Skip to content
Winn Foundation Trust 4019863075 at a glance

· Private foundation

Winn Foundation Trust 4019863075

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$225k
Granted FY2024still arriving
20
Grants FY2024still arriving
7
States reached
$100k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
05Through PlinthRead

Read this first · the figures below need context

100% of Winn Foundation Trust 4019863075’s FY2025 grant dollars went to Community Foundation Of North Central Florida, not to grantees.

Its money now reaches organizations through that sponsor, which does not report who recommended each grant. FY2025 names 13 organizations directly, so a portfolio cannot be read from it. Everything below is therefore FY2024, the last year Winn Foundation Trust 4019863075 named its own grantees at scale: 16 organizations, $225k. It is dated, not current.

Organizations named directly on the return

0
’20
0
’21
0
’22
0
’23
16
’24
13
’25

Amber years are those where most dollars went to a sponsor.

01What it funds
0189% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2025.

Philanthropy$4.1MEnvironment$121kAnimals$116kArts & Culture$1kOther$0
02FY2024 · 20 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k18 grants · $25k
  • $50k–250k2 grants · $200k
$1,000
Median grant
7
States reached
$150k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Humane Society of North Central Florida$100,000
Alachua Conservation Trust$100,000
Putnam Land Conservancy$5,000
American Bird Conservancy$5,000
World Wildlfie Fund$5,000
Green Mountain Conservancy$2,000
Windham County Humane Society$1,000
1000 Friends of Florida$1,000
Avian Research and Conservation Institute$1,000
Bonnyvale Environmental Education Center$1,000
Longleaf Alliance$500
Humane Society of the United States$500
Xerces Society$500
Cornell Lab of Ornithology$500
Rainforest Alliance$500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY20–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 19%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%Franklin Land Trust: $1k → 14%Cornell Lab of Ornithology: $500 → 16%Rainforest Alliance: $500 → 17%World Wildlfie Fund: $5k → 14%Coastal Plains Institute: $1k → 12%1000 Friends of Florida: $1k → 19%Various: $223k → 19%Putnam Land Conservancy: $5k → 23%Longleaf Alliance: $500 → 19%Xerces Society: $500 → 12%American Bird Conservancy: $5k → 6%RARE: $550 → 7%Vermont Museum of Natural History: $500 → 11%Bennington Museum: $500 → 11%Cornell Lab of Ornithology: $500 → 16%Humane Society of the United States: $500 → 14%Humane Society of North Central Florida: $100k → 19%Putnam Land Conservancy: $1k → 23%Xerces Society: $500 → 12%Whitingham Historical Society: $200 → 11%Bennington Museum: $200 → 11%Various: $201k → 19%Santa Fe Lake Dwewllers: $100 → 23%Green Mountain Conservancy: $2k → 11%Bennington Museum: $135 → 11%Avian Research and Conservation Institute: $1k → 19%Santa Fe Audubon Society: $100 → 23%Putney Mountain Association: $500 → 11%Community Foundation of North Centr: $4.1M → 19%Green Mountain Conservancy: $250 → 11%Community Foundation of North Centr: $25k → 19%Bonnyvale Environmental Education Center: $1k → 11%Alachua Conservation Trust: $100k → 19%Windham County Humane Society: $1k → 11%Prairie Crrek Conservation Cemetary: $500 → 19%Prairie Crrek Conservation Cemetary: $500 → 19%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

VT
NY
MA
OR
VA
MD
DC
AL
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

80%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$894k · 11 repeat orgs$218k to everyone else

11 repeat relationships: 10 still active in FY2024, 1 since wound down; 18 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call). Read against FY2024, the last year this funder named its own grantees directly; its giving has since run through a sponsor, which reports no donor behind each grant.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

11
18

Total granted

$894k
$218k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

0%
0%

Still filing today

64%
67%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 70% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $4k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24’25
EnvironmentAnimalsArts & CultureOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • V
    Various
    4× · 2020–2023 · $873k
  • PL
    PUTNAM LAND CONSERVANCY INC
    2× · 2024–2025 · $6k · revenue 0%
  • HW
    Humane World for Animals Inc
    2× · 2024–2025 · $6k · revenue 0%

Funded once

  • AC
    ALACHUA CONSERVATION TRUST INC
    one grant, 2024 · $100k · revenue 0%
  • AC
    Alachua County Humane Society Inc
    one grant, 2024 · $100k · revenue -3%
  • AB
    American Bird Conservancy
    one grant, 2024 · $5k · revenue 0%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Maine Audubon Society

Maine Audubon works to conserve Maine's wildlife and habitat by engaging people of all ages in education, conservation, and action. We are helping the people of Maine become the nation's most informed and effective stewards of wildlife and…

Environment
2
Rainforest Trust

Rainforest trust saves endangered wildlife and protects our planet by creating rainforest reserves through partnerships, community engagement, and donor support.

International
3
Wildlife Conservation Society

The wildlife conservation society (wcs) saves wildlife and wild places worldwide through science, conservation action, education, and inspiring people to value nature.

Animals
4
Natura International Inc

Natura International conserves rainforests and other key natural ecosystems and the endangered species they contain through creation of protected areas in collaboration with local governments and communities in Latin America. In this way…

Public Benefit
5
Defenders of Wildlife

Defenders of Wildlife is a national, nonprofit membership organization dedicated to the protection of all native animals and plants in their natural communities.

Animals
6
Florida Wildlife Federation

To safeguard Florida's water, wildlife, and wild spaces by taking action today to prevent irreversible loss tomorrow.

Animals
7
Woodstock Land Conservancy Inc

Acquire land and easements to preserve and enhance the open lands, forests, water resources, scenic areas and historical sights of the Woodstock, NY area. Steward protected lands and offer educational programs and events regarding nature…

Environment
8
Volcan Mountain Foundation

The Volcan Mountain Foundation's mission is to preserve Volcan Mountain Range in its natural state for all generations.

—
9
Placer Land Trust

Placer Land Trust works with willing landowners and conservation partners to permanently protect and care for natural and agricultural lands in Placer County for current and future generations.

Environment
10
Wild Landscapes Inc

Wild landscapes, inc. (wli) is dedicated to conserving large and connected landscapes globally significant to wildlife and crucial to local communities. our environmental conservation strategy is to empower communities, conservationists,…

Animals
11
National Audubon Society Inc

We work towards a future where birds thrive across the americas because audubon is a powerful, diverse, and ever-growing force for conservation. (continued on schedule o).

Environment
12
Massachusetts Audubon Society Inc

To protect the nature of massachusetts for people and for wildlife through education, land conservation, advocacy, scientific research, and habitat stewardship/restoration.

Environment
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The Longleaf Alliance Inc; the most unlike its peers is Humane World for Animals Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

21 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 21 of the 30 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
5
Early backer (in before they grew)
20/21
Grantees still filing
7/21
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

COMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF NORTH CENTRAL FLORIDA: $4,147,585 · PhilanthropyCOMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF NORTH CENTRAL FLORIDAVarious: $873,420 · OtherVarious+11 more: $5,950 · OtherALACHUA CONSERVATION TRUST INC: $100,000 · EnvironmentPUTNAM LAND CONSERVANCY INC: $6,000 · EnvironmentWORLD WILDLIFE FUND INC: $5,000 · Environment+7 more: $6,800 · EnvironmentAlachua County Humane Society Inc: $100,000 · AnimalsHumane World for Animals Inc: $5,500 · AnimalsAmerican Bird Conservancy: $5,000 · Animals+2 more: $3,000 · AnimalsBENNINGTON MUSEUM INC: $835 · Arts & CultureVERMONT MUSEUM OF NATURAL HISTORY INC: $500 · Arts & Culture
Philanthropy$4,147,585Other$879,370Environment$117,800Animals$113,500Arts & Culture$1,335

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetALACHUA CONSERVATION TRUST INC: $100,000 over 1y, 1.1% of budgetAlachua County Humane Society Inc: $100,000 over 1y, 2.3% of budgetPUTNAM LAND CONSERVANCY INC: $6,000 over 2y, 1.3% of budgetHumane World for Animals Inc: $5,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetAmerican Bird Conservancy: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetWORLD WILDLIFE FUND INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetGREEN MOUNTAIN CONSERVANCY INCORPORATED: $2,250 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetWINDHAM COUNTY HUMANE SOCIETY: $2,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetBonnyvale Environmental Education Center: $1,100 over 2y, 0.3% of budget1000 FRIENDS OF FLORIDA INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetXERCES SOCIETY INC: $1,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetFRANKLIN LAND TRUST INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetBENNINGTON MUSEUM INC: $835 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetRARE: $550 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetRAINFOREST ALLIANCE INC: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPutney Mountain Association Incorporated: $500 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetTHE LONGLEAF ALLIANCE INC: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Nature ConservancyVanguard Charitable E…Morgan Stanley Global…Network for GoodDonor Advised Charita…Fidelity Investments …Amazonsmile Foundation
The Nature ConservancyVA13× affinity4 shared granteesties to 6 of 6Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Nature Conservancy · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · Network for Good · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Winn Foundation Trust 4019863075 funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Winn Foundation Trust 4019863075. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 30%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 22%
  • Green Mountain Conservancy Incorporated: 49% of income from government
  • Putney Mountain Association Incorporated: 44% of income from government
  • Coastal Plains Institute Inc: 41% of income from government
  • Xerces Society Inc: 22% of income from government
  • Putnam Land Conservancy Inc: 13% of income from government
  • Franklin Land Trust Inc: 7% of income from government
  • Alachua Conservation Trust Inc: 5% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
3get no government money at all
5report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Winn Foundation Trust 4019863075?

Find your warmest path to Winn Foundation Trust 4019863075 through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 30 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Winn Foundation Trust 4019863075’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home