· Private foundation
Winn Foundation Trust 4019863075
Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
Read this first · the figures below need context
100% of Winn Foundation Trust 4019863075’s FY2025 grant dollars went to Community Foundation Of North Central Florida Inc, not to grantees.
Its money now reaches organizations through that sponsor, which does not report who recommended each grant. FY2025 names 13 organizations directly, so a portfolio cannot be read from it. Everything below is therefore FY2024, the last year Winn Foundation Trust 4019863075 named its own grantees at scale: 16 organizations, $225k. It is dated, not current.
Organizations named directly on the return
Amber years are those where most dollars went to a sponsor.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2020–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k18 grants · $25k
- $50k–250k2 grants · $200k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| Alachua Conservation Trust | $100,000 |
| Humane Society of North Central Florida | $100,000 |
| Putnam Land Conservancy | $5,000 |
| World Wildlfie Fund | $5,000 |
| American Bird Conservancy | $5,000 |
| Green Mountain Conservancy | $2,000 |
| Windham County Humane Society | $1,000 |
| Bonnyvale Environmental Education Center | $1,000 |
| 1000 Friends of Florida | $1,000 |
| Avian Research and Conservation Institute | $1,000 |
| Humane Society of the United States | $500 |
| Putney Mountain Association | $500 |
| Prairie Crrek Conservation Cemetary | $500 |
| Xerces Society | $500 |
| Cornell Lab of Ornithology | $500 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Dollar for dollar, your grants (FY20–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 19%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of your dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
11 repeat relationships — 10 still active in FY2024, 1 since wound down; 18 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call). Read against FY2024, the last year this funder named its own grantees directly; its giving has since run through a sponsor, which reports no donor behind each grant.
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 70% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $4k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- VVarious4× · 2020–2023 · $873k
- PLPUTNAM LAND CONSERVANCY INC2× · 2024–2025 · $6k · revenue 0%
- HWHumane World for Animals Inc2× · 2024–2025 · $6k · revenue 0%
Funded once
- ACALACHUA CONSERVATION TRUST INCone grant, 2024 · $100k · revenue 0%
- ACAlachua County Humane Society Incone grant, 2024 · $100k · revenue 0%
WORLD WILDLIFE FUND INCone grant, 2024 · $5k · revenue -2%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Maine Audubon works to conserve Maine's wildlife and habitat by engaging people of all ages in education, conservation, and action. We are helping the people of Maine become the nation's most informed and effective stewards of wildlife and…
Rainforest trust saves endangered wildlife and protects our planet by creating rainforest reserves through partnerships, community engagement, and donor support.
The wildlife conservation society (wcs) saves wildlife and wild places worldwide through science, conservation action, education, and inspiring people to value nature.
Natura International conserves rainforests and other key natural ecosystems and the endangered species they contain through creation of protected areas in collaboration with local governments and communities in Latin America. In this way…
Defenders of Wildlife is a national, nonprofit membership organization dedicated to the protection of all native animals and plants in their natural communities.
To safeguard Florida's water, wildlife, and wild spaces by taking action today to prevent irreversible loss tomorrow.
Acquire land and easements to preserve and enhance the open lands, forests, water resources, scenic areas and historical sights of the Woodstock, NY area. Steward protected lands and offer educational programs and events regarding nature…
The Volcan Mountain Foundation's mission is to preserve Volcan Mountain Range in its natural state for all generations.
Placer Land Trust works with willing landowners and conservation partners to permanently protect and care for natural and agricultural lands in Placer County for current and future generations.
Wild landscapes, inc. (wli) is dedicated to conserving large and connected landscapes globally significant to wildlife and crucial to local communities. our environmental conservation strategy is to empower communities, conservationists,…
We work towards a future where birds thrive across the americas because audubon is a powerful, diverse, and ever-growing force for conservation. (continued on schedule o).
To protect the nature of massachusetts for people and for wildlife through education, land conservation, advocacy, scientific research, and habitat stewardship/restoration.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The Longleaf Alliance Inc and the most unlike its peers is Humane World for Animals Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
Your grantees are a median of 39 years old; the field is 12. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 27% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 4% lost their exemption, against 17% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
21 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 21 of the 30 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds COMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF NORTH CENTRAL FLORIDA ↗
- Who funds ALACHUA CONSERVATION TRUST INC ↗
- Who funds Alachua County Humane Society Inc ↗
- Who funds PUTNAM LAND CONSERVANCY INC ↗
- Who funds Humane World for Animals Inc ↗
- Who funds WORLD WILDLIFE FUND INC ↗
- Who funds American Bird Conservancy ↗
- Who funds GREEN MOUNTAIN CONSERVANCY INCORPORATED ↗
- Who funds WINDHAM COUNTY HUMANE SOCIETY ↗
- Who funds Bonnyvale Environmental Education Center ↗
- Who funds FRANKLIN LAND TRUST INC ↗
- Who funds AVIAN RESEARCH & CONSERVATION INSTITUTE INC ↗
- Who funds XERCES SOCIETY INC ↗
- Who funds COASTAL PLAINS INSTITUTE INC ↗
- Who funds 1000 FRIENDS OF FLORIDA INC ↗
- Who funds BENNINGTON MUSEUM INC ↗
- Who funds RARE ↗
- Who funds RAINFOREST ALLIANCE INC ↗
- Who funds VERMONT MUSEUM OF NATURAL HISTORY INC ↗
- Who funds Putney Mountain Association Incorporated ↗
- Who funds THE LONGLEAF ALLIANCE INC ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: The Nature Conservancy · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · Network for Good · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Winn Foundation Trust 4019863075 funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Green Mountain Conservancy Incorporated — 49% of income from government
- Putney Mountain Association Incorporated — 44% of income from government
- Coastal Plains Institute Inc — 41% of income from government
- Xerces Society Inc — 22% of income from government
- Putnam Land Conservancy Inc — 13% of income from government
- Franklin Land Trust Inc — 7% of income from government
- Alachua Conservation Trust Inc — 5% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to Winn Foundation Trust 4019863075?
Find your warmest path to Winn Foundation Trust 4019863075 through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.