Skip to content
Winter Clarence W Charitable Trust at a glance

· Private foundation

Winter Clarence W Charitable Trust

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$32k
Granted FY2025still arriving
4
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$18k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2018 to 2025.

Community Improvement$71kHuman Services$61kHealth$33kFood & Nutrition$25kCrime & Legal$23kYouth Development$22kHousing & Shelter$15kEmployment$10kOther$0
02FY2025 · 4 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k3 grants · $14k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $18k
$6,400
Median grant
1
States reached
$612k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
BRISTOL BOROUGH COMMUNITY ACTION GROUP$18,000
BUCKS COUNTY OPPORTUNITY COUNCIL$6,400
ADVOCATES FOR THE HOMELESS & THOSE IN NE$5,000
KEEP MUSIC ALIVE$2,600
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY18–25, $147k) land where the poverty rate runs at 7%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 15% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%THE BABY BUREAU: $5k → 6%HUMANGOOD PENNSYLVANIA: $5k → 7%KEEP MUSIC ALIVE: $3k → 10%VALLEY YOUTH HOUSE COMMITTEE: $5k → 11%VALLEY YOUTH HOUSE COMMITTEE INC: $2k → 11%OPERATION WARM INC: $10k → 6%BABY BUREAU: $5k → 6%ONE HOUSE AT A TIME: $5k → 7%VALLEY YOUTH HOUSE COMMITTEE: $5k → 11%ONE HOUSE AT A TIME: $5k → 7%VALLEY YOUTH HOUSE COMMITTEE: $5k → 11%BABY BUREAU: $4k → 6%MOMS OFFERING MOMS SUPPORT: $1k → 11%BUCKS COUNTY OPPORTUNITY COUNCIL INC: $8k → 6%MOMS OFFERING MOMS SUPPORT: $1k → 11%BUCKS COUNTY OPPORTUNITY COUNCIL: $6k → 6%TWILIGHT WISH FOUNDATION: $5k → 6%TWILIGHT WISH FOUNDATION: $5k → 6%BUCKS COUNTY OPPORTUNITY COUNCIL INC: $10k → 6%BUCKS COUNTY OPPORTUNITY COUNCIL INC: $8k → 6%BUCKS COUNTY OPPORTUNITY COUNCIL INC: $8k → 6%BUCKS COUNTY OPPORTUNITY COUNCIL INC: $8k → 6%BUCKS COUNTY OPPORTUNITY COUNCIL INC: $5k → 6%NETWORK OF VICTIM ASSISTANCE: $10k → 6%NETWORK OF VICTIM ASSISTANCE: $8k → 6%NETWORK OF VICTIM ASSISTANCE: $5k → 6%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

59%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$164k · 10 repeat orgs$115k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +53% since the first grant, against 0% for those funded once.

10 repeat relationships: 1 still active in FY2025, 9 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

10
15

Total granted

$164k
$89k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+53%
0%

Still filing today

90%
53%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 20% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $26k went to new ones.

50%100%’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesHealthEmploymentEducationEnvironmentPublic BenefitOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • BC
    BUCKS COUNTY OPPORTUNITY COUNCIL INC
    7× · 2018–2025 · $53k · revenue +135%
  • NO
    Network of Victim Assistance
    3× · 2022–2024 · $23k · revenue +4%
  • VY
    VALLEY YOUTH HOUSE COMMITTEE INC
    4× · 2019–2024 · $17k · revenue +74%

Funded once

  • OW
    Operation Warm Incgraduated
    one grant, 2019 · $10k · revenue +216%
  • IA
    INCREASING ACCESS TO AUTISM TREATMENT PO
    one grant, 2018 · $10k
  • BC
    BUCKS COUNTY COATS OPERATION WARM INC
    one grant, 2018 · $10k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Women Against Abuse Inc

The mission of women against abuse is to provide quality, compassionate, and nonjudgmental services in a manner that fosters self-respect and independence in persons experiencing intimate partner violence and to lead the struggle to end…

Human Services
2
Ch Pennsylvania Under - 21

Our mission is to serve children and youth facing homelessness and human trafficking, and to protect and safeguard all children. we provide trauma-informed interventions for youth who are in need.covenant house pennsylvania (chpa) remains…

Housing & Shelter
3
Family Service Association of Bucks County

Mission: we listen, care and help. every day. vision: a community where anyone can achieve their full potential. programs: our services treat mental health issues; reduce substance use; shelter, feed, educate and seek permanent housing for…

Human Services
4
Princeton Healthcare System a New Jersey Nonprofit Corporation

The mission of princeton healthcare system is to provide exceptional, compassionate care to enhance the health and wellness of our patients, their families, and our community. princeton healthcare system provides inpatient and outpatient…

Health
5
Reading Hospital

Website: www.towerhealth.org/locations/reading-hospital the mission of reading hospital is to provide compassionate, accessible, high-quality, cost-effective healthcare to the community; to promote health; to education healthcare…

Health
6
Maternal & Family Health Services Inc

As a private non-profit health and human services organization, maternal and family health services (mfhs) works to meet the health and nutrition needs of northeastern pennsylvania's women, children, and families with essential…

Health
7
Chespenn Health Services Inc

To provide comprehensive primary and preventive care and social services to medically underserved families and individuals regardless of their ability to pay.

Health
8
Pennsylvania Organization for Women in Early Recovery

See schedule o.power's mission is to help women reclaim their lives from addiction and related emotional health issues and improve the well-being of future generations. we provide a range of gender-responsive, trauma-informed drug and…

Health
9
Bucks County Housing Group Inc

Bucks county housing group (bchg) mission is to end food and housing insecurity within our communities. supportive housing program our supportive housing program (shp) is a transitional shelter program where we seek to empower individuals…

—
10
The Children's Home of Pittsburgh

The children's home of pittsburgh, established in 1893, is an independent, non-profit licensed organization whose purpose is to promote the health and well-being of infants and children through services which establish and strengthen the…

Health
11
Manna On Main Street

Manna on main street is committed to ending hunger in the north penn region by providing food, fulfilling social service and education needs, and conducting community outreach. through a food pantry and soup kitchen, emergency financial…

—
12
Lehigh Valley Physician Group

Establish and maintain a medical group consisting of clinicians employed by lehigh valley health network. this medical group will fulfill the charitable mission of promoting community health through health education, injury prevention, and…

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Bucks County Opportunity Council Inc; the most unlike its peers is Twilight Wish Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

19 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 19 of the 28 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
5
Early backer (in before they grew)
18/19
Grantees still filing
12/19
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

BUCKS COUNTY OPPORTUNITY COUNCIL INC: $53,400 · Human ServicesBUCKS COUNTY OPPORTUNITY COUNCIL INCNetwork of Victim Assistance: $23,000 · Human ServicesNetwork of Victim AssistanceVALLEY YOUTH HOUSE COMMITTEE INC: $17,000 · Human ServicesVALLEY YOUTH HOUSE COMMITTEE INCBABY BUREAU: $14,000 · Human ServicesBABY BUREAUTWILIGHT WISH FOUNDATION: $10,000 · Human ServicesTWILIGHT WISH FOUNDATIONOperation Warm Inc: $10,000 · Human ServicesOperation Warm IncONE HOUSE AT A TIME INC: $10,000 · Human ServicesONE HOUSE AT A TIME INCHUMANGOOD PENNSYLVANIA: $5,000 · Human Services+2 more: $4,600 · Human ServicesBRISTOL BOROUGH COMMUNITY ACTION GROUP: $18,000 · OtherBRISTOL BOROUGH COMMUNITY ACTION GROU…NUTRITION ALLIANCE (MANNA): $15,000 · OtherNUTRITION ALLIANCE (MANNA)INCREASING ACCESS TO AUTISM TREATMENT PO: $10,000 · OtherINCREASING ACCESS TO AUTISM TREATMENT…BUCKS COUNTY COATS OPERATION WARM INC: $10,000 · OtherBUCKS COUNTY COATS OPERATION WARM INCHEALTHY FAMILIES INITIATIVE: $8,000 · OtherHEALTHY FAMILIES INITIATIVEADVOCATES FOR THE HOMELESS & THOSE IN NE: $5,000 · OtherADVOCATES FOR THE HOMELESS & THOSE IN…GIRLS CODE THE WORLD: $5,000 · OtherGIRLS CODE THE WORLDFAMILY SERVICE ASSOCIATION OF BUCKS COUN: $5,000 · OtherFAMILY SERVICE ASSOCIATION OF BUCKS C…NEED INC: $5,000 · OtherNEED INCEDUCATIONAL NATURE TRAIL & PEDESTRIAN BR: $4,000 · OtherSNIPES FARM AND EDUCATION CENTER: $5,000 · OtherSNIPES FARM AND EDUCATION CENTER+1 more: $2,000 · OtherLENAPE VALLEY FOUNDATION: $10,000 · HealthGRAND VIEW HOSPITAL: $5,000 · HealthTHE CAREER WARDROBE: $10,000 · EmploymentADVOCATES FOR HOMELESS AND THOSE IN NEED: $5,000 · Public BenefitBUCKS COUNTY AUDUBON SOCIETY: $5,000 · EnvironmentMETROPOLITAN AREA NEIGHBORHOOD NUTRITION ALLIANCE: $5,000 · Food & Nutrition
Human Services$147,000Other$92,000Health$15,000Employment$10,000Public Benefit$5,000Environment$5,000Food & Nutrition$5,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetBUCKS COUNTY OPPORTUNITY COUNCIL INC: $53,400 over 7y, 0.2% of budgetNetwork of Victim Assistance: $23,000 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetVALLEY YOUTH HOUSE COMMITTEE INC: $17,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetBABY BUREAU: $14,000 over 3y, 4.0% of budgetTWILIGHT WISH FOUNDATION: $10,000 over 2y, 1.2% of budgetLENAPE VALLEY FOUNDATION: $10,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTHE CAREER WARDROBE: $10,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetONE HOUSE AT A TIME INC: $10,000 over 2y, 1.1% of budgetADVOCATES FOR HOMELESS AND THOSE IN NEED: $5,000 over 1y, 1.5% of budgetGRAND VIEW HOSPITAL: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHUMANGOOD PENNSYLVANIA: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBUCKS COUNTY AUDUBON SOCIETY: $5,000 over 1y, 2.1% of budgetMETROPOLITAN AREA NEIGHBORHOOD NUTRITION ALLIANCE: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSNIPES FARM AND EDUCATION CENTER: $5,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetKEEP MUSIC ALIVE: $2,600 over 1y, 2.9% of budgetJOE HAND BOXING GYM INC: $2,000 over 1y, 1.1% of budgetMOMS OFFERING MOMS SUPPORT: $2,000 over 2y, 1.7% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Foundations Community…W W Smith Charitable …The Philadelphia Foun…Sanders Caroline J S …Penn Community Bank F…A L Johnson Charitabl…The Grundy FoundationUnited Way of Bucks C…Bucks County Foundati…Howell Lockhart Seipl…Phillies Charities IncCharities Aid Foundat…
Foundations Community PartnershipPA26.3× affinity10 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Foundations Community Partnership · W W Smith Charitable Trust · The Philadelphia Foundation · Sanders Caroline J S Td No 2 · Penn Community Bank Foundation · A L Johnson Charitable Trust · The Grundy Foundation · United Way of Bucks County · Bucks County Foundation · Howell Lockhart Seiple No 1 Idt Res · Phillies Charities Inc · Charities Aid Foundation America

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Winter Clarence W Charitable Trust funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Winter Clarence W Charitable Trust. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%5%10%15%20%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    6report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–20%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 28 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Winter Clarence W’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home