Skip to content
Yeo & Yeo Foundation at a glance

· Private foundation

Yeo & Yeo Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$164k
Granted FY2025still arriving
65
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$13k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
0197% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2019 to 2024.

Human Services$144kHealth$93kEducation$59kRecreation & Sports$51kAnimals$47kHousing & Shelter$40kYouth Development$38kPhilanthropy$31kOther$0
02FY2025 · 65 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k64 grants · $151k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $13k
$2,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$85k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Alzheimer's Association$12,958
American Cancer Society$9,500
Individual grant recipient$5,000
Kalamazoo Animal Rescue$5,000
Assistance League of Southeastern Michigan$5,000
CAN Council$5,000
Saginaw Community Food Club & Kitchen$4,241
Peace Lutheran Church & School$4,000
Aid in Milan$4,000
Holy Trinity Lutheran Church$3,600
Women's Resource Center$3,500
SOS Community Services Inc$3,500
Huron Waterloo Pathways Iniative$3,500
Food Bank of Eastern Michigan$3,000
Real Lansing Football Club$3,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY20–25, $73k) land where the poverty rate runs at 15%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 78% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%ANGEL NAMES ASSOCIATION: $2k → 7%CLARA'S HOPE: $3k → 5%PBJ Outreach Inc: $4k → 21%Child Advocacy Center of Lapeer: $4k → 10%Fenton Center for Hope: $2k → 5%GIVE-A-KIDS PROJECTS: $7k → 16%THE CARE STORE: $2k → 19%Childrens Discovery Academy: $3k → 12%Give-A-Kid Projects: $2k → 16%GIVE-A-KID PROJECTS: $1k → 16%THE CLEAN LOVE PROJECT: $500 → 21%CHILDREN'S DISCOVERY ACADEMY: $2k → 12%Kidneys for Kids: $2k → 14%THE CARE STORE: $1k → 19%STARFISH FAMILY SERVICES: $1k → 21%GIVE-A-KID-PROJECTS: $1k → 16%ANGELS' PLACE: $1k → 8%SOS Community Services Inc: $4k → 14%CHRISTY'S LEGACY OF HOPE: $3k → 21%CHILDREN'S DISCOVERY ACADEMY: $2k → 12%Child & Family Charities: $3k → 16%WHALEY CHILDREN'S CENTER: $1k → 16%SELF LOVE BEAUTY: $1k → 9%CHILDREN DISCOVERY ACADEMY: $1k → 12%LOVE INC OF GRATIOT COUNTY: $250 → 12%WHALEY CHILDREN'S CENTER: $1k → 16%SELF LOVE BEAUTY: $4k → 9%Franklin Avenue Mission: $2k → 16%Wings of Mercy - East Michigan: $3k → 16%Ennis Center for Children: $3k → 16%WELLSPRING LUTHERAN SERVICES: $5k → 18%UNDERGROUND RAILROAD: $4k → 18%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

MI
NY
OR
IA
OH
NE
MD
NC
DC
LA
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

48%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$378k · 54 repeat orgs$414k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +35% since the first grant, against +12% for those funded once.

54 repeat relationships: 22 still active in FY2025, 32 since wound down; 43 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

54
161

Total granted

$378k
$307k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+35%
+12%

Still filing today

63%
48%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 35% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $107k went to new ones.

50%100%’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesAnimalsHousing & ShelterYouth DevelopmentEducationHealthOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • CA
    CHILD ABUSE & NEGLECT COUNCIL GREAT LAKES BAY REGION
    5× · 2020–2025 · $24k · revenue +39%
  • GO
    GAMERS OUTREACH FOUNDATION INC
    2× · 2022–2023 · $18k · revenue +7%
  • SPECIAL OLYMPICS MICHIGAN INC
    2× · 2020–2023 · $12k · revenue +110%

Funded once

  • AM
    ACS - MAKING STRIDES AGAIN BREAST C
    one grant, 2020 · $9k
  • CN
    Caregiving Network Inc
    one grant, 2021 · $5k · revenue -16%
  • GL
    GREAT LAKES BAY FOUNDATION GLB RE
    one grant, 2023 · $5k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Humane Society of Southwestern Michigan

Humane society of southwestern michigan exists to provide shelter and care for sick, homeless and unwanted animals. in addition, the organization provides adoption services for the animals in its care.

Animals
2
Humane Society of South Central Mi

Animal shelter - provide a safe haven for animals without homes.

Animals
3
Siren Eaton Shelter

Provide shelter for homeless and domestic violence victims

Community Improvement
4
Fostering Solutions

The purpose of the organization is to provide child welfare and supporting services to children, families, and individuals working and living in michigan.

Human Services
5
Michigan Casa Inc

Michigan casa, inc. is dedicated to changing the lives of abused and neglected children by advocating for their best interests through establishing, supporting, and expanding quality casa programs throughout the state of michigan to ensure…

Civil Rights
6
Humane Society & Animal Rescue of Muskegon County

To shelter and find forever homes for homeless dogs and cats.

Animals
7
Homeless Action Network of Detroit

Our mission is to increase awareness of the problems of people who are homeless and the development and carrying out of strategies to create permanent solutions to homelessness in our community.

Human Services
8
Calhoun County Animal Center Inc

To retrieve, care for, shelter and adopt out cats and dogs in calhoun county michigan

Animals
9
Ronald McDonald House of Mid-Michigan

To provide a warm & caring Home-Away-From-Home for ill children and their families.

Health
10
Harm Reduction Michigan

The mission of harm reduction is to reduce substance abuse and related activities in a respectful manner in collaboration with the user

Health
11
Habitat for Humanity of Lapeer - Tuscola

To eliminate sub-standard housing and homelessness from lapeer county.

—
12
The Serenity House of Flint

Advocate for people in recovery & provides holistic options for those recovering from substance use disorder, codependency & trauma.

Human Services
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Rebuilding Together Southeast Michigan Inc; the most unlike its peers is Jayden Lamb Memorial Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

132 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 132 of the 259 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
22
Early backer (in before they grew)
129/132
Grantees still filing
72/132
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

AMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY: $35,500 · OtherAMERICAN CANCER SOCIETYCHILD ABUSE & NEGLECT COUNCIL GREAT LAKES BAY REGION: $24,300 · Other+137 more: $442,772 · Other+137 moreGIVE A KID PROJECTS: $10,500 · Human ServicesGIVE A KID …CHILDREN'S DISCOVERY ACADEMY INC: $7,700 · Human ServicesCHILDREN'S …SELF LOVE BEAUTY: $5,000 · Human ServicesSELF LOVE B…ASSISTANCE LEAGUE OF SOUTHEASTERN MICHIGAN: $5,000 · Human ServicesASSISTANCE …LUTHERAN CHILD & FAMILY SERVICE OF MICHIGAN INC: $5,000 · Human ServicesLUTHERAN CH…CHILD ADVOCACY CENTER OF LAPEER CO: $4,000 · Human ServicesP B J OUTREACH INC: $4,000 · Human ServicesUNDERGROUND RAILROAD INC: $4,000 · Human ServicesSOS COMMUNITY SERVICES: $3,500 · Human ServicesChild and Family Charities: $3,000 · Human ServicesTHE CARE STORE: $3,000 · Human ServicesWINGS OF MERCY EAST MICHIGAN INC: $3,000 · Human ServicesENNIS CENTER FOR CHILDREN INC: $3,000 · Human ServicesCHRISTY'S LEGACY OF HOPE INC: $3,000 · Human ServicesAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches: $3,000 · Human Services+6 more: $11,660 · Human Services+6 moreAMAZING GRACE ANIMAL RESCUE: $9,300 · AnimalsKALAMAZOO ANIMAL RESCUE: $7,500 · AnimalsHUMANE SOCIETY OF BAY COUNTY INC: $4,000 · AnimalsHUMANE SOCIETY OF ST CLAIR COUNTY - SNAP: $3,500 · AnimalsADOPT-A-PET INC: $2,150 · AnimalsAMERICAN HUMANE ASSOCIATION: $2,000 · AnimalsBinder Park Zoological Society Inc: $2,000 · AnimalsALL ABOUT ANIMALS RESCUE: $1,600 · AnimalsDALIS TO THE RESCUE: $1,500 · AnimalsGROSSE POINTE ANIMAL ADOPTION SOCIETY: $1,500 · Animals+2 more: $2,245 · AnimalsKALAMAZOO VALLEY HABITAT FOR HUMANITY INC: $9,620 · Housing & ShelterHumble Design Inc: $4,500 · Housing & ShelterRescue Ministries of Mid-Michigan: $3,750 · Housing & ShelterAFFORDABLE HOUSING ALLIANCE OF MIDLAND COUNTY: $3,000 · Housing & ShelterSHELTER ASSOCIATION OF WASHTENAW COUNTY: $2,500 · Housing & ShelterREBUILDING TOGETHER SOUTHEAST MICHIGAN INC: $2,500 · Housing & ShelterBELOVED ASHEVILLE: $2,300 · Housing & ShelterHABITAT FOR HUMANITY OF HURON VALLEY: $2,000 · Housing & ShelterMIDLAND AREA HOMES INC: $1,995 · Housing & ShelterSLEEP IN HEAVENLY PEACE INC: $1,250 · Housing & ShelterUNITED WAY OF SAGINAW COUNTY: $10,500 · PhilanthropyMIDLAND AREA COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $7,750 · PhilanthropyCaregiving Network Inc: $5,000 · PhilanthropyFRIENDS OF THE ALLEY LTD: $5,000 · PhilanthropyKali's Cure For Paralysis Foundation Inc: $3,000 · PhilanthropyThe Scripps Howard Foundation: $2,000 · PhilanthropyGAMERS OUTREACH FOUNDATION INC: $17,500 · Youth DevelopmentELE'S PLACE INC: $4,300 · Youth DevelopmentAlma Police Athletic League: $3,200 · Youth DevelopmentHaiti Foundation Against Poverty: $2,700 · Youth DevelopmentHEART OF SAGINAW: $2,000 · Youth DevelopmentGIRL SCOUTS OF SOUTHEASTERN MICHIGAN: $2,000 · Youth DevelopmentCENTRAL MICHIGAN YOUTH FOR CHRIST: $1,500 · Youth DevelopmentSPECIAL OLYMPICS MICHIGAN INC: $11,500 · Recreation & SportsBAY COMMUNITY TENNIS ASSOCIATION: $8,000 · Recreation & SportsWOMEN OF COLORS: $6,000 · Recreation & SportsBEAVERTON ACTIVITY CENTER: $3,750 · Recreation & SportsMT PLEASANT FIGURE SKATING CLUB INC: $1,500 · Recreation & Sports
Other$502,572Human Services$78,360Animals$37,295Housing & Shelter$33,415Philanthropy$33,250Youth Development$33,200Recreation & Sports$30,750

Showing the 200 largest grantees by grant value.

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetCHILD ABUSE & NEGLECT COUNCIL GREAT LAKES BAY REGION: $24,300 over 5y, 0.5% of budgetGAMERS OUTREACH FOUNDATION INC: $17,500 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetREAD Association of Saginaw County: $12,007 over 4y, 1.5% of budgetSPECIAL OLYMPICS MICHIGAN INC: $11,500 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetUNITED WAY OF SAGINAW COUNTY: $10,500 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetGIVE A KID PROJECTS: $10,500 over 4y, 5.0% of budgetEPILEPSY FOUNDATION OF MICHIGAN: $9,927 over 3y, 0.4% of budgetKALAMAZOO VALLEY HABITAT FOR HUMANITY INC: $9,620 over 4y, 0.2% of budgetAMAZING GRACE ANIMAL RESCUE: $9,300 over 4y, 1.4% of budgetAID IN MILAN: $9,200 over 3y, 0.8% of budgetPARTNERSHIP CENTER: $8,000 over 2y, 3.7% of budgetBAY COMMUNITY TENNIS ASSOCIATION: $8,000 over 2y, 13% of budgetMIDLAND AREA COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $7,750 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetCHILDREN'S DISCOVERY ACADEMY INC: $7,700 over 4y, 1.0% of budgetKALAMAZOO ANIMAL RESCUE: $7,500 over 3y, 0.7% of budgetGreat Lakes Bay Health Centers: $7,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetMAJOR CHORDS FOR MINORS: $7,000 over 3y, 2.6% of budgetEast Side Soup Kitchen: $6,170 over 3y, 0.5% of budgetWOMEN OF COLORS: $6,000 over 2y, 1.3% of budgetCOMMUNITY HEALING CENTERS: $5,570 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetFlushing Youth Tackle Football Program: $5,500 over 3y, 3.1% of budgetFood Bank of Eastern Michigan: $5,410 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCaregiving Network Inc: $5,000 over 1y, 2.2% of budgetSELF LOVE BEAUTY: $5,000 over 2y, 2.4% of budgetASSISTANCE LEAGUE OF SOUTHEASTERN MICHIGAN: $5,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetFRIENDS OF THE ALLEY LTD: $5,000 over 3y, 2.5% of budgetLUTHERAN CHILD & FAMILY SERVICE OF MICHIGAN INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHumble Design Inc: $4,500 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetELE'S PLACE INC: $4,300 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetCHILD ADVOCACY CENTER OF LAPEER CO: $4,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetP B J OUTREACH INC: $4,000 over 1y, 3.3% of budgetUNDERGROUND RAILROAD INC: $4,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetHUMANE SOCIETY OF BAY COUNTY INC: $4,000 over 4y, 0.4% of budgetRescue Ministries of Mid-Michigan: $3,750 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetBEAVERTON ACTIVITY CENTER: $3,750 over 2y, 0.8% of budgetHUMANE SOCIETY OF ST CLAIR COUNTY - SNAP: $3,500 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetMID-MICHIGAN CHILDREN'S MUSEUM: $3,500 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetSOS COMMUNITY SERVICES: $3,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetEASTERN MICHIGAN UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION: $3,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAlma Police Athletic League: $3,200 over 1y, 3.0% of budgetSAGINAW-SHIAWASSEE HABITAT FOR HUMANITY: $3,107 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetChild and Family Charities: $3,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetLACASA: $3,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetGREAT LAKES BAY REGIONAL ALLIANCE: $3,000 over 1y, 1.6% of budgetTHE CARE STORE: $3,000 over 2y, 1.2% of budgetWINGS OF MERCY EAST MICHIGAN INC: $3,000 over 1y, 3.4% of budgetENNIS CENTER FOR CHILDREN INC: $3,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSOUTH LANSING MINISTRIES: $3,000 over 1y, 10% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds CHILD ABUSE & NEGLECT COUNCIL GREAT LAKES BAY REGION ↗
  • Who funds GAMERS OUTREACH FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds READ Association of Saginaw County ↗
  • Who funds SPECIAL OLYMPICS MICHIGAN INC ↗
  • Who funds UNITED WAY OF SAGINAW COUNTY ↗
  • Who funds GIVE A KID PROJECTS ↗
  • Who funds EPILEPSY FOUNDATION OF MICHIGAN ↗
  • Who funds KALAMAZOO VALLEY HABITAT FOR HUMANITY INC ↗
  • Who funds AMAZING GRACE ANIMAL RESCUE ↗
  • Who funds AID IN MILAN ↗
  • Who funds PARTNERSHIP CENTER ↗
  • Who funds BAY COMMUNITY TENNIS ASSOCIATION ↗
  • Who funds MIDLAND AREA COMMUNITY FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds CHILDREN'S DISCOVERY ACADEMY INC ↗
  • Who funds KALAMAZOO ANIMAL RESCUE ↗
  • Who funds Great Lakes Bay Health Centers ↗
  • Who funds MAJOR CHORDS FOR MINORS ↗
  • Who funds East Side Soup Kitchen ↗
  • Who funds WOMEN OF COLORS ↗
  • Who funds COMMUNITY HEALING CENTERS ↗
  • Who funds Flushing Youth Tackle Football Program ↗
  • Who funds Food Bank of Eastern Michigan ↗
  • Who funds Caregiving Network Inc ↗
  • Who funds SELF LOVE BEAUTY ↗
  • Who funds ASSISTANCE LEAGUE OF SOUTHEASTERN MICHIGAN ↗
  • Who funds FRIENDS OF THE ALLEY LTD ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Consumers Energy Foun…Wallace & Irene Bronn…Charles Stewart Mott …Saginaw Community Fou…Wm McNally Family Fou…Bierlein Companies Fo…Allen E & Marie A Nic…Wickson-Link Memorial…DTE Energy FoundationMichigan Health Endow…Harry a and Margaret …Community Foundation …
Consumers Energy FoundationMI57.8× affinity31 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Consumers Energy Foundation · Wallace & Irene Bronner Family Charitable Foundation · Charles Stewart Mott Foundation · Saginaw Community Foundation · Wm McNally Family Foundation · Bierlein Companies Foundation · Allen E & Marie A Nickless Memorial Foundation · Wickson-Link Memorial Foundation · DTE Energy Foundation · Michigan Health Endowment Fund · Harry a and Margaret D Towsley Foundation · Community Foundation of Greater Flint

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Yeo & Yeo Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Yeo & Yeo Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%1%4%8%15%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    1get no government money at all
    34report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 259 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Yeo & Yeo’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home