· Private foundation
Daniel J Taylor Family Charitable Foundation
Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2020–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2025
- Under $10k66 grants · $135k
- $10k–50k15 grants · $246k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| WESTMINSTER WOODS CAMP AND RETREAT CENTER INC | $30,000 |
| ORPHEUM THEATRE | $26,000 |
| CPRF | $25,000 |
| PHILLIPS FUNDAMENTAL LEARNING CENTER | $25,000 |
| GEORGE MASON UNIVERSITY | $25,000 |
| EMPOWER | $20,000 |
| MAYO CLINIC | $15,000 |
| CENTRAL KS COMMUNITY FOUNDATION | $10,000 |
| TOP EARLY LEARNING CENTER | $10,000 |
| AMERICAN RED CROSS | $10,000 |
| SALVATION ARMY | $10,000 |
| HUMANKIND MINISTRIES | $10,000 |
| ASPEN CHAPEL | $10,000 |
| UNITED METHODIST OPEN DOOR | $10,000 |
| UNITED WAY OF THE PLAINS | $10,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY20–25, $219k) land where the poverty rate runs at 16%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
94 repeat relationships — 73 still active in FY2025, 21 since wound down; 6 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 97% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $12k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- WWWESTMINSTER WOODS CAMP AND RETREAT CENTER INC5× · 2021–2025 · $140k · revenue +14%
- PFPHILLIPS FUNDAMENTAL LEARNING CENTER INC4× · 2021–2025 · $100k · revenue +153%
- TWTHE WICHITA CHILDREN'S HOME3× · 2020–2022 · $72k · revenue +43%
Funded once
- HHHUNTER HEALTH CLINICgraduatedone grant, 2023 · $25k · revenue +31%
- HSHOLY SAVIOR CATHOLIC CHURCHone grant, 2020 · $25k
- GMGEORGE MASON UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION INCone grant, 2020 · $10k · revenue +3%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Kansas wesleyan university is a liberal arts college that promotes and integrates academic excellence, spiritual development, personal well-being, and social responsibility.
Kansas legal services is devoted to helping low income kansans meet their basic needs through the provision of important legal and mediation services.
To engage in grant making to medical educational organizations and related charitable activities in the area of eye disease and vision disorder, and the care and treatment thereof.
Helping people move to a better life through hope-filled care, services, and advocacy; calling all those of goodwill to join us
To drive economic growth and community advancement in the wichita region.
On behalf of the university of kansas school of medicine-wichita, wcgme administers the graduate medical education program for resident physicians in the city of wichita, kansas. wcgme's involvement in graduate medical education in wichita…
The mission of the kansas academy of family physicians is to empower and cultivate kansas family physicians to: serve as trusted and innovative leaders champion a diverse, sustainable and inclusive workforce advocate and collaborate for…
The mission of healthcore clinic, inc is to provide quality family healthcare through improved access and a heightened and unrelenting focus on education and prevention.
Engaging and aligning providers and stakeholders to establish Kansas as a role model for health care quality and a top performer in health care outcomes.
Leading the way to the best kc region by convening innovative leaders, collaborating with like-minded organizations, advocating for positive change, and helping small businesses grow.
Health care services for the people of western nebraska and eastern wyoming.
Wplf seeks private charitable support to create young readers, ensure digital inclusion, and provide equitable access to information. wplf's sole purpose is to create a margin of excellence at wichita public library.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Senior Services Inc of Wichita and the most unlike its peers is Village League Co. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 39 years old; the field is 25. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 17% startups (under 5 years old) — 3% of your grantees by number, and just 1% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 9% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
79 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 79 of the 145 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds WESTMINSTER WOODS CAMP AND RETREAT CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds PHILLIPS FUNDAMENTAL LEARNING CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds THE WICHITA CHILDREN'S HOME ↗
- Who funds UNITED METHODIST OPEN DOOR ↗
- Who funds HOPENET INC ↗
- Who funds LEAGUE 42 FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds Institute for Humane Studies ↗
- Who funds FUNDAMENTAL LITERACY FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds UNITED WAY OF THE PLAINS INC ↗
- Who funds EMPOWER EVERGREEN INC ↗
- Who funds CATO INSTITUTE ↗
- Who funds HUMANKIND MINISTRIES WICHITA INC ↗
- Who funds WICHITA COLLEGIATE SCHOOL ↗
- Who funds HUNTER HEALTH CLINIC ↗
- Who funds CATHOLIC CHARITIES INC ↗
- Who funds Grumpy Old Men Inc ↗
- Who funds SENIOR SERVICES INC OF WICHITA ↗
- Who funds KANSAS PUBLIC TELECOMMUNICATIONS SERVICE ↗
- Who funds Guadalupe Health Foundation ↗
- Who funds HEALTHNETWORK FOUNDATION FKA HEALTH NET FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds HILLSDALE COLLEGE ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Wichita Foundation · Dwane L and Velma Lunt Wallace Charitable Foundation · United Way of the Plains Inc · Berry Foundation Inc · Textron Charitable Trust Dtd 122353 · The Fidelity Bank Foundation · Kansas Health Foundation · Belin Foundation · Ima Foundation · Lattner Family Foundation Inc · Goebel Family-Star Lumber Charitable Trust · Bruce G Cochener Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Daniel J Taylor Family Charitable Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Wounded Warrior Project Inc — 0% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to Daniel J Taylor Family Charitable Foundation?
Find your warmest path to Daniel J Taylor Family Charitable Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.