Skip to content
Plinth

· Public charity

Williams Charity Fund

We are organized exclusively for charitable purpose including but not limited to raising & distributing funds to organizations that benefit veterans, rescue missions, food kitchens, the poor, caring for the sick, charitable educational, civic & other 501(c)(3) doing good work.

$265k
Granted FY2017
13
Grants FY2017
2
States reached
$50k
Largest
01What you fund
01FY2017 · 13 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2017

  • Under $10k1 grant · $5k
  • $10k–50k11 grants · $210k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $50k
$22,211
Median grant
2
States reached
$0
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
YWCA Rock County$50,000
Salvation Army$25,000
Holy Cross Children Services$25,000
Gifts Shelter$25,000
Project 1649$25,000
Covenant House$25,000
ECHO$22,211
Detroit Rescue Mission$20,000
House of Mercy$12,500
Healthnet$10,000
Child Safe MI$10,000
Childrens Trus Fund$10,000
Cass Community$5,000
02The need
02

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY17–17, $107k) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 23% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%Covenant House: $25k → 21%Child Safe MI: $10k → 8%ECHO: $22k → 10%YWCA Rock County: $50k → 10%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Community & Home Supports Inc

Community & home supports, inc. was founded to help people and communities address poverty and homelessness. we strive to fulfill our purpose by developing, leading, and participating in collaborative and innovative efforts that support…

Human Services
2
Catholic Social Services of Washtenaw County

Catholic Social Services of Washtenaw County D/B/A Catholic Charities Washtenaw County provides diverse, holistic social services including adoption and pregnancy counseling, food and basic needs assistance, domestic and child abuse…

3
Catholic Charities of the Diocese of St Cloud

At Catholic Charities, we focus our efforts around three core pillars: Food Access, Mental Health and Housing. Guided by our mission - to serve and enhance human dignity for all people - we provide essential services and foster a sense of…

Human Services
4
The Christ Child Society of Detroit

The christ child society of detroit is an organization serving the metropolitan detroit and out-state areas of michigan by promoting the well-being of disadvantaged children and their families.

Human Services
5
Comprehensive Community Solutions Inc

To bring about fundamental transformation of neighborhoods, communities, and circumstances of those who live there, through programs and services which emphasize building human capital, communities and affordable housing.

Human Services
6
Catholic Charities of Kansas City - St Joseph Inc

Helping people move to a better life through hope-filled care, services, and advocacy; calling all those of goodwill to join us

Human Services
7
Methodist Children's Home

Methodist children's home equips children, youth, and families to flourish by offering hope through christian-centered relationships, services, and support.

Human Services
8
Holy Cross Youth and Family Services Inc

Holy cross youth & families services dba kairos healthcare is an agency committed to individual wellness, family stability, and positive change. our mission is to provide quality substance abuse treatment services to adults, adolescents,…

9
Community Service Foundation Inc

Provide affordable housing, educational training in homeownership and household budgeting, fair housing counseling, and other related housing services to pinellas county residents.

10
Choices of Manistee County Inc

Choices of manistee county, inc. provides emergency shelter, crisis intervention, counseling, advocacy, and education to survivors of domestic violence in manistee county, empowering survivors to achieve safety and self-determination.

Human Services
11
House of the Good Shepherd

House of Good Shepherd serves with love and compassion women and children affected by domestic violence by offering a safe place with opportunities for emotional, educational and spiritual growth, giving hope and continued support for a…

Human Services
12
United Methodist Ministry With Children and Families Inc

Methodist childrens homes seeks to bring restoration to children and youth who have been neglected or abused. by the end of their time with us, we hope to see that they find reconciliation with their biological families, love within an…

Human Services

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Cass Community Social Services Inc and the most unlike its peers is Covenant House Michigan. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

03the grantee network

10 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 10 of the 13 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
10/10
Grantees still filing
9/10
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

YOUNG WOMEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF ROCK COUNTY INC — $50,000 · Human ServicesYOUNG WOMEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF ROCK C…COVENANT HOUSE MICHIGAN — $25,000 · Human ServicesCOVENANT HOUSE MICHIGANEVERYONE COOPERATING TO HELP OTHERS INC — $22,211 · Human ServicesEVERYONE COOPERATING TO HELP OTHERS INCCHILD SAFE MICHIGAN — $10,000 · Human ServicesCHILD SAFE MICHIGANHOLY CROSS SERVICES INC — $25,000 · OtherHOLY CROSS SERVICES INCSALVATION ARMY — $25,000 · OtherSALVATION ARMYHOUSE OF MERCY — $12,500 · OtherHOUSE OF MERCYChildrens Trus Fund — $10,000 · OtherChildrens Trus FundCASS COMMUNITY SOCIAL SERVICES INC — $5,000 · OtherCASS COMMUNITY SOCIAL SERVICES IN…Detroit Rescue Mission Ministries — $20,000 · HealthDetroit Resc…HEALTHNET OF ROCK COUNTY INC — $10,000 · HealthHEALTHNET OF…PROJECT 1649 INC — $25,000 · Youth DevelopmentPROJECT 16…COMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF SOUTHERN WISCONSIN INC — $25,000 · PhilanthropyCOMMUNITY …
Human Services$107,211Other$77,500Health$30,000Youth Development$25,000Philanthropy$25,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetYOUNG WOMEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF ROCK COUNTY INC — $50,000 over 1y, 2.5% of budgetCOMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF SOUTHERN WISCONSIN INC — $25,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetCOVENANT HOUSE MICHIGAN — $25,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetHOLY CROSS SERVICES INC — $25,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetEVERYONE COOPERATING TO HELP OTHERS INC — $22,211 over 1y, 1.0% of budgetDetroit Rescue Mission Ministries — $20,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetCHILD SAFE MICHIGAN — $10,000 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetHEALTHNET OF ROCK COUNTY INC — $10,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetCASS COMMUNITY SOCIAL SERVICES INC — $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Baird Foundation IncWI15.4× affinity6 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Baird Foundation Inc · The Chicago Community Trust · Jpc Foundation · Community Foundation of Southern Wisconsin Inc · Alliant Energy Foundation Inc · American Endowment Foundation · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Network for Good · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Williams Charity Fund funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%your share of their income ↑0%13%25%38%50%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–50%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    04Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Williams Charity Fund?

    Find your warmest path to Williams Charity Fund through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 13 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2017, released 2017. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph