Skip to content
Workforce Investment Council of Clackamas County at a glanceAlso receives grants: funding profile →

· Public charity

Workforce Investment Council of Clackamas County

Clackamas workforce partnership serves youth, adult, and dislocated workers through its partnerships with private industry and workforce development providers.

$3.0M
Granted FY2025still arriving
17
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$1.2M
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Employment$25MHuman Services$5k
02FY2025 · 17 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • $10k–50k10 grants · $189k
  • $50k–250k4 grants · $335k
  • $250k+3 grants · $2.4M
$31,631
Median grant
1
States reached
$1.3M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
CLACKAMAS COMMUNITY COLLEGE$1,172,018
IMMIGRANT AND REFUGEE COMMUNITY$758,734
CLACKAMAS EDUCATION SERVICE$495,678
ANTFARM YOUTH SERVICES$95,000
YOUTH MUSIC PROGRAM$80,000
NORTH CLACKAMAS EDUCATION FOUNDATIO$80,000
LAKEWOOD CENTER FOR THE ARTS$80,000
NORTHWEST FAMILY SERVICES$48,524
TODOS JUNTOS INC$31,631
CLACKAMAS COUNTY CHILDREN FAMILY$16,949
CLACKAMAS COUNTY ARTS COUNCIL$15,000
HAPPY VALLEY SOFTBALL ASSOCIATION$14,827
OREGON MANUFACTURING EXTENSION PTNP$14,575
REX PUTNAM MUSIC BOOSTERS$13,284
LOVEONE$12,950
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY20–25, $302k) land where the poverty rate runs at 8%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 4% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%FOLKTIME INC: $6k → 12%THE INN HOME FOR BOYS: $5k → 12%THE FATHERS HEART: $83k → 8%CLACKAMAS WOMEN'S SERVICES: $6k → 8%MOLALLA HOPE: $80k → 8%LOVEONE: $103k → 8%LOVEONE: $13k → 8%FRIENDS OF ESTACADA COMMUNITY CENTE: $6k → 8%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

98%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$24M · 11 repeat orgs$566k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +79% since the first grant, against +71% for those funded once.

11 repeat relationships: 11 still active in FY2025, 0 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

11
14

Total granted

$24M
$381k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+79%
+71%

Still filing today

82%
100%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 94% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $185k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesCrime & LegalArts & CultureEducationCommunity ImprovementHealthOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • THE IMMIGRANT AND REFUGEE COMMUNITY ORGANIZATION
    9× · 2017–2025 · $3.3M · revenue +166%
  • NF
    NORTHWEST FAMILY SERVICES
    6× · 2017–2025 · $767k · revenue +251%
  • OM
    Oregon Manufacturing Extension Partnership Inc
    8× · 2018–2025 · $416k · revenue +71%

Funded once

  • FH
    Fathers Heart Street Ministry
    one grant, 2024 · $83k · revenue 0%
  • MH
    MOLALLA HOPE INC
    one grant, 2024 · $80k · revenue 0%
  • AM
    AMERICAN MILITARY ENCOURAGEMENT NETWORKgraduated
    one grant, 2024 · $80k · revenue +28% · 46% of their budget
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Beyond These Walls

Beyond These Walls supports LGBTQ people impacted by incarceration in Oregon by providing direct service housing and advocacy.

Civil Rights
2
Oregon Justice Network

Oregon Justice Network is an alliance built and staffed by criminal legal system impacted people advocating for the well-being of people affected or at-risk of being affected by carceral systems. Our work centers around restorative…

Human Services
3
Oregon Abuse Advocates and Survivors in Service

Providing support and advocacy for abuse survivors.

Crime & Legal
4
Oregon Casa Network

To lead oregon's casa programs to provide a strong voice for every abused and neglected child

Human Services
5
Youth Empowerment Shelter

To provide youth in crisis a place of physical and emotional safety while assisting them to build positive relationships and develop their individual potentials.

Youth Development
6
Every Child Central Oregon

Mobilizing the community to uplift children and families impacted by foster care in Oregon.

Human Services
7
Eastern Oregon Health and Wellness Inc

Eastern oregon health & wellness provides recovery housing and outpatient services that support individuals and families impacted by substance use disorder through safe housing, trauma-informed care, and community-based support.

Health
8
Family Promise of Cowlitz County

To help families with children in our community who are situationally homeless achieve sustainable independence through a community based response by providing temporary housing, usually 60-90 days, along with case management.

Human Services
9
Priority Oregon

To support public policies that will help oregon's economy and create new family supporting jobs in oregon.

—
10
Outsiders Inn

Outsiders Inn (OI) provides peer-lead homeless services and operates multiple shelter programs with a recovery focused model in the Clark County, WA area.

Housing & Shelter
11
Clackamas Service Center

Clackamas service center is an inclusive, "one-stop" community center for individuals and families seeking food relief and resources for improved health, dignity, and stability.

Human Services
12
Oregon Human Development Corporation

To promote economic and social advancement of farmworkers and disadvantaged individuals through the provision of education, training, advocacy and services that enhance self-sufficiency.

Human Services
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Easter Seals of Oregon; the most unlike its peers is Rex Putnam High School Music Boosters. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

26 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 26 of the 29 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

5
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
10
Early backer (in before they grew)
26/26
Grantees still filing
18/26
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

CLACKAMAS COMMUNITY COLLEGE: $14,426,302 · OtherCLACKAMAS COMMUNITY COLLEGECLACKAMAS EDUCATION SERVICE DISTRIC: $4,227,082 · OtherCLACKAMAS EDUCATION SERVICE DISTRICTHE IMMIGRANT AND REFUGEE COMMUNITY ORGANIZATION: $3,261,813 · OtherTHE IMMIGRANT AND REFUGEE COMMUNITY ORGANIZATION+9 more: $1,255,969 · Other+9 moreOregon Manufacturing Extension Partnership Inc: $416,465 · Community ImprovementNorth Clackamas Education Foundation: $202,228 · EducationRex Putnam High School Music Boosters: $108,166 · EducationLoveone: $116,099 · Human ServicesFathers Heart Street Ministry: $82,500 · Human ServicesMOLALLA HOPE INC: $80,000 · Human Services+4 more: $23,090 · Human ServicesARTS ACTION ALLIANCE FOUNDATION DBA CLACKAMAS COUNTY ARTS ALLIANCE: $112,771 · Arts & CultureYOUTH MUSIC PROJECT: $80,000 · Arts & CultureLAKEWOOD THEATRE COMPANY: $80,000 · Arts & CultureTodos Juntos Inc: $76,080 · Crime & LegalCASA OF CLACKAMAS COUNTY: $6,000 · Crime & LegalBRIDGES TO CHANGE INC: $6,000 · Crime & LegalAMERICAN MILITARY ENCOURAGEMENT NETWORK: $80,000 · Food & Nutrition
Other$23,171,166Community Improvement$416,465Education$310,394Human Services$301,689Arts & Culture$272,771Crime & Legal$88,080Food & Nutrition$80,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetTHE IMMIGRANT AND REFUGEE COMMUNITY ORGANIZATION: $3,261,813 over 9y, 1.4% of budgetNORTHWEST FAMILY SERVICES: $766,849 over 6y, 5.0% of budgetOregon Manufacturing Extension Partnership Inc: $416,465 over 8y, 4.0% of budgetANTFARM INC: $360,818 over 4y, 2.5% of budgetNorth Clackamas Education Foundation: $202,228 over 2y, 29% of budgetLoveone: $116,099 over 2y, 34% of budgetARTS ACTION ALLIANCE FOUNDATION DBA CLACKAMAS COUNTY ARTS ALLIANCE: $112,771 over 2y, 15% of budgetRex Putnam High School Music Boosters: $108,166 over 2y, 56% of budgetFathers Heart Street Ministry: $82,500 over 1y, 1.1% of budgetLAKEWOOD THEATRE COMPANY: $80,000 over 1y, 2.4% of budgetAMERICAN MILITARY ENCOURAGEMENT NETWORK: $80,000 over 1y, 46% of budgetRivers of Life Center: $80,000 over 1y, 66% of budgetTodos Juntos Inc: $76,080 over 2y, 2.6% of budgetOREGON WORKFORCE PARTNERSHIP: $10,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetCASA OF CLACKAMAS COUNTY: $6,000 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetFOLK-TIME INC: $6,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetCORVALLIS NEIGHBORHOOD HOUSING SERVICES INC: $6,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetBRIDGES TO CHANGE INC: $6,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetFRIENDS OF ESTACADA COMMUNITY CENTER INC: $6,000 over 1y, 2.3% of budgetPARROTT CREEK CHILD AND FAMILY SERVICES: $6,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetCLACKAMAS WOMEN'S SERVICES: $6,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetEASTER SEALS OF OREGON: $5,475 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetTHE INN HOME FOR BOYS DBA TRUE HOUSING: $5,090 over 1y, 0.5% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Oregon Community …OCF Joseph E Weston P…Meyer Memorial TrustThe Collins FoundationThe Robert D and Marc…Careoregon IncJuan Young TrustMarie Lamfrom Charita…Providence Health & S…The Roundhouse Founda…Clackamas Women's Ser…The Autzen Foundation
The Oregon Community FoundationOR33.1× affinity17 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Oregon Community Foundation · OCF Joseph E Weston Public Foundation · Meyer Memorial Trust · The Collins Foundation · The Robert D and Marcia H Randall Charitable Trust · Careoregon Inc · Juan Young Trust · Marie Lamfrom Charitable Foundation Trust · Providence Health & Services - Oregon · The Roundhouse Foundation · Clackamas Women's Services · The Autzen Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Workforce Investment Council of Clackamas County funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Workforce Investment Council of Clackamas County. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 40%6%25%56%100%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 29%
  • Oregon Manufacturing Extension Partnership Inc: 83% of income from government
  • Easter Seals of Oregon: 77% of income from government
  • Rivers of Life Center: 65% of income from government
  • Todos Juntos Inc: 64% of income from government
  • Mental Health Association of Oregon: 41% of income from government
  • Bridges to Change Inc: 40% of income from government
  • Northwest Family Services: 35% of income from government
  • Clackamas Women's Services: 33% of income from government
  • American Military Encouragement Network: 31% of income from government
  • Antfarm Inc: 29% of income from government
  • Folk-Time Inc: 26% of income from government
  • Parrott Creek Child and Family Services: 20% of income from government
  • Loveone: 12% of income from government
  • Corvallis Neighborhood Housing Services Inc: 11% of income from government
  • Arts Action Alliance Foundation Dba Clackamas County Arts Alliance: 9% of income from government
  • Oregon Workforce Partnership: 5% of income from government
  • The Immigrant and Refugee Community Organization: 4% of income from government
  • Youth Music Project: 1% of income from government
  • Casa of Clackamas County: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
4get no government money at all
3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
4rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 29 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Workforce Investment Council of Clackamas County’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home