How much did WESTERN STATES LEARNING CORPORATION grant in FY2024?

WESTERN STATES LEARNING CORPORATION reported 43 grants totaling $4,625,069 in its FY2024 IRS filing.

Where is WESTERN STATES LEARNING CORPORATION based?

WESTERN STATES LEARNING CORPORATION is based in WY.

WESTERN STATES LEARNING CORPORATION

Foundation Dossiers Also receives grants — funding profile →

· Public charity

WESTERN STATES LEARNING CORPORATION

Help organizations advance towards their mission through customized solutions, including program management, knowledge development and trusted advising.

$4.6M

Granted FY2024

Grants

Communities

$415k

Largest

01What you fund

What you funded, over time

By grantee IRS cause code (NTEE).

A cause breakdown isn’t shown here: 58% of WESTERN STATES LEARNING CORPORATION’s grantee dollars go to organizations outside the IRS cause taxonomy (common for large international and research funders), so a chart would be mostly “unclassified” and misrepresent the portfolio.

02beneath the categories

Past the labels — and the year it shifted

Beneath the NTEE codes, this is what the grant descriptions actually say.

…and in their own words, year by year

2023

pdgdistrict

2024

pdg-r subgrant

2025

—

Words distinctive to each year’s grant purposes (TF-IDF) · event-driven terms in cyan.

03FY2024 · 43 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

Under $10k1 grant · $5k
$10k–50k15 grants · $393k
$50k–250k23 grants · $2.7M
$250k+4 grants · $1.5M

$60,000

Median grant

States reached

$10M

Total assets

Largest grants

UNIVERSITY OF WYOMING$415,096
ROCKY MOUNTAIN MANOR INC$406,465
TRUE NORTH ACADEMY$359,753
BIGHORN VALLEY HEALTH CENTER INC$345,996
CHEYENNE HEALTH AND WELLNESS$223,451
ONE22 RESOURCE CENTER$216,758
THE HUB ON SMITH$194,605
EP-MPAL LLC DBA MOUNTAIN PLAZA$183,601
EPPSON CENTER FOR SENIORS INC$181,291
EP-RSAL LLC DBA DEER TRAIL ASSISTED$181,165
SAFEHOUSE SERVICES INC$139,237
HIGH POINT COUNSELING$139,147
MEMORIAL HOSPITAL OF SWEETWATER CTY$137,500
WYOMING RESORTS LLC DBA BEST$137,363
COMEA INC$125,460

02The need

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY23–24, $929k) land where the poverty rate runs at 10% — the area typically sits at 9%. 62% of those dollars reach neighborhoods with above-average need. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA, United Way ALICE — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge

repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

43%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.

$2.4M · 12 repeat orgs$3.3M to everyone else

12 repeat relationships — 12 still active in FY2024, 0 since wound down; 29 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

Total granted

$2.4M

$92k

Still filing today

58%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 31% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $3.2M went to new ones.

RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

Human ServicesHealthHousing & ShelterCrime & LegalAnimalsPhilanthropyOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

OR
ONE22 RESOURCE CENTER
2× · 2023–2024 · $275k · revenue +270%
CH
CHEYENNE HEALTH AND WELLNESS
2× · 2023–2024 · $265k · revenue +60%
CC
COMPASS CENTER FOR FAMILIES
2× · 2023–2024 · $92k · revenue +28%

Funded once

LC
LINCOLN COUNTY SCHOOL DISTRICT 2
one grant, 2023 · $45k
SC
SUBLETTE COUNTY SCHOOL DISTRICT 1
one grant, 2023 · $40k
TC
TETON COUNTY SCHOOL DISTRICT 1
one grant, 2023 · $7k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

Regional West Health Services

Health care services for the people of western nebraska and eastern wyoming.

Health

Wyoming County Healthcare Center Ii

Health

Central Wyoming Hospice & Transitions

To companion the end of life journey with skill and compassion.

—

Carbon County Counseling Center

Provide professional counseling services to the residents of Carbon County, WY

—

Wyoming Medical Center Inc

Assist banner health complete its mission to make health care easier, so life can be better by providing integrated and coordinated care and population health management.

Health

Cheyenne County Community Center

Dedicated to serving the health, wellness, recreational, and social needs of cheyenne county and surrounding area

—

Wyoming Rescue Mission

Wyoming Rescue Mission restores homeless lives to community independence with the love of Christ.

Housing & Shelter

Wyoming Senior Citizens Inc

Wsci administers programs for senior citizens to promote their independence and self sufficiency.

Human Services

South Central Montana Regional Mental

Mental health and chemical dependency services

—

Western Colorado Healthcare

Collaborating to improve rural healthcare

Education

Community Counseling Services

Treat chemical dependency and mental illness.

—

Buffalo Senior Center Inc

The buffalo senior center, inc. provides human services, nutrition programs, transportation services, and other miscellaneous services to the senior residents of the city of buffalo and johnson county, wyoming.

—

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Community Health Center of Central and the most unlike its peers is Community Services. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

Your grantees are a median of 37 years old; the field is 11. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

The field is 29% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close — 2% lost their exemption, against 14% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund

2%1/44

the rest of the field

14%

2,793/20,543

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

05the grantee network

22 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue.

Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)

Early backer (in before they grew)

22/22

Grantees still filing

20/22

Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

Other$3,336,456Human Services$928,523Health$678,642Housing & Shelter$567,559Animals$124,577Crime & Legal$91,602Philanthropy$19,291

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Wyoming Community FoundationWY35.7× affinity15 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Wyoming Community Foundation · Wyoming Assn of Non Profit Organizations · Wyoming Governor's Residence Foundation · First Interstate BancSystem Foundation · United Way of Laramie County · The John P Ellbogen Foundation · Natrona Collective Health Trust · The Andrew Allen Charitable Foundation · Direct Relief · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Network for Good · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organisation WESTERN STATES LEARNING CORPORATION funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2025

’20’21’22’23’24’25

no gov moneyreceives it· size = income

0get no government money at all

0rely on government for over half their income

typical government reliance, FY20–25

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Through Plinth

Your grantmaking, live and operational

This dossier was generated cold from public filings. In Plinth it’s a working system — every applicant assessed and every grant monitored. Here’s a taste, run on one of your grantees: ROCKY MOUNTAIN MANOR INC.

Agentic due diligence · confidence × risk

Financial management

low risk

~12 months of operating runway; revenue grew over 8 filed years.

Track record & reputation

low risk

8 years of Form 990 filings, still active.

Legal standing

low risk

US 501(c)(3); EIN 830202826 on file with current IRS Form 990 filings.

Governance

Live in Plinth

Board composition & governance documents — verified live in Plinth from the applicant.

Compliance & sanctions

Live in Plinth

OFAC / UN sanctions screening — run live in Plinth at assessment.

Program capacity

Live in Plinth

Staffing, M&E and activity alignment — assessed live in Plinth from submitted proposals.

Live · Plinth’s real DD engine

Run the actual assessment on ROCKY MOUNTAIN MANOR INC, cold from public data.

Generated live from public IRS filings + open web sources by Plinth’s agentic engine. Shown as an illustration of the product, not a formal assessment.

Post-award monitoring · continuous checks

On trackFinancial stability— Roughly 12 months of cash on hand.
On trackSustained operations— Filing through 2025; revenue grew over the period.
WatchReliance on your funding— Your grants peaked at 42% of their budget — load-bearing; a dependency Plinth would track.
Awaiting reportEvidence of delivery— Plinth collects the grantee's own monitoring reports post-award.

What you see here is static and public. In Plinth it’s operational — the full six-pillar framework on every applicant (with their own documents + live registry and sanctions checks), monitoring dashboards on every award, custom board reports, and eligibility routing for intake.

Agentic due diligenceMonitoring dashboardsCustom board reportsEligibility routing

Preview generated from this grantee’s public IRS filings and independent reporting. Pillars marked “live in Plinth” require the applicant’s submitted documents. Shown as illustration, not a formal assessment.

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPro

How do I get to Western States Learning Corporation?

Find your warmest path to Western States Learning Corporation through people who sit on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the introduction across shared trustees and officers.

Every link is a documented governance overlap in public IRS 990 filings — not a personal network — and each hop carries its own confidence tier. Low-confidence or distant paths are held back rather than guessed.

WESTERN STATES LEARNING CORPORATION

What you funded, over time

Past the labels — and the year it shifted

Where the money goes

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Who you back again

Backed again, and grew

Funded once

22 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Government reliance of your grantees

Your grantmaking, live and operational

How do I get to Western States Learning Corporation?

More from the funding graph

WESTERN STATES LEARNING CORPORATION

What you funded, over time

Past the labels — and the year it shifted

Where the money goes

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Who you back again

Backed again, and grew

Funded once

22 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Government reliance of your grantees

Your grantmaking, live and operational

How do I get to Western States Learning Corporation?

More from the funding graph