Skip to content

· Private foundation

William and Mary Swift Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$1k
Granted FY2025still arriving
13
Grants FY2025still arriving
4
States reached
$100
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Education$5kAnimals$4kEnvironment$3kHuman Services$3kArts & Culture$1kYouth Development$600Health$500Religion$300Other$0
02FY2025 · 13 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$100
Median grant
4
States reached
$328
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
AC PAW - ACME$100
THE WATERSHED CENTER$100
CHILDREN & FAMILIES OF IA$100
WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT$100
LEELANAU CONSERVANCY$100
SALVATION ARMY$100
INLAND SEAS EDUC ASSOCIATON$100
TC PAW CAT RESCUE$100
NORTH SKY RAPTOR SANCTUARY$100
CITY OPERA HOUSE$100
NMC FOUNDATION$100
PENINSULA COMMUNITY LIBRARY$100
BETA GAMMA SIGMA HONORS SOCIETY$100
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–25, $2k) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 16%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 16%CHILDREN & FAMILIES OF IA: $100 → 10%CHILDREN & FAMILIES OF IA: $100 → 10%CHILDREN & FAMILIES OF IA: $100 → 10%CHILDREN & FAMILIES OF IA: $100 → 10%CHILDREN & FAMILIES OF IA: $100 → 10%CHILDREN & FAMILIES OF IA: $100 → 10%PEACE RANCH: $1k → 10%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

61%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$10k · 20 repeat orgs$7k to everyone else

20 repeat relationships: 13 still active in FY2025, 7 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

20
10

Total granted

$10k
$7k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

0%
+44%

Still filing today

40%
60%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
AnimalsHuman ServicesEducationArts & CultureHealthEnvironmentOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT INC
    8× · 2017–2025 · $800 · revenue +90%
  • TP
    TC PAW CAT RESCUE
    3× · 2023–2025 · $300 · revenue +132%
  • TS
    TRAVERSE SYMPHONY ORCHESTRA D/B/A TRAVERSE CITY PHILHARMONIC
    3× · 2017–2020 · $300 · revenue +62%

Funded once

  • OM
    Old Mission Peninsula Education Foundation
    one grant, 2017 · $1k · revenue -93%
  • PI
    PARAKLESIS INCgraduated
    one grant, 2017 · $1k · revenue +34%
  • MP
    MICHAEL'S PLACEgraduated
    one grant, 2017 · $1k · revenue +44%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Humane Society of Southwestern Michigan

Humane society of southwestern michigan exists to provide shelter and care for sick, homeless and unwanted animals. in addition, the organization provides adoption services for the animals in its care.

Animals
2
Michigan Anti-Cruelty Society

To maintain and operate a hospital, ambulance and veterinary services for the care of animals. the maintenance and operation of kennels and suitable chambers for the humane destruction of wounded animals.

Animals
3
Mid-Michigan Cat Rescue

Rescue & find homes for cats; spay, nueter and adopt out as many cats as possible. Provice foster care homes for unadopted. Provide Vet care. Educate the public about over population available programs.

—
4
Animal Shelter of Crawford County

To operate an animal shelter.

Animals
5
Bird Center of Michigan Inc

Rescue, care for, and release abandoned and injured birds.

—
6
Oconto Area Humane Society & Animal Shelter Inc

Oconto area humane society is an open-admission shelter dedicated to providing protection, care and shelter for abandoned and homeless campanion animals

Animals
7
Michigan Animal Rescue League

The mission of the michigan animal rescue league is to provide the highest quality of life to dogs and cats through rescue, medical care, socialization and behavioral support, short- and long-term sanctuary, adoption, and community…

Animals
8
Pearsons Howling Timbers

To provide life-long sanctuary to wolves, wolf dogs, and exotic animals that have been neglected, abused, abandoned or relinquished by their previous owner. To assist humane societies, animal shelters and the Michigan Department of…

Animals
9
Humane Society & Animal Rescue of Muskegon County

To shelter and find forever homes for homeless dogs and cats.

Animals
10
Humane Society of West Michigan

Our mission is to promote the humane treatment and responsible care of animals in west michigan through education, example, placement and protection.

Animals
11
West Michigan Wildlife Center

Non-profit wildlife rehabilitation rescue services West Michigan Wildlife Center is an independent nonprofit volunteer organization dedicated to offering the West Michigan area a reliable high-quality resource for the rehabilitation of…

Animals
12
Wildside Rehabilitation and Education Center

Wildside Rehabilitation and Education Center is a non-profit organization opened in 1995 and devoted to the rehabilitation and release of sick, injured, and orphaned wildlife. We are one of the largest wildlife rehabilitation centers in…

Animals
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Vista Maria; the most unlike its peers is Peter Dougherty Society. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

15 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 15 of the 30 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
14/15
Grantees still filing
8/15
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

PENINSULA COMMUNITY LIBRARY: $1,700 · OtherPENINSULA COMMUNITY LIBRARYGRAND TRAVERSE REG'L LAND CONSERVANCY: $1,000 · OtherGRAND TRAVERSE REG'L LAND CONSERVANCYTHE WATERSHED CENTER: $800 · OtherTHE WATERSHED CENTERCITY OPERA HOUSE: $800 · OtherCITY OPERA HOUSEINLAND SEAS EDUC ASSOCIATON: $700 · OtherINLAND SEAS EDUC ASSOCIATONSALVATION ARMY: $600 · OtherSALVATION ARMYAC PAW - ACME: $600 · OtherAC PAW - ACMEVISTA MARIA: $500 · OtherVISTA MARIAMICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY: $500 · OtherMICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITYMUNSON REGIONAL HEALTHCARE FOUNDATION: $500 · OtherMUNSON REGIONAL HEALTHCARE FOUNDATIONNMC FOUNDATION: $300 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF IOWA - STEAD FOUNDATION: $300 · Other+4 more: $700 · Other+4 morePARAKLESIS INC: $1,000 · Human ServicesPARAKLESIS INCWOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT INC: $800 · Human ServicesWOUNDED WARRIOR…CHILDREN AND FAMILIES OF IOWA: $600 · Human ServicesCHILDREN AND FA…CHERRYLAND HUMANE SOCIETY: $1,000 · AnimalsCHERRYLAND HUM…SILVER MUZZLE COTTAGE: $300 · AnimalsSILVER MUZZLE …TC PAW CAT RESCUE: $300 · AnimalsTC PAW CAT RES…WINGS OF WONDER INC: $300 · AnimalsWINGS OF WONDE…North Sky Raptor Sanctuary: $300 · AnimalsNorth Sky Rapt…Old Mission Peninsula Education Foundation: $1,000 · EducationNORTH IOWA AREA COMMUNITY COLLEGE FOUNDATION: $300 · EducationMICHAEL'S PLACE: $1,000 · HealthLEELANAU CONSERVANCY: $800 · EnvironmentTRAVERSE SYMPHONY ORCHESTRA D/B/A TRAVERSE CITY PHILHARMONIC: $300 · Arts & CulturePETER DOUGHERTY SOCIETY: $100 · Arts & Culture
Other$9,000Human Services$2,400Animals$2,200Education$1,300Health$1,000Environment$800Arts & Culture$400

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetOld Mission Peninsula Education Foundation: $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetPARAKLESIS INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetCHERRYLAND HUMANE SOCIETY: $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetWOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT INC: $800 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetLEELANAU CONSERVANCY: $800 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetCHILDREN AND FAMILIES OF IOWA: $600 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetVISTA MARIA: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSILVER MUZZLE COTTAGE: $300 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetTC PAW CAT RESCUE: $300 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetWINGS OF WONDER INC: $300 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetTRAVERSE SYMPHONY ORCHESTRA D/B/A TRAVERSE CITY PHILHARMONIC: $300 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetNorth Sky Raptor Sanctuary: $300 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetNORTH IOWA AREA COMMUNITY COLLEGE FOUNDATION: $300 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetPETER DOUGHERTY SOCIETY: $100 over 1y, 0.3% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds Old Mission Peninsula Education Foundation ↗
  • Who funds PARAKLESIS INC ↗
  • Who funds MICHAEL'S PLACE ↗
  • Who funds CHERRYLAND HUMANE SOCIETY ↗
  • Who funds WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT INC ↗
  • Who funds LEELANAU CONSERVANCY ↗
  • Who funds CHILDREN AND FAMILIES OF IOWA ↗
  • Who funds VISTA MARIA ↗
  • Who funds SILVER MUZZLE COTTAGE ↗
  • Who funds TC PAW CAT RESCUE ↗
  • Who funds WINGS OF WONDER INC ↗
  • Who funds TRAVERSE SYMPHONY ORCHESTRA D/B/A TRAVERSE CITY PHILHARMONIC ↗
  • Who funds North Sky Raptor Sanctuary ↗
  • Who funds NORTH IOWA AREA COMMUNITY COLLEGE FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds PETER DOUGHERTY SOCIETY ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Oleson FoundationMI17.8× affinity6 shared granteesties to 6 of 6Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Oleson Foundation · Grand Traverse Regional Community Foundation · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization William and Mary Swift Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from William and Mary Swift Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →median 0%
  • Wounded Warrior Project Inc: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
5report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to William and Mary Swift Foundation?

Find your warmest path to William and Mary Swift Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 30 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on William and Mary Swift’s filings →

More from the funding graph