’s filings →

    More from the funding graph