Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

The Donald G Currie Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$55k
Granted FY2025still arriving
6
Grants FY2025still arriving
2
States reached
$15k
Largest
01What you fund
0196% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172025.

Housing & Shelter$74kHuman Services$73kPublic Safety & Disaster$66kEducation$62kYouth Development$62kCrime & Legal$52kEmployment$50kFood & Nutrition$20kOther$0
02FY2025 · 6 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k2 grants · $10k
  • $10k–50k4 grants · $45k
$10,000
Median grant
2
States reached
$1.6M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
RICHLAND POLICE FOUNDATION$15,000
ELIJAH FAMILY HOMES$10,000
SAN AUGUSTINE CARE SHARE$10,000
NORTH FRANKLIN HERITAGE MUSEUM$10,000
MY FRIENDS PLACE$5,000
MID COLUMBIA MEALS ON WHEELS$5,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY24–25, $25k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%SAFE HARBOR CRISIS: $20k → 11%MID COLUMBIA MEALS ON WHEELS: $5k → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

26%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$132k · 3 repeat orgs$371k to everyone else

3 repeat relationships — 0 still active in FY2025, 3 since wound down; 6 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

3
13

Total granted

$132k
$316k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

0%
0%

Still filing today

33%
38%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 0% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $55k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesYouth DevelopmentEmploymentEducationHealthArts & CultureOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • BB
    Big Bro Joe Foundation
    2× · 2023–2024 · $62k · 48% of their budget
  • RP
    RICHLAND POLICE DEPARTMENT FOUNDATION
    2× · 2018–2022 · $37k
  • MP
    MOS PLACE
    4× · 2020–2024 · $33k

Funded once

  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2019 · $59k
  • GC
    Grace Collectivegraduated
    one grant, 2021 · $50k · revenue +151%
  • EL
    ELKS LODGE 2710
    one grant, 2017 · $50k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Survivors Resources Inc Dba Safe Haven Inc of Pike County

Provide counseling, crisis intervention, 24 hour crisis hotline, advocacy, safe housing and supportive services to victims of sexual assault and domestic violence.

2
S a F E Shelter

We are committed to helping victims of sexual assault and abuse and domestic assault and abuse through advocacy support and education. We provide emergency shelter to domestic assault victims. We Also are committed to educating the public…

3
Saving Grace

Saving grace offers safety, hope, and healing to survivors of intimiate partner violence and sexual assault and engages central oregon to build life free from violence.

Human Services
4
Safehouse Crisis Center Inc

To provide shelter and advocacy services to victims of domestic violence, sexual assault, and stalking in the 11 counties of southeast kansas.

Human Services
5
Lorain County Safe Harbor Corp

The organization provides a comprehensive range of family focused services for lorain county, ohio victims of domestic violence. we endeavor to be a part of collaborative community

Human Services
6
Southside Survivor Response Center Inc

Provide crisis intervention, advocacy, safety services, and education to empower people affected by sexual assault, domestic violence and various crisis situations through community collaboration.

7
Sarahs House

Provide temporary housing and support assistance to pregnant women in need

Human Services
8
Safe Harbor Crisis Center

Safe harbor, a non-profit organization, provides shelter, supportiveservices and advocacy to survivors of domestic violence and sexual assault, as well as education, awareness and resources to our community. our vision is to empower…

Human Services
9
Safety Shelter of St Johns County Inc

The mission of the organization is to offer protection and quality services for victims of domestic and sexual abuse and their minor children in st. johns county, florida through the establishment and operation of a temporary shelter and…

Housing & Shelter
10
San Francisco Safehouse

The organization works in concert with San Francisco Network Ministries Housing Corporation to provide transitional housing, supportive services, and aftercare to aid and support homeless women who have been commercially sexually exploited…

Human Services
11
Nashville Safe Haven Family Shelter Inc

Lead our community's efforts to house, support, empower and advocate for families experiencing homelessness.

Housing & Shelter
12
Safe Embrace

Safe Embrace is committed to ending the cycle of domestic and sexual violence with innovative prevention and intervention services. We help victims of domestic abuse, sexual assault, and human trafficking become survivors by providing…

Health

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Support Advocacy and Resource Center and the most unlike its peers is Big Bro Joe Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

9 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 9 of the 22 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
9/9
Grantees still filing
3/9
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

Individual grant recipient — $58,816 · OtherIndividual grant recipientELKS LODGE 2710 — $50,000 · OtherELKS LODGE 2710RICHLAND POLICE DEPARTMENT FOUNDATION — $37,000 · OtherRICHLAND POLICE DEPARTMENT FOUNDATIONMOS PLACE — $32,500 · OtherMOS PLACEJEFFERSON ELEMENTARY PTA — $30,000 · OtherJEFFERSON ELEMENTARY PTAIndividual grant recipient — $25,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientSALVATION ARMY TRI-CITIES — $20,000 · OtherSALVATION ARMY TRI-CITIESRICHLAND POLICE FOUNDATION — $15,000 · Other+6 more — $32,500 · Other+6 moreBig Bro Joe Foundation — $62,000 · Youth DevelopmentBig Bro Joe F…Grace Collective — $50,000 · EmploymentGrace Colle…ORCHARD ELEMENTARY PARENT TEACHER ORGANIZATION — $30,000 · EducationSAFE HARBOR CRISIS NURSERY — $20,000 · Human ServicesSENIOR LIFE RESOURCES NORTHWEST — $5,000 · Human ServicesSUPPORT ADVOCACY AND RESOURCE CENTER — $15,000 · HealthNORTH FRANKLIN HERITAGE MUSEUM — $10,000 · Arts & CultureELIJAH FAMILY HOMES — $10,000 · Housing & Shelter
Other$300,816Youth Development$62,000Employment$50,000Education$30,000Human Services$25,000Health$15,000Arts & Culture$10,000Housing & Shelter$10,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetBig Bro Joe Foundation — $62,000 over 2y, 48% of budgetSAFE HARBOR CRISIS NURSERY — $20,000 over 1y, 2.0% of budgetSUPPORT ADVOCACY AND RESOURCE CENTER — $15,000 over 1y, 1.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds Big Bro Joe Foundation
  • Who funds Grace Collective
  • Who funds ORCHARD ELEMENTARY PARENT TEACHER ORGANIZATION
  • Who funds SAFE HARBOR CRISIS NURSERY
  • Who funds SUPPORT ADVOCACY AND RESOURCE CENTER
  • Who funds NORTH FRANKLIN HERITAGE MUSEUM
  • Who funds ELIJAH FAMILY HOMES
  • Who funds SAN AUGUSTINE CARE & SHARE INC
  • Who funds SENIOR LIFE RESOURCES NORTHWEST

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

3 Rivers Community FoundationWA20× affinity7 shared granteesties to 6 of 6Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: 3 Rivers Community Foundation · United Way of Benton & Franklin Counties · Women Helping Women Fund Tri-Cities · Numerica Credit Union · Lamb Weston Charitable Foundation · Columbus Foundation · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization The Donald G Currie Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
2021222324
no gov · 00%3%13%28%50%your share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY2024

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to The Donald G Currie Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to The Donald G Currie Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 22 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph