How much did WILLIAM JOSEF FOUNDATION INC grant in FY2024?

A cause breakdown isn’t shown here: 45% of WILLIAM JOSEF FOUNDATION INC’s grantee dollars go to organizations outside the IRS cause taxonomy (common for large international and research funders), so a chart would be mostly “unclassified” and misrepresent the portfolio.

02beneath the categories

Past the labels — and the year it shifted

Beneath the NTEE codes, this is what the grant descriptions actually say.

…and in their own words, year by year

2019

food

2020

southfood bankcorporation

2021

capital ops

2022

collaborativepolicygreater atlantalatino

2023

housingcapital

Words distinctive to each year’s grant purposes (TF-IDF) · event-driven terms in cyan.

03FY2024 · 32 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

$10k–50k4 grants · $130k
$50k–250k28 grants · $2.8M

$100,000

Median grant

States reached

$73M

Total assets

Largest grants

OPEN DOORS INC$175,000
SALVATION ARMY$150,000
ATLANTA NEIGHBORHOOD DEVELOPMENT PARTNERSHIP$150,000
INTOWN CARES$150,000
GEORGIA WORKS$150,000
COMMON MARKET GEORGIA$150,000
HOPE ATLANTA$125,000
LATINO COMMUNITY FUND$125,000
PARTNERS FOR HOME$125,000
UNITED WAY OF GREATER ATLANTA$125,000
GSU HEALTH POLICY CENTERARCHI$125,000
ATLANTA LAND TRUST$100,000
GIDEON'S PROMISE$100,000
GEORGIA JUSTICE PROJECT$100,000
GEORGIA BUDGET & POLICY INSTITUTE$100,000

02The need

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY19–24, $1.7M) land where the poverty rate runs at 13% — the area typically sits at 11%. 94% of those dollars reach neighborhoods with above-average need. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA, United Way ALICE — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge

repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

78%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.

$14M · 38 repeat orgs$3.8M to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +78% since the first grant, against +73% for the ones you funded once.

38 repeat relationships — 20 still active in FY2024, 18 since wound down; 12 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

Total granted

$14M

$2.8M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+78%

+73%

Still filing today

55%

57%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 67% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $990k went to new ones.

RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

Human ServicesHousing & ShelterFood & NutritionCrime & LegalPhilanthropyCivil RightsOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

AC
ATLANTA COMMUNITY FOOD BANK
3× · 2019–2021 · $900k · revenue +78%
PF
PARTNERS FOR HOME
4× · 2020–2024 · $725k · revenue +1418%
FS
FIRST STEP STAFFING
2× · 2020–2021 · $700k · revenue +177%

Funded once

CF
CONSERVATION FUND
one grant, 2023 · $500k
MS
MLK SR COMMUNITY RESOURCES COLLAB
one grant, 2021 · $250k
SU
STEP UP ON SECOND STREETgraduated
one grant, 2021 · $250k · revenue +158%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

Transforming Georgia Inc

Transforming Georgia, Inc. is organized to make an indelible impact on the lives of Georgians through fighting for voting rights, supporting legislative solutions, programs and other proactive efforts to transform our communities.

Civil Rights

Feeding the Homeless Project Inc

Feeding homeless individuals in Downtown Atlanta.

Food & Nutrition

Atlanta Center for Self Sufficiency Inc

To empower financially vulnerable individuals in our community to become self-sufficient, sustainably employed, and economic contributors to society

Employment

Lift Up Atlanta Inc

To assist the homeless and the needy.

Human Services

Southwest Georgia Housing Opportunities

The organization's mission is to actively partner with the community to seek solutions to homelessness through advocacy, services and collaboration.

Human Services

Intown Collaborative Ministries Inc

To prevent and reverse homelessness and hunger in Intown Atlanta.

Human Services

Trans Housing Coalition Inc

Support the trans and gender-nonconforming community in greater atlanta.

Housing & Shelter

Atlanta Association of Legal

—

Asian Americans Advancing Justice

Asian Americans Advancing Justice - Atlanta's mission is to protect and promote the civil and human rights of Asian Americans, Native Hawaiians, and Pacific Islanders in Georgia and the Southeast through policy advocacy, legal services,…

Human Services

Georgia Health Initiative Inc

Philanthropy

Georgia Economic Development

The foundation functions as an advocate of economic development for the state of georgia.

Community Improvement

LeadingAge Georgia Inc

The statewide association of not-for-profit and other mission-driven organizations dedicated to providing quality housing, health care, community based and other related services for older Georgians. The mission of the association is to…

Education

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Partners for Home Inc and the most unlike its peers is Southern Center for Human Rights. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

Your grantees are a median of 27 years old; the field is 10. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

The field is 31% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 18% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund

0.0%0/52

the rest of the field

18%

2,918/16,011

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

05the grantee network

50 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue.

Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)

Early backer (in before they grew)

50/50

Grantees still filing

41/50

Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

Other$8,890,250Housing & Shelter$2,035,000Philanthropy$1,755,000Human Services$1,735,000Food & Nutrition$1,655,000Employment$700,000Civil Rights$650,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

United Way of Greater Atlanta IncGA62.1× affinity28 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: United Way of Greater Atlanta Inc · The Community Foundation for Greater · Tull Charitable Foundation Inc · Georgia Power Foundation Inc · Betty and Davis Fitzgerald Foundation · The Waterfall Foundation Inc · The Imlay Foundation Inc · Atl Fdn-W Peters Main · Kaiser Foundation Health Plan of Georgiainc · Tr Uw Charles I Branan · Annie E Casey Foundation Inc · THDF II Inc DBA

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organisation WILLIAM JOSEF FOUNDATION INC funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024

’20’21’22’23’24

no gov moneyreceives it· size = income

1get no government money at all

0rely on government for over half their income

typical government reliance, FY20–24

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Through Plinth

Your grantmaking, live and operational

This dossier was generated cold from public filings. In Plinth it’s a working system — every applicant assessed and every grant monitored. Here’s a taste, run on one of your grantees: GEORGIA SUPPORTIVE HOUSING ASSOC.

Agentic due diligence · confidence × risk

Financial management

insufficient risk

Limited financial data in public filings.

Track record & reputation

medium risk

3 years of Form 990 filings, still active.

Legal standing

low risk

US 501(c)(3); EIN 271111452 on file with current IRS Form 990 filings.

Governance

Live in Plinth

Board composition & governance documents — verified live in Plinth from the applicant.

Compliance & sanctions

Live in Plinth

OFAC / UN sanctions screening — run live in Plinth at assessment.

Program capacity

Live in Plinth

Staffing, M&E and activity alignment — assessed live in Plinth from submitted proposals.

Live · Plinth’s real DD engine

Run the actual assessment on GEORGIA SUPPORTIVE HOUSING ASSOC, cold from public data.

Generated live from public IRS filings + open web sources by Plinth’s agentic engine. Shown as an illustration of the product, not a formal assessment.

Post-award monitoring · continuous checks

Awaiting reportFinancial stability— Runway not derivable from filings.
WatchSustained operations— Filing through 2024; revenue contracted over the period.
WatchReliance on your funding— Your grants peaked at 67% of their budget — load-bearing; a dependency Plinth would track.
Awaiting reportEvidence of delivery— Plinth collects the grantee's own monitoring reports post-award.

What you see here is static and public. In Plinth it’s operational — the full six-pillar framework on every applicant (with their own documents + live registry and sanctions checks), monitoring dashboards on every award, custom board reports, and eligibility routing for intake.

Agentic due diligenceMonitoring dashboardsCustom board reportsEligibility routing

Preview generated from this grantee’s public IRS filings and independent reporting. Pillars marked “live in Plinth” require the applicant’s submitted documents. Shown as illustration, not a formal assessment.

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPro

How do I get to William Josef Foundation Inc?

Find your warmest path to William Josef Foundation Inc through people who sit on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the introduction across shared trustees and officers.

Every link is a documented governance overlap in public IRS 990 filings — not a personal network — and each hop carries its own confidence tier. Low-confidence or distant paths are held back rather than guessed.

WILLIAM JOSEF FOUNDATION INC

What you funded, over time

Past the labels — and the year it shifted

Where the money goes

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Who you back again

Backed again, and grew

Funded once

50 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Government reliance of your grantees

Your grantmaking, live and operational

How do I get to William Josef Foundation Inc?

More from the funding graph

WILLIAM JOSEF FOUNDATION INC

What you funded, over time

Past the labels — and the year it shifted

Where the money goes

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Who you back again

Backed again, and grew

Funded once

50 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Government reliance of your grantees

Your grantmaking, live and operational

How do I get to William Josef Foundation Inc?

More from the funding graph