· Public charity
With God All Things Are Possible
To reach people with the Gospel of Jesus Christ.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2021–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
The 12 grants below total $281,853 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $341,021 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $59,168 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k2 grants · $11k
- $10k–50k8 grants · $131k
- $50k–250k2 grants · $140k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| City of Life Ministries | $90,000 |
| Mountain Gateway- Village Global | $50,000 |
| Rock Orphanage | $30,000 |
| Frontline 247 Marriage | $25,000 |
| Bridges For Peace USA | $15,656 |
| Here's Hope Ministries | $14,000 |
| FoldAR | $13,500 |
| Free the Oppressed | $12,350 |
| Hope House Haiti USA | $10,000 |
| YWAM Honolulu | $10,000 |
| Back To Jerusalem | $6,000 |
| Counteract USA | $5,347 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY21–24, $133k) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 66% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
6 repeat relationships — 3 still active in FY2024, 3 since wound down; 9 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 47% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $150k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- COCITY OF LIFE MINISTRIES2× · 2023–2024 · $210k · revenue -24% · 55% of their budget
- FTFree the Oppressed4× · 2021–2024 · $99k · revenue -41%
- RLRUBIES LV2× · 2021–2022 · $66k
Funded once
- TCTHE CHURCH OF JESUS CHRIST OF LATTER-DAY SAINTSone grant, 2023 · $157k
- MOMIGHTY OAKS FOUNDATIONone grant, 2021 · $100k · revenue -26%
- SGSKULL GAMESgraduatedone grant, 2023 · $70k · revenue +65%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Religious
Religious
Supporing missionaries worldwide
To spread the gospel of jesus christ through crusades
We support Christian missionaries and help with humanitarian aid and relief around the globe.
Spread the Christianity
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Stand 4 Justice Movement and the most unlike its peers is Leaving Legacies Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 14 years old; the field is 16. You back the younger end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 17% of your grantees by number, and just 30% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 6% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
24 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 24 of the 33 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds CITY OF LIFE MINISTRIES ↗
- Who funds MIGHTY OAKS FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds Free the Oppressed ↗
- Who funds SKULL GAMES ↗
- Who funds ROCK ORPHANAGE INTERNATIONAL INC ↗
- Who funds STAND 4 JUSTICE MOVEMENT ↗
- Who funds HOOKERS FOR JESUS ↗
- Who funds MercyGift ↗
- Who funds REACT DC INC ↗
- Who funds Family Talk Action Corporation ↗
- Who funds Relentless Pursuit Outreach & Recovery Corp ↗
- Who funds HERE'S HOPE MINISTRIES INC ↗
- Who funds REBOOT RECOVERY INC ↗
- Who funds LEAVING LEGACIES FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds YOUTH WITH A MISSION-HONOLULU INC ↗
- Who funds FRONTLINE MINISTRIES INC ↗
- Who funds Hope House Haiti USA Inc ↗
- Who funds YWAM Ships Orange County ↗
- Who funds RIGHTEOUS ADVENTURE MINISTRIES INC ↗
- Who funds NOORISTAN FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds YOUTH WITH A MISSION PITTSBURGH INC ↗
- Who funds BACK TO JERUSALEM INC ↗
- Who funds Counteract USA Inc ↗
- Who funds JUDSON UNIVERSITY A BAPTIST INSTITUTION ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Servant Foundation · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · Raymond James Charitable Endowment Fund · Paypal Charitable Giving Fund · American Endowment Foundation · Network for Good · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · National Philanthropic Trust · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization With God All Things Are Possible funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to With God All Things Are Possible?
Find your warmest path to With God All Things Are Possible through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.