Skip to content

· Private foundation

Womenconnect4good Inc

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$1.9M
Granted FY2025still arriving
34
Grants FY2025still arriving
13
States reached
$250k
Largest
01What it funds
0196% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Arts & Culture$1.9MCommunity Improvement$1.0MCivil Rights$653kFood & Nutrition$530kInternational$325kYouth Development$312kEnvironment$200kHealth$178kOther$0
02FY2025 · 34 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k5 grants · $22k
  • $10k–50k17 grants · $304k
  • $50k–250k11 grants · $1.3M
  • $250k+1 grant · $250k
$25,000
Median grant
13
States reached
$2.3M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
NATIONAL WOMEN'S HISTORY MUSEUM$250,000
LET IT RIPPLE$238,000
CONVOY OF HOPE$220,000
FUND FOR WOMEN'S EQUALITY$150,000
CONNECTED WOMEN LEADERS$150,000
IMPACT ASSETS INC$100,000
GREEN TIDE RISING PROJECT$100,000
WOMEN'S SPORTS FOUNDATION$100,000
TAKING THE REINS$80,000
TAKE THE LEAD$75,000
EQUALITY NOW$50,000
WORLD PULSE VOICES$50,000
OUR DAUGHTERS' FUTURES FUND$35,000
GLOBAL IMPACT$34,000
EISENHOWER EXCHANGE FELLOWSHIPS$25,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY21–25, $595k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%WORLD PULSE VOICES: $100k → 12%WOMEN'S FUND OF RHODE ISLAND: $5k → 14%WORLD PULSE VOICES: $50k → 12%WOMEN'S FIND OF RHODE ISLAND: $5k → 14%WORLD PULSE VOICES: $50k → 12%WORLD PULSE VOICES: $50k → 12%TAKING THE REINS: $125k → 14%WOMEN MOVING MILLIONS: $25k → 17%WORLD PULSE VOICES: $10k → 12%TAKING THE REINS: $80k → 14%WOMEN MOVING MILLIONS: $25k → 17%WOMEN MOVING MILLIONS: $20k → 17%WOMEN MOVING MILLIONS: $20k → 17%WOMEN MOVING MILLIONS: $20k → 17%CATHOLIC CHARITIES OF SOUTH MISSOURI: $5k → 15%CATHOLIC CHARITIES OF SOUTH MISSOURI: $5k → 15%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

IL
NY
MA
OR
IN
PA
CT
RI
CA
UT
MO
VA
MD
AZ
KS
NC
SC
DC
GA
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

82%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$4.5M · 31 repeat orgs$983k to everyone else

31 repeat relationships: 16 still active in FY2025, 15 since wound down; 14 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

31
41

Total granted

$4.5M
$508k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

0%
+10%

Still filing today

61%
44%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 69% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $475k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesArts & CultureHealthEducationPublic BenefitInternationalOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • NW
    NATIONAL WOMEN'S HISTORY MUSEUM
    5× · 2021–2025 · $1.1M · revenue +25%
  • TT
    TAKE THE LEAD INC
    3× · 2023–2025 · $305k · revenue +36%
  • WM
    WOMEN MOVING MILLIONS INC
    5× · 2021–2025 · $110k · revenue +118%

Funded once

  • WF
    WSS FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2022 · $150k
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2022 · $63k
  • WS
    World Systems Solutions Inc
    one grant, 2024 · $50k · revenue 0%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Independent Women's Forum

Engage more individuals in the civic process, educate them about the impact of public policies on their lives and our economy, and build support for policies that empower individuals.

Civil Rights
2
Womens Funding Network

Our mission as a global alliance is to provide strategies, research, and resources that support the critical agency and influence of women's foundations and gender justice funders in the movement for equality, justice, and power for all.

Education
3
Woman Inc

W.O.M.A.N., Inc. supports survivors of domestic violence and their loved ones along their healing journeys, bridging value rich networks designed to address intersections of violence. In all our work, we strive to continually increase our…

Health
4
Women Forward International

Women forward international (wfi) partners the next generation with nonprofit and private sector organizations and artists to implement solutions critical to human process, bridging mind and heart to bring about unity, collaboration, and…

International
5
Womens Global Empowerment Fund

The mission of Women's Global Empowerment Fund is to empower women through economic, social and political programs; creating opportunities while addressing inequality, strengthening families and communities. Our strategy is to provide…

International
6
Foundation for Women's Cancer

To support and empower all affected by gynecologic cancers through education, research, and public awareness.

Health
7
Women's Link Worldwide

A legal organization working to advance the rights of women, girls, and gender diverse people. We work on issues of reproductive rights, gender-based violence, climate, and racial justice in East Africa, Europe, Latin America, and the…

Civil Rights
8
Association for Women in Science Inc

To achieve equality and full participation for women in science, mathematics, engineering and technology.

—
9
American Association of University Women Inc

Aauw advances gender equity for women and girls through research, education, and advocacy.

Education
10
Women Deliver Inc

Women deliver is a global feminist advocacy organization with a clear mission: to ensure that every self-identifying girl and woman has control over her body and life. see organization's full mission statement in schedule o.

Education
11
International Women's Forum Inc

The mission of the international women's forum is to advance women's leadership worldwide. iwf takes direct action to achieve our mission in three important ways. connect: our convenings provide networking and cutting-edge content…

Education
12
Strategic Advocacy for Human Rights Inc

Fueling a worldwide network of women human rights defenders (whrds) to strengthen laws, policies and practices to end sexual and gender-based violence (sgbv).

Civil Rights
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Womens Sports Foundation; the most unlike its peers is Parkinsons Group of the Ozarks. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

51 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 51 of the 91 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

2
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
12
Early backer (in before they grew)
49/51
Grantees still filing
29/51
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

NATIONAL WOMEN'S HISTORY MUSEUM: $1,115,000 · Arts & CultureNATIONAL WOMEN'S HISTORY MUSEUMLet It Ripple Inc: $478,650 · Arts & CultureLet It Ripple Inc+4 more: $112,500 · Arts & Culture+4 moreTAKE THE LEAD: $590,000 · OtherTAKE THE LEADI AM A LEADER: $225,000 · OtherI AM A LEADERGREEN TIDE RISING PROJECT: $150,000 · OtherGREEN TIDE RISING PROJECTWSS FOUNDATION: $150,000 · OtherWSS FOUNDATIONProject Dandelion Inc: $150,000 · OtherProject Dandelion IncDrury University: $87,500 · OtherWomens Sports Foundation: $100,000 · Other+58 more: $724,173 · Other+58 moreWorld Pulse Voices: $260,000 · Human ServicesWorld Pulse…TAKING THE REINS: $205,000 · Human ServicesTAKING THE …WOMEN MOVING MILLIONS INC: $110,000 · Human ServicesWOMEN MOVIN…+4 more: $27,500 · Human ServicesFUND FOR WOMEN'S EQUALITY INC: $525,000 · Civil RightsFUND FOR W…+1 more: $10,000 · Civil RightsTAKE THE LEAD INC: $305,000 · Food & NutritionCONVOY OF HOPE: $225,000 · InternationalGlobal Impact: $34,000 · InternationalEisenhower Exchange Fellowships Incorporated: $25,000 · InternationalCenter for Third World Organizing: $15,000 · International+1 more: $3,500 · InternationalBREAST CANCER FOUNDATION OF THE OZARKS: $100,000 · PhilanthropyIMPACTASSETSINC: $100,000 · PhilanthropyOZARKS TECHNICAL COMMUNITY COLLEGE FOUNDATION: $11,050 · PhilanthropyROCKEFELLER PHILANTHROPY ADVISORS INC: $10,000 · Philanthropy+1 more: $2,500 · Philanthropy
Arts & Culture$1,706,150Other$2,176,673Human Services$602,500Civil Rights$535,000Food & Nutrition$305,000International$302,500Philanthropy$223,550

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetNATIONAL WOMEN'S HISTORY MUSEUM: $1,115,000 over 5y, 14% of budgetFUND FOR WOMEN'S EQUALITY INC: $525,000 over 2y, 64% of budgetLet It Ripple Inc: $478,650 over 4y, 77% of budgetTAKE THE LEAD INC: $305,000 over 3y, 10% of budgetWorld Pulse Voices: $260,000 over 5y, 8.4% of budgetCONVOY OF HOPE: $225,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTAKING THE REINS: $205,000 over 2y, 12% of budgetWOMEN MOVING MILLIONS INC: $110,000 over 5y, 1.8% of budgetBREAST CANCER FOUNDATION OF THE OZARKS: $100,000 over 4y, 0.4% of budgetDrury University: $87,500 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetWorld Systems Solutions Inc: $50,000 over 1y, 4.9% of budgetFrom The Heart Productions: $50,000 over 1y, 1.4% of budgetOur Daughter's Future Fund: $35,000 over 1y, 22% of budgetGlobal Impact: $34,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHOPE FOUNDATION: $27,500 over 2y, 23% of budgetTHE FILM COLLABORATIVE INC: $25,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetPEOPLE FOR THE AMERICAN WAY: $25,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetTHE VICTIM CENTER: $20,000 over 3y, 0.4% of budgetGREATER MISSOURI LEADERSHIP FOUNDATION INC: $20,000 over 3y, 4.2% of budgetAmerican Heart Association Inc: $17,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetOZARKS TECHNICAL COMMUNITY COLLEGE FOUNDATION: $11,050 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetCATHOLIC CHARITIES OF SOUTHERN MISSOURI INC: $10,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetWomen's Fund of Rhode Island: $10,000 over 2y, 1.2% of budgetAMERICAN CIVIL LIBERTIES UNION OF MISSOURI FOUNDATION: $10,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetGlobal Good Fund: $10,000 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetJUNIOR LEAGUE OF SANTA BARBARA: $8,000 over 2y, 1.9% of budgetCOMBAT SEXUAL ASSAULT: $5,000 over 1y, 7.4% of budgetTHE CHILD ADVOCACY CENTER INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetHORSES & HEROES INC: $5,000 over 1y, 1.4% of budgetEQUUS FOUNDATION INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetMOUNT SAINT MARY'S UNIVERSITY: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPARKINSONS GROUP OF THE OZARKS: $5,000 over 1y, 4.8% of budgetHOPE REFUGE INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetASSOCIATION FOR WOMEN IN COMMUNICATIONS INC: $5,000 over 2y, 2.0% of budgetWomen of Achievement: $5,000 over 1y, 2.9% of budgetDynamic Strides Therapy Inc: $3,750 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetTHE GEEK FOUNDATION: $3,500 over 1y, 1.9% of budgetPLAN INTERNATIONAL USA INC: $3,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSANTA BARBARA ARTS COLLABORATIVE INC: $2,500 over 1y, 1.1% of budgetCOMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF THE OZARKS INC: $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSPRINGFIELD BLACK TIE INC: $2,500 over 1y, 1.8% of budgetALL STARS HELPING KIDS INC: $1,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds NATIONAL WOMEN'S HISTORY MUSEUM ↗
  • Who funds FUND FOR WOMEN'S EQUALITY INC ↗
  • Who funds Let It Ripple Inc ↗
  • Who funds TAKE THE LEAD INC ↗
  • Who funds World Pulse Voices ↗
  • Who funds CONVOY OF HOPE ↗
  • Who funds TAKING THE REINS ↗
  • Who funds Project Dandelion Inc ↗
  • Who funds WOMEN MOVING MILLIONS INC ↗
  • Who funds BREAST CANCER FOUNDATION OF THE OZARKS ↗
  • Who funds IMPACTASSETSINC ↗
  • Who funds Womens Sports Foundation ↗
  • Who funds Drury University ↗
  • Who funds World Systems Solutions Inc ↗
  • Who funds From The Heart Productions ↗
  • Who funds Our Daughter's Future Fund ↗
  • Who funds Global Impact ↗
  • Who funds HOPE FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds WOMEN'S ECONOMIC VENTURES ↗
  • Who funds THE FILM COLLABORATIVE INC ↗
  • Who funds PEOPLE FOR THE AMERICAN WAY ↗
  • Who funds Eisenhower Exchange Fellowships Incorporated ↗
  • Who funds THE VICTIM CENTER ↗
  • Who funds GREATER MISSOURI LEADERSHIP FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds American Heart Association Inc ↗
  • Who funds Center for Third World Organizing ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Dr Nancy O'Reilly Family FoundationMO36.8× affinity15 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Dr Nancy O'Reilly Family Foundation · The Charlie & Mary Beth O'Reilly Family Foundation · Community Foundation of the Ozarks Inc · Musgrave Foundation · Larry P O'Reilly and Family Foundation · Commerce Bancshares Foundation · Santa Barbara Foundation · Arvest Foundation · California Community Foundation · Gs Donor Advised Philanthropy Fund for Wealth Management Inc · United Way of the Ozarks Inc · Robert M - Bobby - Allison Charitable Tr

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Womenconnect4good Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Womenconnect4good Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 50%5%19%42%75%funder's share of their income ↑0%13%25%38%50%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    5get no government money at all
    8report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–50%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Womenconnect4good Inc?

    Find your warmest path to Womenconnect4good Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 91 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Womenconnect4good’s filings →

    More from the funding graph