Skip to content
Westreich Foundation at a glanceAlso receives grants: funding profile →

· Private foundation

Westreich Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$988k
Granted FY2024still arriving
26
Grants FY2024still arriving
12
States reached
$125k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
05Through PlinthRead
01What it funds
0199% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Health$2.7MHuman Services$917kEducation$862kEnvironment$728kPhilanthropy$335kArts & Culture$285kInternational$275kFood & Nutrition$203kOther$0
02FY2024 · 26 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k6 grants · $25k
  • $10k–50k12 grants · $235k
  • $50k–250k8 grants · $728k
$25,000
Median grant
12
States reached
$12M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
EPIDEMIC ANSWERS$125,000
PEACHTREE COLLABORATIVE$100,000
ALLIANCE FOR NATURAL HEALTH INTERNATIONAL$100,000
ENERGETIC HEALTH INSTITUTE$100,000
ASHEVILLE JUNIOR THEATER FOUNDATION$100,000
GMO SCIENCE CO TARA FIRMA FARMS INSTITUTE$78,000
HEALTH FREEDOM INSTITUTE (HFI)$75,000
MOMS ACROSS AMERICA$50,000
HEALTH FREEDOM DEFENSE FUND (HFDF)$35,000
ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH TRUST (EHT)$25,000
US RIGHT TO KNOW$25,000
ENVIRONMENTAL WORKING GROUP$25,000
CENTER FOR URBAN RENEWAL & EDUCATION (CURE)$25,000
TRUTH IS ONE INTERFAITH CHURCH INC$20,000
WALNUT COVE MEMBERS ASSOCIATION INC$15,325
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–24, $194k) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%US RIGHT TO KNOW: $35k → 10%US RIGHT TO KNOW: $25k → 10%US RIGHT TO KNOW: $25k → 10%US RIGHT TO KNOW: $25k → 10%US RIGHT TO KNOW: $25k → 10%CENTER FOR CONSCIOUS LIVING & DYING: $20k → 12%US RIGHT TO KNOW: $15k → 10%CONSCIOUSNESS AND HEALING INITIATIVE (CHI): $2k → 11%CENTER FOR CONSCIOUS LIVING & DYING: $5k → 12%US RIGHT TO KNOW: $10k → 10%US RIGHT TO KNOW: $8k → 10%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

WA
ID
MN
IL
NY
MA
OR
WY
IA
IN
OH
PA
CT
CA
UT
CO
WV
VA
MD
NM
NC
DC
AL
GA
TX
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

81%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$5.1M · 43 repeat orgs$1.2M to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +76% since the first grant, against +40% for those funded once.

43 repeat relationships: 17 still active in FY2024, 26 since wound down; 7 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

43
38

Total granted

$5.1M
$1.1M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+76%
+40%

Still filing today

40%
29%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 87% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $117k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
EducationHealthArts & CultureHuman ServicesPublic BenefitPhilanthropyOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • MA
    Moms Across America
    7× · 2018–2024 · $383k · revenue +125% · 34% of their budget
  • DH
    Documenting Hope Inc
    7× · 2018–2024 · $355k · revenue +88%
  • WA
    Words Alive
    5× · 2017–2021 · $185k · revenue +58%

Funded once

  • U
    UCSD
    one grant, 2019 · $110k
  • NI
    NATIONAL INSTITUTE FOR SCIENCE
    one grant, 2019 · $105k
  • AO
    ACADEMY OF INTEGRATIVE HEALTH & MEDICINE
    one grant, 2017 · $100k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Academy of Integrative Health & Medicine

The Academy of Integrative Health & Medicine (AIHM) is a global interprofessional integrative health association working to transform healthcare body, mind, spirt, community & planet. AIHM is the leading professional organization for the…

Health
2
Nutritionfactsorg Inc

To improve public health by providing the latest in evidence-based nutrition and health research in an accessible format to enable the public to make informed dietary choices.

Food & Nutrition
3
The Plantrician Project

To educate, equip & empower physicians & other healthcare providers about the benefits of plant-based nutrition, to produce resources to inform & inspire their patients to shift to a whole food, plant-based way of living.

Science & Tech
4
Health Research Institute

Health Research Institute carries out scientific research, education and communication to improve sustainability of food and agriculture, and to promote human health.

Food & Nutrition
5
Organic Farmers Association

The mission of the Organic Farmers Association is to provide a strong and unified national voice for domestic certified organic producers so that organic agriculture will become the basis of a viable United States food and agricultural…

Food & Nutrition
6
Preventive Medicine Research Institute

Preventive Medicine Research Institute is a pioneer in scientific research investigating the effects of diet and lifestyle choices on health and disease. Our work is grounded in compassion and dedication to service. PMRI achieves its…

Health
7
The Organic Center Inc

The organic center's mission is to conduct and convene credible, evidence-based science on the environmental and health effects of organic food and farming and communicate the findings to the public. we will achieve our mission through: -…

Environment
8
The Breakthrough Institute

The Breakthrough Institute is a research center that identifies and promotes technological solutions to environmental and human development challenges.

Environment
9
A Greener World

A Greener World empowers sustainable solutions in agriculture, promoting and supporting real-life farming models to the public and offering farmers and ranchers practical guidance, resources and support on achieving truly sustainable…

Food & Nutrition
10
Uc-Veg

Providing Healthy Shopping Tours, groups receive instruction on health benefits of vegetables and fruits while learning how to read nutrition labels. correlated to chronic illnes

Food & Nutrition
11
Center for Responsible Science
Philanthropy
12
Center for Humane Technology

Center for Humane Technology is a nonprofit dedicated to ensuring that the most consequential technologies actually serve humanity. We bring clarity to how the tech ecosystem works in order to shift the incentives that drive it.

Science & Tech
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is American Nutrition Association Inc; the most unlike its peers is Asheville Junior Theater Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

34 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 34 of the 90 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

3
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
13
Early backer (in before they grew)
34/34
Grantees still filing
25/34
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

ALLIANCE FOR NATURAL HEALTH: $725,000 · OtherALLIANCE FOR NATURAL HEALTHMoms Across America: $382,500 · OtherMoms Across AmericaENERGETIC HEALTH INSTITUTE: $330,000 · OtherENERGETIC HEALTH INSTITUTEALLIANCE FOR NATURAL HEALTH INTERNATIONAL: $250,000 · OtherALLIANCE FOR NATURAL HEALTH INTERNATIONALPUTENTI-BOGOTA FAMILY FOUNDATION: $200,000 · OtherGMO SCIENCE CO TARA FIRMA FARMS INSTITUTE: $186,000 · Other+63 more: $2,396,250 · Other+63 moreDocumenting Hope Inc: $355,000 · EducationDocumenting…CALIFORNIA STATE UNIVERSITY SAN MARCOS CORPORATION: $165,000 · EducationCALIFORNIA …OGLETHORPE UNIVERSITY INC: $75,000 · EducationOGLETHORPE …ACNPE: $30,000 · EducationSOCIAL GOOD FUND INC: $25,000 · Education+1 more: $10,000 · EducationAsheville Junior Theater Foundation: $201,000 · Arts & CultureWords Alive: $185,000 · Arts & CultureSAMUEL LAWRENCE FOUNDATION: $76,500 · Arts & CulturePEACHTREE COLLABORATIVE: $250,000 · HealthINFORMED CONSENT ACTION NETWORK: $35,000 · HealthAMERICAN CITIZENS FOR HEALTH CHOICE: $35,000 · HealthA Voice for Choice Inc: $25,000 · HealthARTS AND HEALING INITIATIVE: $20,000 · HealthORGANIC CONSUMERS ASSOCIATION: $310,000 · Public Benefit+1 more: $1,500 · Public BenefitUS RIGHT TO KNOW: $167,500 · Human ServicesCenter for Conscious Living & Dying: $25,000 · Human Services+1 more: $1,500 · Human ServicesENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH TRUST: $75,000 · PhilanthropyWALNUT COVE MEMBERS ASSOCIATION INC: $15,325 · Philanthropy
Other$4,469,750Education$660,000Arts & Culture$462,500Health$365,000Public Benefit$311,500Human Services$194,000Philanthropy$90,325

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetMoms Across America: $382,500 over 7y, 34% of budgetDocumenting Hope Inc: $355,000 over 7y, 12% of budgetORGANIC CONSUMERS ASSOCIATION: $310,000 over 5y, 5.4% of budgetPEACHTREE COLLABORATIVE: $250,000 over 2y, 23% of budgetAsheville Junior Theater Foundation: $201,000 over 2y, 100% of budgetWords Alive: $185,000 over 5y, 6.1% of budgetUS RIGHT TO KNOW: $167,500 over 8y, 11% of budgetCALIFORNIA STATE UNIVERSITY SAN MARCOS CORPORATION: $165,000 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetNATIONAL VACCINE INFORMATION CENTER: $105,000 over 6y, 2.0% of budgetSAMUEL LAWRENCE FOUNDATION: $76,500 over 4y, 11% of budgetOGLETHORPE UNIVERSITY INC: $75,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH TRUST: $75,000 over 1y, 18% of budgetENVIRONMENTAL WORKING GROUP: $65,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetKITCHENS FOR GOOD: $52,500 over 3y, 0.6% of budgetCOASTAL ROOTS FARM: $50,000 over 2y, 1.4% of budgetRACHEL'S NETWORK INC: $45,000 over 4y, 2.1% of budgetTHE GLEANINGS FOUNDATION: $40,000 over 1y, 20% of budgetINFORMED CONSENT ACTION NETWORK: $35,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetAMERICAN CITIZENS FOR HEALTH CHOICE: $35,000 over 2y, 11% of budgetACNPE: $30,000 over 1y, 26% of budgetSOCIAL GOOD FUND INC: $25,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCenter for Conscious Living & Dying: $25,000 over 2y, 6.2% of budgetA Voice for Choice Inc: $25,000 over 2y, 7.7% of budgetTruth is One Interfaith Church Inc: $20,000 over 1y, 6.3% of budgetARTS AND HEALING INITIATIVE: $20,000 over 3y, 3.5% of budgetWALNUT COVE MEMBERS ASSOCIATION INC: $15,325 over 1y, 2.5% of budgetINSTITUTE FOR NATURAL MEDICINE: $10,000 over 1y, 1.0% of budgetAMERICAN NUTRITION ASSOCIATION INC: $10,000 over 1y, 1.5% of budgetENVIRONMENTAL GRANTMAKERS ASSOCIATION: $6,500 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetMOMS AGAINST FLUORIDATION DBA NATIONAL CLEAN WATER ALLIANCE: $5,000 over 1y, 3.9% of budgetONE MORE WAVE SURF CORP: $1,500 over 1y, 1.1% of budgetCONSCIOUSNESS AND HEALING INITIATIVE INC: $1,500 over 1y, 0.4% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds Moms Across America ↗
  • Who funds Documenting Hope Inc ↗
  • Who funds ORGANIC CONSUMERS ASSOCIATION ↗
  • Who funds PEACHTREE COLLABORATIVE ↗
  • Who funds Asheville Junior Theater Foundation ↗
  • Who funds Words Alive ↗
  • Who funds US RIGHT TO KNOW ↗
  • Who funds CALIFORNIA STATE UNIVERSITY SAN MARCOS CORPORATION ↗
  • Who funds NATIONAL VACCINE INFORMATION CENTER ↗
  • Who funds SAMUEL LAWRENCE FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds OGLETHORPE UNIVERSITY INC ↗
  • Who funds ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH TRUST ↗
  • Who funds ENVIRONMENTAL WORKING GROUP ↗
  • Who funds KITCHENS FOR GOOD ↗
  • Who funds COASTAL ROOTS FARM ↗
  • Who funds RACHEL'S NETWORK INC ↗
  • Who funds THE GLEANINGS FOUNDATION ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Rancho Santa Fe Found…The San Diego Foundat…The Walrath Family Fo…Kauai Energy InstituteForrest C & Frances H…The Community Foundat…Rsf Social Finance IncJewish Community Foun…ImpactassetsincBoston Foundation IncNational Philanthropi…Morgan Stanley Global…
Rancho Santa Fe FoundationCA15.2× affinity5 shared granteesties to 7 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Rancho Santa Fe Foundation · The San Diego Foundation · The Walrath Family Foundation · Kauai Energy Institute · Forrest C & Frances H Lattner Foundation · The Community Foundation of Western North Carolina Inc · Rsf Social Finance Inc · Jewish Community Foundation of San Diego · Impactassetsinc · Boston Foundation Inc · National Philanthropic Trust · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Westreich Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Westreich Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%6%25%56%100%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    1get no government money at all
    3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Westreich Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to Westreich Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 90 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Westreich’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home