Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

William and Mary Swift Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$1k
Granted FY2025still arriving
13
Grants FY2025still arriving
4
States reached
$100
Largest
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172025.

Education$5kAnimals$4kEnvironment$3kHuman Services$3kArts & Culture$1kYouth Development$600Health$500Religion$300Other$0
02FY2025 · 13 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

$100
Median grant
4
States reached
$328
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
TC PAW CAT RESCUE$100
CITY OPERA HOUSE$100
NMC FOUNDATION$100
AC PAW - ACME$100
THE WATERSHED CENTER$100
CHILDREN & FAMILIES OF IA$100
INLAND SEAS EDUC ASSOCIATON$100
NORTH SKY RAPTOR SANCTUARY$100
PENINSULA COMMUNITY LIBRARY$100
BETA GAMMA SIGMA HONORS SOCIETY$100
WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT$100
LEELANAU CONSERVANCY$100
SALVATION ARMY$100
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY17–25, $600) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 16%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 16%CHILDREN & FAMILIES OF IA: $100 → 10%CHILDREN & FAMILIES OF IA: $100 → 10%CHILDREN & FAMILIES OF IA: $100 → 10%CHILDREN & FAMILIES OF IA: $100 → 10%CHILDREN & FAMILIES OF IA: $100 → 10%CHILDREN & FAMILIES OF IA: $100 → 10%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

61%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$10k · 20 repeat orgs$7k to everyone else

20 repeat relationships — 13 still active in FY2025, 7 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

20
10

Total granted

$10k
$7k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

0%
+44%

Still filing today

40%
50%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
AnimalsEducationHuman ServicesArts & CultureHealthEnvironmentOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT INC
    8× · 2017–2025 · $800 · revenue +70%
  • TS
    TRAVERSE SYMPHONY ORCHESTRA D/B/A TRAVERSE CITY PHILHARMONIC
    3× · 2017–2020 · $300 · revenue +62%
  • NI
    NORTH IOWA AREA COMMUNITY COLLEGE FOUNDATION
    3× · 2017–2020 · $300 · revenue +203%

Funded once

  • PR
    PEACE RANCH
    one grant, 2017 · $1k
  • MP
    MICHAEL'S PLACEgraduated
    one grant, 2017 · $1k · revenue +44%
  • OM
    Old Mission Peninsula Education Foundation
    one grant, 2017 · $1k · revenue -93%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Humane Society of Southwestern Michigan

Humane society of southwestern michigan exists to provide shelter and care for sick, homeless and unwanted animals. in addition, the organization provides adoption services for the animals in its care.

Animals
2
Michigan Anti-Cruelty Society

To maintain and operate a hospital, ambulance and veterinary services for the care of animals. the maintenance and operation of kennels and suitable chambers for the humane destruction of wounded animals.

Animals
3
Mid-Michigan Cat Rescue

Rescue & find homes for cats; spay, nueter and adopt out as many cats as possible. Provice foster care homes for unadopted. Provide Vet care. Educate the public about over population available programs.

4
Animal Shelter of Crawford County

To operate an animal shelter.

Animals
5
Bird Center of Michigan Inc

Rescue, care for, and release abandoned and injured birds.

6
Oconto Area Humane Society & Animal Shelter Inc

Oconto area humane society is an open-admission shelter dedicated to providing protection, care and shelter for abandoned and homeless campanion animals

Animals
7
Michigan Animal Rescue League

The mission of the michigan animal rescue league is to provide the highest quality of life to dogs and cats through rescue, medical care, socialization and behavioral support, short- and long-term sanctuary, adoption, and community…

Animals
8
Pearsons Howling Timbers

To provide life-long sanctuary to wolves, wolf dogs, and exotic animals that have been neglected, abused, abandoned or relinquished by their previous owner. To assist humane societies, animal shelters and the Michigan Department of…

Animals
9
Humane Society & Animal Rescue of Muskegon County

To shelter and find forever homes for homeless dogs and cats.

Animals
10
Humane Society of West Michigan

Our mission is to promote the humane treatment and responsible care of animals in west michigan through education, example, placement and protection.

Animals
11
West Michigan Wildlife Center

Non-profit wildlife rehabilitation rescue services West Michigan Wildlife Center is an independent nonprofit volunteer organization dedicated to offering the West Michigan area a reliable high-quality resource for the rehabilitation of…

Animals
12
Wildside Rehabilitation and Education Center

Wildside Rehabilitation and Education Center is a non-profit organization opened in 1995 and devoted to the rehabilitation and release of sick, injured, and orphaned wildlife. We are one of the largest wildlife rehabilitation centers in…

Animals

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Vista Maria and the most unlike its peers is Peter Dougherty Society. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

14 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 14 of the 30 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
13/14
Grantees still filing
7/14
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

PENINSULA COMMUNITY LIBRARY — $1,700 · OtherPENINSULA COMMUNITY LIBRARYPEACE RANCH — $1,000 · OtherPEACE RANCHGRAND TRAVERSE REG'L LAND CONSERVANCY — $1,000 · OtherGRAND TRAVERSE REG'L LAND CONSERVANCYTHE WATERSHED CENTER — $800 · OtherTHE WATERSHED CENTERCITY OPERA HOUSE — $800 · OtherCITY OPERA HOUSEINLAND SEAS EDUC ASSOCIATON — $700 · OtherINLAND SEAS EDUC ASSOCIATONSALVATION ARMY — $600 · OtherSALVATION ARMYAC PAW - ACME — $600 · OtherAC PAW - ACMEVISTA MARIA — $500 · OtherMUNSON REGIONAL HEALTHCARE FOUNDATION — $500 · OtherMICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY — $500 · Other+6 more — $1,300 · Other+6 moreCHERRYLAND HUMANE SOCIETY — $1,000 · AnimalsCHERRYLAND HUM…WINGS OF WONDER INC — $300 · AnimalsWINGS OF WONDE…SILVER MUZZLE COTTAGE — $300 · AnimalsSILVER MUZZLE …TC PAW CAT RESCUE — $300 · AnimalsTC PAW CAT RES…North Sky Raptor Sanctuary — $300 · AnimalsNorth Sky Rapt…WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT INC — $800 · Human ServicesWOUNDED W…CHILDREN AND FAMILIES OF IOWA — $600 · Human ServicesCHILDREN …Old Mission Peninsula Education Foundation — $1,000 · EducationNORTH IOWA AREA COMMUNITY COLLEGE FOUNDATION — $300 · EducationMICHAEL'S PLACE — $1,000 · HealthLEELANAU CONSERVANCY — $800 · EnvironmentTRAVERSE SYMPHONY ORCHESTRA D/B/A TRAVERSE CITY PHILHARMONIC — $300 · Arts & CulturePETER DOUGHERTY SOCIETY — $100 · Arts & Culture
Other$10,000Animals$2,200Human Services$1,400Education$1,300Health$1,000Environment$800Arts & Culture$400

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetOld Mission Peninsula Education Foundation — $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetCHERRYLAND HUMANE SOCIETY — $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetWOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT INC — $800 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetLEELANAU CONSERVANCY — $800 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetCHILDREN AND FAMILIES OF IOWA — $600 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetVISTA MARIA — $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTRAVERSE SYMPHONY ORCHESTRA D/B/A TRAVERSE CITY PHILHARMONIC — $300 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetNORTH IOWA AREA COMMUNITY COLLEGE FOUNDATION — $300 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetWINGS OF WONDER INC — $300 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetSILVER MUZZLE COTTAGE — $300 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetTC PAW CAT RESCUE — $300 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetNorth Sky Raptor Sanctuary — $300 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetPETER DOUGHERTY SOCIETY — $100 over 1y, 0.3% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds MICHAEL'S PLACE
  • Who funds Old Mission Peninsula Education Foundation
  • Who funds CHERRYLAND HUMANE SOCIETY
  • Who funds WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT INC
  • Who funds LEELANAU CONSERVANCY
  • Who funds CHILDREN AND FAMILIES OF IOWA
  • Who funds VISTA MARIA
  • Who funds TRAVERSE SYMPHONY ORCHESTRA D/B/A TRAVERSE CITY PHILHARMONIC
  • Who funds NORTH IOWA AREA COMMUNITY COLLEGE FOUNDATION
  • Who funds WINGS OF WONDER INC
  • Who funds SILVER MUZZLE COTTAGE
  • Who funds TC PAW CAT RESCUE
  • Who funds North Sky Raptor Sanctuary
  • Who funds PETER DOUGHERTY SOCIETY

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Oleson FoundationMI17.8× affinity6 shared granteesties to 6 of 6Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Oleson Foundation · Grand Traverse Regional Community Foundation · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization William and Mary Swift Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%your share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from governmentmedian 0%
  • Wounded Warrior Project Inc0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
5report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
typical government reliance, FY2025

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to William and Mary Swift Foundation?

Find your warmest path to William and Mary Swift Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 30 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph