· Private foundation
William Sloane Jelin Charitable Foundation
Its FY2024 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k31 grants · $97k
- $10k–50k3 grants · $40k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| CHEWONKI FOUNDATION OF MAINE | $15,000 |
| BIKES FOR THE WORLD | $15,000 |
| Valentino Achak Deng Foundation | $10,000 |
| FRIENDS SEMINARY | $5,000 |
| CASA FOR CHILDREN OF ESSEX COUNTY | $5,000 |
| Wings over Haiti | $5,000 |
| WILLIAMS COLLEGE | $5,000 |
| BASBLUE INC | $5,000 |
| THE NATIONAL FILM PRESERVE LTD | $5,000 |
| World Affairs Council of Maine | $5,000 |
| PORTLAND MEDIA CENTER | $5,000 |
| MAJI SAFI GROUP | $5,000 |
| MAINE HISTORICAL SOCIETY | $5,000 |
| WESLEYAN UNIVERSITY | $5,000 |
| ROLAND PARK COUNTRY SCHOOL INC | $3,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY17–24, $228k) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 23% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +50% since the first grant, against +26% for the ones you funded once.
52 repeat relationships — 34 still active in FY2024, 18 since wound down.
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- BFBikes for the World Inc8× · 2017–2024 · $135k · revenue +22%
- TATHE ARCHER SCHOOL FOR GIRLS INC6× · 2017–2022 · $75k · revenue +20%
- CFChewonki Foundation Inc8× · 2017–2024 · $68k · revenue +6%
Funded once
- KSKENT SCHOOLone grant, 2018 · $25k · revenue +7%
JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITYgraduatedone grant, 2021 · $25k · revenue +40%- UOUniversity of Southern Maine Foundationgraduatedone grant, 2019 · $10k · revenue +92%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
The bac is committed to provide excellence in design education grounded in practice and accessible to diverse communities.
Bates is a college of the liberal arts and sciences, and is a coeducational, nonsectarian, residential college with special commitments to academic rigor, and to assuring in all of its efforts the dignity of each individual, and access to…
The University of New Haven is a student-centered comprehensive university with an emphasis on excellence in liberal arts and professional education. Our mission is to prepare our students to lead purposeful and fulfilling lives in a…
Provide an independent forum for those who dare to read, think, speak, and write to advance the professional, literary, and scientific understanding of sea power and other issues critical to global security.
To enhance, every day, the health of our patients, our families and our communities. We do that through a range of health care services for people of all ages, in a variety of care settings.
Guided by the principles of academic rigor and diversity, the international school of san francisco offers programs of study in french and english to prepare its graduates for a world in which the ability to think critically and to…
The fsmb serves as the voice for state medical boards, supporting them through education, assessment, research and advocacy while providing services and initiatives that promote patient safety, quality health care and regulatory best…
New york school of interior design provides the most innovative, immersive, and transformative interior design education in the world, demonstrating the impact of professionally designed interiors on the health, happiness, and well-being…
Maine Media Workshops & College educates and inspires visual artists and storytellers to achieve their creative potential. We provide lifelong learning opportunities for those pursuing the fine arts and media-related professions. We are…
The philadelphia school educates children for a future that is impossible to know but not impossible to shape. learn here. go anywhere.
Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.
The mission of mit is to advance knowledge and educate students in science, technology, and other areas of scholarship that will best serve the nation and the world in the 21st century.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Children's Defense Fund and the most unlike its peers is First Amendment Museum At the Gannett House. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 33 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 3% of your grantees by number, and just 5% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 3% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
60 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 60 of the 69 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds Bikes for the World Inc ↗
- Who funds SEEDS OF PEACE INC ↗
- Who funds THE ARCHER SCHOOL FOR GIRLS INC ↗
- Who funds Chewonki Foundation Inc ↗
- Who funds MAINE HISTORICAL SOCIETY ↗
- Who funds WINGS OVER HAITI INC ↗
- Who funds Williams College ↗
- Who funds CASA FOR CHILDREN OF ESSEX COUNTY INC ↗
- Who funds PORTLAND MEDIA CENTER ↗
- Who funds MAJI SAFI GROUP ↗
- Who funds WESLEYAN UNIVERSITY ↗
- Who funds KENT SCHOOL ↗
- Who funds JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY ↗
- Who funds REFUGEPOINT INC ↗
- Who funds MAINE STATE SOCIETY FOR THE PROTECTION OF ANIMALS ↗
- Who funds VALENTINO ACHAK DENG FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds MEDICINE FOR PEACE ↗
- Who funds KIPP SOCAL PUBLIC SCHOOLS ↗
- Who funds TREE OF LIFE FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds THE BROOKLYN HOSPITAL FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds World Affairs Council of Maine ↗
- Who funds COMMUNITIES IN SCHOOLS OF LOS ANGELES INC ↗
- Who funds THE NASPGHAN FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds SOUTH MOUNTAIN CONSERVANCY INC ↗
- Who funds FRIENDS OF THE CHILDREN ↗
- Who funds FIRST AMENDMENT MUSEUM AT THE GANNETT HOUSE ↗
- Who funds The National Film Preserve Ltd ↗
- Who funds MAINE COLLEGE OF ART AND DESIGN ↗
- Who funds BASBLUE INC ↗
- Who funds Jewish Community Alliance Southern Maine ↗
- Who funds INTERNEWS NETWORK ↗
- Who funds GILMAN SCHOOL INCORPORATED ↗
- Who funds Chabad Lubavitch of Maine Inc ↗
- Who funds ROLAND PARK COUNTRY SCHOOL INC ↗
- Who funds One Voice ↗
- Who funds University of Southern Maine Foundation ↗
- Who funds Good Shepherd Food Bank ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Maine Community Foundation Inc · Elmina B Sewall Foundation · Roger K Berle Charitable Trust · Murray Charitable Trust · Spectemur Agendo Inc · Sam L Cohen Foundation · Fisher Charitable Foundation · Davis Family Foundation · Roxanne Quimby Foundation Inc · Albert B Glickman Family Foundation · Lunder Foundation · Libra Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization William Sloane Jelin Charitable Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Johns Hopkins University — 12% of income from government
- Wesleyan University — 1% of income from government
- Williams College — 0% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to William Sloane Jelin Charitable Foundation?
Find your warmest path to William Sloane Jelin Charitable Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.