· Private foundation
Wiener Family Future Foundation Inc
Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2018–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k8 grants · $12k
- $10k–50k7 grants · $85k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| CLIMATE CHANGE FOR ALL EDUCATORS INC | $17,500 |
| CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL COLORADO FOUNDATION | $15,000 |
| UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA | $12,500 |
| KIDS IN CRISIS INC | $10,000 |
| I HAVE A DREAM | $10,000 |
| ACCESS OPPORTUNITY | $10,000 |
| COMMUNITY RESOURCE CENTER | $10,000 |
| AMERICARES FOUNDATION | $4,000 |
| CLIMATE PSYCHOLOGY ALLIANCE NORTH AMERICA LTD | $2,500 |
| AMERICAN FRIENDS OF BEIT RUTH INC | $2,000 |
| SAVE THE SOUND INC | $1,500 |
| MEALS ON WHEELS INC OF GREENWICH CT | $500 |
| THE WELLES REMY CROWTHER CHARITABLE TRUST | $500 |
| NYC ALLIANCE AGAINST SEXUAL ASSAULT INC | $500 |
| REI COOPERATIVE ACTION FUND | $500 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY21–24, $52k) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +37% since the first grant, against -15% for the ones you funded once.
17 repeat relationships — 7 still active in FY2024, 10 since wound down; 7 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 59% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $35k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- KIKIDS IN CRISIS INC5× · 2020–2024 · $53k · revenue +67%
- WJWESTCHESTER JEWISH COMMUNITY SERVICES INC3× · 2018–2021 · $50k · revenue +60%
- CHChildren's Hospital Colorado Foundation4× · 2018–2024 · $45k · revenue +37%
Funded once
- VFVictims First Incone grant, 2022 · $10k · revenue -99%
- CRCOMMUNITY RESOURCE CENTERone grant, 2021 · $10k
- RHROBIN HOOD FOUNDATIONone grant, 2020 · $5k · revenue -10%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
The union of concerned scientists puts rigorous, independent science into action, developing solutions and advocating for a healthy, safe, and just future.
Crisis group works to prevent and resolve deadly conflict around the world by informing and influencing the perceptions and actions of policymakers and other key conflict actors. to this end, we endeavour to talk to all sides and provide…
Relief international (ri) partners with communities impacted by conflict, climate change, and disaster to save lives, build greater resilience, and promote long-term health and wellbeing of people in the communities that we serve. relief…
To save lives & relieve suffering through health interventions & related activities that strengthen communities affected by conflict, natural disasters & disease outbreaks.
Wri is committed to creating change that improves people's lives and ensures the natural world can thrive. (see schedule o)wri's bold vision requires a formula for success we call "count it. change it. scale it.":- count it: our work is…
To conduct and support programs and activities aimed at solving some of the world's greatest public health challenges, with a specific focus on enabling health workers to have the greatest possible impact on the health of the people they…
The purpose of the water research foundation (wrf) is a definitive research organization to advance the science of all things water to better meet the evolving needs of its subscribers and the water sector. to engage exclusively in…
To effectively and efficiently mitigate risks to the reliability and security of the western interconnection's bulk power system.
Actionaid is an international network building a just, equitable, and sustainable world in solidarity with communities on the frontlines of poverty and injustice. actionaid usa is the u.s. branch of actionaid international, which works in…
Inspired by the gift of donation from our communities, allosource responsibly provides innovative cellular and tissue allografts to advance patient healing.
Ahip is the national trade association representing the health insurance industry. ahip's members provide health care coverage, services and solutions to more than 200 million americans. we are committed to market-based solutions and…
Childfund alliance is a global network of 11 child-focused development and humanitarian organizations working in more than 70 countries. we help nearly 30 million children and their families to overcome poverty and the underlying…
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Hope for Haiti Inc and the most unlike its peers is University of Southern California. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 31 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 4% of your grantees by number, and just 3% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
31 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2026, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 31 of the 39 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA ↗
- Who funds KIDS IN CRISIS INC ↗
- Who funds WESTCHESTER JEWISH COMMUNITY SERVICES INC ↗
- Who funds Children's Hospital Colorado Foundation ↗
- Who funds ACCESS OPPORTUNITY ↗
- Who funds TEAM RUBICON INC ↗
- Who funds CLIMATE CHANGE FOR ALL EDUCATORS ↗
- Who funds EVERYTOWN FOR GUN SAFETY SUPPORT FUND INC ↗
- Who funds COMMUNITY FOUNDATION BOULDER COUNTY ↗
- Who funds RIGHT 2 THRIVE INC ↗
- Who funds WORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INC ↗
- Who funds Victims First Inc ↗
- Who funds THE CHILDRENS STOREFRONT ↗
- Who funds COMMUNITY RESOURCE CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds AMERICARES FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds UNITED IN HARMONY ↗
- Who funds ROBIN HOOD FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds UNITED JEWISH APPEAL-FEDERATION OF JEWISH PHILANTHROPIES OF NEW YORK INC ↗
- Who funds FRIENDS OF UNITED HATZALAH INC ↗
- Who funds HOPE FOR HAITI INC ↗
- Who funds HORIZONS BRIDGEPORT ↗
- Who funds HAWAII COMMUNITY FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds Save The Children Federation Inc ↗
- Who funds Climate Psychology Alliance North America Ltd ↗
- Who funds AMERICAN FRIENDS OF BEIT RUTH INC ↗
- Who funds REI COOPERATIVE ACTION FUND ↗
- Who funds WELLES REMY CROWTHER CHARITABLE TRUST ↗
- Who funds SAVE THE SOUND ↗
- Who funds FIRST DESCENTS ↗
- Who funds NEW YORK CITY ALLIANCE AGAINST SEXUAL ASSAULT INC ↗
- Who funds MEALS-ON-WHEELS INC ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Jewish Communal Fund · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · Network for Good · National Philanthropic Trust · Paypal Charitable Giving Fund · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Wiener Family Future Foundation Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Kids in Crisis Inc — 49% of income from government
- Save the Sound — 37% of income from government
- Save the Children Federation Inc — 30% of income from government
- Americares Foundation Inc — 0% of income from government
- Hope for Haiti Inc — 0% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to Wiener Family Future Foundation Inc?
Find your warmest path to Wiener Family Future Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.