How much did WILLAMETTA K DAY FOUNDATION grant in FY2024?

Philanthropy$15MEducation$5.1MArts & Culture$415kAnimals$173kYouth Development$147kHuman Services$123kHealth$77kEnvironment$35kInternational$33kOther$12M

02beneath the categories

Past the labels — and the year it shifted

Beneath the NTEE codes, this is what the grant descriptions actually say.

…and in their own words, year by year

2020

orangedesertfreedom greatgreat apesrenopacificsisters

2021

losalzheimers diseasesisterscorporationarmenianhealthlady

2022

museumcorporationarmenianlos angeles

2023

landlinfieldrenolos angelessistershealthlady

Words distinctive to each year’s grant purposes (TF-IDF) · event-driven terms in cyan.

03FY2024 · 76 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

Under $10k52 grants · $180k
$10k–50k16 grants · $253k
$50k–250k4 grants · $415k
$250k+4 grants · $6.3M

$5,000

Median grant

States reached

$76M

Total assets

Largest grants

ROBERT DAY FOUNDATION$2,500,000
ROBERT LOUIS STEVENSON SCHOOL (SCIENCE BUILDING)$2,000,000
CLAREMONT MCKENNA COLLEGE (ROBERT DAY SCIENCES CENTER)$1,500,000
WESTRIDGE SCHOOL FOR GIRLS (THE WILLAMETTA KECK DAY ENDOWMENT FUND$250,000
UNIVERSITY OF NEVADA RENO FOUNDATION (HOOKER CREEK RANCH ENDOWED SCHOLARSHI$180,000
LINFIELD UNIVERSITY$80,000
ROBERT LOUIS STEVENSON SCHOOL$80,000
SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA INSTITUTE OF ARCHITECTURE$75,000
YALE UNIVERSITY (SCHOOL OF ARCHITECTURE)$45,000
THE SEQUOYAH EDUCATIONAL CENTER$30,000
UNIVERSITY OF NEVADA RENO FOUNDATION (HOOKER CREEK RANCH ENDOWED SCHOLARSHI$20,000
PASADENA WALDORF SCHOOL$15,000
ANYONE CORPORATION$15,000
AURORA HUMANITARIAN INITIATIVE FOUNDATION INC$15,000
GIVEDIRECTLY INC$15,000

02The need

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY20–24, $93k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11% — the area typically sits at 10%. 81% of those dollars reach neighborhoods with above-average need. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA, United Way ALICE — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge

repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

98%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.

$33M · 68 repeat orgs$744k to everyone else

68 repeat relationships — 48 still active in FY2024, 20 since wound down; 23 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

Total granted

$33M

$461k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+59%

+74%

Still filing today

79%

62%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 96% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $283k went to new ones.

RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

EducationArts & CultureHuman ServicesHealthPhilanthropyAnimalsOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

RL
ROBERT LOUIS STEVENSON SCHOOL
5× · 2020–2024 · $4.3M · revenue +32%
CM
CLAREMONT MCKENNA COLLEGE
3× · 2020–2022 · $3.0M · revenue +50%
WS
WESTRIDGE SCHOOL FOR GIRLS
2× · 2021–2022 · $515k · revenue +32%

Funded once

TH
THE HARRAH AUTOMOBILE FOUNDATION
one grant, 2023 · $50k · revenue +18%
LC
LINDFIELD COLLEGE
one grant, 2020 · $50k
CI
CARE INC
one grant, 2022 · $45k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

University of California

To raise and manage private funds to support uci's broader mission of excellence in teaching, research and public service.

Education

The American Institute of Architects

The AIA California, in collaboration with local components, is the voice of the architectural profession.

—

California Water Data Consortium

The California Water Data Consortium is an independent, nonprofit organization created by a partnership of state agencies and others to ensure that Californians have access to the best possible water and ecological information to make…

Science & Tech

Pitzer College

Pitzer College is an educational institution focusing on undergraduate education.

Education

Harvey Mudd College

HMC is one of the premier math, science and engineering liberal arts colleges in the nation.

Education

Western Electricity Coordinating Council

To effectively and efficiently mitigate risks to the reliability and security of (cont'd sch. o) the western interconnection's bulk power system.

Public Benefit

Sierra Watch

Sierra watch secures conservation outcomes to protect the natural resources, mountain communities, and timeless values of the tahoe sierra.

Environment

California Academy of Sciences

To regenerate the natural world through science, learning, and collaboration

Arts & Culture

Claremont Graduate University

A private, independent, nonprofit institution of higher learning that is a high research activity university awarding master's and doctoral degrees within its five schools and three independent departments.

Education

California Hotel & Lodging Association

CH&LA operates to protect the rights and interest of the California lodging industry. Legislative advocacy, educational training, communication, and cost-savings programs are provided for all segments of the industry. Supports strategic…

—

The Waverly School

To educate curious, resourceful, and confident learners from preschool to twelfth grade.

Education

California College of the Arts

To educate students of diverse backgrounds in areas of fine arts, architecture, design, & writing.

Education

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Tahoe Family Solutions Inc and the most unlike its peers is Occidental College. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side

Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 31 years old; the field is 14. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

The field is 24% startups (under 5 years old) — 1% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 12% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund

0.0%0/115

the rest of the field

12%

22,290/186,863

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

05the grantee network

107 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2026.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue.

Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)

Early backer (in before they grew)

105/107

Grantees still filing

92/107

Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

Philanthropy$15,035,630Other$12,329,675Education$5,089,550Arts & Culture$415,400Animals$172,853Youth Development$147,300Human Services$122,750

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Deborah and TJ Day FoundationNV46.4× affinity19 shared granteesties to 10 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Deborah and TJ Day Foundation · Wm Keck Foundation · Community Foundation of Northern Nevada · Tahoe Community Foundation · Renown Health · The Confidence Foundation · Robert Z Hawkins Foundation · The E L Cord Foundation · NV Energy Charitable Foundation · Weingart Foundation · Orange County Community Foundation · California Community Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organisation WILLAMETTA K DAY FOUNDATION funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024

’20’21’22’23’24

no gov moneyreceives it· size = income

5get no government money at all

1rely on government for over half their income

⤢ axis zoomed · 0–90%

typical government reliance, FY20–24

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Through Plinth

Your grantmaking, live and operational

This dossier was generated cold from public filings. In Plinth it’s a working system — every applicant assessed and every grant monitored. Here’s a taste, run on one of your grantees: MUSIC FOR UNITY.

Agentic due diligence · confidence × risk

Financial management

insufficient risk

Limited financial data in public filings.

Track record & reputation

low risk

5 years of Form 990 filings, still active; revenue up +83% since.

Legal standing

low risk

US 501(c)(3); EIN 843962111 on file with current IRS Form 990 filings.

Governance

Live in Plinth

Board composition & governance documents — verified live in Plinth from the applicant.

Compliance & sanctions

Live in Plinth

OFAC / UN sanctions screening — run live in Plinth at assessment.

Program capacity

Live in Plinth

Staffing, M&E and activity alignment — assessed live in Plinth from submitted proposals.

Live · Plinth’s real DD engine

Run the actual assessment on MUSIC FOR UNITY, cold from public data.

Generated live from public IRS filings + open web sources by Plinth’s agentic engine. Shown as an illustration of the product, not a formal assessment.

Post-award monitoring · continuous checks

Awaiting reportFinancial stability— Runway not derivable from filings.
On trackSustained operations— Filing through 2024; revenue grew over the period.
WatchReliance on your funding— Your grants peaked at 100% of their budget — load-bearing; a dependency Plinth would track.
Awaiting reportEvidence of delivery— Plinth collects the grantee's own monitoring reports post-award.

What you see here is static and public. In Plinth it’s operational — the full six-pillar framework on every applicant (with their own documents + live registry and sanctions checks), monitoring dashboards on every award, custom board reports, and eligibility routing for intake.

Agentic due diligenceMonitoring dashboardsCustom board reportsEligibility routing

Preview generated from this grantee’s public IRS filings and independent reporting. Pillars marked “live in Plinth” require the applicant’s submitted documents. Shown as illustration, not a formal assessment.

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPro

How do I get to Willametta K Day Foundation?

Find your warmest path to Willametta K Day Foundation through people who sit on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the introduction across shared trustees and officers.

Every link is a documented governance overlap in public IRS 990 filings — not a personal network — and each hop carries its own confidence tier. Low-confidence or distant paths are held back rather than guessed.

WILLAMETTA K DAY FOUNDATION

What you funded, over time

Past the labels — and the year it shifted

Where the money goes

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Who you back again

Backed again, and grew

Funded once

107 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2026.

Government reliance of your grantees

Your grantmaking, live and operational

How do I get to Willametta K Day Foundation?

More from the funding graph

WILLAMETTA K DAY FOUNDATION

What you funded, over time

Past the labels — and the year it shifted

Where the money goes

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Who you back again

Backed again, and grew

Funded once

107 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2026.

Government reliance of your grantees

Your grantmaking, live and operational

How do I get to Willametta K Day Foundation?

More from the funding graph