How much did WINTER CLARENCE W CHARITABLE TRUST grant in FY2024?

WINTER CLARENCE W CHARITABLE TRUST reported 7 grants totaling $32,000 in its FY2024 IRS filing.

Where is WINTER CLARENCE W CHARITABLE TRUST based?

WINTER CLARENCE W CHARITABLE TRUST is based in MO.

WINTER CLARENCE W CHARITABLE TRUST

Foundation Dossiers

· Private foundation

WINTER CLARENCE W CHARITABLE TRUST

This foundation does not accept unsolicited requests — it funds preselected organizations.

$32k

Granted FY2024

Grants

Communities

$10k

Largest

01What you fund

0173% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant clustered by its grantee’s IRS cause code (NTEE), by year — across FY2018–2024.

Human Services$138kHealth$15kEmployment$10kEducation$5kPublic Benefit$5kEnvironment$5kRecreation & Sports$2kOther$67k

02beneath the categories

Past the labels — and the year it shifted

Beneath the NTEE codes, this is what the grant descriptions actually say.

…and in their own words, year by year

2018

—

2019

—

2020

—

2021

—

2022

—

2023

moms

Words distinctive to each year’s grant purposes (TF-IDF) · event-driven terms in cyan.

03FY2024 · 7 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

Under $10k6 grants · $22k
$10k–50k1 grant · $10k

$4,000

Median grant

States reached

$761k

Total assets

Largest grants

NETWORK OF VICTIM ASSISTANCE$10,000
HEALTHY FAMILIES INITIATIVE$8,000
ADVOCATES FOR HOMELESS & THOSE IN NEED$5,000
BABY BUREAU$4,000
JOE HAND BOXING GYM INC$2,000
VALLEY YOUTH HOUSE COMMITTEE INC$2,000
MOMS OFFERING MOMS SUPPORT$1,000

02The need

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY18–24, $138k) land where the poverty rate runs at 7% — the area typically sits at 9%. 14% of those dollars reach neighborhoods with above-average need. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA, United Way ALICE — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge

repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

64%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.

$158k · 10 repeat orgs$89k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +53% since the first grant, against +35% for the ones you funded once.

10 repeat relationships — 4 still active in FY2024, 6 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

Total granted

$158k

$74k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+53%

+35%

Still filing today

90%

42%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 53% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $15k went to new ones.

RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

Human ServicesHealthEmploymentEducationEnvironmentPublic BenefitOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

BC
BUCKS COUNTY OPPORTUNITY COUNCIL INC
6× · 2018–2023 · $47k · revenue +136%
NO
NETWORK OF VICTIM ASSISTANCE
3× · 2022–2024 · $23k · revenue +51%
VY
VALLEY YOUTH HOUSE COMMITTEE INC
4× · 2019–2024 · $17k · revenue +92%

Funded once

OW
OPERATION WARM INCgraduated
one grant, 2019 · $10k · revenue +216%
BC
BUCKS COUNTY COATS OPERATION WARM INC
one grant, 2018 · $10k
IA
INCREASING ACCESS TO AUTISM TREATMENT PO
one grant, 2018 · $10k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

Humane Pennsylvania

Provides adoption centers, non-profit vet hospitals and clinics, & animal welfare mgmt services

Animals

Goodwill of Southwestern Pennsylvania

Goodwill of southwestern pennsylvania is a human service agency and network of not-for-profit businesses whose mission is to strengthen communities, advance reuse and sustainability, and empower people to achieve their potential. as one of…

Employment

The Midwife Center for Birth and Women's

The midwife center is southwestern pennsylvania's only licensed and accredited freestanding birth center offering full scope nurse-midwifery care to women and their families. services include prenatal labor and delivery, postpartum,…

Health

The Women and Girls Foundation

The Women and Girls Foundation (WGF) is a non-profit organization based in Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania engaged in statewide programming and policy work. The mission of WGF is to achieve equality for women and girls, now and for generations to…

Civil Rights

Ten Thousand Villages of Central Pennsylvania Inc

Ten Thousand Villages creates opportunities for artisans in developing countries to earn income by bringing their products and stories to our markets through long-term fair-trade relationships.

International

Pennsylvania Family Council

Foster social welfare by educating citizens.

—

Wayne County Childrens Christmas Bureau

The organization provides basic necessities and creature comforts of a child's life including warm serviceable inner and outer wear, comfortable and attractive school and dress clothing, school supplies, age appropriate learning tools,…

Human Services

Loved Twice

The mission of Loved Twice is to clothe newborns in need with quality reused baby clothing for the first year of life. For us, even one baby going without proper clothing is one too many. We believe the community starts with serving our…

Human Services

Casa of Allegheny County

To recruit and train community members to advocate for the best interests of abused and neglected children.

Civil Rights

Healthy Start Inc

The mission of healthy start, inc. is to focus primarily on the reduction of infant mortality and low birth weight babies in southwestern pennsylvania in such a way as to make valuable use of its resources, preserve its flexibility and…

—

Boulder Valley Women's Health

Our mission is to provide high quality and equitable reproductive and sexual health services, abortion, and education to all people, regardless of any barriers to healthcare that they may face.

—

The Best Little Cat House in Pa

Animals

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Valley Youth House Committee Inc and the most unlike its peers is Humangood Pennsylvania. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

05the grantee network

17 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue.

Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)

Early backer (in before they grew)

16/17

Grantees still filing

15/17

Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

Human Services$138,000Other$67,000Health$15,000Employment$10,000Education$5,000Public Benefit$5,000Environment$5,000Recreation & Sports$2,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Foundations Community PartnershipPA22.5× affinity8 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Foundations Community Partnership · Sanders Caroline J S Td No 2 · The Philadelphia Foundation · United Way of Bucks County · Bucks County Foundation · W W Smith Charitable Trust · Penn Community Bank Foundation · The Gordon Charter Foundation · Phillies Charities Inc · Chubb Charitable Foundation · Charities Aid Foundation America · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organisation WINTER CLARENCE W CHARITABLE TRUST funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024

’20’21’22’23’24

no gov moneyreceives it· size = income

0get no government money at all

0rely on government for over half their income

⤢ axis zoomed · 0–20%

typical government reliance, FY20–24

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Through Plinth

Your grantmaking, live and operational

This dossier was generated cold from public filings. In Plinth it’s a working system — every applicant assessed and every grant monitored. Here’s a taste, run on one of your grantees: THE BABY BUREAU.

Agentic due diligence · confidence × risk

Financial management

insufficient risk

Limited financial data in public filings.

Track record & reputation

low risk

6 years of Form 990 filings, still active; revenue up 2.4× since.

Legal standing

low risk

US 501(c)(3); EIN 455568559 on file with current IRS Form 990 filings.

Governance

Live in Plinth

Board composition & governance documents — verified live in Plinth from the applicant.

Compliance & sanctions

Live in Plinth

OFAC / UN sanctions screening — run live in Plinth at assessment.

Program capacity

Live in Plinth

Staffing, M&E and activity alignment — assessed live in Plinth from submitted proposals.

Live · Plinth’s real DD engine

Run the actual assessment on THE BABY BUREAU, cold from public data.

Generated live from public IRS filings + open web sources by Plinth’s agentic engine. Shown as an illustration of the product, not a formal assessment.

Post-award monitoring · continuous checks

Awaiting reportFinancial stability— Runway not derivable from filings.
On trackSustained operations— Filing through 2024; revenue grew over the period.
On trackReliance on your funding— Your grants peaked at 4% of their budget — diversified.
Awaiting reportEvidence of delivery— Plinth collects the grantee's own monitoring reports post-award.

What you see here is static and public. In Plinth it’s operational — the full six-pillar framework on every applicant (with their own documents + live registry and sanctions checks), monitoring dashboards on every award, custom board reports, and eligibility routing for intake.

Agentic due diligenceMonitoring dashboardsCustom board reportsEligibility routing

Preview generated from this grantee’s public IRS filings and independent reporting. Pillars marked “live in Plinth” require the applicant’s submitted documents. Shown as illustration, not a formal assessment.

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPro

How do I get to Winter Clarence W Charitable Trust?

Find your warmest path to Winter Clarence W Charitable Trust through people who sit on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the introduction across shared trustees and officers.

Every link is a documented governance overlap in public IRS 990 filings — not a personal network — and each hop carries its own confidence tier. Low-confidence or distant paths are held back rather than guessed.

WINTER CLARENCE W CHARITABLE TRUST

What you funded, over time

Past the labels — and the year it shifted

Where the money goes

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Who you back again

Backed again, and grew

Funded once

17 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Government reliance of your grantees

Your grantmaking, live and operational

How do I get to Winter Clarence W Charitable Trust?

More from the funding graph

WINTER CLARENCE W CHARITABLE TRUST

What you funded, over time

Past the labels — and the year it shifted

Where the money goes

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Who you back again

Backed again, and grew

Funded once

17 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Government reliance of your grantees

Your grantmaking, live and operational

How do I get to Winter Clarence W Charitable Trust?

More from the funding graph