Skip to content
Western Healthconnect at a glanceAlso receives grants: funding profile →

· Public charity

Western Healthconnect

Support significant improvements in health care delivery and outcomes within the context of nonprofit, charitable ownership.

$1.2M
Granted FY2024still arriving
8
Grants FY2024still arriving
1
States reached
$297k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2022 to 2024.

Housing & Shelter$2.3MHealth$1.2MPublic Benefit$300kHuman Services$50k
02FY2024 · 8 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • $10k–50k1 grant · $50k
  • $50k–250k6 grants · $827k
  • $250k+1 grant · $297k
$150,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$137M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
COMMITTEE ON THE SHELTERLESS$296,927
ALLIANCE MEDICAL CENTER INC$200,000
CITY OF PETALUMA$190,000
PETALUMA HEALTH CENTER$150,000
COPPERTOWER FAMILY MEDICAL CENTER INC$127,363
REACH FOR HOME$109,200
MOTHERS CARE$50,000
LA FAMILIA SANA$49,940
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY24–24, $109k) land where the poverty rate runs at 9%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 8%REACH FOR HOME: $109k → 9%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

53%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$2.1M · 5 repeat orgs$1.8M to everyone else

5 repeat relationships: 4 still active in FY2024, 1 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

5
2

Total granted

$2.1M
$1.5M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+28%
+587%

Still filing today

80%
100%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 71% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $337k went to new ones.

50%100%’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’22’23’24
HealthHousing & ShelterHuman ServicesOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • CO
    COMMITTEE ON THE SHELTERLESS
    3× · 2022–2024 · $735k · revenue +108%
  • ALLIANCE MEDICAL CENTER INC
    2× · 2023–2024 · $315k · revenue +28%
  • PETALUMA HEALTH CENTER INC
    2× · 2023–2024 · $190k · revenue +14%

Funded once

  • BH
    BURBANK HOUSINGSR CORPORATIONgraduated
    one grant, 2022 · $800k · revenue +587%
  • BH
    Burbank Housing Corporationgraduated
    one grant, 2023 · $700k · revenue +286%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Community Medical Centers Inc

The organization provides primary medical, behavior health, and dental care to the population of san joaquin, and solano counties without regard to patients' ability to pay.

Health
2
Pomona Community Health Center

Pomona community health center's mission is to be the medical home for the underserved in our community by providing high quality preventive and primary care health services.

Health
3
Community Health Center of Snohomish County

Community health center of snohomish county (chc) provides our diverse communities with access to high quality, affordable primary health care.

Health
4
Sonoma Valley Community Health Center

To provide accessible, quality health care to those who need it, especially the underserved.

Unclassified
5
Marin Community Clinic

To improve the health of our patients and community by providing high quality, cost-effective, culturally sensitive, patient-centered health care.

Health
6
San Fernando Community Hospital

Provides primary care, oral health, and behavioral health care, including health education to the community without regard to the ability to pay for services.

Health
7
Asian Health Services

Asian Health Services (AHS) provides a continuum of medical care, mental health care, dental care and other healthcare services for all, including health education; perinatal services; behavioral health; family and youth services;…

Health
8
Peninsula Community Health Services of Alaska

Strengthening the community by providing accessible and affordable health care.

Health
9
Mendocino Community Health Clinic Inc

To provide the highest quality healthcare for everyone in our communities.

Health
10
Redwood Coast Medical Services Inc

Oriented community based primary care. to include but not limited to, a broad range of preventative health and dental services to residents and visitors within the coastal areas of northern california.

Health
11
South Central Family Health Center

To improve the quality of life for the diverse communities we serve providing affordable and comprehensive healthcare and education in a welcoming multi-cultural environment.

Health
12
East Valley Community Health Center Inc

East valley community health center's mission is to provide access to excellent health care while engaging and empowering our patients, employees and partners to improve their well-being and health of our communities.

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Petaluma Health Center Inc; the most unlike its peers is Mother's Care Support. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

10 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 10 of the 11 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
10/10
Grantees still filing
7/10
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

BURBANK HOUSINGSR CORPORATION: $800,000 · OtherBURBANK HOUSINGSR CORPORATIONCOMMITTEE ON THE SHELTERLESS: $735,265 · OtherCOMMITTEE ON THE SHELTERLESSCITY OF PETALUMA: $300,000 · OtherCITY OF PETALUMA+1 more: $49,940 · OtherHEALTHCARE FOUNDATION NORTHERN SONOMA COUNTY: $515,000 · HealthHEALTHCARE FOUNDATION NORTHERN SON…ALLIANCE MEDICAL CENTER INC: $315,000 · HealthALLIANCE MEDICAL CENTER INCPETALUMA HEALTH CENTER INC: $190,000 · HealthPETALUMA HEALTH CENTER INCCOPPERTOWER FAMILY MED CTR INC DBA ALEXANDER VALLEY HEALTHCARE: $127,363 · HealthCOPPERTOWER FAMILY MED CTR INC DBA…Mother's Care Support: $50,000 · HealthBurbank Housing Corporation: $700,000 · Housing & ShelterBurbank Housing Corp…REACH FOR HOME: $109,200 · Human Services
Other$1,885,205Health$1,197,363Housing & Shelter$700,000Human Services$109,200

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetCOMMITTEE ON THE SHELTERLESS: $735,265 over 3y, 4.2% of budgetBurbank Housing Corporation: $700,000 over 1y, 7.0% of budgetHEALTHCARE FOUNDATION NORTHERN SONOMA COUNTY: $515,000 over 2y, 16% of budgetALLIANCE MEDICAL CENTER INC: $315,000 over 2y, 0.9% of budgetPETALUMA HEALTH CENTER INC: $190,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetCOPPERTOWER FAMILY MED CTR INC DBA ALEXANDER VALLEY HEALTHCARE: $127,363 over 1y, 1.8% of budgetREACH FOR HOME: $109,200 over 1y, 4.0% of budgetLA FAMILIA SANA: $49,940 over 1y, 8.7% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Sonoma County Communi…Sonoma County Vintner…Bothin FoundationEast Bay Community Fo…St Joseph Health Nort…Healthcare Foundation…Redwood Credit Union …California Healthcare…Marin Community Found…The San Francisco Fou…Vanguard Charitable E…Donor Advised Charita…
Sonoma County Community FoundationCA19.7× affinity7 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Sonoma County Community Foundation · Sonoma County Vintners Foundation · Bothin Foundation · East Bay Community Foundation · St Joseph Health Northern California LLC · Healthcare Foundation Northern Sonoma County · Redwood Credit Union Community Fund Inc · California Healthcare Foundation · Marin Community Foundation · The San Francisco Foundation · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Western Healthconnect funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Western Healthconnect. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%6%25%56%100%funder's share of their income ↑0%15%30%45%60%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–60%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 11 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Western Healthconnect’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home