· Public charity
Indiana University Health Arnett Inc
Lead the transformation of healthcare through quality, innovation & education, and make Indiana one of the nation's healthiest states.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k9 grants · $49k
- $10k–50k4 grants · $50k
- $50k–250k3 grants · $393k
- $250k+1 grant · $528k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| INDIANA LATINO INSTITUTE INC | $527,634 |
| Goodwill Foundation of Central and Southern Indiana | $186,262 |
| Lafayette Family YMCA | $150,000 |
| UNITED WAY OF GREATER LAFAYETTE | $56,755 |
| FOOD FINDERS FOOD BANK INC | $17,000 |
| Mental Health America Wabash Valley Region | $13,000 |
| HEALTHY COMMUNITIES CLINTON CO | $10,000 |
| Lyn Treece Boys and Girls Club of Tippecanoe County | $10,000 |
| WeCare of Clinton County Inc | $8,500 |
| Upper Room Youth Center | $5,000 |
| Attica Consolidated School Corporation | $5,000 |
| LAFAYETTE URBAN MINISTRY | $5,000 |
| Sagamore Council Boy Scouts of America | $5,000 |
| CORE Community Center | $5,000 |
| Hanna Community Council Inc | $5,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY18–24, $433k) land where the poverty rate runs at 15%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 57% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +36% since the first grant, against +5% for the ones you funded once.
20 repeat relationships — 12 still active in FY2024, 8 since wound down; 5 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 65% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $355k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- YMYOUNG MENS CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF LAFAYETTE4× · 2018–2023 · $503k · revenue +75%
- WRWABASH RIVER ENHANCEMENT CORPORATIO ATTN STANTON LAMBERT2× · 2021–2022 · $400k · revenue +190%
- HCHEALTHY COMMUNITIES OF CLINTON COUN6× · 2018–2024 · $237k · revenue +119%
Funded once
- UWUNITED WAY FOR CLINTON COUNTY INCone grant, 2021 · $115k · revenue -20%
- MHMENTAL HEALTH AMERICA INCone grant, 2021 · $80k · revenue +20%
- IUINDIANA UNIVERSITY HEALTH ARNETT FOUNDATION INCone grant, 2017 · $29k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Lead the transformation of healthcare through quality, innovation & education, and make Indiana one of the nation's healthiest states.
Lead the transformation of healthcare through quality, innovation & education, and make Indiana one of the nation's healthiest states.
Lead the transformation of healthcare through quality, innovation & education, and make Indiana one of the nation's healthiest states.
Coordinate health care information by providing a community-wide clinical data and information exchange to the health care community.
Lead the transformation of healthcare through quality, innovation & education, and make Indiana one of the nation's healthiest states.
Lead the transformation of healthcare through quality, innovation & education, and make Indiana one of the nation's healthiest states.
Lead the transformation of healthcare through quality, innovation & education, and make Indiana one of the nation's healthiest states.
The wellness council of indiana is part of a national network promoting worksite wellness programs to help indiana employers positively impact medical expenses and utilization rates, employee recruitment and retention, absenteeism,…
The lafayette general foundation was created to support lafayette general health (lgh), acadiana's only community-owned, nonprofit health system. we exist to help fulfill lgh's mission, to restore, maintain, and improve health. our role is…
Lead the transformation of healthcare through quality, innovation & education, and make indiana one of the nation's healthiest states.
Lead the transformation of healthcare through quality, innovation & education, and make Indiana one of the nation's healthiest states.
Lead the transformation of healthcare through quality, innovation & education, and make Indiana one of the nation's healthiest states.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Greater Lafayette Commerce Comm and Economic Development Foundation and the most unlike its peers is Purdue International Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 37 years old; the field is 20. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 20% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 12% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
33 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 33 of the 44 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds Indiana Latino Institute Inc ↗
- Who funds YOUNG MENS CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF LAFAYETTE ↗
- Who funds UNITED WAY OF GREATER LAFAYETTE ↗
- Who funds WABASH RIVER ENHANCEMENT CORPORATIO ATTN STANTON LAMBERT ↗
- Who funds PURDUE INTERNATIONAL INC ↗
- Who funds YOUNG MENS CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION FOUNDATION OF GREATER LAFAYETTE ↗
- Who funds HEALTHY COMMUNITIES OF CLINTON COUN ↗
- Who funds GOODWILL LEGACY GROUP FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds WHITE COUNTY UNITED WAY INC ↗
- Who funds LAFAYETTE YMCA SUPPORT CORPORATION ↗
- Who funds Indiana University Health Foundation Inc ↗
- Who funds UNITED WAY FOR CLINTON COUNTY INC ↗
- Who funds MENTAL HEALTH AMERICA WABASH VALLEY REGION INC ↗
- Who funds MENTAL HEALTH AMERICA INC ↗
- Who funds FOOD FINDERS FOOD BANK INC ↗
- Who funds GREATER LAFAYETTE COMMERCE COMM AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds LYN TREECE BOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF TIPPECANOE COUNTY ↗
- Who funds INDIANA UNIVERSITY HEALTH ARNETT FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds HANNA COMMUNITY CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds LEARNING NETWORK OF CLINTON COUNTY ↗
- Who funds BOY SCOUTS OF AMERICA SAGAMORE COUNCIL 162 ↗
- Who funds OPEN DOOR HEALTH CLINIC INC ↗
- Who funds CORE Community Center ↗
- Who funds FREEDOM MISSION INC ↗
- Who funds LAFAYETTE TRANSITIONAL HOUSING CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds WECARE OF CLINTON COUNTY ↗
- Who funds American Heart Association Inc ↗
- Who funds ART MUSEUM OF GREATER LAFAYETTE INC ↗
- Who funds NAMI West Central Indiana Inc ↗
- Who funds JUNIOR ACHIEVEMENT OF NORTHERN IN INC ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: United Way of Greater Lafayette · Greater Lafayette Community Foundation · North Central Health Services Inc · Community Foundation of Howard County · Arconic Foundation · Bauer Family Resources Inc · Sia Foundation Inc · Lilly Endowment Inc · James K and Mary Jo Risk Family Foundation Inc · Duke Energy Foundation · Alfred J McAllister and Dorothy N McAllister Foundation · Northwest Central Indiana Community Partnerships Inc
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Indiana University Health Arnett Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.