· Private foundation
Westreich Foundation
Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k6 grants · $25k
- $10k–50k12 grants · $235k
- $50k–250k8 grants · $728k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| EPIDEMIC ANSWERS | $125,000 |
| PEACHTREE COLLABORATIVE | $100,000 |
| ALLIANCE FOR NATURAL HEALTH INTERNATIONAL | $100,000 |
| ENERGETIC HEALTH INSTITUTE | $100,000 |
| ASHEVILLE JUNIOR THEATER FOUNDATION | $100,000 |
| GMO SCIENCE CO TARA FIRMA FARMS INSTITUTE | $78,000 |
| HEALTH FREEDOM INSTITUTE (HFI) | $75,000 |
| MOMS ACROSS AMERICA | $50,000 |
| HEALTH FREEDOM DEFENSE FUND (HFDF) | $35,000 |
| ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH TRUST (EHT) | $25,000 |
| US RIGHT TO KNOW | $25,000 |
| ENVIRONMENTAL WORKING GROUP | $25,000 |
| CENTER FOR URBAN RENEWAL & EDUCATION (CURE) | $25,000 |
| TRUTH IS ONE INTERFAITH CHURCH INC | $20,000 |
| WALNUT COVE MEMBERS ASSOCIATION INC | $15,325 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY17–24, $194k) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +76% since the first grant, against +40% for the ones you funded once.
43 repeat relationships — 17 still active in FY2024, 26 since wound down; 7 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 87% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $117k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- MAMoms Across America7× · 2018–2024 · $383k · revenue +125% · 34% of their budget
- DHDocumenting Hope Inc7× · 2018–2024 · $355k · revenue +88%
- WAWords Alive5× · 2017–2021 · $185k · revenue +58%
Funded once
- UUCSDone grant, 2019 · $110k
- NINATIONAL INSTITUTE FOR SCIENCEone grant, 2019 · $105k
- AOACADEMY OF INTEGRATIVE HEALTH & MEDICINEone grant, 2017 · $100k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
The Academy of Integrative Health & Medicine (AIHM) is a global interprofessional integrative health association working to transform healthcare body, mind, spirt, community & planet. AIHM is the leading professional organization for the…
To improve public health by providing the latest in evidence-based nutrition and health research in an accessible format to enable the public to make informed dietary choices.
To educate, equip & empower physicians & other healthcare providers about the benefits of plant-based nutrition, to produce resources to inform & inspire their patients to shift to a whole food, plant-based way of living.
Health Research Institute carries out scientific research, education and communication to improve sustainability of food and agriculture, and to promote human health.
The mission of the Organic Farmers Association is to provide a strong and unified national voice for domestic certified organic producers so that organic agriculture will become the basis of a viable United States food and agricultural…
Preventive Medicine Research Institute is a pioneer in scientific research investigating the effects of diet and lifestyle choices on health and disease. Our work is grounded in compassion and dedication to service. PMRI achieves its…
The organic center's mission is to conduct and convene credible, evidence-based science on the environmental and health effects of organic food and farming and communicate the findings to the public. we will achieve our mission through: -…
The Breakthrough Institute is a research center that identifies and promotes technological solutions to environmental and human development challenges.
A Greener World empowers sustainable solutions in agriculture, promoting and supporting real-life farming models to the public and offering farmers and ranchers practical guidance, resources and support on achieving truly sustainable…
Providing Healthy Shopping Tours, groups receive instruction on health benefits of vegetables and fruits while learning how to read nutrition labels. correlated to chronic illnes
Center for Humane Technology is a nonprofit dedicated to ensuring that the most consequential technologies actually serve humanity. We bring clarity to how the tech ecosystem works in order to shift the incentives that drive it.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is American Nutrition Association Inc and the most unlike its peers is Asheville Junior Theater Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 16 years old; the field is 16. You back the younger end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 12% of your grantees by number, and just 9% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
34 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 34 of the 90 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds Moms Across America ↗
- Who funds Documenting Hope Inc ↗
- Who funds ORGANIC CONSUMERS ASSOCIATION ↗
- Who funds PEACHTREE COLLABORATIVE ↗
- Who funds Asheville Junior Theater Foundation ↗
- Who funds Words Alive ↗
- Who funds US RIGHT TO KNOW ↗
- Who funds CALIFORNIA STATE UNIVERSITY SAN MARCOS CORPORATION ↗
- Who funds NATIONAL VACCINE INFORMATION CENTER ↗
- Who funds SAMUEL LAWRENCE FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds OGLETHORPE UNIVERSITY INC ↗
- Who funds ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH TRUST ↗
- Who funds ENVIRONMENTAL WORKING GROUP ↗
- Who funds KITCHENS FOR GOOD ↗
- Who funds COASTAL ROOTS FARM ↗
- Who funds RACHEL'S NETWORK INC ↗
- Who funds THE GLEANINGS FOUNDATION ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Rancho Santa Fe Foundation · The San Diego Foundation · The Walrath Family Foundation · Kauai Energy Institute · Forrest C & Frances H Lattner Foundation · The Community Foundation of Western North Carolina Inc · Rsf Social Finance Inc · Jewish Community Foundation of San Diego · Impactassetsinc · Boston Foundation Inc · National Philanthropic Trust · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Westreich Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to Westreich Foundation?
Find your warmest path to Westreich Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.