Skip to content

· Public charity

Women Helping Women Fund Tri-Cities

To empower women and children to create healthy families and a vibrant community.

$206k
Granted FY2024still arriving
16
Grants FY2024still arriving
1
States reached
$15k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Human Services$219kYouth Development$217kEmployment$205kHealth$171kEducation$131kHousing & Shelter$129kArts & Culture$38kFood & Nutrition$38kOther$0
02FY2024 · 16 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 16 grants below total $195,001, the rows itemized in this filing. The $205,662 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $10,661 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k1 grant · $5k
  • $10k–50k15 grants · $190k
$13,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$481k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
CHILDREN'S DEVELOPMENT CENTER$15,000
GRACE COLLECTIVE$15,000
SAFE HARBOR SUPPORT CENTER$15,000
DOMESTIC VIOLENCE SERVICES OF BENTON & FRANKLIN COUNTIES$15,000
GIRL SCOUTS OF EASTERN WA & NORTHERN ID$15,000
MIRROR MINISTRIES$15,000
THERAPEUTIC RIDING OF TRI-CITIES$14,000
HEARTLINKS HOSPICE & PALLIATIVE CARE$13,000
WSU FOUNDATION$12,000
B5 LEARNING CENTER$10,648
ELIJAH FAMILY HOMES$10,000
MID-COLUMBIA MASTERSINGERS$10,000
TRI-COUNTY PARTNERS HABITAT FOR HUMANITY$10,000
COLUMBIA ABILITY ALLIANCE$10,000
SECOND HARVEST INLAND NORTHWEST$10,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–24, $343k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 8%ROYAL FAMILY KIDS CAMP: $9k → 9%MIRROR MINISTRIES: $25k → 11%HEARTLINKS HOSPICE & PALLIATIVE CARE: $13k → 17%LUTHERAN COMMUNITY SERVICES NW: $15k → 9%MIRROR MINISTRIES: $25k → 11%MIRROR MINISTRIES: $20k → 11%SAFE HARBOR SUPPORT CENTER: $15k → 11%MIRROR MINISTRIES: $15k → 11%DOMESTIC VIOLENCE SERVICES OF BENTON & FRANKLIN COUNTIES: $15k → 11%MIRROR MINISTRIES: $15k → 11%DOMESTIC VIOLENCE SERVICES OF BENTON & FRANKLIN COUNTIES: $15k → 11%SAFE HARBOR SUPPORT CENTER: $15k → 11%DOMESTIC VIOLENCE SERVICES: $15k → 11%MIRROR MINISTRIES: $15k → 11%DOMESTIC VIOLENCE SERVICES OF BENTON & FRANKLIN COUNTIES: $11k → 11%B5 LEARNING CENTER: $11k → 11%FAMILY LEARNING CENTER: $10k → 11%DOMESTIC VIOLENCE SERVICES OF BENTON & FRANKLIN COUNTIES: $9k → 11%FAMILY LEARNING CENTER: $8k → 11%MODERN LIVING SERVICES: $7k → 11%CHAPLAINCY HEALTH CARE: $5k → 11%HEARTLINKS HOSPICE AND PALLATIVE CENTER: $24k → 11%HEARTLINKS HOSPICE AND PALLATIVE CARE: $22k → 11%HEARTLINKS HOSPICE AND PALLATIVE CENTER: $11k → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

87%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$1.1M · 21 repeat orgs$160k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +49% since the first grant, against +33% for those funded once.

21 repeat relationships: 15 still active in FY2024, 6 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

21
14

Total granted

$1.1M
$148k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+49%
+33%

Still filing today

95%
86%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 94% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $12k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
Human ServicesEducationHealthYouth DevelopmentEmploymentArts & CultureOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • MM
    Mirror Ministries
    6× · 2018–2024 · $115k · revenue +476%
  • GC
    Grace Collective
    4× · 2021–2024 · $90k · revenue +151%
  • CB
    COLUMBIA BASIN COLLEGE FOUNDATION
    5× · 2017–2023 · $71k · revenue +49%

Funded once

  • GC
    GRACE CLINIC
    one grant, 2020 · $20k · revenue +15%
  • RC
    RESTORATION COMMUNITY IMPACT
    one grant, 2023 · $15k
  • FT
    FOR THE CHILDRENgraduated
    one grant, 2018 · $15k · revenue +92%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Southwest Youth and Family Services

SWYFS partners with youth and families to transform their futures.

Human Services
2
King County Sexual Assault Resource Center

KCSARC is the largest and most comprehensive non-profit provider of sexual assault services in King County and Washington State. Our vision is a community free of sexual violence. Our mission is to: give voice to victims, their families,…

—
3
Transitions

Transitions works to end poverty and homelessness for women and children in Spokane, Washington.

Human Services
4
Northwest Counseling Service Inc

Housing Counseling Services

Housing & Shelter
5
Building Changes

Building changes advances equitable responses to homelessness in washington state, with a focus on children, youth, and families. we work at the intersection of housing, education, and health systems, partnering with communities and public…

Health
6
Every Child Central Oregon

Mobilizing the community to uplift children and families impacted by foster care in Oregon.

Human Services
7
Saving Grace

Saving grace offers safety, hope, and healing to survivors of intimiate partner violence and sexual assault and engages central oregon to build life free from violence.

Human Services
8
Arc of Washington Co Inc

To create partnerships that foster nurturing communities where people with disabilities can live their vision of valued life.

Human Services
9
Refugee Care Collective Northwest

Provide care to refugee families.

Human Services
10
Columbia River Mental Health Services

Columbia river mental health services is a full service mental health agency offering a wide spectrum of behavioral health services to children and adults of clark county, washington.

Health
11
Columbia Wellness

CARE. Commitment to improving quality of life. Advocacy for mental health and overall well-being. Response to community needs. Effective treatment with measurable outcomes.

—
12
Re Sources

RE Sources mobilizes people of Northwest Washington to build just and thriving communities and to protect the land, water, and climate on which we all depend.

Environment
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Domestic Violence Services of Benton & Franklin Counties; the most unlike its peers is River of Life Mcc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

34 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 34 of the 36 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
12
Early backer (in before they grew)
33/34
Grantees still filing
24/34
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Mirror Ministries: $115,000 · Human ServicesMirror MinistriesHEARTLINKS: $68,845 · Human ServicesHEARTLINKSDOMESTIC VIOLENCE SERVICES OF BENTON & FRANKLIN COUNTIES: $64,550 · Human ServicesDOMESTIC VIOLENCE SERVICES OF B…SAFE HARBOR CRISIS NURSERY: $30,250 · Human ServicesSAFE HARBOR CRISIS NURSERYB5 LEARNING CENTER: $28,148 · Human ServicesB5 LEARNING CENTERLutheran Community Services Northwest: $15,000 · Human Services+3 more: $20,926 · Human Services+3 moreCOLUMBIA BASIN COLLEGE FOUNDATION: $71,300 · EducationCOLUMBIA BASIN C…CHILDREN'S DEVELOPMENTAL CENTER: $39,000 · EducationCHILDREN'S DEVEL…THE CHILDREN'S READING FOUNDATION: $34,503 · EducationTHE CHILDREN'S R…COMMUNITIES IN SCHOOLS OF BENTON-FRANKLI: $24,000 · EducationCOMMUNITIES IN S…WASHINGTON STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION: $12,000 · EducationWASHINGTON STATE…HABITAT FOR HUMANITY INTERNATIONAL INC TRI-COUNTY PARTNERS: $69,000 · OtherHABITAT FOR HUMANITY INTE…Forge Youth Mentoring: $53,300 · OtherForge Youth MentoringMID-COLUMBIA MASTERSINGERS: $24,700 · OtherMID-COLUMBIA MASTERSINGER…Perfect Image Leadership Foundation: $17,000 · OtherPerfect Image Leadership …RIVER OF LIFE MCC: $10,000 · OtherSECOND HARVEST INLAND NORTHWEST: $38,051 · OtherSECOND HARVEST INLAND NOR…RESTORATION COMMUNITY IMPACT: $15,000 · OtherRESTORATION COMMUNITY IMP…FOR THE CHILDREN: $15,000 · OtherFOR THE CHILDRENWORLD RELIEF CORP OF NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF EVANGELICALS: $12,120 · Other+3 more: $19,915 · Other+3 moreGrace Collective: $90,000 · EmploymentGrace Collect…COLUMBIA INDUSTRIES: $55,000 · EmploymentCOLUMBIA INDU…THERAPEUTIC RIDING OF TRI-CITIES: $46,000 · HealthTHERAPEUTI…SUPPORT ADVOCACY AND RESOURCE CENTER: $35,000 · HealthSUPPORT AD…GRACE CLINIC: $20,000 · HealthGRACE CLIN…TRI-CITIES PREGNANCY NETWORK: $15,000 · HealthTRI-CITIES…Girl Scouts of Eastern Washington and Northern Idaho: $65,000 · Youth DevelopmentGirl Scout…BOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF BENTON AND FRANKLIN COUNTIES: $38,329 · Youth DevelopmentBOYS & GIR…YOUNG LIFE: $5,000 · Youth DevelopmentELIJAH FAMILY HOMES: $60,000 · Housing & Shelter
Human Services$342,719Education$180,803Other$274,086Employment$145,000Health$116,000Youth Development$108,329Housing & Shelter$60,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetMirror Ministries: $115,000 over 6y, 7.3% of budgetGrace Collective: $90,000 over 4y, 5.0% of budgetCOLUMBIA BASIN COLLEGE FOUNDATION: $71,300 over 5y, 1.9% of budgetHABITAT FOR HUMANITY INTERNATIONAL INC TRI-COUNTY PARTNERS: $69,000 over 5y, 0.9% of budgetHEARTLINKS: $68,845 over 4y, 0.5% of budgetGirl Scouts of Eastern Washington and Northern Idaho: $65,000 over 4y, 0.7% of budgetDOMESTIC VIOLENCE SERVICES OF BENTON & FRANKLIN COUNTIES: $64,550 over 5y, 0.9% of budgetELIJAH FAMILY HOMES: $60,000 over 5y, 3.0% of budgetCOLUMBIA INDUSTRIES: $55,000 over 4y, 1.0% of budgetForge Youth Mentoring: $53,300 over 4y, 9.9% of budgetTHERAPEUTIC RIDING OF TRI-CITIES: $46,000 over 3y, 7.0% of budgetCHILDREN'S DEVELOPMENTAL CENTER: $39,000 over 3y, 0.3% of budgetBOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF BENTON AND FRANKLIN COUNTIES: $38,329 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetSECOND HARVEST INLAND NORTHWEST: $38,051 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetSUPPORT ADVOCACY AND RESOURCE CENTER: $35,000 over 2y, 1.3% of budgetTHE CHILDREN'S READING FOUNDATION: $34,503 over 3y, 1.8% of budgetSAFE HARBOR CRISIS NURSERY: $30,250 over 2y, 2.9% of budgetB5 LEARNING CENTER: $28,148 over 3y, 9.7% of budgetMID-COLUMBIA MASTERSINGERS: $24,700 over 3y, 4.2% of budgetCOMMUNITIES IN SCHOOLS OF BENTON-FRANKLI: $24,000 over 2y, 0.9% of budgetGRACE CLINIC: $20,000 over 1y, 2.8% of budgetRESTORATION COMMUNITY IMPACT: $15,000 over 1y, 1.4% of budgetFOR THE CHILDREN: $15,000 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetTRI-CITIES PREGNANCY NETWORK: $15,000 over 1y, 1.9% of budgetLutheran Community Services Northwest: $15,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetWORLD RELIEF CORP OF NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF EVANGELICALS: $12,120 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetWASHINGTON STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION: $12,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetModern Living Services: $6,676 over 1y, 8.2% of budgetTri-Cities Chaplaincy: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetYOUNG LIFE: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMID-COLUMBIA SYMPHONY SOCIETY: $4,800 over 1y, 2.6% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

United Way of Benton & Franklin CountiesWA49.5× affinity21 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: United Way of Benton & Franklin Counties · 3 Rivers Community Foundation · Lamb Weston Charitable Foundation · Numerica Credit Union · Columbus Foundation · School's Out Washington · Hazel Hodgson Charitable Foundation · Kadlec Regional Medical Center · Innovia Foundation · The Donald G Currie Foundation · Hapo Community Credit Union · Inatai Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Women Helping Women Fund Tri-Cities funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Women Helping Women Fund Tri-Cities. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%3%6%10%funder's share of their income ↑0%19%38%56%75%share of the org’s income from government →median 67%
  • World Relief Corp of National Association of Evangelicals: 67% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
11report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
1rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–75%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 36 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Women Helping Women Fund Tri-Cities’ filings →

More from the funding graph