Skip to content
Plinth
Foundation DossiersAlso receives grants — funding profile →
Plinth

· Private foundation

With Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$8.3M
Granted FY2025still arriving
53
Grants FY2025still arriving
17
States reached
$760k
Largest
01What you fundRead
02The needRead
03Your edgeRead
04Your fieldRead
05Through PlinthRead
01What you fund
0172% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant clustered by its grantee’s IRS cause code (NTEE), by year — across FY2018–2025.

Education$4.7MHealth$4.4MHuman Services$2.9MArts & Culture$433kCommunity Improvement$358kInternational$225kRecreation & Sports$128kCivil Rights$110kPhilanthropy$62kOther$5.3M
02FY2025 · 53 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k12 grants · $52k
  • $10k–50k9 grants · $245k
  • $50k–250k21 grants · $3.2M
  • $250k+11 grants · $4.8M
$128,000
Median grant
17
States reached
$8.0M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
THE NATIONAL ALLIANCE TO ADVANCE ADOLESCENT HEALTH$760,000
INSTITUTE FOR EXCEPTIONAL CARE$610,000
THE ARC OF THE UNITED STATES$510,000
VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER$460,000
NATIONAL DOWN SYNDROME SOCIETY$433,000
FAMILY VOICES$423,000
WIKI EDUCATION FOUNDATION$410,000
UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY RESEARCH FOUNDATION$315,000
UNIVERSITY OF THE PACIFIC$310,000
CONSUMER TECHNOLOGY ASSOCIATION FOUNDATION$300,000
UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS AT CHICAGO$250,000
COMMUNICATION FIRST$238,000
THE ASSOCIATION FOR SUCCESSFUL PARENTING$230,000
PACIFIC DENTAL SERVICES FOUNDATION$225,000
UNIVERSITY OF HAWAII FOUNDATION$210,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY18–25, $2.9M) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 50% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants spread fairly evenly across need levels.

area typical 10%KEYSTONE SERVICE SYSTEMS INC: $6k → 12%PARENTS HELPING PARENTS INC: $29k → 8%THE ACHIEVABLE FOUNDATION: $40k → 14%GRANTMAKERS IN AGING: $10k → 9%POLICY WORKS INC: $10k → 19%COMMUNITY OPTIONS INC: $100k → 11%FAMILY VOICES: $423k → 8%PARENTS HELPING PARENTS INC: $5k → 8%THE ACHIEVABLE FOUNDATION: $3k → 14%POLICY WORKS INC: $6k → 19%ASSOICATION OF UNIVERSITY CENTERS ON DISABILITIES: $760k → 8%ASSOCIATION OF UNIVERSITY CENTERS ON DISABILITIES: $110k → 8%FAMILY VOICES: $50k → 8%NYSARC INC: $50k → 17%THE ASSOCIATION FOR SUCCESSFUL PARENTING: $230k → 19%FAMILY VOICES: $50k → 8%RCOZ: $3k → 10%THE ASSOCIATION FOR SUCCESSFUL PARENTING: $55k → 19%SPM DISABILITY JUSTICE FUND: $10k → 10%RCOZ: $2k → 10%ASSOICATION OF UNIVERSITY CENTERS ON DISABILITIES: $4k → 8%SUPPORTED LIFE INSTITUTE: $6k → 12%ASSOCIATION OF UNIVERSITY CENTERS ON DISABILITIES: $2k → 8%THE CHILDREN'S PARTNERSHIP: $2k → 14%THE ARC OF THE UNITED STATES: $510k → 14%THE ARC OF THE UNITED STATES: $54k → 14%THE ARC OF THE UNITED STATES: $54k → 14%NATIONAL COUNCIL ON INDEPENDENT LIVING: $40k → 14%ARC OF THE US: $33k → 14%ARC OF THE US: $33k → 14%ARC OF THE US: $33k → 14%ARC OF THE US: $25k → 14%ARC OF THE US: $11k → 14%NATIONAL COUNCIL ON INDEPENDENT LIVING: $10k → 14%ARC OF THE US: $7k → 14%NATIONAL COUNCIL ON INDEPENDENT LIVING: $5k → 14%QUALITY TRUST FOR INDIVIDUALS WITH DISABILITIES INC: $50k → 14%QUALITY TRUST FOR INDIVIDUALS WITH DISABILITIES INC: $50k → 14%NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF BLACK SOCIAL WORKERS: $4k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

AK
NH
WA
MN
IL
MI
NY
MA
OR
WY
IN
OH
PA
NJ
CT
CA
CO
NE
KY
VA
MD
DE
KS
TN
NC
SC
DC
HI
GA
TX
FL

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

71%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$13M · 52 repeat orgs$5.2M to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +28% since the first grant, against +16% for the ones you funded once.

52 repeat relationships — 29 still active in FY2025, 23 since wound down; 19 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

52
78

Total granted

$13M
$3.4M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+28%
+16%

Still filing today

77%
71%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 76% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $1.9M went to new ones.

50%100%’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
EducationHealthHuman ServicesPhilanthropyCivil RightsArts & CultureOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • IF
    Institute for Exceptional Care
    3× · 2022–2025 · $822k · revenue +40%
  • TA
    THE ARC OF THE UNITED STATES
    7× · 2018–2025 · $760k · revenue +37%
  • AUTISTIC SELF ADVOCACY NETWORK INC
    8× · 2018–2025 · $673k · revenue +44%

Funded once

  • KK
    KENNEDY KRIEGER INSTITUTE INC
    one grant, 2024 · $316k
  • OREGON HEALTH & SCIENCE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATIONgraduated
    one grant, 2020 · $125k · revenue +79%
  • OH
    OREGON HEALTH & SCIENCE UNIVERSITY
    one grant, 2024 · $113k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Neurology Associates of Stony Brook University Faculty Practice Corp

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
2
Arc Research Institute

Our mission is to accelerate scientific progress, understand the root causes of disease, and narrow the gap between discoveries and impact on patients.

Health
3
Massachusetts Institute of Technology

The mission of mit is to advance knowledge and educate students in science, technology, and other areas of scholarship that will best serve the nation and the world in the 21st century.

Education
4
Stony Brook Internists University Faculty Practice Corporation

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
5
University Family Physicians Inc

Engage actively and continuously in medical research, education and training in the practice of medicine in conjunction with the department of family medicine of the indiana university school of medicine and indiana university…

—
6
American Academy of Neurology

The Academy's mission is to enhance member career fulfillment and promote brain health for all.

Community Improvement
7
Stony Brook Urology University Faculty Practice Corporation

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
8
University of New Haven

The University of New Haven is a student-centered comprehensive university with an emphasis on excellence in liberal arts and professional education. Our mission is to prepare our students to lead purposeful and fulfilling lives in a…

Education
9
University of Maryland Anesthesiology Associates Pa

Under the medical service plan of the university of maryland school of medicine, medical services are rendered by the members of the faculty on behalf of the school of medicine in connection with their duties to provide clinical…

—
10
University of Maryland Neurology Associates Pa

Under the medical service plan of the university of maryland school of medicine, medical services are rendered by the members of the faculty on behalf of the school of medicine in connection with their duties to provide clinical…

—
11
National Association of College and University Attorneys

To advance the practice of higher education attorneys for the benefit of the institutions they serve.

—
12
Furman University

The primary mission of furman as a liberal arts institution is to provide a distinctive education in fine arts, humanities, social sciences, mathematics and the sciences, as well as selected professional disciplines.

Education

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Independent Sector and the most unlike its peers is Pacific Dental Services Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

← shrinkinggrowing →↓ leaning in → pulling backsteadyChild Abuse Advocacy Servic…Faith-Based Liberal Arts Co…Developmental Disabilities …Community FoundationsCommunity College Foundatio…Immigrant Worker SupportWomen & Girls Leadership De…Senior Support ServicesPolicy Research and AdvocacyCancer Support ServicesHealth Access Advocacy and …
the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side
Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 42 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number22%3%<5yr14%5%5–10yr19%16%10–20yr16%19%20–35yr13%21%35–55yr16%36%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value22%1%<5yr14%10%5–10yr19%27%10–20yr16%19%20–35yr13%16%35–55yr16%26%55yr+

The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 3% of your grantees by number, and just 1% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.8% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
0.8%1/122
the rest of the field
13%
240,395/1,819,443

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

113 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 113 of the 155 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

2
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
21
Early backer (in before they grew)
113/113
Grantees still filing
72/113
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

National Disability Rights Network Inc — $659,500 · OtherNational Disability Rights Network…NATIONAL DOWN SYNDROME SOCIETY — $483,000 · OtherNATIONAL DOWN SYNDROME SOCIETYUNIVERSITY OF NEW HAMPSHIRE — $435,000 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF NEW HAMPSHIREIndividual grant recipient — $335,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientKENNEDY KRIEGER INSTITUTE INC — $316,000 · OtherKENNEDY KRIEGER INSTITUTE INCUNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS AT CHICAGO — $250,000 · Other+64 more — $3,141,250 · Other+64 moreUniversity of Kentucky Research Foundation — $514,400 · EducationUniversity of Kentucky Resea…VIRGINIA COMMONWEALTH UNIVERSITY FOUNDAT — $460,000 · EducationVIRGINIA COMMONWEALTH UNIVER…WIKI EDUCATION FOUNDATION — $450,000 · EducationWIKI EDUCATION FOUNDATIONCOMMUNICATION FIRST — $345,500 · EducationCOMMUNICATION FIRSTUniversity of the Pacific — $345,000 · EducationUniversity of the PacificTHE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE LELAND STANFORD JUNIOR UNIVERSITY — $251,400 · EducationTHE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE…DREXEL UNIVERSITY — $225,000 · EducationUNIVERSITY OF HAWAII FOUNDATION — $210,000 · EducationRUTGERS UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION — $162,000 · EducationUNIVERSITY OF WYOMING FOUNDATION — $160,000 · EducationST JOHN FISHER UNIVERSITY — $157,944 · Education+25 more — $1,394,937 · Education+25 moreTHE NATIONAL ALLIANCE TO ADVANCE ADOLESCENT HEALTH — $1,015,000 · HealthTHE NATIONAL ALLIANCE TO A…Institute for Exceptional Care — $822,000 · HealthInstitute for Exceptional …AUTISTIC SELF ADVOCACY NETWORK INC — $672,500 · HealthAUTISTIC SELF ADVOCACY NET…Vanderbilt University Medical Center — $510,000 · HealthVanderbilt University Medi…SPINA BIFIDA ASSOCIATION OF AMERICA — $198,700 · HealthChildren's Hospital Los Angeles — $169,000 · Health+21 more — $1,041,200 · Health+21 moreASSOCIATION OF UNIVERSITY CENTERS ON DISABILITIES — $876,000 · Human ServicesASSOCIATION OF UN…THE ARC OF THE UNITED STATES — $760,240 · Human ServicesTHE ARC OF THE UN…FAMILY VOICES — $523,000 · Human ServicesFAMILY VOICESThe Association for Successful Parenting — $285,000 · Human ServicesThe Association f…Community Options Inc — $100,000 · Human ServicesQUALITY TRUST FOR INDIVIDUALS WITH DISABILITIES INC — $100,000 · Human Services+12 more — $242,400 · Human Services+12 moreBOREALIS PHILANTHROPY — $425,000 · Arts & Culture+1 more — $7,500 · Arts & CultureCONSUMER TECHNOLOGY ASSOCIATION FOUNDATION — $358,000 · Community ImprovementPACIFIC DENTAL SERVICES FOUNDATION — $225,000 · International
Other$5,619,750Education$4,676,181Health$4,428,400Human Services$2,886,640Arts & Culture$432,500Community Improvement$358,000International$225,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetTHE NATIONAL ALLIANCE TO ADVANCE ADOLESCENT HEALTH — $1,015,000 over 5y, 14% of budgetASSOCIATION OF UNIVERSITY CENTERS ON DISABILITIES — $876,000 over 3y, 9.5% of budgetInstitute for Exceptional Care — $822,000 over 3y, 5.0% of budgetTHE ARC OF THE UNITED STATES — $760,240 over 7y, 0.6% of budgetAUTISTIC SELF ADVOCACY NETWORK INC — $672,500 over 8y, 7.4% of budgetNational Disability Rights Network Inc — $659,500 over 4y, 5.5% of budgetFAMILY VOICES — $523,000 over 2y, 9.3% of budgetUniversity of Kentucky Research Foundation — $514,400 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetVanderbilt University Medical Center — $510,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetNATIONAL DOWN SYNDROME SOCIETY — $483,000 over 2y, 9.2% of budgetVIRGINIA COMMONWEALTH UNIVERSITY FOUNDAT — $460,000 over 2y, 2.0% of budgetWIKI EDUCATION FOUNDATION — $450,000 over 2y, 19% of budgetBOREALIS PHILANTHROPY — $425,000 over 6y, 0.2% of budgetCONSUMER TECHNOLOGY ASSOCIATION FOUNDATION — $358,000 over 2y, 3.6% of budgetCOMMUNICATION FIRST — $345,500 over 3y, 36% of budgetUniversity of the Pacific — $345,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetThe Association for Successful Parenting — $285,000 over 2y, 39% of budgetTHE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE LELAND STANFORD JUNIOR UNIVERSITY — $251,400 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetDREXEL UNIVERSITY — $225,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF HAWAII FOUNDATION — $210,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetSPINA BIFIDA ASSOCIATION OF AMERICA — $198,700 over 2y, 0.5% of budgetChildren's Hospital Los Angeles — $169,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetRUTGERS UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION — $162,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF WYOMING FOUNDATION — $160,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetST JOHN FISHER UNIVERSITY — $157,944 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetBRANDEIS UNIVERSITY — $140,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetDisability Voices United — $139,450 over 4y, 18% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF CENTRAL FLORIDA FOUNDATION INC — $135,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetSPECIAL OLYMPICS INC — $128,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetRush University Medical Center — $128,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetOREGON HEALTH & SCIENCE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION — $125,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetPROTEUS FUND INC — $113,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetTHE COUNCIL ON QUALITY & LEADERSHIP IN SUPPORTS FOR PEOPLE WITH DISABILITIES — $100,000 over 1y, 1.8% of budgetCommunity Options Inc — $100,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF MASSACHUSETTS FOUNDATION INC — $100,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetQUALITY TRUST FOR INDIVIDUALS WITH DISABILITIES INC — $100,000 over 2y, 2.5% of budgetFORT WAYNE MEDICAL SOCIETY FOUNDATION INC — $90,000 over 1y, 1.2% of budgetGeneration Patient Inc — $85,000 over 4y, 1.0% of budgetNew Disabled South Inc — $80,000 over 1y, 2.4% of budgetALZHEIMER'S DISEASE & RELATED DISORDERS ASSOCIATION INC — $77,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetARC MASSACHUSETTS INC — $75,000 over 1y, 5.1% of budgetBaylor College of Medicine — $75,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN ACADEMY OF DEVELOPMENTAL MEDICINE AND DENTISTRY — $60,000 over 1y, 9.7% of budgetNATIONAL COUNCIL ON INDEPENDENT LIVING — $57,000 over 3y, 2.7% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF ROCHESTER — $50,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetUniversity of Louisville Research Foundation — $50,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetACTIVATING CHANGE INC — $50,000 over 1y, 1.1% of budgetUniversity of Massachusetts Dartmouth Foundation — $50,000 over 1y, 3.2% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Ford FoundationBorealis PhilanthropyCalifornia Healthcare…The Robert Wood Johns…California Communicat…The Arc of the United…Foundation to Promote…The California Endowm…Christopher Reeve Fou…Gordon E and Betty I …AARPPublic Health Institu…
The Ford FoundationNY30× affinity18 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Ford Foundation · Borealis Philanthropy · California Healthcare Foundation · The Robert Wood Johnson Foundation · California Communications Access Foundation Dba Ability Central · The Arc of the United States · Foundation to Promote Open Society · The California Endowment · Christopher Reeve Foundation · Gordon E and Betty I Moore Foundation · AARP · Public Health Institute

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization With Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 80%6%25%56%100%your share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 9%
  • Arc Massachusetts Inc — 100% of income from government
  • Family Voices — 39% of income from government
  • Association of University Centers On Disabilities — 34% of income from government
  • Community Catalyst Inc — 15% of income from government
  • Johns Hopkins University — 12% of income from government
  • The Association for Successful Parenting — 9% of income from government
  • Brandeis University — 9% of income from government
  • President and Fellows of Harvard College — 7% of income from government
  • University of Maryland Baltimore Foundation Inc — 3% of income from government
  • Oregon Health & Science University Foundation — 1% of income from government
  • Rowan University Foundation Inc — 0% of income from government
  • Community Options Inc — 0% of income from government
  • Rutgers University Foundation — 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
8get no government money at all
20report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
1rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to With Foundation?

Find your warmest path to With Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 155 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home
State money flows
the interactive map of money crossing state lines