· Private foundation
Hazel Hodgson Charitable Foundation
Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| TROT | $1,643 |
| MIRROR MINISTRIES | $1,642 |
| ASSEMBLIES OF GOD FOUNDATION CO AG FINANCIAL SOLUTIONS | $1,095 |
| BAILIE MEMORIAL YOUTH RANCH | $1,095 |
| KENNEWICK HIGH SCHOOL | $1,095 |
| UNIVERSITY OF PUGET SOUND | $1,095 |
| SALVATION ARMY | $548 |
| TRI-CITY UNION GOSPEL MISSION | $548 |
| BILLY GRAHAM EVANGELISTIC ASC | $548 |
| MUSTARD SEED INC | $548 |
| FIRST UNITED METHODIST CHURCH | $548 |
| HOLY LAND CHRISTIAN MISSION | $548 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY17–24, $22k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +20% since the first grant, against +7% for the ones you funded once.
13 repeat relationships — 10 still active in FY2024, 3 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 70% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $3k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- BMBAILIE MEMORIAL YOUTH RANCH INC8× · 2017–2024 · $10k · revenue +26%
- TUTHE UNIVERSITY OF PUGET SOUND8× · 2017–2024 · $10k · revenue -13%
- KHKENNEWICK HIGH SCHOOL7× · 2017–2024 · $9k
Funded once
- TKTHE KENNEWICK POLICE DEPARTMENT FOUNDATIONgraduatedone grant, 2019 · $2k · revenue +150%
- TDTRI-CITIES DIAPER BANKone grant, 2020 · $2k
- RCRESTORATION CONVOYone grant, 2021 · $2k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
The Duluth Bethel is a spiritually grounded, private nonprofit organization, offering individuals dignity, hope and the opportunity to improve their qualify of life through chemical dependency rehabilitation and community correction…
Provide care to refugee families.
Bethany House Services empowers homeless and at-risk families with the solutions to achieve housing stability and long-term self-sufficiency.
Provide assistance to victims of domestic violence including counseling, information and referral, crisis intervention and education.
St. Francis House provides food clothing and necessities at no cost to people with low income or experiencing homelessness in King County Washington. Single men women and families are welcome.
We help families experiencing homelessness find lasting independence and security.
To provide shelter and advocacy services to victims of domestic violence, sexual assault, and stalking in the 11 counties of southeast kansas.
See schedule oadvancing physical and emotional safety by reducing the impact and occurrence of sexual and domestic violence, human trafficking and stalking through inclusive intervention and prevention services for children, youth, and…
To provide food for those in need.
Elijah family homes fosters hope, dignity, and self-sufficiency through stable housing and support services for families seeking recovery.
Assist individuals and families in crisis from domestic violence, sexual assault, crime and economic emergencies. Services are also available to friends and family members of those involved.
The mission of fcr is to provide a welcoming and safe environment for all survivors of trauma, including those impacted by domestic and sexual violence, human trafficking, and other causes. fcr services offered are consistent with our…
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Domestic Violence Services of Benton & Franklin Counties and the most unlike its peers is The Kennewick Police Department Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
12 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 12 of the 29 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds BAILIE MEMORIAL YOUTH RANCH INC ↗
- Who funds THE UNIVERSITY OF PUGET SOUND ↗
- Who funds TRI CITY UNION GOSPEL MISSION ↗
- Who funds SUPPORT ADVOCACY AND RESOURCE CENTER ↗
- Who funds THE KENNEWICK POLICE DEPARTMENT FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds DOMESTIC VIOLENCE SERVICES OF BENTON & FRANKLIN COUNTIES ↗
- Who funds Mirror Ministries ↗
- Who funds SECOND HARVEST INLAND NORTHWEST ↗
- Who funds HABITAT FOR HUMANITY INTERNATIONAL INC TRI-COUNTY PARTNERS ↗
- Who funds B5 LEARNING CENTER ↗
- Who funds BENTON FRANKLIN RECOVERY COALITION ↗
- Who funds Tri-Cities Chaplaincy ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: 3 Rivers Community Foundation · United Way of Benton & Franklin Counties · Lamb Weston Charitable Foundation · Women Helping Women Fund Tri-Cities · Numerica Credit Union · Kadlec Regional Medical Center · Columbus Foundation · American Endowment Foundation · Amazonsmile Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Hazel Hodgson Charitable Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.