· Private foundation
Womenconnect4good Inc
Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2025
- Under $10k5 grants · $22k
- $10k–50k17 grants · $304k
- $50k–250k11 grants · $1.3M
- $250k+1 grant · $250k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| NATIONAL WOMEN'S HISTORY MUSEUM | $250,000 |
| LET IT RIPPLE | $238,000 |
| CONVOY OF HOPE | $220,000 |
| CONNECTED WOMEN LEADERS | $150,000 |
| FUND FOR WOMEN'S EQUALITY | $150,000 |
| WOMEN'S SPORTS FOUNDATION | $100,000 |
| IMPACT ASSETS INC | $100,000 |
| GREEN TIDE RISING PROJECT | $100,000 |
| TAKING THE REINS | $80,000 |
| TAKE THE LEAD | $75,000 |
| WORLD PULSE VOICES | $50,000 |
| EQUALITY NOW | $50,000 |
| OUR DAUGHTERS' FUTURES FUND | $35,000 |
| GLOBAL IMPACT | $34,000 |
| WOMEN MOVING MILLIONS | $25,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY21–25, $595k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
31 repeat relationships — 16 still active in FY2025, 15 since wound down; 14 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 69% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $475k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- NWNATIONAL WOMEN'S HISTORY MUSEUM5× · 2021–2025 · $1.1M · revenue +25%
- TTTAKE THE LEAD INC3× · 2023–2025 · $305k · revenue +36%
- WMWOMEN MOVING MILLIONS INC5× · 2021–2025 · $110k · revenue +118%
Funded once
- WFWSS FOUNDATIONone grant, 2022 · $150k
- IGIndividual grant recipientone grant, 2022 · $63k
From The Heart Productionsgraduatedone grant, 2019 · $50k · revenue +132%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Engage more individuals in the civic process, educate them about the impact of public policies on their lives and our economy, and build support for policies that empower individuals.
Our mission as a global alliance is to provide strategies, research, and resources that support the critical agency and influence of women's foundations and gender justice funders in the movement for equality, justice, and power for all.
W.O.M.A.N., Inc. supports survivors of domestic violence and their loved ones along their healing journeys, bridging value rich networks designed to address intersections of violence. In all our work, we strive to continually increase our…
Women forward international (wfi) partners the next generation with nonprofit and private sector organizations and artists to implement solutions critical to human process, bridging mind and heart to bring about unity, collaboration, and…
The mission of Women's Global Empowerment Fund is to empower women through economic, social and political programs; creating opportunities while addressing inequality, strengthening families and communities. Our strategy is to provide…
To support and empower all affected by gynecologic cancers through education, research, and public awareness.
A legal organization working to advance the rights of women, girls, and gender diverse people. We work on issues of reproductive rights, gender-based violence, climate, and racial justice in East Africa, Europe, Latin America, and the…
To achieve equality and full participation for women in science, mathematics, engineering and technology.
Aauw advances gender equity for women and girls through research, education, and advocacy.
Women deliver is a global feminist advocacy organization with a clear mission: to ensure that every self-identifying girl and woman has control over her body and life. see organization's full mission statement in schedule o.
The mission of the international women's forum is to advance women's leadership worldwide. iwf takes direct action to achieve our mission in three important ways. connect: our convenings provide networking and cutting-edge content…
Fueling a worldwide network of women human rights defenders (whrds) to strengthen laws, policies and practices to end sexual and gender-based violence (sgbv).
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Womens Sports Foundation and the most unlike its peers is Parkinsons Group of the Ozarks. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 28 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 4% of your grantees by number, and just 4% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 2% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
51 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 51 of the 91 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds NATIONAL WOMEN'S HISTORY MUSEUM ↗
- Who funds FUND FOR WOMEN'S EQUALITY INC ↗
- Who funds Let It Ripple Inc ↗
- Who funds TAKE THE LEAD INC ↗
- Who funds World Pulse Voices ↗
- Who funds CONVOY OF HOPE ↗
- Who funds TAKING THE REINS ↗
- Who funds Project Dandelion Inc ↗
- Who funds WOMEN MOVING MILLIONS INC ↗
- Who funds Womens Sports Foundation ↗
- Who funds IMPACTASSETSINC ↗
- Who funds BREAST CANCER FOUNDATION OF THE OZARKS ↗
- Who funds Drury University ↗
- Who funds From The Heart Productions ↗
- Who funds World Systems Solutions Inc ↗
- Who funds Our Daughter's Future Fund ↗
- Who funds Global Impact ↗
- Who funds HOPE FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds THE FILM COLLABORATIVE INC ↗
- Who funds Eisenhower Exchange Fellowships Incorporated ↗
- Who funds WOMEN'S ECONOMIC VENTURES ↗
- Who funds PEOPLE FOR THE AMERICAN WAY ↗
- Who funds GREATER MISSOURI LEADERSHIP FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds THE VICTIM CENTER ↗
- Who funds American Heart Association Inc ↗
- Who funds Center for Third World Organizing ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Dr Nancy O'Reilly Family Foundation · The Charlie & Mary Beth O'Reilly Family Foundation · Community Foundation of the Ozarks Inc · Musgrave Foundation · Larry P O'Reilly and Family Foundation · Commerce Bancshares Foundation · Santa Barbara Foundation · Arvest Foundation · California Community Foundation · Gs Donor Advised Philanthropy Fund for Wealth Management Inc · United Way of the Ozarks Inc · Robert M - Bobby - Allison Charitable Tr
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Womenconnect4good Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to Womenconnect4good Inc?
Find your warmest path to Womenconnect4good Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.