Skip to content
Plinth

· Public charity

Women's Economic Self-Sufficiency Team Corp

Wesst is a home to entrepreneurs providing a support system of consulting, training, incubation, and lending to help new mexicans strengthen and grow their small businesses through sustainable business models, financial empowerment, and job creation.

$3.0M
Granted FY2024still arriving
81
Grants FY2024still arriving
1
States reached
$96k
Largest
01What you fund
01

What you funded, over time

By grantee IRS cause code (NTEE).

A cause breakdown isn’t shown here: 71% of WOMEN'S ECONOMIC SELF-SUFFICIENCY TEAM CORP’s grantee dollars fall outside its nine largest cause areas, whether because the recipient carries no IRS cause code or because its cause sits in the long tail. A chart would be mostly one residual band and misrepresent the portfolio.

02FY2024 · 81 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

The 81 grants below total $2,497,554 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $3,041,189 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $543,635 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.

By grant size · FY2024

  • $10k–50k61 grants · $1.2M
  • $50k–250k20 grants · $1.3M
$30,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$12M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
COVENANT SCHOOLS OF RIO RANCH$96,498
THE SUNNYSIDE DAYCARE$80,000
LA LUZ EARLY CHILDHOOD CENTER$80,000
HAPPY DAYS CHRISTIAN DAY CARE & PRE$80,000
WEE KIDS KOUNTRY KLUB INC$80,000
BUILDING BRIDGES CHILD DEVELOPMENT$80,000
COVENANT SCHOOL DEL NORTE$63,395
3-D ENTERPRISES INC$60,000
LITTLE TUMBLEWEED DAYCARE NEW BEGIN$60,000
PERALTA'S PLAYHOUSE INC$60,000
LITTLE BUTTERFLIES LEARNING CENTER$60,000
ALBUQUERQUE FOURSQUARE CHURCH DBA E$60,000
EL GRITO INC$60,000
RAINBOW CHILD DEVELOPMENT CENTER IN$60,000
ROBERT CHAVEZ YOUTH DEVELOPMENT$52,371
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY18–24, $512k) land where the poverty rate runs at 15%, against an area that typically sits at 17%. 37% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 17%WEE KIDS KOUNTRY KLUB INC: $80k → 19%PERALTA'S PLAYHOUSE INC: $60k → 19%HAPPY DAYS CHRISTIAN DAY CARE & PRE: $80k → 10%CHILDRENS CHRISTIAN DEVELOPMENT CEN: $10k → 18%KIDZO CCDC - WEST CAMPUS: $10k → 18%SANTA FE MONTESSORI CHILDCARE PROGR: $30k → 12%CHARLOTTES PLACE PRESCHOOL: $30k → 23%LA LUZ EARLY CHILDHOOD CENTER: $80k → 14%CUIDANDO LOS NIOS: $40k → 14%ENCUENTRO NUEVO MEXICO: $22k → 14%ENCUENTRO NUEVO MEXICO: $17k → 14%ROBERT CHAVEZ YOUTH DEVELOPMENT: $52k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Albuquerque Preschool Cooperative

To provide quality pre-school education and childcare for children ages 2 to 6 years old in an un-hurried, pressure-free environment.

Education
2
Nuestros Ninos Day Care Center Inc

To provide quality education care for eligible infants, preschool, and school-age children.

3
Fallbrook Child Development Center Inc

We provide quality early childhood education and day care for children ages one to five years. We strive to promote each childs intellectual, emotional, social, and physical development in preparation for kindergarten.

Human Services
4
Denton City-County Day School

Denton City County Day School provides quality, affordable childcareto families in Denton County. Our mission is to provide qualitypre-kindergarten education and loving care to children ages 2 through 5 years. Our vision is that all DCCDS…

Human Services
5
Lopez Children's Center

Preschool & child care for rural lopez island. our mission is to provide an environment that nurtures the social, emotional, cognitive and physical development of young children.

6
Del Norte Child Care Council

To provide education and support services that promote and encourage quality care, education, healthy growth and development of all children and families in del norte county

7
El Buen Pastor Early Childhood Development Center

Situated in central Austin EBPECDC is a community based child development center whose mission is to meet the needs of the entire family through empowerment and community participation. The Center provides a stimulating environment that…

Education
8
Sunshine Valley Child Care

Sunshine Valley Child Care is a non-denomination Christian Child Care Center that offerschildren 16 months to 5 1/2 years a variety of activities and opportunties to learn and grow.

9
Desert Sun Child Development Center Inc

Education: to provide a high-quality early childhood development program and serve as a resource to parents.

Education
10
Linda Vista Children's Center

We help children discover a way of dealing with life that is realistic, comfortable, and satisfying. Self-confidence is nurtured as children learn to rely on themselves and each other. The noncompetitive environment is one that allows each…

11
New Mexico Child Care and Educ

Nmccea contributes leadership professional development and private/ nmccea contributes leadership professional development and private/ nd education program

12
Quality Childrens Services

QCS provides early childhood development and childcare program services to children from underserved and disadvantaged families. The programs are funded by various governmental entities and are located in the counties of Los Angeles Madera…

Human Services

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Garcia Street Club Inc and the most unlike its peers is Rehoboth Christian School Assoc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

Your grantees are a median of 39 years old; the field is 18. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number20%5%<5yr12%5%5–10yr20%23%10–20yr17%14%20–35yr15%36%35–55yr16%18%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value20%3%<5yr12%3%5–10yr20%27%10–20yr17%14%20–35yr15%38%35–55yr16%14%55yr+

The field is 20% startups (under 5 years old) — 5% of your grantees by number, and just 3% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close 1% lost their exemption, against 12% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
1%1/82
the rest of the field
12%
699/5,987

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

21 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 21 of the 82 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
21/21
Grantees still filing
9/21
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

COVENANT SCHOOLS OF RIO RANCH — $96,498 · OtherTHE SUNNYSIDE DAYCARE — $80,000 · OtherCOVENANT SCHOOL DEL NORTE — $63,395 · Other+63 more — $1,589,632 · Other+63 moreSSTPS INC — $80,000 · Human ServicesSSTPS INCWEE KIDS KOUNTRY KLUB OF HOBBS INC — $80,000 · Human ServicesWEE KIDS KOUNTRY KLUB …HAPPY DAYS CHRISTIAN DAY CARE & PRE-SCHOOL INC — $80,000 · Human ServicesHAPPY DAYS CHRISTIAN D…Peraltas Playhouse Inc — $60,000 · Human ServicesPeraltas Playhouse IncYOUTH DEVELOPMENT INC — $52,371 · Human ServicesYOUTH DEVELOPMENT INCCUIDANDO LOS NIOS INC — $40,000 · Human ServicesCUIDANDO LOS NIOS INCLA PLAZA DE ENCUENTRO GATHERING PLACE — $39,343 · Human ServicesLA PLAZA DE ENCUENTRO …AMISTAD FAMILY SERVICES INC — $30,000 · Human ServicesAMISTAD FAMILY SERVICE…Santa Fe Montessori Childcare Program — $30,000 · Human ServicesSanta Fe Montessori Ch…CHILDREN'S CHRISTIAN DEVELOPMENT CENTERS INC - KIDZO — $20,000 · Human ServicesBUILDING BRIDGES CHILD DEV — $80,000 · EducationEL GRITO INC — $60,000 · EducationCOMMUNITY 5413 Childrens Promise Centers — $50,000 · EducationRehoboth Christian School Assoc — $10,000 · EducationNAVAJO UNITED METHODIST CENTER — $40,000 · HealthEXPLORA SCIENCE CENTER & CHILDREN'S MUSEUM OF ALBUQUERQUE INC — $10,000 · Arts & Culture
Other$1,829,525Human Services$511,714Education$200,000Health$40,000Arts & Culture$10,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetSSTPS INC — $80,000 over 1y, 5.2% of budgetBUILDING BRIDGES CHILD DEV — $80,000 over 1y, 3.1% of budgetWEE KIDS KOUNTRY KLUB OF HOBBS INC — $80,000 over 1y, 3.6% of budgetHAPPY DAYS CHRISTIAN DAY CARE & PRE-SCHOOL INC — $80,000 over 1y, 9.6% of budgetPeraltas Playhouse Inc — $60,000 over 1y, 2.2% of budgetEL GRITO INC — $60,000 over 1y, 1.7% of budgetRIO GRANDE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CO — $54,342 over 2y, 1.5% of budgetYOUTH DEVELOPMENT INC — $52,371 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetGARCIA STREET CLUB INC — $50,000 over 1y, 6.2% of budgetCOMMUNITY 5413 Childrens Promise Centers — $50,000 over 1y, 3.5% of budgetAlbuquerque Christian School — $40,000 over 1y, 2.7% of budgetCUIDANDO LOS NIOS INC — $40,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetNAVAJO UNITED METHODIST CENTER — $40,000 over 1y, 4.3% of budgetLA PLAZA DE ENCUENTRO GATHERING PLACE — $39,343 over 2y, 8.0% of budgetAMISTAD FAMILY SERVICES INC — $30,000 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetSanta Fe Montessori Childcare Program — $30,000 over 1y, 5.3% of budgetLA VIDA FELICIDAD INC — $24,440 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetCHILDREN'S CHRISTIAN DEVELOPMENT CENTERS INC - KIDZO — $20,000 over 1y, 1.0% of budgetEXPLORA SCIENCE CENTER & CHILDREN'S MUSEUM OF ALBUQUERQUE INC — $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetMIDWEST NEW MEXICO COMMUNITY ACTION PROGRAM — $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetRehoboth Christian School Assoc — $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds SSTPS INC
  • Who funds BUILDING BRIDGES CHILD DEV
  • Who funds WEE KIDS KOUNTRY KLUB OF HOBBS INC
  • Who funds HAPPY DAYS CHRISTIAN DAY CARE & PRE-SCHOOL INC
  • Who funds Peraltas Playhouse Inc
  • Who funds EL GRITO INC
  • Who funds RIO GRANDE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CO
  • Who funds YOUTH DEVELOPMENT INC
  • Who funds GARCIA STREET CLUB INC
  • Who funds COMMUNITY 5413 Childrens Promise Centers
  • Who funds Albuquerque Christian School
  • Who funds CUIDANDO LOS NIOS INC
  • Who funds NAVAJO UNITED METHODIST CENTER
  • Who funds LA PLAZA DE ENCUENTRO GATHERING PLACE
  • Who funds AMISTAD FAMILY SERVICES INC

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Albuquerque Community FoundationNM16.3× affinity6 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Albuquerque Community Foundation · Santa Fe Community Foundation · Nusenda Foundation · Marshall L and Perrine D McCune Charitable Foundation Inc · Pnm Tnmp Foundation · Carl C Anderson Sr and Marie Jo Anderson Charitable Foundation · WK Kellogg Foundation · American Endowment Foundation · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Women's Economic Self-Sufficiency Team Corp funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%1%3%6%10%your share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    11report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 82 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph