Skip to content
Yampa Valley Medical Center Foundation at a glanceAlso receives grants: funding profile →

· Public charity

Yampa Valley Medical Center Foundation

The mission of YAMPA VALLEY MEDICAL CENTER FOUNDATION is to support the healthcare services of uchealth yampa valley medical center and the communities it serves.

$1.7M
Granted FY2025still arriving
4
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$250k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Health$5.5MRecreation & Sports$1.0MHuman Services$171kEducation$113kYouth Development$107kPublic Safety & Disaster$50kPhilanthropy$27kFood & Nutrition$12kOther$0
02FY2025 · 4 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 4 grants below total $413,901, the rows itemized in this filing. The $1,682,638 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $1,268,737 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2025

  • $10k–50k1 grant · $35k
  • $50k–250k2 grants · $129k
  • $250k+1 grant · $250k
$78,901
Median grant
1
States reached
$28M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
NORTHWEST COLORADO HEALTH$250,000
YVMC$78,901
ROUTT COUNTY RIDERS$50,000
YAMPA VALLEY AUTISM PROGRAM$35,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY20–24, $221k) land where the poverty rate runs at 6%, against an area that typically sits at 7%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 7%ADVOCATES OF ROUTT COUNTY: $95k → 6%HORIZONS SPECIALIZED SERVICES: $26k → 6%BETTER TOMORROW: $20k → 6%ADVOCATES OF ROUTT COUNTY: $20k → 6%BETTER TOMORROW: $15k → 6%LIFT UP ROUTT COUNTY: $10k → 6%LIFT UP ROUTT COUNTY: $10k → 6%BETTER TOMORROW: $10k → 6%LIFT UP ROUTT COUNTY: $9k → 6%LIFT UP ROUTT COUNTY: $6k → 6%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

97%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$6.8M · 19 repeat orgs$221k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +55% since the first grant, against +22% for those funded once.

19 repeat relationships: 3 still active in FY2025, 16 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

19
12

Total granted

$6.8M
$171k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+55%
+22%

Still filing today

68%
67%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 88% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $50k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesHealthEducationYouth DevelopmentRecreation & SportsPhilanthropyOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • YV
    YAMPA VALLEY MEDICAL CENTER
    8× · 2017–2025 · $3.4M · revenue +55%
  • SH
    STEAMBOAT HEALTH & RECREATION ASSOC
    4× · 2019–2022 · $1.0M · revenue +127%
  • NC
    NORTHWEST COLORADO VISITING NURSE ASSOCIATION
    6× · 2020–2025 · $760k · revenue +152%

Funded once

  • CM
    COLORADO MOUNTAIN COLLEGE FOUNDATION INC
    one grant, 2023 · $35k · revenue -2%
  • TO
    TOWN OF OAK CREEK
    one grant, 2020 · $25k
  • CS
    COURT SPORTS FOR LIFE FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2023 · $25k · revenue +18%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Routt County Economic Development Partnership

The purpose(s) of the Partnership is to improve the quality of life and economic well-being across Routt County by: (i) enabling business and job retention to increase employment and improve the public welfare, (ii) promoting and assisting…

Community Improvement
2
Colorado Veterans Resource Coalition
Health
3
Colorado Thrives

Colorado Thrives exists to support Coloradans to achieve economic mobility through access to good jobs.

Community Improvement
4
Colorado Wellness Center for Girls
—
5
The Colorado Health Foundation
Health
6
Community School Collaborative

To provide innovative career exploration and work-based learning opportunities that prepare youth to enter tomorrow's workforce and build fulfilling lives.

Education
7
Upper Colorado River Alliance
Environment
8
Colorado Press Association

Promote the general interest of daily, weekly, and monthly newspapers and online publications, improve editorials and business methods of daily and weekly newspapers, and advance those newspapers' usefulness and influence in the public…

—
9
Rise 5280

Completed 10 college tours by air and ground. Attended on campus events. Completing college enrollment for the students - applications FASFA community projects room assignments meal plans campus life. Helping to process physical and mental…

Community Improvement
10
Destination Colorado Meetings

a member based state association of over 100 companies targeting meeting planners & incentive buyers. members include bureaus, hotels, resorts, destination management companies, activity companies, & other meeting services. we are…

—
11
Community Foundation Serving Southwest Colorado

To develop and increase charitable giving that connects donors to community needs in Southwest Colorado and to support the nonprofit sector through granting and educational opportunities.

Philanthropy
12
Rural Communities Resource Center

The Rural Communities Resource Center RCRC is a grassroots non-profit organization in Northeast Colorado. The RCRC provides advocacy, support and education to create systems change and develop programs that promote the physical, emotional…

Human Services
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Northwest Colorado Visiting Nurse Association; the most unlike its peers is Mountain Village Montessori Charter School. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

25 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 25 of the 33 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
7
Early backer (in before they grew)
23/25
Grantees still filing
20/25
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

YAMPA VALLEY MEDICAL CENTER: $3,397,308 · HealthYAMPA VALLEY MEDICAL CENTERNORTHWEST COLORADO VISITING NURSE ASSOCIATION: $760,000 · HealthNORTHWEST COLORADO VISITING NURSE ASSOCIATION+3 more: $99,900 · HealthSTEAMBOAT HEALTH & RECREATION ASSOC: $1,000,000 · Recreation & SportsSTEAMBOAT HEALTH…Steamboat Springs School District RE-2: $470,000 · OtherSteamboat Sprin…South Routt School District RE-3: $143,000 · OtherSouth Routt Sch…Hayden School District No RE-1: $118,000 · OtherHayden School D…REACHING EVERYONE PREVENTING SUICIDE INC: $101,800 · OtherREACHING EVERYO…COLORADO MOUNTAIN COLLEGE FOUNDATION INC: $35,000 · Other+7 more: $110,300 · Other+7 moreBETTER TOMORROW: $226,000 · Human ServicesHORIZONS SPECIALIZED SERVICES: $101,300 · Human ServicesYampa Valley Autism Program: $85,000 · Human ServicesINTEGRATED COMMUNITY: $79,000 · Human ServicesLift Up of Routt County: $34,500 · Human Services+1 more: $12,000 · Human ServicesPARTNERS IN ROUTT COUNTY: $65,400 · EducationROUTT COUNTY RIDERS: $50,000 · EducationNORTH ROUTT COMMUNITY CHARTER SCHOOL: $28,000 · EducationMOUNTAIN VILLAGE MONTESSORI CHARTER SCHOOL: $10,000 · EducationNorthwest Colorado Center for Independence Inc: $8,000 · EducationYAMPA VALLEY COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $26,890 · PhilanthropyCOURT SPORTS FOR LIFE FOUNDATION: $25,000 · PhilanthropyBOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF NORTHWEST COLO: $14,000 · Youth DevelopmentCONNECTIONS 4 KIDS: $2,500 · Youth Development
Health$4,257,208Recreation & Sports$1,000,000Other$978,100Human Services$537,800Education$161,400Philanthropy$51,890Youth Development$16,500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetYAMPA VALLEY MEDICAL CENTER: $3,397,308 over 8y, 0.8% of budgetSTEAMBOAT HEALTH & RECREATION ASSOC: $1,000,000 over 4y, 5.0% of budgetNORTHWEST COLORADO VISITING NURSE ASSOCIATION: $760,000 over 6y, 0.9% of budgetBETTER TOMORROW: $226,000 over 5y, 9.0% of budgetREACHING EVERYONE PREVENTING SUICIDE INC: $101,800 over 5y, 10% of budgetHORIZONS SPECIALIZED SERVICES: $101,300 over 5y, 0.4% of budgetYampa Valley Autism Program: $85,000 over 5y, 2.6% of budgetINTEGRATED COMMUNITY: $79,000 over 5y, 2.2% of budgetPARTNERS IN ROUTT COUNTY: $65,400 over 4y, 4.9% of budgetROUTT COUNTY RIDERS: $50,000 over 1y, 14% of budgetCOLORADO WEST REGIONAL MENTAL HEALTH INC: $46,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetROCKY MOUNTAIN PLANNED PARENTHOOD INC: $38,200 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetCOLORADO MOUNTAIN COLLEGE FOUNDATION INC: $35,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetLift Up of Routt County: $34,500 over 4y, 0.4% of budgetNORTH ROUTT COMMUNITY CHARTER SCHOOL: $28,000 over 2y, 0.6% of budgetYAMPA VALLEY COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $26,890 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetCOURT SPORTS FOR LIFE FOUNDATION: $25,000 over 1y, 1.2% of budgetGRAND FUTURES PREVENTION COALITION: $22,500 over 2y, 8.2% of budgetNorthwest Colorado Community Health Partnership Inc: $15,700 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetCOMMUNITY BUDGET CENTER: $15,000 over 1y, 2.5% of budgetBOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF NORTHWEST COLO: $14,000 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetROUTT COUNTY COUNCIL ON AGING INC: $12,000 over 1y, 1.7% of budgetMOUNTAIN VILLAGE MONTESSORI CHARTER SCHOOL: $10,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetNorthwest Colorado Center for Independence Inc: $8,000 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetCONNECTIONS 4 KIDS: $2,500 over 1y, 1.2% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Craig-Scheckman Famil…United Way of the Yam…Colorado Gives Founda…Rocky Mountain Health…Anschutz Family Found…The Colorado Health F…Mile High United Way …Moffat County United …Steamboat Springs Edu…The Moniker FoundationThe Colorado TrustSteve and Kelly Bloom…
Craig-Scheckman Family FoundationCO45.3× affinity19 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Craig-Scheckman Family Foundation · United Way of the Yampa Valley · Colorado Gives Foundation · Rocky Mountain Health Foundation · Anschutz Family Foundation · The Colorado Health Foundation · Mile High United Way Inc · Moffat County United Way · Steamboat Springs Education Fund · The Moniker Foundation · The Colorado Trust · Steve and Kelly Bloom Family Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Yampa Valley Medical Center Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Yampa Valley Medical Center Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%4%8%15%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    13report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 33 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Yampa Valley Medical Center’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home