· Private foundation
Yeo & Yeo Foundation
Its FY2024 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2019–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| American Cancer Society | $6,000 |
| Epilepsy Foundation of Michigan | $5,500 |
| Thomas Township Parks & Recreation | $5,000 |
| Individual grant recipient | $5,000 |
| Bay Community Tennis Association | $5,000 |
| First Step Inc | $5,000 |
| Valley Lutheran High School | $4,100 |
| PBJ Outreach Inc | $4,000 |
| Child Advocacy Center of Lapeer | $4,000 |
| Eastern Michigan University Foundation | $3,500 |
| Angel Whispers Healing Center | $3,500 |
| Humane Society of St Clair County | $3,500 |
| Zonta Club of Michigan | $3,500 |
| Childrens Discovery Academy | $3,200 |
| Alma Police Athletic League | $3,200 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY20–24, $68k) land where the poverty rate runs at 15%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 76% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +35% since the first grant, against +17% for the ones you funded once.
48 repeat relationships — 21 still active in FY2024, 27 since wound down; 36 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 39% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $91k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- CACHILD ABUSE & NEGLECT COUNCIL GREAT LAKES BAY REGION4× · 2020–2023 · $19k · revenue +39%
- GOGAMERS OUTREACH FOUNDATION INC2× · 2022–2023 · $18k · revenue +7%
SPECIAL OLYMPICS MICHIGAN INC2× · 2020–2023 · $12k · revenue +110%
Funded once
- AMACS - MAKING STRIDES AGAIN BREAST Cone grant, 2020 · $9k
- CCCAN COUNCIL ARENAC-BAY-HURON-SAGINAone grant, 2022 · $5k
- CNCaregiving Network Incone grant, 2021 · $5k · revenue -16%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Humane society of southwestern michigan exists to provide shelter and care for sick, homeless and unwanted animals. in addition, the organization provides adoption services for the animals in its care.
The Betterment of the lives of stray, owned and abandoned companion animals in Saginaw County, MI. Our county has over 20,000 households living below the federal poverty guidelines that own at least one pet. We are their safety net. We…
To shelter and find forever homes for homeless dogs and cats.
Michigan casa, inc. is dedicated to changing the lives of abused and neglected children by advocating for their best interests through establishing, supporting, and expanding quality casa programs throughout the state of michigan to ensure…
Advocate for people in recovery & provides holistic options for those recovering from substance use disorder, codependency & trauma.
Animal shelter - provide a safe haven for animals without homes.
Our mission is to save the lives of animals while enriching the lives of humans.
Our mission is to increase awareness of the problems of people who are homeless and the development and carrying out of strategies to create permanent solutions to homelessness in our community.
Rescue & find homes for cats; spay, nueter and adopt out as many cats as possible. Provice foster care homes for unadopted. Provide Vet care. Educate the public about over population available programs.
To eliminate sub-standard housing and homelessness from lapeer county.
Our mission is to assist our affiliates to increase capacity to build simple decent homes in partnership with people in need in the State of Michigan.
To retrieve, care for, shelter and adopt out cats and dogs in calhoun county michigan
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Rebuilding Together Southeast Michigan Inc and the most unlike its peers is Jayden Lamb Memorial Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 28 years old; the field is 15. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 23% startups (under 5 years old) — 5% of your grantees by number, and just 2% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.8% lost their exemption, against 15% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
116 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2026, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 116 of the 216 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Showing your 200 largest grantees by grant value.
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds CHILD ABUSE & NEGLECT COUNCIL GREAT LAKES BAY REGION ↗
- Who funds GAMERS OUTREACH FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds READ Association of Saginaw County ↗
- Who funds SPECIAL OLYMPICS MICHIGAN INC ↗
- Who funds GIVE A KID PROJECTS ↗
- Who funds KALAMAZOO VALLEY HABITAT FOR HUMANITY INC ↗
- Who funds UNITED WAY OF SAGINAW COUNTY ↗
- Who funds EPILEPSY FOUNDATION OF MICHIGAN ↗
- Who funds PARTNERSHIP CENTER ↗
- Who funds BAY COMMUNITY TENNIS ASSOCIATION ↗
- Who funds MIDLAND AREA COMMUNITY FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds CHILDREN'S DISCOVERY ACADEMY INC ↗
- Who funds AMAZING GRACE ANIMAL RESCUE ↗
- Who funds MAJOR CHORDS FOR MINORS ↗
- Who funds East Side Soup Kitchen ↗
- Who funds WOMEN OF COLORS ↗
- Who funds AID IN MILAN ↗
- Who funds SELF LOVE BEAUTY ↗
- Who funds Caregiving Network Inc ↗
- Who funds LUTHERAN CHILD & FAMILY SERVICE OF MICHIGAN INC ↗
- Who funds Humble Design Inc ↗
- Who funds ELE'S PLACE INC ↗
- Who funds P B J OUTREACH INC ↗
- Who funds HUMANE SOCIETY OF BAY COUNTY INC ↗
- Who funds UNDERGROUND RAILROAD INC ↗
- Who funds Ypsilanti Community Schools Foundation ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Consumers Energy Foundation · Wallace & Irene Bronner Family Charitable Foundation · Charles Stewart Mott Foundation · Saginaw Community Foundation · Wm McNally Family Foundation · Bierlein Companies Foundation · Allen E & Marie A Nickless Memorial Foundation · Wickson-Link Memorial Foundation · Dte Energy Foundation · Michigan Health Endowment Fund · Harry a and Margaret D Towsley Foundation · Community Foundation of Greater Flint
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Yeo & Yeo Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.