Skip to content

· Private foundation

Will & Kristin Price Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$216k
Granted FY2024still arriving
16
Grants FY2024still arriving
4
States reached
$45k
Largest
01What it funds
0199% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2024.

Education$281kHuman Services$222kYouth Development$130kHealth$93kHousing & Shelter$92kFood & Nutrition$17kPublic Safety & Disaster$17kPhilanthropy$17kOther$0
02FY2024 · 16 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k9 grants · $46k
  • $10k–50k7 grants · $170k
$6,000
Median grant
4
States reached
$5.4M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Wichita Children's Home$45,000
Fundamental Learning Center$25,000
Top Schools Inc$25,000
International 22Q112 Foundation$25,000
Door of Hope$20,000
A Place Called Home$20,000
Five Acres$10,000
Ronald McDonald House$6,000
Center of Hope$5,000
Kansas Food Bank$5,000
Red Cross$5,000
Habitat Humanity - Wichita$5,000
United Way$5,000
Rainbows United$5,000
Episcopal Social Services Breakthrough$5,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY20–24, $269k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 74% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%Red Cross: $5k → 14%International 22Q112 Foundation: $10k → 6%International 22Q112 Foundation: $25k → 8%Red Cross: $3k → 14%International 22Q112 Foundation: $5k → 6%International 22Q112 Foundation: $20k → 8%Red Cross: $3k → 14%International 22Q112 Foundation: $10k → 8%Red Cross: $3k → 14%Red Cross: $3k → 14%Wichita Children's Home: $45k → 16%Wichita Children's Home: $45k → 16%Wichita Children's Home: $25k → 16%Wichita Children's Home: $25k → 16%Wichita Children's Home: $25k → 16%Rainbows United: $5k → 16%Rainbows United: $3k → 16%Rainbows United: $3k → 16%Rainbows United: $3k → 16%Rainbows United: $3k → 16%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

100%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$865k · 18 repeat orgs$4k to everyone else

18 repeat relationships: 16 still active in FY2024, 2 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

18
2

Total granted

$865k
$4k

Still filing today

67%
0%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24
Human ServicesEducationHealthPhilanthropyFood & NutritionOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • PF
    PHILLIPS FUNDAMENTAL LEARNING CENTER INC
    4× · 2021–2024 · $176k · revenue +153%
  • TW
    THE WICHITA CHILDREN'S HOME
    5× · 2020–2024 · $165k · revenue +43%
  • TI
    THE INTERNATIONAL 22Q112 FOUNDATION INC
    5× · 2020–2024 · $70k · revenue +22% · 30% of their budget

Funded once

  • HH
    Habitat Humanity - Colorado
    one grant, 2020 · $3k
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2021 · $1k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Covenant House Georgia Inc

Covenant house georgia provides shelters, protects and advocates on behalf of homeless, trafficked, runaway and sexually exploited youth.

—
2
House of Hope

Treating substance use disorders, rebuilding lives, strengthening families, and empowering women.

—
3
Covenant House California

Covenant house is dedicated to serving all of god's children with absolute respect and unconditional love to help youth experiencing homelessness and to protect and safeguard all youth in need.

Human Services
4
Shelter House Community Shelter and Transition Services

Through shelter and housing, advocacy and supportive services, our mission is to prevent and end homelessness in our community.

—
5
Covenant House Washington Dc

Covenant house washington, dc ("chw") provides shelter, crisis care, community services, and outreach services to youth in the washington dc area.

Human Services
6
Chicago House & Social Service Agency

Provides housing and support services to individuals and families impacted by hiv/aids

Health
7
Under 21

Since 1972, under 21, d.b.a. covenant house new york (chny) has been working with one of new york city's most vulnerable populations - youth experiencing homelessness, age 16-24, and their dependent children. chny provides young people…

Human Services
8
Ch Pennsylvania Under - 21

Our mission is to serve children and youth facing homelessness and human trafficking, and to protect and safeguard all children. we provide trauma-informed interventions for youth who are in need.covenant house pennsylvania (chpa) remains…

Housing & Shelter
9
Covenant House

In 34 cities across five countries, covenant house builds bridges to hope for young people facing homelessness and survivors of human trafficking. we meet their immediate needs for food, clothing, protection, and medical and mental health…

Human Services
10
Allies for Every Child Inc

All children need a childhood. Allies for Every Child brings together and strengthens families, cultivating conditions for children to succeed in life. (Continues on Schedule O)

Human Services
11
The Children's Home Inc

Provides residential and community services to promote long-term well-being and success for young people and families who experience disruption in their lives.

Human Services
12
Safehouse Denver Inc

Safehouse denver assists adult, children, and youth in reclaiming their right to a life free from domestic violence. the agency provides a broad spectrum of culturally competent, trauma-informed services, including but not limited to,…

Human Services
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The Wichita Children's Home; the most unlike its peers is The International 22Q112 Foundation Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

12 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 12 of the 20 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
12/12
Grantees still filing
10/12
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

A PLACE CALLED HOME: $80,000 · OtherA PLACE CALLED HOMETop Schools Inc: $75,000 · OtherTop Schools IncTop Children's fund: $50,000 · OtherTop Children's fundDOOR OF HOPE: $32,500 · OtherDOOR OF HOPEWichita State University: $30,000 · OtherWichita State UniversityFive Acres The Boys and Girls' Aid Society of Los Angeles County: $22,500 · OtherFive Acres The Boys and Girls' Aid Society of L…Habitat Humanity - Wichita: $21,000 · OtherHabitat Humanity - WichitaRonald McDonald House: $18,000 · OtherCenter of Hope Inc: $17,000 · OtherSalvation Army: $17,000 · Other+2 more: $4,000 · OtherTHE WICHITA CHILDREN'S HOME: $165,000 · Human ServicesTHE WICHITA CHILDREN'S HOMETHE INTERNATIONAL 22Q112 FOUNDATION INC: $70,000 · Human ServicesTHE INTERNATIONAL 22Q112 FOUNDATION…American National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches: $17,000 · Human ServicesAmerican National Red Cross & Its C…RAINBOWS UNITED INC: $17,000 · Human ServicesRAINBOWS UNITED INCPHILLIPS FUNDAMENTAL LEARNING CENTER INC: $175,800 · EducationPHILLIPS FUNDAMENTAL L…EPISCOPAL SOCIAL SERVICES INC DBA BREAKTHROUGH: $23,000 · HealthUNITED WAY OF THE PLAINS INC: $17,000 · PhilanthropyKANSAS FOODBANK WAREHOUSE INC: $17,000 · Food & Nutrition
Other$367,000Human Services$269,000Education$175,800Health$23,000Philanthropy$17,000Food & Nutrition$17,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetPHILLIPS FUNDAMENTAL LEARNING CENTER INC: $175,800 over 4y, 3.3% of budgetTHE WICHITA CHILDREN'S HOME: $165,000 over 5y, 0.4% of budgetA PLACE CALLED HOME: $80,000 over 5y, 0.4% of budgetTHE INTERNATIONAL 22Q112 FOUNDATION INC: $70,000 over 5y, 30% of budgetDOOR OF HOPE: $32,500 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetEPISCOPAL SOCIAL SERVICES INC DBA BREAKTHROUGH: $23,000 over 5y, 0.2% of budgetFive Acres The Boys and Girls' Aid Society of Los Angeles County: $22,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetCenter of Hope Inc: $17,000 over 5y, 0.3% of budgetUNITED WAY OF THE PLAINS INC: $17,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches: $17,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetRAINBOWS UNITED INC: $17,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetKANSAS FOODBANK WAREHOUSE INC: $17,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds PHILLIPS FUNDAMENTAL LEARNING CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds THE WICHITA CHILDREN'S HOME ↗
  • Who funds A PLACE CALLED HOME ↗
  • Who funds THE INTERNATIONAL 22Q112 FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds DOOR OF HOPE ↗
  • Who funds EPISCOPAL SOCIAL SERVICES INC DBA BREAKTHROUGH ↗
  • Who funds Five Acres The Boys and Girls' Aid Society of Los Angeles County ↗
  • Who funds Center of Hope Inc ↗
  • Who funds UNITED WAY OF THE PLAINS INC ↗
  • Who funds American National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches ↗
  • Who funds RAINBOWS UNITED INC ↗
  • Who funds KANSAS FOODBANK WAREHOUSE INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Goebel Family-Star Lumber Charitable TrustKS15.7× affinity5 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Goebel Family-Star Lumber Charitable Trust · Berry Foundation Inc · Daniel J Taylor Family Charitable Foundation · K T Wiedemann Foundation Inc · Belin Foundation · The Fidelity Bank Foundation · Bruce G Cochener Foundation · Kansas Health Foundation · The Sunderland Foundation · Textron Charitable Trust Dtd 122353 · National Philanthropic Trust · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Will & Kristin Price Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Will & Kristin Price Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%3%10%23%40%funder's share of their income ↑0%6%13%19%25%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    1get no government money at all
    7report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–25%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Will & Kristin Price Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to Will & Kristin Price Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 20 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Will & Kristin Price’s filings →

    More from the funding graph