Skip to content
Plinth
Foundation Dossiers
Plinth

· Public charity

Hapo Community Credit Union

Hapo provides low cost savings vehicles with superior interest return and low interest rate loans to its members, without capital stock, organized and operated for mutual purposes and without profit.

$617k
Granted FY2024still arriving
23
Grants FY2024still arriving
3
States reached
$100k
Largest
01What you fundRead
02The needRead
03Your edgeRead
04Your fieldRead
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2024.

Recreation & Sports$1.3MHealth$1.3MYouth Development$735kArts & Culture$554kCommunity Improvement$411kHuman Services$217kEnvironment$185kEducation$143kOther$0
02FY2024 · 23 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

The 23 grants below total $536,729 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $616,582 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $79,853 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k10 grants · $68k
  • $10k–50k9 grants · $150k
  • $50k–250k4 grants · $318k
$10,000
Median grant
3
States reached
$2.4B
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
FRANKLIN COUNTY HAPO CENTER$100,000
TRI CITY CANCER CENTER$77,030
GO WEST FOUNDATION DBA CREDIT UNION FOR KIDS$71,164
TOYOTA CENTER AND ARENA$70,000
CITY OF RICHLAND$35,000
SMG TRI CITIES$27,000
COLUMBIA BASIN COLLEGE FOUNDATION$21,000
ASSOCIATION OF WASHINGTON BUSINESS$15,000
GREATER VANCOUVER CHAMBER OF COMMERCE$11,000
BOYS AND GIRLS CLUB$11,000
WORLDWIDE FOUNDATION FOR CREDIT UNIONS$10,100
STATE OF WA SUPT OF PUBLIC INSTRUCTION$10,000
TRI-TOWN GET DOWN LLC$10,000
SOROPTIMIST INTERNATIONAL OF PASCO KENNEWICK$8,500
TRI CITIES REGIONAL CHAMBER OF COMMERCE$8,430
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY17–24, $181k) land where the poverty rate runs at 9%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 8%GO WEST FOUNDATION DBA CREDIT UNION FOR KIDS: $71k → 9%GO WEST FOUNDATION DBA CREDIT UNION FOR KIDS: $51k → 9%GO WEST FOUNDATION DBA CREDIT UNION FOR KIDS: $40k → 9%NORTHWEST CREDIT UNION FOUNDATION: $8k → 9%SAFE HARBOR SUPPORT CENTER: $6k → 11%SAFE HARBOR CRISIS NURSERY: $5k → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

96%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$4.9M · 33 repeat orgs$185k to everyone else

33 repeat relationships — 18 still active in FY2024, 15 since wound down; 5 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

33
13

Total granted

$4.9M
$147k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+24%
+41%

Still filing today

73%
85%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 93% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $38k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
EducationCommunity ImprovementYouth DevelopmentHuman ServicesHealthInternationalOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • TW
    TRI-CITIES WATER FOLLIES ASSOCIATION
    2× · 2017–2022 · $610k · revenue +15% · 31% of their budget
  • BG
    BOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF BENTON AND FRANKLIN COUNTIES
    7× · 2018–2024 · $256k · revenue +153%
  • GF
    GOWEST FOUNDATION
    4× · 2017–2024 · $170k · revenue ×19

Funded once

  • SI
    SOROPTIMIST INTERNATIONAL OF AUBURN
    one grant, 2018 · $25k · revenue -24% · 47% of their budget
  • WR
    West Richland Chamber of Commerce
    one grant, 2022 · $20k · revenue +25%
  • ES
    Evergreen School District Foundation 114
    one grant, 2019 · $15k · revenue -18%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Association of Washington Cities

The association of washington cities builds connections between our state's diverse cities and towns, while providing our members with the support needed to thrive through delivery of data-driven education, nationally recognized pooling…

—
2
Western Electricity Coordinating Council

To effectively and efficiently mitigate risks to the reliability and security of the western interconnection's bulk power system.

Public Benefit
3
Sound Credit Union

A member owned cooperative providing financial services, including loans and share deposits to its members.

—
4
Seattle Economic Development Fund Business Impact Nw

To provide economic development financing to serve the needs of small businesses in the state of washington that would not qualify for private financing under conventional financing criteria.

Community Improvement
5
Washington Women's Foundation

Washington women's foundation is a strong and inclusive collective of informed women who together influence community transformation through individual and collective discovery, high-impact grant making and by listening to and respecting…

Philanthropy
6
Walla Walla Valley Chamber of Commerce

The walla walla valley chamber of commerce is a member-focused organization and community partner that fosters a sustainable, healthy and vibrant economic environment through business promotion, advocacy, education and services.

—
7
Credit Unions in the State of Washington

Our mission is is to collaborate with community to create access to financial opportunities. we provide affordable credit union financial services to low and moderate income people in washington state. this enables people in washington to…

—
8
Minnesota Chamber of Commerce and Industry

The minnesota chamber of commerce proactively leads the business community statewide to: advance pro-business, responsible minnesota public policy that creates jobs and grows the econony; provde member services to address evolving business…

—
9
Washington Society of Certified Public a

We are a community of cpas and financial professionals cultivating authentic relationships, unique learning experiences, and purposeful advocacy for our future.

—
10
Washington Filmworks

To build and enhance the competitiveness of Washington State's film and associated creative industry. We accomplish this by marketing and managing the state's production incentive program, representing the state in national and…

Community Improvement
11
Seward Chamber of Commerce Conference and Visitors Bureau Inc

Promote and support our members in maintaining a diversified economy and positive business and living environment in the greater seward area.

—
12
Columbia River Economic Development Council

In 2024, columbia river economic development council (credc) continued to provide service contracts, consulting studies, and research and reports for various private and municipal entities located within clark county, washington and the…

—

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Association of Washington Business and the most unlike its peers is Central Washington Hispanic Chamber of Commerce. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

← shrinkinggrowing →↓ leaning in → pulling backsteadyYouth Sports ProgramsYouth Education & Career Pa…Youth Development & Support…Immigrant Rights & AdvocacyLive Theatre & Performance …Family Philanthropic Founda…Faith-Based Healthcare Syst…Regional Business ChambersYakima Valley Regional Nonp…
the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side
Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 32 years old; the field is 17. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number20%0%<5yr13%3%5–10yr20%12%10–20yr16%41%20–35yr14%9%35–55yr17%35%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value20%0%<5yr13%0%5–10yr20%8%10–20yr16%51%20–35yr14%3%35–55yr17%37%55yr+

The field is 20% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 11% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
0.0%0/52
the rest of the field
11%
868/7,976

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

38 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 38 of the 51 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

2
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
9
Early backer (in before they grew)
37/38
Grantees still filing
32/38
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

TRI-CITY WATER FOLLIES ASSOCIATION — $870,000 · OtherTRI-CITY WATER FOLLIES ASSOCIATIONTRI-CITIES WATER FOLLIES ASSOCIATION — $610,000 · OtherTRI-CITIES WATER FOLLIES ASSOCIATIONFRANKLIN COUNTY — $503,490 · OtherFRANKLIN COUNTYCITY OF KENNEWICK — $354,166 · OtherCITY OF KENNEWICKRICHLAND POLICE DEPARTMENT — $313,000 · OtherRICHLAND POLICE DEPARTMENT+29 more — $803,645 · Other+29 moreTRI-CITIES CANCER CENTER FOUNDATION — $673,869 · HealthTRI-CITIES CANC…KADLEC FOUNDATION — $39,000 · HealthKADLEC FOUNDATI…BOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF BENTON AND FRANKLIN COUNTIES — $255,647 · Youth DevelopmentYOUNG LIFE — $22,750 · Youth DevelopmentGIRLS ON THE RUN SOUTHEAST WASHINGTON — $10,000 · Youth DevelopmentTRI-CITY REGIONAL CHAMBER OF COMMER — $148,680 · Community ImprovementCREDIT UNION NATIONAL ASSOCIATION INC — $99,999 · Community ImprovementWest Richland Chamber of Commerce — $20,000 · Community Improvement+1 more — $8,000 · Community ImprovementGOWEST FOUNDATION — $169,954 · Human ServicesSOROPTIMIST INTERNATIONAL OF AUBURN — $25,000 · Human ServicesSAFE HARBOR CRISIS NURSERY — $11,380 · Human ServicesCOLUMBIA BASIN COLLEGE FOUNDATION — $51,500 · EducationEvergreen School District Foundation 114 — $15,155 · EducationFORT VANCOUVER REGIONAL LIBRARY FOUNDATION — $10,725 · EducationWASHINGTON STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION — $10,000 · EducationKENNEWICK POLICE OFFICERS BENEFIT ASSOCIATION — $47,500 · Public Safety & Disaster
Other$3,454,301Health$712,869Youth Development$288,397Community Improvement$276,679Human Services$206,334Education$87,380Public Safety & Disaster$47,500

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetTRI-CITIES CANCER CENTER FOUNDATION — $673,869 over 8y, 9.1% of budgetTRI-CITIES WATER FOLLIES ASSOCIATION — $610,000 over 2y, 31% of budgetBOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF BENTON AND FRANKLIN COUNTIES — $255,647 over 7y, 2.5% of budgetGOWEST FOUNDATION — $169,954 over 4y, 3.2% of budgetTRI-CITY REGIONAL CHAMBER OF COMMER — $148,680 over 6y, 5.3% of budgetGOWEST CREDIT UNION ASSOCIATION — $109,250 over 4y, 0.5% of budgetCREDIT UNION NATIONAL ASSOCIATION INC — $99,999 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetCOLUMBIA BASIN COLLEGE FOUNDATION — $51,500 over 3y, 3.4% of budgetKENNEWICK POLICE OFFICERS BENEFIT ASSOCIATION — $47,500 over 5y, 13% of budgetGREATER VANCOUVER CHAMBER OF COMMERCE — $46,292 over 5y, 1.3% of budgetASSOCIATION OF WASHINGTON BUSINESS — $45,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetFirst Story — $44,750 over 6y, 0.4% of budgetKADLEC FOUNDATION — $39,000 over 2y, 1.2% of budgetCENTRAL WASHINGTON FAIR ASSOCIATION — $34,000 over 4y, 0.2% of budgetWISHING STAR FOUNDATION — $26,500 over 3y, 2.9% of budgetSOROPTIMIST INTERNATIONAL OF AUBURN — $25,000 over 1y, 47% of budgetYOUNG LIFE — $22,750 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetBuilding Industry Association of Clark County — $21,911 over 3y, 0.6% of budgetWORLD COUNCIL OF CREDIT UNIONS INC — $21,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetWORLDWIDE FOUNDATION FOR CREDIT UNIONS INC — $20,100 over 2y, 0.5% of budgetWest Richland Chamber of Commerce — $20,000 over 1y, 18% of budgetHOME BUILDERS ASSOCIATION OF TRI CITIES WASHINGTON — $19,866 over 3y, 0.7% of budgetEvergreen School District Foundation 114 — $15,155 over 1y, 4.0% of budgetWOMEN HELPING WOMEN FUND TRI-CITIES — $12,695 over 2y, 3.5% of budgetTHE LINKS INC — $12,500 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetSAFE HARBOR CRISIS NURSERY — $11,380 over 2y, 0.6% of budgetFORT VANCOUVER REGIONAL LIBRARY FOUNDATION — $10,725 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetSECOND HARVEST INLAND NORTHWEST — $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSOROPTIMIST INTERNATIONAL OF PASCO-KENNEWICK — $8,500 over 1y, 6.4% of budgetMid-Columbia Ballet — $8,000 over 1y, 3.8% of budgetYAKIMA VALLEY VISITORS & CONVENTION BUREAU — $7,350 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetSOUTHWEST WASHINGTON WORKFORCE DEVELOPMENT COUNCIL — $6,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetJUNIOR ACHIEVEMENT OF WASHINGTON — $5,731 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetGrace Collective — $5,150 over 2y, 0.3% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

3 Rivers Community Fo…Numerica Credit UnionCredit Unions in the …Onpoint Community Cre…Lamb Weston Charitabl…Umpqua Bank Charitabl…United Way of Benton …Iq Credit UnionWomen Helping Women F…Washington Associatio…Building ChangesColumbus Foundation
3 Rivers Community FoundationWA19.8× affinity7 shared granteesties to 7 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: 3 Rivers Community Foundation · Numerica Credit Union · Credit Unions in the State of Washington · Onpoint Community Credit Union · Lamb Weston Charitable Foundation · Umpqua Bank Charitable Foundation · United Way of Benton & Franklin Counties · Iq Credit Union · Women Helping Women Fund Tri-Cities · Washington Association of Sheriffs and Police Chiefs · Building Changes · Columbus Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Hapo Community Credit Union funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%3%10%23%40%your share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 0%
  • First Story — 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
7report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 51 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home
State money flows
the interactive map of money crossing state lines