Loading…
· Public charity
WOMEN'S CLUB OF SCC CHARITIES
This organization's mission is to mobilize the sugarloaf community to support local charities.
$285k
Granted FY2024
6
Grants
2
Communities
$105k
Largest
01What you fund
0162% classified
What you funded, over time
Every grant clustered by its grantee’s IRS cause code (NTEE), by year — across FY2017–2024.
Health$319kHuman Services$311kPhilanthropy$275kHousing & Shelter$176kReligion$65kYouth Development$64kOther$735k
02beneath the categories
Past the labels — and the year it shifted
Beneath the NTEE codes, this is what the grant descriptions actually say.
…and in their own words, year by year
2018
—
2019
—
2020
adultssyndromegwinnettsexualdisabilitiesforensic
2021
adultssyndromegwinnettsexualforensicdisabilities
2022
adultssyndromechildrenforensicgwinnettdisabilities
2023
adultssyndromechildrenforensicdisabilities
Words distinctive to each year’s grant purposes (TF-IDF) · event-driven terms in cyan.
03FY2024 · 6 grants
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2024
- $10k–50k5 grants · $180k
- $50k–250k1 grant · $105k
$36,000
Median grant
2
States reached
$23k
Total assets
Largest grants
- BIRDIES FOR CHARITY$105,000
- HOME OF HOPE AT GWINNETT CHILDREN'S$36,000
- SPECIAL NEEDS SCHOOL OF GWINNETT$36,000
- MOSAIC GEORGIA$36,000
- RAINBOW VILLAGE$36,000
- DULUTH COOP$36,000
02The need
04
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
show:
Your human-services grants (FY18–23, $229k) land where the poverty rate runs at 9% — the area typically sits at 9%. 100% of those dollars reach neighborhoods with above-average need. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA, United Way ALICE — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
03Your edge
repeat funding
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
98%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$1.9M · 15 repeat orgs$44k to everyone else
15 repeat relationships — 6 still active in FY2024, 9 since wound down.
How the two cohorts compare
Re-uppedFunded once
Organizations
15
2
Total granted
$1.9M
$44k
Median revenue growth · since first grant
+71%
+97%
Still filing today
60%
50%
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.
RenewedFirst-time
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
HealthHuman ServicesPhilanthropyHousing & ShelterYouth DevelopmentReligionOther
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- BFBIRDIES FOR CHARITY4× · 2021–2024 · $275k · revenue +12%
- TNTHE NEXT STOP FOUNDATION6× · 2018–2023 · $229k · revenue +71%
- RVRAINBOW VILLAGE5× · 2017–2024 · $176k · revenue +249%
Funded once
- SASPECTRUM AUTISM SUPPORT GROUPgraduatedone grant, 2018 · $36k · revenue +97%
- WFWES FOUNDATIONone grant, 2019 · $8k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
04Your field
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
1
Cape Cod Village Inc
Creating housing for adults on the autism spectrum
Housing & Shelter
2
Spectrum Community Services Inc
The organization serves the needs of individuals with disabilities and the economically challenged and provides residential options referred and funded through county mental health/mental retardation programs. also provided are family…
—
3
Life Village Inc
Providing affordable and supportive housing for individuals with disabilities.
—
4
Wellspring Community Support
To provide supportive living services to chronically and persistently mentally ill adults and to prevent these individuals from having to be institutionalized as a result of teaching them how to live independently.
Human Services
5
Adults With Autism Living With
To provide adults with autism with resources and support to facilitate opportunities to experience and explore a variety of choices designed to encourage them to realize their strengths, their interests, and the essence of their…
Health
6
Unique Care Practical Solutions Inc
Care of mentally disabled individuals in their home
Human Services
7
Spectrum Thrift Store Inc
The organizations mission is to give employment opportunities to individuals with autism and development delays. because everyone deserves to thrive.
Human Services
8
Green Oaks Center
The center achieves day and employment services, personal living and residential support and family support for the mentally challenged citizens of colquitt and worth counties of georgia.
Human Services
9
Julia Greeley Home Inc
Julia greeley home, inc. serves single unaccompanied women in the denver metro area between the ages of 18 and 64 who are struggling with chronic or repeated homelessness. the program fulfills existing gaps between overnigh short term…
Housing & Shelter
10
Friendly Connections Inc
We are a family company that helps connect families and individuals with our friendly professionals. We have Coaching Services handled by our Direct Support Professionals (DSPs) in Supported Employment, Pre-Vocational Training, Community…
Health
11
Vanguard Landing Inc
The mission of vanguard landing is to offer a safe, intentional, interactive and inclusive community where persons with intellectual and developmental differences can thrive and achieve their life's full potential.
Housing & Shelter
12
Personalized Independent Living
To provide quality and loving environment in our homes and day programs that serve individuals living with intellectual and/or physical disabilities.
Human Services
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Rainbow Village Inc and the most unlike its peers is Wellspring Living Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
05the grantee network
10 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2024.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue.
1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
5
Early backer (in before they grew)
10/10
Grantees still filing
7/10
Grew since you first funded
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Other$735,397Health$318,860Human Services$311,360Philanthropy$275,000Housing & Shelter$176,000Religion$65,000Youth Development$64,250
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds BIRDIES FOR CHARITY ↗
- Who funds THE NEXT STOP FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds RAINBOW VILLAGE ↗
- Who funds MOSAIC GEORGIA ↗
- Who funds ANNANDALE VILLAGE ↗
- Who funds HOME OF HOPE AT GWINNETT CHILDREN'S ↗
- Who funds WELLSPRING LIVING ↗
- Who funds PGA TOUR CHARITIES ↗
- Who funds CONNECTIONS HOMES ↗
- Who funds SPECTRUM AUTISM SUPPORT GROUP ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Community Foundation for NortheastGA18× affinity6 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →
Open a dossier: Community Foundation for Northeast · Jackson Emc Foundation Inc · The Primerica Foundation Inc · The Scott Hudgens Family · The Imlay Foundation Inc · The Nordson Corporation Foundation · The Community Foundation for Greater · Enterprise Holdings Foundation · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organisation WOMEN'S CLUB OF SCC CHARITIES funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
2024
’20’21’22’23’24
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
1get no government money at all
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–60%
typical government reliance, FY20–24
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
05Through Plinth
Through Plinth
Your grantmaking, live and operational
This dossier was generated cold from public filings. In Plinth it’s a working system — every applicant assessed and every grant monitored. Here’s a taste, run on one of your grantees: ANNANDALE VILLAGE.
Agentic due diligence · confidence × risk
Financial management
low risk
~12 months of operating runway; revenue contracted over 6 filed years.
Track record & reputation
low risk
6 years of Form 990 filings, still active.
Legal standing
low risk
US 501(c)(3); EIN 273444167 on file with current IRS Form 990 filings.
Governance
Live in Plinth
Board composition & governance documents — verified live in Plinth from the applicant.
Compliance & sanctions
Live in Plinth
OFAC / UN sanctions screening — run live in Plinth at assessment.
Program capacity
Live in Plinth
Staffing, M&E and activity alignment — assessed live in Plinth from submitted proposals.
Live · Plinth’s real DD engine
Run the actual assessment on ANNANDALE VILLAGE, cold from public data.
Generated live from public IRS filings + open web sources by Plinth’s agentic engine. Shown as an illustration of the product, not a formal assessment.
Post-award monitoring · continuous checks
- On trackFinancial stability— Roughly 12 months of cash on hand.
- On trackSustained operations— Filing through 2023; revenue contracted over the period.
- On trackReliance on your funding— Your grants peaked at 35% of their budget — diversified.
- Awaiting reportEvidence of delivery— Plinth collects the grantee's own monitoring reports post-award.
What you see here is static and public. In Plinth it’s operational — the full six-pillar framework on every applicant (with their own documents + live registry and sanctions checks), monitoring dashboards on every award, custom board reports, and eligibility routing for intake.
Agentic due diligenceMonitoring dashboardsCustom board reportsEligibility routing
Preview generated from this grantee’s public IRS filings and independent reporting. Pillars marked “live in Plinth” require the applicant’s submitted documents. Shown as illustration, not a formal assessment.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPro
How do I get to Women's Club of Scc Charities?
Find your warmest path to Women's Club of Scc Charities through people who sit on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the introduction across shared trustees and officers.
Every link is a documented governance overlap in public IRS 990 filings — not a personal network — and each hop carries its own confidence tier. Low-confidence or distant paths are held back rather than guessed.
More from the funding graph
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars pass through an intermediary
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
Strange bedfellows
the named clusters of US funding
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home
State money flows
the interactive map of money crossing state lines