Skip to content

· Private foundation

Windsor Foundation Inc

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$170k
Granted FY2025still arriving
11
Grants FY2025still arriving
6
States reached
$41k
Largest
01What it funds
0195% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Religion$1.5MInternational$306kPublic Safety & Disaster$205kHealth$38kHousing & Shelter$36kRecreation & Sports$16kEducation$2kFood & Nutrition$1kOther$0
02FY2025 · 11 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k5 grants · $34k
  • $10k–50k6 grants · $136k
$15,000
Median grant
6
States reached
$221k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
MISSION TO THE WORLD$41,040
REBUILDING HOPE$21,600
NEW HARVEST MISSIONS INTERNATIONAL$21,600
SIM$19,800
DISCIPLE MAKERS$16,800
MISSION TO NORTH AMERICA$15,000
CROSSWORLD$9,600
NAVIGATORS$7,800
EUROPEAN BAPTIST FELLOWSHIP$7,200
CAMPUS CRUSADE FOR CHRIST$6,000
EVANGELICAL FREE CHURCH OF AMERICA$3,600
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY19–23, $20k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 99% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 8%HEARTLAND BAPTIST MISSIONS: $6k → 16%HEARTLAND BAPTIST MISSIONS: $4k → 16%SAMARITAN GROUP INC: $10k → 12%KENT CENTER INC: $500 → 12%COMPASS: $250 → 7%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

MN
MI
IN
PA
CO
MO
KY
VA
MD
DE
NC
DC
OK
GA
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
04

Where the work is directed

The same grants placed two ways: where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose sends the money.

About 14% of Windsor Foundation Inc’s grant dollars are earmarked for a different county than the recipient’s own address.

Windsor Foundation Inclessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address · 13% directed abroad (not shown)
How this is measured
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the funder’s own 990 grant descriptions.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

96%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$2.1M · 37 repeat orgs$80k to everyone else

37 repeat relationships: 11 still active in FY2025, 26 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

37
13

Total granted

$2.1M
$80k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+35%
+59%

Still filing today

43%
31%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
ReligionHuman ServicesPublic Safety & DisasterYouth DevelopmentInternationalRecreation & SportsOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • NH
    NEW HARVEST MISSIONS INTERNATIONAL INC
    9× · 2017–2025 · $293k · revenue +12%
  • RH
    REBUILDING HOPE INC
    9× · 2017–2025 · $205k · revenue +229%
  • DI
    DISCIPLEMAKERS INC
    9× · 2017–2025 · $134k · revenue +67%

Funded once

  • MT
    MISSIOAN TO NORTH AMERICA
    one grant, 2017 · $36k
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2017 · $12k
  • 2S
    20 SCHEMES INC
    one grant, 2020 · $10k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Worldserve Ministries

To advance the gospel in closed and hard-to-reach nations and to impact those nations for christ.

International
2
Vision International Missions

To propagate the gospel of jesus christ; to examine candidates and appoint missionaries. to endorse missionary programs according to standards set forth in the new testament, to establish churches, church schools & mission societies in…

Religion
3
Kings Commission Ministries

Our mission is to carry out the commands of our Lord Jesus Christ to take the Good News of the gospel to the whole world teaching people to obey everything He commanded. We work among mostly low-literacy populations so we do this by…

—
4
Heart Bridge International

Heart Bridge International exists to equip and empower Christians around the world to fulfill the Great Commission. The organization provides free ministry training, discipleship resources, and practical coaching to under-resourced…

Religion
5
Audio Scripture Ministries

Asm's commitment to the great commission leads us to serve others by:-partnering with national leaders, churches, ministries, and individuals to create and distribute scripture media to share the good news of jesus.-recording bible and…

—
6
Discover Your Mission Inc

Supporing missionaries worldwide

Religion
7
Destiny Ministries International Inc

Provide oversight spititual support, evangelize the word help the poor and needy including aid in the translation of the nible

Religion
8
Faithbytheword Incorporated

As Christs followers, we have the Holy Spirit residing within us, which means we have His power to fulfill this command. We cant save anyone, but its our responsibility to tell people about the God who can. How will they believe unless…

Human Services
9
Dozen Ministries

Religious

Religion
10
International Impact Ministries in
Religion
11
Jubal Band Ministries

Jubal band ministries mission is to invite people to become disciples of christian life with jesus.

Religion
12
Christian Ministries
International
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Disciplemakers Inc; the most unlike its peers is Special Olympics Maryland Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
05the grantee network

23 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 23 of the 51 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
7
Early backer (in before they grew)
21/23
Grantees still filing
20/23
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

MISSION TO THE WORLD: $452,280 · OtherMISSION TO THE WORLDMISSION TO NORTH AMERICA: $197,500 · OtherMISSION TO NORTH AMERICASIM: $177,900 · OtherSIMDISCIPLEMAKERS INC: $134,200 · OtherDISCIPLEMAKERS INCCROSSWORLD: $113,900 · OtherCROSSWORLDTHE NAVIGATORS: $88,000 · OtherTHE NAVIGATORSCAMPUS CRUSADE FOR CHRIST: $56,273 · Other+28 more: $249,388 · Other+28 moreNEW HARVEST MISSIONS INTERNATIONAL INC: $293,000 · ReligionNEW HARVEST MISSIONS IN…Metro Atlanta Seminary Inc: $58,500 · ReligionMetro Atlanta Seminary …EUROPEAN BAPTIST FELLOWSHIP INC: $46,600 · ReligionEUROPEAN BAPTIST FELLOW…MARKINC MINISTRIES: $34,500 · ReligionMARKINC MINISTRIES+4 more: $29,640 · Religion+4 moreREBUILDING HOPE INC: $205,100 · Public Safety & DisasterREBUILDING…HAVEN MINISTRIES INC: $25,000 · Housing & ShelterSAMARITAN GROUP INC: $10,000 · Human ServicesHEARTLAND BAPTIST MISSION: $9,500 · Human Services+2 more: $750 · Human ServicesFELLOWSHIP OF CHRISTIAN ATHLETES: $11,800 · Youth DevelopmentCompassion International Incorporated: $8,458 · International
Other$1,469,441Religion$462,240Public Safety & Disaster$205,100Housing & Shelter$25,000Human Services$20,250Youth Development$11,800International$8,458

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetNEW HARVEST MISSIONS INTERNATIONAL INC: $293,000 over 9y, 10% of budgetREBUILDING HOPE INC: $205,100 over 9y, 14% of budgetDISCIPLEMAKERS INC: $134,200 over 9y, 0.3% of budgetMetro Atlanta Seminary Inc: $58,500 over 7y, 3.7% of budgetEUROPEAN BAPTIST FELLOWSHIP INC: $46,600 over 5y, 12% of budgetMARKINC MINISTRIES: $34,500 over 6y, 2.2% of budgetHAVEN MINISTRIES INC: $25,000 over 5y, 1.1% of budgetSERGE GLOBAL INC: $21,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetSEEJESUSNET INC: $14,500 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetFELLOWSHIP OF CHRISTIAN ATHLETES: $11,800 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetSAMARITAN GROUP INC: $10,000 over 1y, 13% of budgetHEARTLAND BAPTIST MISSION: $9,500 over 2y, 0.5% of budgetCompassion International Incorporated: $8,458 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetSAMARITAN'S PURSE: $4,800 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetTHE NATIONAL CHILDREN'S CANCER SOCIETY: $4,500 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetSPECIAL OLYMPICS MARYLAND INC: $2,250 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetRebuilding Together Eastern Shore Inc: $1,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetKENT SCHOOL INC: $750 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetKent Center Inc: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN BIBLE SOCIETY: $340 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCOMPASS INC: $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds NEW HARVEST MISSIONS INTERNATIONAL INC ↗
  • Who funds REBUILDING HOPE INC ↗
  • Who funds DISCIPLEMAKERS INC ↗
  • Who funds Metro Atlanta Seminary Inc ↗
  • Who funds EUROPEAN BAPTIST FELLOWSHIP INC ↗
  • Who funds MARKINC MINISTRIES ↗
  • Who funds HAVEN MINISTRIES INC ↗
  • Who funds SERGE GLOBAL INC ↗
  • Who funds SEEJESUSNET INC ↗
  • Who funds FELLOWSHIP OF CHRISTIAN ATHLETES ↗
  • Who funds 20 SCHEMES INC ↗
  • Who funds SAMARITAN GROUP INC ↗
  • Who funds HEARTLAND BAPTIST MISSION ↗
  • Who funds Compassion International Incorporated ↗
  • Who funds SAMARITAN'S PURSE ↗
  • Who funds THE NATIONAL CHILDREN'S CANCER SOCIETY ↗
  • Who funds SPECIAL OLYMPICS MARYLAND INC ↗
  • Who funds Rebuilding Together Eastern Shore Inc ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Mid Shore Community Foundation IncMD15.6× affinity5 shared granteesties to 8 of 8Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Mid Shore Community Foundation Inc · The Clifton Foundation Inc · David a Bramble Foundation Inc · Raymond James Charitable Endowment Fund · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Windsor Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Windsor Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 50%1%4%8%15%funder's share of their income ↑0%8%15%22%30%share of the org’s income from government →median 12%
  • Rebuilding Together Eastern Shore Inc: 12% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
5get no government money at all
8report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–30%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Windsor Foundation Inc?

Find your warmest path to Windsor Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 51 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Windsor’s filings →

More from the funding graph