Skip to content

Washington · Private foundation

Whole Systems Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$29k
Granted FY2024(still arriving)
19
Grants FY2024
20
Organizations funded FY2023
20%
First-time grantees FY2023
Read the full brief
Median grant, FY2024
$1,000
Largest grant, FY2024
$5,000
Organizations funded a year
13 to 20
FY2017 to FY2023
States reached, FY2024
9
Total assets, FY2024
$454k
Applications
Preselected organizations only
Per its most recent filing; check its own site

How open it is to new grantees

In FY2023, 20% of the organizations Whole Systems Foundation funded were first-time grantees, receiving 25% of its grant dollars.

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2023, 75% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $8k went to new ones.

50%100%’18’19’20’21’22’23
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’18’19’20’21’22’23
EnvironmentPublic BenefitCivil RightsEducationOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
The numbers by year
Fiscal yearOrganizations fundedTo those organizationsFirst-time grantees
FY2024still arriving19$29k11%
FY202320$32k20%
FY202217$24k35%
FY202116$27k19%
FY202013$25k0%
FY201917$40k29%
FY201815$32k20%
FY201713$34kn/a
100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Environment$210kInternational$9kAnimals$6kPublic Benefit$4kReligion$4kCommunity Improvement$3kCivil Rights$3kHuman Services$2k

Where its grants go

Grant dollars by states, across the years we hold.

Which US states its grants reach

VT
MN
NY
MA
OR
CA
CO
MD
DC
GA

Top grantees

Largest recipients by total granted, FY2017 to FY2024, and the share of each one’s budget the grants supplied at peak.

GranteeTotal grantedYearsShare of their budget
Environmental Law Alliance Worldwide$15,40080%
Global Footprint Network Inc$13,50080%
Trees Water and People$12,00080%
Solar Cookers International$8,00080%
Foundation Earth$7,60061%
The Oregon League of Conservation Voters$7,50070%
Xerces Society Inc$6,00080%
Our Climate$5,000240%
Pulitzer Center on Crisis Reporting$4,00010%
San Francisco Zen Center$4,0001n/a
Show all 20 grantees
All grantees of Whole Systems Foundation by total granted
GranteeTotal grantedYearsShare of their budget
Environmental Law Alliance Worldwide$15,40080%
Global Footprint Network Inc$13,50080%
Trees Water and People$12,00080%
Solar Cookers International$8,00080%
Foundation Earth$7,60061%
The Oregon League of Conservation Voters$7,50070%
Xerces Society Inc$6,00080%
Our Climate$5,000240%
Pulitzer Center on Crisis Reporting$4,00010%
San Francisco Zen Center$4,0001n/a
Northwest Earth Institute$3,00020%
Post Growth Institute$3,0001n/a
Plant Initiative$3,0003n/a
Cultural Survival Inc$3,00020%
Off-Grid Retreats$2,50021%
Animas Valley Institute$2,00010%
Environmental Defense Fund Incorporated$1,50010%
Oregon Natural Resources Council Fund Oregon Wild$1,50030%
Ecoviva Nfp$1,00010%
Citizens Climate Education Corp$1,00010%

What it could do for these grantees

Plus 16 recipients with no EIN on record ($136k), not named here.

Where it is load-bearing

Whole Systems Foundation supplied at least a quarter of the budget for 1 of its grantees at some point. The chart plots its 17 largest grantees; load-bearing ones sit top left.

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetEnvironmental Law Alliance Worldwide: $15,400 over 8y, 0.2% of budgetGlobal Footprint Network Inc: $13,500 over 8y, 0.3% of budgetTrees Water and People: $12,000 over 8y, 0.2% of budgetSolar Cookers International: $8,000 over 8y, 0.2% of budgetFoundation Earth: $7,600 over 6y, 1.1% of budgetThe Oregon League of Conservation Voters: $7,500 over 7y, 0.1% of budgetXerces Society Inc: $6,000 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetOur Climate: $5,000 over 2y, 40% of budgetPulitzer Center on Crisis Reporting: $4,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNorthwest Earth Institute: $3,000 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetCultural Survival Inc: $3,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetOff-Grid Retreats: $2,500 over 2y, 0.9% of budgetAnimas Valley Institute: $2,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetEnvironmental Defense Fund Incorporated: $1,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetOregon Natural Resources Council Fund Oregon Wild: $1,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetEcoviva Nfp: $1,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetCitizens Climate Education Corp: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget

Tap a dot to name the grantee.

How this is measured
Share of budget is the funder’s grant in a year over the grantee’s total revenue that year, at its highest across the years we hold; revenue is from all sources. Only grantees confirmed against their own filings, whose grants do not exceed their revenue, are plotted: the largest 17.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Rockefeller Philanthropy Advisors IncNY14.2× affinity5 shared granteesties to 9 of 9Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Rockefeller Philanthropy Advisors Inc · Rsf Social Finance Inc · The Oregon Community Foundation · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Network for Good · National Philanthropic Trust · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Compare Whole Systems Foundation with peer funders

About Whole Systems Foundation

How much does Whole Systems Foundation give?
Whole Systems Foundation reported 19 grants totaling $29,000 in its FY2024 IRS filing. It funded between 13 and 20 organizations a year over FY2017 to FY2023.
What does Whole Systems Foundation fund?
By grant dollars over FY2017 to FY2024, its largest causes are Environment (87%), International (4%), Animals (2%).
Who are Whole Systems Foundation's largest grantees?
By total granted over FY2017 to FY2024: Environmental Law Alliance Worldwide ($15k), Global Footprint Network Inc ($14k), Trees Water and People ($12k).
Does Whole Systems Foundation fund new organizations?
In FY2023, 20% of the organizations it funded were first-time grantees.
Does Whole Systems Foundation accept unsolicited applications?
Its most recent filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and does not take unsolicited requests. Check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
Which funders back the same organizations as Whole Systems Foundation?
Its strongest co-funders, measured against what their size predicts, include Rockefeller Philanthropy Advisors Inc, Rsf Social Finance Inc, The Oregon Community Foundation.
Where is Whole Systems Foundation based?
Whole Systems Foundation is based in WA.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 36 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Whole Systems’ filings →

More from the funding graph