Skip to content

· Public charity

Williams Charity Fund

We are organized exclusively for charitable purpose including but not limited to raising & distributing funds to organizations that benefit veterans, rescue missions, food kitchens, the poor, caring for the sick, charitable educational, civic & other 501(c)(3) doing good work.

$265k
Granted FY2017
13
Grants FY2017
2
States reached
$50k
Largest
01What it funds
01FY2017 · 13 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2017

  • Under $10k1 grant · $5k
  • $10k–50k11 grants · $210k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $50k
$22,211
Median grant
2
States reached
$0
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
YWCA Rock County$50,000
Gifts Shelter$25,000
Salvation Army$25,000
Project 1649$25,000
Holy Cross Children Services$25,000
Covenant House$25,000
ECHO$22,211
Detroit Rescue Mission$20,000
House of Mercy$12,500
Childrens Trus Fund$10,000
Child Safe MI$10,000
Healthnet$10,000
Cass Community$5,000
02The need
02

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–17, $107k) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 23% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%Covenant House: $25k → 21%Child Safe MI: $10k → 8%ECHO: $22k → 10%YWCA Rock County: $50k → 10%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Community & Home Supports Inc

Community & home supports, inc. was founded to help people and communities address poverty and homelessness. we strive to fulfill our purpose by developing, leading, and participating in collaborative and innovative efforts that support…

Human Services
2
Catholic Social Services of Washtenaw County

Catholic Social Services of Washtenaw County D/B/A Catholic Charities Washtenaw County provides diverse, holistic social services including adoption and pregnancy counseling, food and basic needs assistance, domestic and child abuse…

—
3
Catholic Charities of the Diocese of St Cloud

At Catholic Charities, we focus our efforts around three core pillars: Food Access, Mental Health and Housing. Guided by our mission - to serve and enhance human dignity for all people - we provide essential services and foster a sense of…

Human Services
4
The Christ Child Society of Detroit

The christ child society of detroit is an organization serving the metropolitan detroit and out-state areas of michigan by promoting the well-being of disadvantaged children and their families.

Human Services
5
Comprehensive Community Solutions Inc

To bring about fundamental transformation of neighborhoods, communities, and circumstances of those who live there, through programs and services which emphasize building human capital, communities and affordable housing.

Human Services
6
Catholic Charities of Kansas City - St Joseph Inc

Helping people move to a better life through hope-filled care, services, and advocacy; calling all those of goodwill to join us

Human Services
7
Methodist Children's Home

Methodist children's home equips children, youth, and families to flourish by offering hope through christian-centered relationships, services, and support.

Human Services
8
Holy Cross Youth and Family Services Inc

Holy cross youth & families services dba kairos healthcare is an agency committed to individual wellness, family stability, and positive change. our mission is to provide quality substance abuse treatment services to adults, adolescents,…

—
9
Community Service Foundation Inc

Provide affordable housing, educational training in homeownership and household budgeting, fair housing counseling, and other related housing services to pinellas county residents.

—
10
Choices of Manistee County Inc

Choices of manistee county, inc. provides emergency shelter, crisis intervention, counseling, advocacy, and education to survivors of domestic violence in manistee county, empowering survivors to achieve safety and self-determination.

Human Services
11
House of the Good Shepherd

House of Good Shepherd serves with love and compassion women and children affected by domestic violence by offering a safe place with opportunities for emotional, educational and spiritual growth, giving hope and continued support for a…

Human Services
12
United Methodist Ministry With Children and Families Inc

Methodist childrens homes seeks to bring restoration to children and youth who have been neglected or abused. by the end of their time with us, we hope to see that they find reconciliation with their biological families, love within an…

Human Services
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Cass Community Social Services Inc; the most unlike its peers is Covenant House Michigan. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
03the grantee network

10 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 10 of the 13 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
10/10
Grantees still filing
9/10
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

YOUNG WOMEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF ROCK COUNTY INC: $50,000 · Human ServicesYOUNG WOMEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF ROCK C…COVENANT HOUSE MICHIGAN: $25,000 · Human ServicesCOVENANT HOUSE MICHIGANEVERYONE COOPERATING TO HELP OTHERS INC: $22,211 · Human ServicesEVERYONE COOPERATING TO HELP OTHERS INCCHILD SAFE MICHIGAN: $10,000 · Human ServicesCHILD SAFE MICHIGANHOLY CROSS SERVICES INC: $25,000 · OtherHOLY CROSS SERVICES INCSALVATION ARMY: $25,000 · OtherSALVATION ARMYHOUSE OF MERCY: $12,500 · OtherHOUSE OF MERCYChildrens Trus Fund: $10,000 · OtherChildrens Trus FundCASS COMMUNITY SOCIAL SERVICES INC: $5,000 · OtherCASS COMMUNITY SOCIAL SERVICES IN…Detroit Rescue Mission Ministries: $20,000 · HealthDetroit Resc…HEALTHNET OF ROCK COUNTY INC: $10,000 · HealthHEALTHNET OF…COMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF SOUTHERN WISCONSIN INC: $25,000 · PhilanthropyCOMMUNITY …PROJECT 1649 INC: $25,000 · Youth DevelopmentPROJECT 16…
Human Services$107,211Other$77,500Health$30,000Philanthropy$25,000Youth Development$25,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetYOUNG WOMEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF ROCK COUNTY INC: $50,000 over 1y, 2.5% of budgetHOLY CROSS SERVICES INC: $25,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetCOMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF SOUTHERN WISCONSIN INC: $25,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetCOVENANT HOUSE MICHIGAN: $25,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetEVERYONE COOPERATING TO HELP OTHERS INC: $22,211 over 1y, 1.0% of budgetDetroit Rescue Mission Ministries: $20,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetHEALTHNET OF ROCK COUNTY INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetCHILD SAFE MICHIGAN: $10,000 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetCASS COMMUNITY SOCIAL SERVICES INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Baird Foundation IncWI15.4× affinity6 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Baird Foundation Inc · The Chicago Community Trust · Jpc Foundation · Community Foundation of Southern Wisconsin Inc · Alliant Energy Foundation Inc · American Endowment Foundation · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Network for Good · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Williams Charity Fund funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Williams Charity Fund. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%13%25%38%50%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–50%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    04Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Williams Charity Fund?

    Find your warmest path to Williams Charity Fund through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 13 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2017, released 2017. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Williams Charity’s filings →

    More from the funding graph