Skip to content
White County United Way Inc at a glanceMostly funded, not a grantmaker: see who funds it →

· Public charity

White County United Way Inc

To unite the community in mobilizing its resources to meet human needs.

$15k
Granted FY2024still arriving
1
Grants FY2024still arriving
1
States reached
$8k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
05Through PlinthRead
01What it funds
0198% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2018 to 2024.

Health$279kHuman Services$263kPublic Safety & Disaster$131kYouth Development$128kEducation$90kFood & Nutrition$79kReligion$27kArts & Culture$24kOther$0
02FY2024 · 1 grant

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 1 grants below total $7,500, the rows itemized in this filing. The $15,000 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $7,500 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.
$7,500
Median grant
1
States reached
$1.8M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
WHITE COUNTY COUNCIL ON AGING INC$7,500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY20–21, $18k) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%GROWING PATCH LEARNING CENTER: $11k → 9%Tippecanoe County Child Care(Righ Steps): $7k → 19%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

63%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$678k · 9 repeat orgs$401k to everyone else

9 repeat relationships: 1 still active in FY2024, 8 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

9
26

Total granted

$678k
$401k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+29%
+37%

Still filing today

78%
54%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
Youth DevelopmentHealthEducationHuman ServicesFood & NutritionArts & CultureOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • LT
    LYN TREECE BOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF TIPPECANOE COUNTY
    5× · 2018–2022 · $110k · revenue +59%
  • LR
    LIRIO RESOURCES INC
    4× · 2018–2021 · $99k · revenue +20%
  • VO
    VALLEY OAKS HEALTH INC
    2× · 2021–2022 · $67k · revenue +13%

Funded once

  • SI
    SAGA INC
    one grant, 2021 · $60k · revenue -93% · 75% of their budget
  • EP
    EASTERN PULASKI SCHOOL CORPORATION
    one grant, 2021 · $29k
  • NC
    NORTH CENTRAL INDIANA RURAL CRISIS
    one grant, 2021 · $27k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Hoosier Families Inc

Hoosier Families is a non-profit organization that provides Community Based programs for Indiana children and families. Hoosier Families is committed to utilizing evidence-based practices to strengthen, rebuild and reunite the individuals…

Human Services
2
Community Care in Union County Inc Community Care in Union County Inc

Provide child care and supporting family services to families in union county, indiana.

Community Improvement
3
New Hope Services Inc

Provide services in response to individual need

Human Services
4
Aging and Community Services of South Central Indiana Inc

Working together, our mission is to enhance the quality of life in our communities, generation through generation to assist older adults, persons with disabilities, and persons that have needs, to access opportunities that will allow them…

Human Services
5
Indiana Guardianship Services

At indiana guardianship services, inc., we are dedicated to providing our clients with the same compassion, attention, and patience as our own family. through competence, service, and dignity, we uphold the values of the national…

Human Services
6
Indiana Co Child Day Care Program

Teaming with families to provide high quality child care and education services for all children.

Human Services
7
Indiana County Community Action Program

Provide resources for low income clients.

Human Services
8
Independent Insurance Agents of Indiana

To enhance the competitive position and fulfill business requirements of independent agents and brokers, advocating buyer interest, and continually striving to be the premier trade association.

—
9
Indiana Center for Prevention of Youth Abuse and Suicide

Child advocacy organization that focuses on the prevention of child sexual abuse and youth suicide.

Youth Development
10
Bowen Health Inc

To provide compassionate, patient-centered care for mind and body that improves the quality of life for our communities.

Health
11
Tecumseh Area Partnership Inc

Employment and training services

Employment
12
Lifespring Inc

Lifespring's mission is to improve and sustain the quality of life in our communities by providing comprehensive behavioral health, addiction and related services.

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Valley Oaks Health Inc; the most unlike its peers is The Ralph & Lilian Fendig Summer Theatre for Children Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

21 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 21 of the 35 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

2
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
6
Early backer (in before they grew)
21/21
Grantees still filing
17/21
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

WHITE COUNTY COUNCIL ON AGING INC: $159,900 · OtherWHITE COUNTY COUNCIL ON AGING INCOTHERS UNDER 5000: $118,892 · OtherOTHERS UNDER 5000LIRIO RESOURCES INC: $98,982 · OtherLIRIO RESOURCES INCTRUSTEES OF PURDUE UNIVERSITY: $34,560 · OtherTRUSTEES OF PURDUE UNIVERSITYEASTERN PULASKI SCHOOL CORPORATION: $28,572 · OtherNORTH CENTRAL INDIANA RURAL CRISIS: $26,517 · Other+15 more: $170,483 · Other+15 moreLYN TREECE BOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF TIPPECANOE COUNTY: $109,791 · Youth DevelopmentLYN TREECE BO…JUNIOR ACHIEVEMENT USA: $10,300 · Youth DevelopmentJUNIOR ACHIEV…BOY SCOUTS OF AMERICA: $7,833 · Youth DevelopmentBOY SCOUTS OF…VALLEY OAKS HEALTH INC: $66,782 · HealthVALLEY OAKS …FOUR COUNTY COMPREHENSIVE MENTAL HEALTH CENTER INC: $26,774 · HealthFOUR COUNTY …MENTAL HEALTH AMERICA WABASH VALLEY REGION INC: $26,108 · HealthMENTAL HEALT…SAGA INC: $60,000 · EducationSAGA INCMEDARYVILLE NURSERY SCHOOL INC: $22,410 · EducationMEDARYVILL…APPLESEED CHILDHOOD EDUCATION INC: $15,000 · EducationAPPLESEED …FOOD FINDERS FOOD BANK INC: $39,500 · Food & NutritionBAUER FAMILY RESOURCES INC: $14,250 · Human ServicesGROWING PATCH LEARNING CENTER INC: $11,000 · Human ServicesTIPPECANOE COUNTY CHILD CARE INC: $7,381 · Human ServicesTHE RALPH & LILIAN FENDIG SUMMER THEATRE FOR CHILDREN INC: $24,000 · Arts & Culture
Other$637,906Youth Development$127,924Health$119,664Education$97,410Food & Nutrition$39,500Human Services$32,631Arts & Culture$24,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetWHITE COUNTY COUNCIL ON AGING INC: $159,900 over 6y, 10% of budgetLYN TREECE BOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF TIPPECANOE COUNTY: $109,791 over 5y, 4.7% of budgetLIRIO RESOURCES INC: $98,982 over 4y, 0.7% of budgetVALLEY OAKS HEALTH INC: $66,782 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetSAGA INC: $60,000 over 1y, 75% of budgetFOOD FINDERS FOOD BANK INC: $39,500 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetFOUR COUNTY COMPREHENSIVE MENTAL HEALTH CENTER INC: $26,774 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetMENTAL HEALTH AMERICA WABASH VALLEY REGION INC: $26,108 over 1y, 2.5% of budgetMEDARYVILLE NURSERY SCHOOL INC: $22,410 over 2y, 37% of budgetINDIANA TEEN CHALLENGE INC: $15,000 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetBAUER FAMILY RESOURCES INC: $14,250 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetMEALS ON WHEELS OF NORTHWEST INDIANA INC: $13,124 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetGROWING PATCH LEARNING CENTER INC: $11,000 over 1y, 2.8% of budgetJUNIOR ACHIEVEMENT USA: $10,300 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNAMI West Central Indiana Inc: $10,000 over 1y, 4.5% of budgetTHE INTREPID PHOENIX INC: $7,962 over 1y, 13% of budgetBOY SCOUTS OF AMERICA: $7,833 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCommunity Wellness Center of Winamac Inc: $7,500 over 1y, 7.1% of budgetTIPPECANOE COUNTY CHILD CARE INC: $7,381 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Jasper Newton Foundat…United Way of Greater…Greater Lafayette Com…North Central Health …Nisource Charitable F…James K and Mary Jo R…Indiana University He…Arconic FoundationEarly Learning Indian…Duke Energy FoundationNatl Christian Charit…American Online Givin…
Jasper Newton Foundation IncIN24.2× affinity9 shared granteesties to 9 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Jasper Newton Foundation Inc · United Way of Greater Lafayette · Greater Lafayette Community Foundation · North Central Health Services Inc · Nisource Charitable Foundation · James K and Mary Jo Risk Family Foundation Inc · Indiana University Health Arnett Inc · Arconic Foundation · Early Learning Indiana Inc · Duke Energy Foundation · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization White County United Way Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from White County United Way Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%5%19%42%75%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    10report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to White County United Way Inc?

    Find your warmest path to White County United Way Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 35 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on White County United Way’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home