· Private foundation
Dr Nancy O'Reilly Family Foundation
Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2025
- Under $10k8 grants · $35k
- $10k–50k10 grants · $184k
- $50k–250k4 grants · $357k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| THE WILD BEAUTY FOUNDATION | $150,000 |
| UNITY OF SANTA BARBARA | $100,000 |
| Individual grant recipient | $57,246 |
| ART OF ELYSIUM | $50,000 |
| LET IT RIPPLE | $47,100 |
| ARABIAN HORSE ASSOCIATION | $25,000 |
| COMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF THE OZARKS | $25,000 |
| HUMANE SOCIETY OF SOUTHWEST MISSOURI | $20,000 |
| NEW WEST SYMPHONY ASSOCIATION | $15,000 |
| SPRINGFIELD BLACK TIE INC | $12,000 |
| COUNCIL OF CHURCHES OF THE OZARKS | $10,000 |
| DYNAMIC STRIDES THERAPY | $10,000 |
| Individual grant recipient | $10,000 |
| UNITED MINISTRIES IN HIGHER EDUCATION | $10,000 |
| SOVEREIGN MILITARY ORDER OF JERUSALEM | $5,210 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY17–25, $264k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 94% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +31% since the first grant, against +11% for the ones you funded once.
48 repeat relationships — 13 still active in FY2025, 35 since wound down; 8 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 38% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $342k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- DSDynamic Strides Therapy Inc9× · 2017–2025 · $364k · revenue +125%
- TTTAKE THE LEAD INC4× · 2019–2023 · $230k · revenue +64%
- HHHarvest Home Inc8× · 2017–2024 · $155k · revenue +223%
Funded once
- NWNATIONAL WOMEN'S HISTORY MUSEUMone grant, 2021 · $125k · revenue +25%
CEDARS-SINAI MEDICAL CENTERone grant, 2024 · $100k · revenue +11%- TTTAKING THE REINSone grant, 2021 · $63k · revenue +10%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
To support and empower all affected by gynecologic cancers through education, research, and public awareness.
True to our christian heritage, we prepare students from diverse religious, cultural, educational and economic backgrounds to live life fully.
Marin humane transforms lives through exceptional animal care, humane education, and advocacy. every day, marin humane inspires compassion and positive relationships between people and animals.
Animal care sanctuary's lifesaving mission as a no kill organization envisions a community that promotes turning compassion into action for companion animals by: 1.) adopting healthy pet companions into loving homes. 2.) promoting the…
Dedicated to the early detection and prevention of cervical cancer around the globe for the women who need it most.
Believing in the value of every life, mary's path empowers vulnerable teen mothers in foster care and their babies to create lives of dignity, hope and self-sufficiency.
We connect people, ideas, and nonprofits to make good happen. our vision is that all of jeffco is thriving.
The mission of the foundation is to improve the health and well-being of the communities served by jefferson hospital through engagement, community-driven research and grantmaking. there are three grantmaking priorities focused on the…
The missouri western state university foundation is a not-for-profit charitable organization that functions solely to support the mission of missouri western state university, as stated in the university's mission statement. the foundation…
The sacramento zoo inspires appreciation, respect and a connection with wildlife and nature through education, recreation and conservation.
Fighting to end animal cruelty and create a more compassionate world.(continued in schedule o)fiscal year 2024-2025 highlights include:investigated/resourced 71 animal cruelty cases, provided care andrehabilitations for 398 animals at our…
To save lives through excellence in organ and tissue donation.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Convoy of Hope and the most unlike its peers is The Caring People. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 28 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
60 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 60 of the 104 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds Dynamic Strides Therapy Inc ↗
- Who funds TAKE THE LEAD INC ↗
- Who funds Harvest Home Inc ↗
- Who funds CONVOY OF HOPE ↗
- Who funds THE ART OF ELYSIUM ↗
- Who funds PLAYERS PHILANTHROPY FUND INC ↗
- Who funds ARABIAN HORSE ASSOCIATION ↗
- Who funds SANSUM CLINIC ↗
- Who funds NATIONAL WOMEN'S HISTORY MUSEUM ↗
- Who funds BREAST CANCER FOUNDATION OF THE OZARKS ↗
- Who funds CEDARS-SINAI MEDICAL CENTER ↗
- Who funds Let It Ripple Inc ↗
- Who funds HUMANE SOCIETY OF SOUTHWEST MISSOURI ↗
- Who funds Drury University ↗
- Who funds SPRINGFIELD BLACK TIE INC ↗
- Who funds TAKING THE REINS ↗
- Who funds BREAKTHROUGH T1D ↗
- Who funds THE VICTIM CENTER ↗
- Who funds NEW WEST SYMPHONY ASSOCIATION ↗
- Who funds COMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF THE OZARKS INC ↗
- Who funds Springfield Symphony Association ↗
- Who funds GIRLS INCORPORATED OF GREATER SANTA BARBARA ↗
- Who funds CAL POLY POMONA PHILANTHROPIC FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds PARK CENTURY SCHOOL ↗
- Who funds BRAVEHEARTS THERAPEUTIC RIDING AND EDUCATIONAL CENTER ↗
- Who funds PARKINSONS GROUP OF THE OZARKS ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Community Foundation of the Ozarks Inc · Womenconnect4good Inc · Larry P O'Reilly and Family Foundation · The Charlie & Mary Beth O'Reilly Family Foundation · Musgrave Foundation · Commerce Bancshares Foundation · Stanley & Elaine Ball Charitable Tr · Arvest Foundation · Ozarks Health Advocacy Foundation · United Way of the Ozarks Inc · Roy W Slusher Charitable Foundation · Cook Family Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Dr Nancy O'Reilly Family Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Child Advocacy Center Inc — 40% of income from government
- Wounded Warrior Project Inc — 0% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to Dr Nancy O'Reilly Family Foundation?
Find your warmest path to Dr Nancy O'Reilly Family Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.