Skip to content
Plinth

· Public charity

Women's Club of Scc Charities

This organization's mission is to mobilize the sugarloaf community to support local charities whose purpose is to improve the financial, emotional and/or physical well being of families and individuals living in gwinnett county.

$285k
Granted FY2024still arriving
6
Grants FY2024still arriving
2
States reached
$105k
Largest
01What you fund
0196% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172024.

Human Services$997kRecreation & Sports$339kHousing & Shelter$234kCrime & Legal$160kEducation$106kHealth$36kPhilanthropy$8kOther$0
02FY2024 · 6 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

  • $10k–50k5 grants · $180k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $105k
$36,000
Median grant
2
States reached
$23k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
BIRDIES FOR CHARITY$105,000
MOSAIC GEORGIA$36,000
SPECIAL NEEDS SCHOOL OF GWINNETT$36,000
HOME OF HOPE AT GWINNETT CHILDREN'S$36,000
Individual grant recipient$36,000
RAINBOW VILLAGE$36,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY18–23, $229k) land where the poverty rate runs at 9%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%THE NEXT STOP FOUNDATION: $47k → 9%THE NEXT STOP FOUNDATION: $45k → 9%THE NEXT STOP FOUNDATION: $37k → 9%THE NEXT STOP FOUNDATION: $34k → 9%THE NEXT STOP FOUNDATION: $33k → 9%THE NEXT STOP FOUNDATION: $33k → 9%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

98%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$1.9M · 15 repeat orgs$44k to everyone else

15 repeat relationships — 6 still active in FY2024, 9 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

15
2

Total granted

$1.9M
$44k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+78%
+97%

Still filing today

67%
50%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
HealthHuman ServicesPhilanthropyHousing & ShelterYouth DevelopmentReligionOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • QC
    QUAD CITIES GOLF CLASSIC CHARITABLE FOUNDATION
    4× · 2021–2024 · $275k · revenue +52%
  • TN
    THE NEXT STOP FOUNDATION INC
    6× · 2018–2023 · $229k · revenue +11%
  • RV
    RAINBOW VILLAGE INC
    5× · 2017–2024 · $176k · revenue +249%

Funded once

  • SA
    SPECTRUM AUTISM SUPPORT GROUP INCgraduated
    one grant, 2018 · $36k · revenue +97%
  • WF
    WES FOUNDATION INC
    one grant, 2019 · $8k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Annandale At Suwanee Inc

To perpetuate a village community to provide progressive life assistance to adults with developmental disabilities so that they can maximize their abilities and maintain their independence in the least restrictive environment.

Health
2
Chatham County Group Homes Inc

To provide a normal home life for residents without regard to their disabilities, race, sex, religion, or creed by integrating them into community life whenever possible.

Human Services
3
Georgia Community Support and Solutions Inc

InCommunity provides meaningful support to individuals with intellectual and developmental disabilities to live safe, healthy, and joyful lives in their communities.

4
Rainbow Omega Inc

Provide group homes for developmentally disabled adults in a caring and nurturing environment.

Human Services
5
Easter Seals East Georgia Inc

Easter Seals East Georgia's mission is to provide exceptional services to ensure that people with disabilities and barriers to employment maximize their potential for employment and independence and broaden their opportunities for full…

Human Services
6
Autism Services Inc

To provide cost-effective residential, social, intellectual, physical and vocational services to individuals with autism in group homes and in home support.

7
Georgia Agape Inc

The organization offers social services as a compassionate outreach to abused, neglected and dependent children and families in need. the organization strives to positively impact the lives of children, families and all those who receive…

8
Gateways to Change Inc

Gateways to change, inc. is a private, non-profit organization dedicated to enhancing the quality of life for persons with developmental disabilities in community settings. gateways was developed in response to the continuing need for new…

Human Services
9
Gillespie Services Inc

The mission of gillespie services, inc. is to provide support systems by the means of affordable and safe housing for persons with developmental disabilities and to enable individuals who have developmental disabilities to live everyday…

Health
10
Noahs House

The organization provides opportunities for growth, independence, and fulfillment for adults with intellectual and developmental disabilities by offering a loving, nurturing, and affordable residential community, along with structured…

Housing & Shelter
11
Green Oaks Center

Educational and work activities for the mentally challenged citizens of colquitt and worth counties of georgia.

Human Services
12
Special Needs Cobb Inc

Special Needs Cobb, Inc. is committed to promoting opportunities for all people with developmental disabilities to live full, productive, self-determined lives of the highest quality by fostering local communities which embrace all people.

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Rainbow Village Inc and the most unlike its peers is Quad Cities Golf Classic Charitable Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

11 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 11 of the 17 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
6
Early backer (in before they grew)
11/11
Grantees still filing
10/11
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

Individual grant recipient — $269,930 · OtherIndividual grant recipientPARTNERS AGAINST DOMESTIC VIOLENCE — $107,000 · OtherPARTNERS AGAINST DOMESTIC VIOLENCESpecial Needs Schools of Gwinnett Inc — $106,000 · OtherSpecial Needs Schools of Gwinnett IncIndividual grant recipient — $66,250 · OtherIndividual grant recipientWCSCC CHARITIES INC — $65,217 · OtherWCSCC CHARITIES INCCONNECTIONS HOMES INC — $58,000 · OtherCONNECTIONS HOMES INCNEW DIRECTIONS — $55,000 · OtherNEW DIRECTIONS+1 more — $8,000 · OtherMOSAIC GEORGIA INC — $159,680 · HealthMOSAIC GEORGIA INCThe Annandale Foundation Inc — $123,680 · HealthThe Annandale Foun…SPECTRUM AUTISM SUPPORT GROUP INC — $35,500 · HealthSPECTRUM AUTISM SU…THE NEXT STOP FOUNDATION INC — $228,680 · Human ServicesTHE NEXT STOP FOUN…GWINNETT CHILDREN'S SHELTER INC — $82,680 · Human ServicesGWINNETT CHILDREN'…QUAD CITIES GOLF CLASSIC CHARITABLE FOUNDATION — $275,000 · PhilanthropyQUAD CITIES GOLF…RAINBOW VILLAGE INC — $176,000 · Housing & ShelterRAINBOW VI…Wellspring Living Inc — $65,000 · ReligionPGA TOUR CHARITIES INC — $64,250 · Youth Development
Other$735,397Health$318,860Human Services$311,360Philanthropy$275,000Housing & Shelter$176,000Religion$65,000Youth Development$64,250

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetQUAD CITIES GOLF CLASSIC CHARITABLE FOUNDATION — $275,000 over 4y, 0.3% of budgetTHE NEXT STOP FOUNDATION INC — $228,680 over 6y, 19% of budgetRAINBOW VILLAGE INC — $176,000 over 5y, 3.1% of budgetMOSAIC GEORGIA INC — $159,680 over 5y, 1.7% of budgetThe Annandale Foundation Inc — $123,680 over 4y, 35% of budgetSpecial Needs Schools of Gwinnett Inc — $106,000 over 5y, 1.8% of budgetGWINNETT CHILDREN'S SHELTER INC — $82,680 over 3y, 3.7% of budgetWellspring Living Inc — $65,000 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetPGA TOUR CHARITIES INC — $64,250 over 2y, 1.1% of budgetCONNECTIONS HOMES INC — $58,000 over 2y, 7.2% of budgetSPECTRUM AUTISM SUPPORT GROUP INC — $35,500 over 1y, 6.5% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds QUAD CITIES GOLF CLASSIC CHARITABLE FOUNDATION
  • Who funds THE NEXT STOP FOUNDATION INC
  • Who funds RAINBOW VILLAGE INC
  • Who funds MOSAIC GEORGIA INC
  • Who funds The Annandale Foundation Inc
  • Who funds Special Needs Schools of Gwinnett Inc
  • Who funds GWINNETT CHILDREN'S SHELTER INC
  • Who funds Wellspring Living Inc
  • Who funds PGA TOUR CHARITIES INC
  • Who funds CONNECTIONS HOMES INC
  • Who funds SPECTRUM AUTISM SUPPORT GROUP INC

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Primerica Foundation IncGA15.7× affinity5 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Primerica Foundation Inc · The Scott Hudgens Family Foundation Inc · Jackson Emc Foundation Inc Attn Amy Rouse · Community Foundation for Northeast Georgia · The Imlay Foundation Inc · The Nordson Corporation Foundation · Enterprise Holdings Foundation · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Women's Club of Scc Charities funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 10%3%10%23%40%your share of their income ↑0%15%30%45%60%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    1get no government money at all
    4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–60%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Women's Club of Scc Charities?

    Find your warmest path to Women's Club of Scc Charities through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 17 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph