Skip to content

· Private foundation

Woodson Family Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$88k
Granted FY2025still arriving
16
Grants FY2025still arriving
5
States reached
$21k
Largest
01What it funds
0181% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Education$74kHealth$65kHuman Services$62kYouth Development$54kFood & Nutrition$36kPhilanthropy$14kEmployment$13kArts & Culture$9kOther$0
02FY2025 · 16 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k13 grants · $42k
  • $10k–50k3 grants · $46k
$5,000
Median grant
5
States reached
$1.6M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
WYOMING WEST WARRIOR FOUNDATION$21,000
CALVARY CHAPEL CHEYENNE$15,000
GREATER BATON ROGUE FOOD BANK$10,000
UNIVERSITY OF WYOMING FOUNDATION$5,000
ALEXS LEMONADE STAND FOUNDATION$5,000
THE SOPHIAS WAY$5,000
CLIMB WYOMING$5,000
FOOD BANK OF WYOMING$5,000
WOMEN WITH PURPOSE$3,000
METANOIA INC$3,000
Individual grant recipient$2,500
SHERIDAN COUNTY FULMER LIBRARY$2,500
HUB ON SMITH$2,500
SHERIDAN BIG BROTHERS BIG SISTERS$1,000
Individual grant recipient$1,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–25, $99k) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 88% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%MILLIONAIR CLUB: $5k → 9%WYOMING WEST WARRIOR FOUNDATION: $21k → 10%WYOMING WEST WARRIOR FOUNDATION: $15k → 10%CLIMB WYOMING: $5k → 10%MILLIONAIR CLUB: $2k → 9%LIFE OF A SINGLE MOM: $3k → 19%WYO WEST WARRIOR FOUNDATION: $8k → 10%THE SOPHIAS WAY: $5k → 9%WYO WEST WARRIOR FOUNDATION: $8k → 10%WYO WEST WARRIOR FOUNDATION: $8k → 10%HOSPICE OF THE VALLEY: $2k → 11%HUB ON SMITH: $5k → 10%HUB ON SMITH: $5k → 10%HUB ON SMITH: $3k → 10%HUB ON SMITH: $3k → 10%THE HUB ON SMITH: $3k → 10%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

WA
MT
IL
WY
OH
CA
CO
NE
VA
AZ
NM
TN
LA
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

75%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$375k · 19 repeat orgs$127k to everyone else

19 repeat relationships: 8 still active in FY2025, 11 since wound down; 8 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

19
28

Total granted

$375k
$89k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+26%
+32%

Still filing today

42%
39%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 57% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $38k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesHealthArts & CultureHousing & ShelterEducationPhilanthropyOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • UO
    UNIVERSITY OF WYOMING FOUNDATION
    5× · 2021–2025 · $25k · revenue +28%
  • GB
    GREATER BATON ROUGE FOOD BANK
    3× · 2022–2025 · $18k · revenue +12%
  • SC
    SENIOR CITIZEN COUNCIL
    5× · 2019–2025 · $18k · revenue +21%

Funded once

  • IW
    Invisible Wounds Foundationgraduated
    one grant, 2024 · $20k · revenue +66%
  • BR
    BATON ROUGE BALLET THEATER
    one grant, 2024 · $9k
  • SU
    SEATTLES UNION GOSPEL MISSION
    one grant, 2017 · $5k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Honorhealth

Honorhealth's mission is to improve the health and well-being of those we serve.

Health
2
The Nebraska Medical Center

The Nebraska Medical Center (TNMC)'s mission is to lead the world in transforming lives to create a healthy future for individuals and communities through premier educational programs, innovative research, and extraordinary patient care.

Health
3
The Susan G Komen Breast Cancer Fdn Group

Susan g. komen 's mission is to save lives by meeting the most critical needs in our communities & investing in breakthrough research to prevent & cure breast cancer.

—
4
Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center

Leadership in the prevention, treatment, and cure of cancer through excellence, vision and cost effectiveness in patient care, outreach programs, research, and education.

Health
5
Baylor Research Institute

To improve the care and well being of our community, nationally and internationally, through innovative clinically relevant research that is consistent with the mission, vision and values of Baylor Scott & White Health (BSWH).

Health
6
The Susan G Komen Breast Cancer Foundation Inc

Susan g. komen has an unmatched, comprehensive 360-degree approach to fighting breast cancer across all fronts and supporting millions of people in the u.s. and in countries worldwide. we advocate for policies to protect patients, drive…

Health
7
Aerial Recovery

Aerial recovery's mission is to save lives and stop evil. through the creation and deployment of humanitarian special operators, aerial recovery brings together selected veterans, first responders, and mission-qualified civilians who,…

—
8
2020 Mom Policy Center for Maternal

The policy center is improving maternal mental health outcomes through closing gaps in care delivery, including improving detection and access to evidence-based and informed clinical and community-based care. the policy center has been…

Health
9
Sutter Bay Medical Foundation

Mission statement: mission: caring for our patients first and our people always. vision: to be the most comprehensive, integrated and connected health system for getting and staying well. values: excellence - we deliver high-quality,…

Health
10
The Johns Hopkins Hospital

For more than 125 years, the mission of the johns hopkins hospital has been to lead the world in the diagnosis and treatment of disease and to train tomorrow's great physicians, nurses and scientists. above all, we aim to provide the…

Health
11
City of Hope National Medical Center

To make hope a reality for all touched by cancer and diabetes. please see schedule o for a continuation of our mission.

Health
12
The Multiple Myeloma Research Foundation Inc

The multiple myeloma research foundation (mmrf) is the largest nonprofit in the world solely focused on accelerating a cure for each and every multiple myeloma patient. we drive the development and delivery of next-generation therapies,…

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Orphan Foundation of America D/B/a Foster Care to Success Foundation; the most unlike its peers is Taco Johns Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

25 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 25 of the 56 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
6
Early backer (in before they grew)
25/25
Grantees still filing
19/25
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

UNIVERSITY OF WYOMING: $47,686 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF WYOMINGBOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF EAST VALLEY: $44,424 · OtherBOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF EAST VALLEYIndividual grant recipient: $41,321 · OtherIndividual grant recipientIndividual grant recipient: $18,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientGREATER BATON ROUGE FOOD BANK: $18,000 · OtherGREATER BATON ROUGE FOOD BANKWYOMING FOOD BANK OF THE ROCKIES: $15,000 · OtherCALVARY CHAPEL OF CHEYENNE: $15,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipient: $14,500 · OtherWYO FOOD BANK OF THE ROCKIES: $10,716 · Other+29 more: $94,100 · Other+29 moreWYO WEST WARRIOR FOUNDATION: $59,000 · Human ServicesWYO WEST WARRIOR FOUNDA…SENIOR CITIZEN COUNCIL: $17,500 · Human ServicesSENIOR CITIZEN COUNCILCLIMB DBA CLIMB WYOMING: $10,500 · Human ServicesCLIMB DBA CLIMB WYOMINGUPLIFT NORTHWEST: $7,000 · Human ServicesUPLIFT NORTHWESTTHE SOPHIA WAY: $5,000 · Human Services+2 more: $5,000 · Human ServicesInvisible Wounds Foundation: $20,000 · HealthNATIONAL JEWISH HEALTH: $12,500 · HealthRECOVERY CAFE: $4,500 · HealthFred Hutchinson Cancer Center: $3,000 · Health+1 more: $500 · HealthUNIVERSITY OF WYOMING FOUNDATION: $25,325 · EducationBATON ROUGE AREA FOUNDATION: $10,000 · PhilanthropyTACO JOHNS FOUNDATION: $4,000 · PhilanthropyFOOD BANK OF THE ROCKIES: $5,000 · Food & NutritionMETANOIA INC: $3,000 · Arts & CultureCHEYENNE FRONTIER DAYS OLD WEST MUSEUM: $1,000 · Arts & Culture
Other$318,747Human Services$104,000Health$40,500Education$25,325Philanthropy$14,000Food & Nutrition$5,000Arts & Culture$4,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetWYO WEST WARRIOR FOUNDATION: $59,000 over 5y, 14% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF WYOMING FOUNDATION: $25,325 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetInvisible Wounds Foundation: $20,000 over 1y, 5.8% of budgetGREATER BATON ROUGE FOOD BANK: $18,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetSENIOR CITIZEN COUNCIL: $17,500 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetNATIONAL JEWISH HEALTH: $12,500 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetCLIMB DBA CLIMB WYOMING: $10,500 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetBATON ROUGE AREA FOUNDATION: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetUPLIFT NORTHWEST: $7,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetFOOD BANK OF THE ROCKIES: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetALEXS LEMONADE STAND FOUNDATION: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetRECOVERY CAFE: $4,500 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetTACO JOHNS FOUNDATION: $4,000 over 1y, 2.9% of budgetTHE LIFE OF A SINGLE MOM: $3,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetFred Hutchinson Cancer Center: $3,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetLOUISIANA ABORTION FUND: $3,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetORPHAN FOUNDATION OF AMERICA D/B/A FOSTER CARE TO SUCCESS FOUNDATION: $3,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetADAPTIVE PERFORMANCE CENTER: $2,500 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetHospice of the Valley: $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds WYO WEST WARRIOR FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds UNIVERSITY OF WYOMING FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds Invisible Wounds Foundation ↗
  • Who funds GREATER BATON ROUGE FOOD BANK ↗
  • Who funds SENIOR CITIZEN COUNCIL ↗
  • Who funds NATIONAL JEWISH HEALTH ↗
  • Who funds CLIMB DBA CLIMB WYOMING ↗
  • Who funds BATON ROUGE AREA FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds UPLIFT NORTHWEST ↗
  • Who funds THE SOPHIA WAY ↗
  • Who funds FOOD BANK OF THE ROCKIES ↗
  • Who funds ALEXS LEMONADE STAND FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds RECOVERY CAFE ↗
  • Who funds TACO JOHNS FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds THE LIFE OF A SINGLE MOM ↗
  • Who funds Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center ↗
  • Who funds LOUISIANA ABORTION FUND ↗
  • Who funds ORPHAN FOUNDATION OF AMERICA D/B/A FOSTER CARE TO SUCCESS FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds METANOIA INC ↗
  • Who funds Resurrection Street Ministry Inc ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Stand Together FoundationVA13.5× affinity4 shared granteesties to 9 of 9Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Stand Together Foundation · Jpmorgan Chase Foundation · Paypal Charitable Giving Fund · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · National Philanthropic Trust · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Woodson Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Woodson Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%4%8%15%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    7report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Woodson Family Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to Woodson Family Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 56 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Woodson Family’s filings →

    More from the funding graph